Branes and Antibranes in AdS$_3$: The Impossible States in the CFT Gap

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12868
• Title: Branes and Antibranes in AdS$_3$: The Impossible States in the CFT Gap
• Authors: Roberto Emparan, Pierre Heidmann
• Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12868v1

Abstract

This paper constructs a new class of IIB supergravity solutions corresponding to states of the D1-D5-P-KKm system with the same charges and energy as non-extremal four-charge black holes, asymptotic to AdS$_3 \times (S^3/\mathbb{Z}_{N_k}) \times T^4$ geometry. The solutions consist of static binary systems of two extremal D1-D5-P black holes with opposite-signed charges, maintained in equilibrium by a topological bubble supporting $N_k$ units of KKm charge. Despite dynamical instability, the spacetime remains smooth at the horizon and exterior. The equilibrium conditions discretize the black hole separation, yielding a quantized spectrum labeled by anti-BPS centers with antibranes and anti-momentum numbers. The lowest energy state lies within an energy window below the dual CFT mass gap, challenging the expectation of no states within the CFT gap and realizing "impossible states."

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The fundamental problem addressed by this research concerns the fine structure of black hole microstates, particularly the spectral organization in the near-extremal region. Conventional theory predicts that in black hole systems with degenerate supersymmetric ground states, there exists a robust energy gap separating the supersymmetric ground state from the first excited state.

Problem Significance

1. Microscopic Origin of Black Hole Entropy: Understanding the microscopic description of non-extremal black hole entropy has been a central issue in string theory and holographic duality
2. CFT Mass Gap: The CFT dual of D1-D5-P black holes predicts an energy gap $\Delta E_{CFT} = 3/c$, where $c$ is the central charge
3. AdS/CFT Correspondence: Verification of holographic duality predictions in the strong coupling regime

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Traditional BPS Constructions: Can only describe supersymmetric states, unable to handle non-BPS excitations
2. Thermodynamic Methods: Lack geometric descriptions of individual microstates
3. Microstate Geometries: Existing constructions are primarily limited to the BPS sector

Research Motivation

The authors were inspired by recent progress in constructing static, non-supersymmetric supergravity configurations, attempting to construct explicit IIB supergravity solutions that may challenge the existence of the CFT mass gap.

Core Contributions

1. Construction of New Brane-Antibrane Bound State Families: Realized static bound states of D1-D5-P branes with antibranes in AdS$_3$
2. Discovery of "Impossible States": The constructed lowest energy states lie within the CFT mass gap, with energy $\Delta E_{min} = O(c^{-5/3}) \ll \Delta E_{CFT} = O(c^{-1})$
3. Realization of Quantized Spectrum: Discrete energy eigenstates naturally emerge from regularity conditions
4. Provision of Microscopic Entropy Counting: Bound state entropy is approximately half that of non-extremal black holes
5. Construction of Finite Temperature Generalization: Demonstrated that these states support thermodynamic perturbations

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework

This work is based on the D1-D5-P-KKm system in IIB supergravity on $T^4$, using the generalized Ernst formalism to construct solutions.

Field Configuration

The ten-dimensional spacetime decomposes as:

• Time direction
• Rigid internal $T^4$
• Momentum-carrying $y$ circle
• $\psi$ circle supporting KKm flux
• Three-dimensional transverse base space $B$

The supergravity fields take the form:

ds²₁₀ = 1/√(Z₁Z₅) [-f dt²/Zₚ + Zₚ(dy - Aₚdt)²] 
        + √(Z₁Z₅) [1/Z₀(dψ + H₀dφ)² + Z₀ ds²(B)]
        + √(Z₁/Z₅) ds²(T⁴)

Ernst Equations

Each sector satisfies the electrostatic Ernst equation:

∆ log Z + Z² ∇A · ∇A = 0
∇ · (ρZ² ∇A) = 0

Solution Construction Process

Step One: Single-Center BPS Black Hole

Begin with a supersymmetric black hole carrying $(N_1, N_5, N_p, N_k)$ charges.

Step Two: Adding Antibranes

Sequentially add $(n_1, n_5, n_p)$ pairs of D1 antibranes, D5 antibranes, and anti-momentum, breaking supersymmetry while preserving net charge.

Step Three: Spatial Separation

Achieve brane/antibrane separation by inflating the KKm NUT center into a smooth Taub-bolt geometry.

Step Four: Regularity Conditions

Regularity at the bolt requires:

Nₖ(q₁ + q̄₁)(q₅ + q̄₅)√(1 - (M²ₚ - Q²ₚ)/ℓ⁴) = 2(q₁ - q̄₁)(q₅ - q̄₅)

Classification of Bound States

Positive Energy Bound States ($E > N_p$)

When anti-momentum is present:

• Regularity conditions fix the separation parameter $\ell^2$
• Energy: $E = N_p + \frac{(\sqrt{n_p(1-X)} - \sqrt{n̄_p(1+X)})²}{X}$
• Where $X = \frac{2}{N_k}(1 + \frac{2n_1}{N_1})(1 + \frac{2n_5}{N_5})$

Zero Energy Bound States ($E = N_p$)

When anti-momentum is absent:

• $\ell^2$ remains a flat direction
• Strong constraint: $N_k N_1 N_5 = 2(N_1 + 2n_1)(N_5 + 2n_5)$
• Number of solutions approximately equals the number of divisors of $N_k$

Key Findings

Energy Scaling

For equal net charge case $N_k = N_1 = N_5 = N_p = N$:

• Lowest energy state: $\Delta E_{min} \sim O(N^{-5}) = O(c^{-5/3})$
• Far below CFT gap: $\Delta E_{CFT} = 1/(2N^3) = O(c^{-1})$

Non-Perturbative Properties

The lowest energy state involves large numbers of antibranes:

• Antibrane numbers: $(n_1, n_5) = O(N)$
• Anti-momentum number: $n̄_p = O(N^2)$
• Separation parameter: $\ell^2 \sim O(N^{-2})$

Geometric Structure

These states possess deep AdS$_2$ throats with length:

L ≈ (R_{AdS₂}/2) log(N_p/∆E)

exceeding the maximum length $L_{max}$ in JT gravity.

Entropy Counting and Stability

Entropy Formula

The total entropy of bound states is:

S = 2π(√(n₁n₅nₚ) + √(n̄₁n̄₅n̄ₚ))

approximately half the BTZ black hole entropy: $S \lesssim S_{BTZ}/2$

Dynamical Stability

Through analysis of conical singularities under axisymmetric perturbations:

• Positive energy states are unstable but with small decay rates
• Zero energy states are stable along flat directions

Finite Temperature Generalization

• Positive energy bound states support thermal perturbations
• Zero energy bound states are isolated at $T=0$

Physical Interpretation and Discussion

Origin of "Impossible States"

The low energy of these states arises from:

1. Redshift Effect: Bound state structure confined to the near-horizon region of BPS black holes
2. Long Throat: The AdS$_2$ throat strongly redshifts local energy
3. Fine-Tuning: Special choice of antibrane numbers

Possible Quantum Correction Effects

1. Schwarzian Fluctuations: Quantum fluctuations in the AdS$_2$ throat may elevate energy
2. Supersymmetry Breaking: Angular defects in the IR throat break local supersymmetry
3. Energy Level Shifts: Global quantum effects may alter the spectrum

Theoretical Significance and Outlook

Challenge to CFT Expectations

These results challenge standard CFT predictions:

1. States Within the Gap: Discovery of numerous states within the mass gap
2. Exponential Suppression: Density of these states exponentially suppressed relative to BPS sector
3. Atypicality: Represent atypical subsets of black hole microstates

Possible Resolution Schemes

1. Quantum Lifting: Quantum corrections may elevate these states above the gap
2. Consistent Interpretation: As legitimately exponentially suppressed states, enriching the near-BPS spectrum

Future Research Directions

1. Entanglement Entropy Calculations: Study entanglement structure via Ryu-Takayanagi prescription
2. Thermodynamic Properties: Complete thermodynamic analysis in the canonical ensemble
3. Instability Characterization: Explicit perturbative analysis and decay rate calculations
4. Multi-Center Generalizations: Construction of configurations involving more centers

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Technical Innovation: Successfully generalized Ernst formalism to AdS$_3$ asymptotics
2. Geometric Clarity: Provides explicit geometric realization of non-BPS states
3. Physical Insight: Reveals rich structure of black hole microstates
4. Mathematical Rigor: Detailed regularity analysis and quantization conditions

Limitations and Shortcomings

1. Classical Approximation: Neglects potentially important quantum corrections
2. Stability Issues: Most states are dynamically unstable
3. Limited Applicability: Restricted to specific charge configurations
4. Quantization Assumptions: Extrapolation from continuous supergravity solutions to quantized states

Impact Assessment

This work may have significant implications for:

1. Black Hole Physics: Provides new methods for constructing microstates
2. Holographic Duality: Challenges and enriches understanding of AdS/CFT
3. String Theory: Demonstrates complex dynamics of brane-antibrane systems
4. Quantum Gravity: Offers new perspectives on quantum effects in near-extremal regions

This research represents important progress in understanding black hole microstructure. Despite certain theoretical challenges, it opens new research directions in the field.