On Physical Mathematics: an approach through Gilles Châtelet's philosophy

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13125
• Title: On Physical Mathematics: an approach through Gilles Châtelet's philosophy
• Author: John Alexander Cruz Morales (Universidad Nacional de Colombia & Istituto Grothendieck)
• Classification: math.HO (History of Mathematics), math-ph (Mathematical Physics), math.MP (Mathematical Physics), physics.hist-ph (History and Philosophy of Physics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13125

Abstract

This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for understanding Physical Mathematics based on Gregory Moore's characterization, grounded in the philosophy of Gilles Châtelet. The author argues that Châtelet's concepts of inverting, splitting, augmenting, and virtuality are essential for discussing the nature of Physical Mathematics. The paper proposes mirror symmetry as a natural case study for testing Châtelet's ideas in this context. This should be viewed as the first step in a long-term project aimed at investigating the relationships between mathematics, physics, and philosophy to construct a global understanding of the structure of the universe, as envisioned by Grothendieck in the late 1980s and independently developed by Châtelet in the early 1990s.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

1. Limitations of Traditional Mathematical-Physical Relations: Traditionally, physics has been viewed as a recipient of mathematical applications, establishing a unidirectional relationship. Wigner's famous essay "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences" exemplifies this conventional perspective.
2. The "Divorce" Crisis of the 1970s: Freeman Dyson declared in 1972 that the "marriage" between mathematics and physics had ended in "divorce," with the two fields seemingly drifting apart.
3. Emergence of New Relations: However, during the same period, work by mathematicians such as Atiyah, Bott, and Singer, and physicists including Coleman, Gross, and Witten, reconstructed this relationship, giving birth to new geometries.

Research Motivation

1. Absence of Philosophical Foundations for Physical Mathematics: While Moore's characterization of Physical Mathematics is pioneering, it lacks a systematic philosophical framework.
2. Need for Interdisciplinary Integration: The hyper-specialization trend in modern science impedes a global understanding of the structure of the universe, necessitating reintegration of mathematics, physics, and philosophy.
3. Realization of Grothendieck's Vision: Inheriting Grothendieck's vision that mathematical mind, physical insight, and philosophical openness are needed to understand fundamental questions.

Core Contributions

1. Established Correspondence between Châtelet's Philosophy and Moore's Physical Mathematics: Argues that Châtelet's "physico-mathematics" is essentially the philosophical version of Moore's "Physical Mathematics."
2. Proposed a Tripartite Philosophical Framework for Understanding Physical Mathematics: Based on three core processes: inversion, differentiation (encompassing splitting and augmenting), and virtuality.
3. Identified Key Characteristics of Physical Mathematics: Extracted inversion, differentiation, and virtuality from Moore's description as essential features of Physical Mathematics.
4. Proposed Mirror Symmetry as a Case Study: Presented mirror symmetry as a concrete instance for applying Châtelet's philosophy to understand Physical Mathematics.
5. Provided Methodology for Interdisciplinary Research: Offered a concrete philosophical methodological framework for integrated research across mathematics, physics, and philosophy.

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework Construction

Extraction of Moore's Physical Mathematics Characteristics

The author identifies three key characteristics from Moore's description:

1. Inversion:
   • Terminological reversal from "Mathematical Physics" to "Physical Mathematics"
   • Physical insights can now lead to important new results in mathematics
   • Physics not only understands sensible reality but also aids in understanding mathematical reality
2. Differentiation:
   • Splitting: Physical Mathematics emerges as an independent field distinct from Mathematical Physics
   • Augmenting: Generation of new knowledge and expansion of the field
3. Virtuality:
   • Relationship with the foundations of physics
   • Emergence of new fundamental objects (both physical and mathematical)
   • Dynamic and elastic foundational principles

Correspondence with Châtelet's Philosophy

Based on Zalamea's analysis of Châtelet's unpublished work, three key "gestures" are identified:

1. Inverting: "Awakening the physical in mathematics"
2. Splitting: Establishing new distinctions and differences
3. Augmenting: Extending and enriching existing knowledge

Philosophical Analysis Method

Philosophy of Virtuality

• Châtelet emphasizes the importance of virtual determination
• Virtuality transcends the current explicit set of determinations
• New relationships between mathematics and physics are established in the emergence of virtuality

Philosophical Significance of Gauge Theory

Châtelet views gauge theory as a revolutionary theory establishing new patterns of physico-mathematics, emphasizing the coordinating protocol between geometric and physical significance.

Case Study: Mirror Symmetry

Physical-Mathematical Characteristics of Mirror Symmetry

Manifestation of the Inverting Gesture

• The transformation from the A-model to the B-model can be viewed as an inverting gesture
• Candelas and colleagues solved problems in symplectic geometry (A-model) by working in the complex geometry (B-model) of the mirror

Emergence of Virtuality

• Virtual fundamental classes and virtual dimensions in Gromov-Witten theory
• These virtualities are necessary for the correct mathematical foundations of objects involved in mirror phenomena

Integration of Mathematical Branches

Mirror symmetry integrates multiple mathematical branches:

• Symplectic and complex geometry
• Integrable systems
• Derived categories
• Geometric representation theory
• Modular forms and L-functions
• Ordinary differential equations and monodromy problems
• Noncommutative geometry

Future Research Directions

Application of Model Theory

The author proposes that model theory, particularly through the concept of categoricity, may provide new perspectives for understanding mirror symmetry:

• Zilber's program for logically perfect structures
• Syntactic/semantic duality may be a more general manifestation of mirror duality
• Mirror symmetry as mediation of polarity between discrete and continuous

Related Work

Historical Context

1. Classical Tradition: The tradition of mathematical-physical unity from Newton and Leibniz through Euler, Lagrange, and Poincaré
2. Modern Development: Work by Atiyah-Bott-Singer and Coleman-Gross-Witten in the 1970s
3. Grothendieck's Program: New foundations of algebraic geometry and their implications for mathematical-physical relationships

Philosophical Tradition

• Exploration of mathematical-physical-philosophical relationships beginning with Plato
• Synthetic approaches of Leibniz, Riemann, and Poincaré
• Lautman's philosophy of mathematics
• Châtelet's physico-mathematics philosophy

Contemporary Developments

• Kontsevich's homological mirror symmetry program (1994)
• Zilber's logical structures in physics program
• Three-dimensional mirror symmetry and geometric Langlands duality

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Necessity of Philosophical Framework: Physical Mathematics requires systematic philosophical treatment to overcome skepticism from mathematicians and physicists.
2. Applicability of Châtelet's Philosophy: Châtelet's concepts of inverting, splitting, augmenting, and virtuality provide a suitable framework for understanding Physical Mathematics.
3. Value of Interdisciplinary Integration: The triangular relationship among mathematics, physics, and philosophy is crucial for generating new knowledge.
4. Paradigmatic Status of Mirror Symmetry: Mirror symmetry is an ideal case study for applying Châtelet's philosophy to understand Physical Mathematics.

Limitations

1. Insufficient Technical Detail: As a philosophical analysis, the paper lacks deep technical mathematical and physical details.
2. Preliminary Nature of Case Study: The analysis of mirror symmetry is merely a "bird's-eye view" overview.
3. Abstractness of Methodology: The proposed philosophical framework requires more concrete applications to validate its effectiveness.
4. Oversimplification of Historical Analysis: The description of the history of mathematical-physical relationships may be overly simplified.

Future Directions

1. In-depth Philosophical Analysis of Mirror Symmetry: Complete philosophical treatment combining technical details.
2. Application to Other Physical Mathematics Fields: Applying the Châtelet framework to gauge theory, string theory, and other domains.
3. Development of Model-Theoretic Approaches: Exploring specific applications of Zilber's program to mirror symmetry.
4. Refinement of Interdisciplinary Methodology: Developing more systematic methods for mathematical-physical-philosophical integration.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Original Perspective: Connecting the relatively obscure philosophy of Châtelet with contemporary Physical Mathematics provides a unique understanding.
2. Interdisciplinary Integration: Successfully combines the history of mathematics, history of physics, and philosophy, exemplifying genuine interdisciplinary research.
3. Conceptual Clarity: Clearly identifies and articulates the core characteristics of Physical Mathematics.
4. Historical Sensitivity: The inheritance and development of Grothendieck's vision demonstrates profound historical awareness.
5. Forward-Looking Approach: Provides concrete directions and methodologies for future interdisciplinary research.

Shortcomings

1. Limited Technical Depth: As a philosophical analysis, it lacks sufficient technical detail to convince professional mathematicians and physicists.
2. Insufficient Empirical Support: Primarily based on conceptual analysis, lacking concrete technical applications to validate the philosophical framework's effectiveness.
3. Superficiality of Case Analysis: The analysis of mirror symmetry is overly general, lacking in-depth technical discussion.
4. Methodological Ambiguity: While proposing a philosophical framework, how to apply it concretely remains insufficiently clear.

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides important philosophical foundations for Physical Mathematics, contributing to theoretical development in the field.
2. Interdisciplinary Significance: May inspire greater interdisciplinary collaboration among mathematicians, physicists, and philosophers.
3. Educational Value: Contributes to cultivating researchers with interdisciplinary perspectives.
4. Long-term Impact: May open new directions for future research in philosophy of science and philosophy of mathematics.

Applicable Contexts

1. Philosophy of Science Research: Provides a new framework for philosophers studying the relationship between mathematics and physics.
2. Interdisciplinary Education: Can be used to cultivate graduate and doctoral students with integrative perspectives.
3. Theoretical Physics Research: Offers philosophical reflection for physicists working in frontier fields such as string theory and quantum gravity.
4. Mathematical Foundations Research: Provides new perspectives for scholars studying mathematical foundations and philosophy of mathematics.

References

The paper cites 20 important works, including:

1. Core Works by Châtelet: Les enjeux du mobile (1993) and L'enchantement du virtuel (2010)
2. Moore's Physical Mathematics Discourse: Multiple papers on the definition and future of Physical Mathematics
3. Classical Literature on Mirror Symmetry: Candelas et al.'s groundbreaking 1991 paper
4. Grothendieck's Philosophical Works: Récoltes et semailles and others
5. Other Important Works: Classical papers by Dyson, Wigner, Atiyah, and others

These references constitute a solid scholarly foundation for the paper, demonstrating the author's thorough understanding of relevant fields.