Gravity and the Hierarchy Problem

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12882
• Title: Gravity and the Hierarchy Problem
• Authors: Thede de Boer, Jisuke Kubo, Manfred Lindner, Markus Reinig
• Classification: hep-ph astro-ph.CO gr-qc hep-th
• Submission Date: October 14, 2025 (submitted to arXiv)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12882

Abstract

This paper proposes a mechanism to address the hierarchy problem of the Standard Model through dynamical generation of the Planck mass in scale-invariant gravity, while simultaneously achieving Einstein gravity and successful cosmic inflation. The authors provide detailed discussions of the scale-generation mechanism via dynamical symmetry breaking and its phenomenological consequences.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. Hierarchy Problem: The enormous disparity between the Standard Model Higgs field mass and the new physics scale is unnatural within the quantum field theory framework
2. Gravitational Theory Issues: Einstein gravity is non-renormalizable, making quantum effect calculations intractable
3. Inflation Theory Challenges: Cosmic inflation requires special parameter choices to achieve "slow-roll" solutions

Research Motivation

• Existing solutions to the hierarchy problem (e.g., supersymmetry) have not been verified experimentally
• A unified mechanism is needed to simultaneously address gravity, inflation, and the hierarchy problem
• Exploring the role of scale invariance in fundamental physics

Innovative Approach

The authors propose addressing these issues through dynamical symmetry breaking in scale-invariant gravity to:

1. Dynamically generate the Planck mass
2. Resolve the hierarchy problem via gravitational mediation
3. Achieve successful inflationary cosmology

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a Unified Mechanism: Connecting dynamical generation of the Planck scale with the resolution of the Standard Model hierarchy problem
2. Constructed a Complete Model: Including the complete Lagrangian with scale-invariant Standard Model, hidden sector, and quadratic gravity
3. Resolved Gravitational Mediation: Avoiding tree-level portal couplings through composite scalar fields, achieving gravitationally-suppressed effective portal terms
4. Achieved Successful Inflation: Implementing Starobinsky inflation in the semi-conformal region, consistent with observational data
5. Provided Phenomenological Predictions: Offering specific constraints on dark radiation, reheating temperature, and other observables

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework

The model is based on a completely scale-invariant setup containing three sectors:

1. Standard Model Sector (Conformal Limit):

L_SM = L_SMGF + D_μH†D^μH - λ_H(H†H)² 

where μ_H = 0 to preserve scale invariance

2. Hidden G Sector (QCD-like Theory):

L_G = -1/2 TrF² + ψ̄i∂/ψ

containing non-Abelian gauge group G = SU(n_c) and chiral fermions ψ

3. Quadratic Gravity Sector:

L_QG/√(-g) = γR² - κC_μναβC^μναβ

Core Mechanism

1. Scale Generation:

• Chiral symmetry in the G sector is dynamically broken, producing condensate ⟨ψ̄ψ⟩
• Dimensional transmutation generates dynamical scale Λ_G
• Effective scalar field σ is described using Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) theory

2. Planck Mass Generation: Non-minimal coupling of composite scalar σ generates the Planck mass:

M²_Pl = (n_c n_f)/(48π²) [ln(1 + Λ²_G/⟨σ⟩²) - Λ²_G/(Λ²_G + ⟨σ⟩²)]⟨σ⟩²

3. Higgs Mass Induction: Portal coupling is induced through gravitational loop diagrams:

μ²_H ≃ ξ_H M²_Pl/(256π²) (5/κ² + 1/(9γ²)(6ξ_H + 1)(6ξ_σ + 1)) × C

Technical Innovations

1. Avoiding Tree-Level Portal: Due to the composite nature of scalar fields, no H†Hσ² tree-level coupling exists
2. Gravitational Mediation: Different sectors are connected through gravitational interactions with non-minimal couplings
3. Semi-Conformal Region: Choosing ξ_H ≃ -1/6 suppresses scalar contributions, achieving natural hierarchy structure

Experimental Setup and Phenomenological Predictions

Inflationary Constraints

1. Scalar Sector Coefficient γ:

• Constrained by scalar power spectrum amplitude: A_s = e^(3.044±0.014) × 10^(-10)
• Corresponding to γ ~ 10^8 to 10^9

2. Weyl Tensor Coefficient κ:

• Constrained by spin-2 ghost production
• Conservative estimate: m_gh > E_max, where E_max ≃ (ρ_end^(1/4) T_RH)^(1/2)

Reheating Temperature Constraints

Through the relationship between e-folding number N_e and reheating temperature:

N_e ≃ 64.62 + 1/3 ln(T_RH/M_Pl) + 1/3 ln[2V(φ*)/3V(φ_end)] + 1/6 ln[V(φ*)/M⁴_Pl]

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Inflationary Predictions:

• Scalar spectral index: n_s ≃ 1 - 2/N_e
• Tensor-to-scalar ratio: r ≃ 12/N_e²
• Consistent with Planck and BICEP/Keck observational data

2. Hierarchy Problem Resolution:

• For N_e ≲ 51.3 and C ≃ +1, achieves Higgs mass m_H ≃ 125 GeV
• No fine-tuning of parameters required

3. Ghost Constraints:

• Ghost production rate extremely small: Ω_gh h² ~ 9.1 × 10^(-12)
• Unitarity violation at unobservable level: O(10^(-11))

Dark Radiation Contribution

Contribution of Nambu-Goldstone bosons to effective relativistic degrees of freedom:

ΔN_eff ≃ 0.027 × (n²_f - 1)ζ⁴_π ≲ 0.11

Satisfies Planck constraint N_eff = 2.99±0.17

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Supersymmetric Approaches: Eliminating quadratic divergences through fermion-boson symmetry
2. Extra-Dimensional Theories: Addressing hierarchy problem through geometric mechanisms
3. Composite Higgs Models: Treating the Higgs as a composite state
4. Scale-Invariant Models: Resolving hierarchy problem through conformal symmetry

Advantages of This Work

1. Unified Framework: Simultaneously addresses gravity, inflation, and hierarchy problem
2. Renormalizability: Based on renormalizable quadratic gravity theory
3. Phenomenologically Rich: Provides multiple observable predictions
4. Theoretical Consistency: Avoids fine-tuning issues

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successful Mechanism: Dynamical breaking of scale-invariant gravity can unify solutions to multiple fundamental physics problems
2. Phenomenologically Viable: Model predictions are consistent with existing observational data
3. Theoretical Elegance: Avoids artificial parameter tuning, providing natural explanations

Limitations

1. Ghost Problem: Spin-2 ghosts in quadratic gravity require further treatment
2. Non-Perturbative Calculations: Parameter C requires non-perturbative methods to determine
3. Cosmological Constant: Does not address the cosmological constant problem
4. Model Dependence: Results depend on specific choice of G sector

Future Directions

1. Non-Perturbative Calculations: Computing non-perturbative effects of chiral symmetry breaking
2. Dark Matter Research: Analyzing baryons and mesons from G sector as dark matter candidates
3. Non-Gaussianity: Studying contributions of Nambu-Goldstone bosons to non-Gaussianity of curvature perturbations
4. Model Extensions: Extending to grand unified theories and broader new physics frameworks

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Proposes novel mechanism connecting gravity, inflation, and particle physics
2. Mathematical Rigor: Based on renormalizable quantum field theory framework
3. Phenomenologically Rich: Provides multiple testable predictions
4. Problem-Oriented: Addresses core problems in fundamental physics

Weaknesses

1. Model Complexity: Involves multiple sectors and parameters, increasing theoretical complexity
2. Ghost Treatment: Handling of spin-2 ghost problem remains controversial
3. Parameter Dependence: Sign and magnitude of critical parameter C require further calculations
4. Experimental Verification: Some predictions difficult to test in near-term experiments

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new perspective for solving hierarchy problem
2. Interdisciplinary Impact: Connects particle physics, gravitational theory, and cosmology
3. Practical Value: Provides theoretical guidance for future experimental observations
4. Reproducibility: Clear calculation procedures facilitate verification and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fundamental Theory Research: Suitable for exploring new physics beyond the Standard Model
2. Cosmological Applications: Provides theoretical framework for early universe evolution
3. Phenomenological Analysis: Guides future collider and cosmological observations
4. Model Building: Serves as reference framework for other unified theories

References

The paper cites 97 important references spanning multiple fields including particle physics, gravitational theory, and cosmology, providing a solid theoretical foundation for this research.