Information-Theoretic Criteria for Knowledge Distillation in Multimodal Learning

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13182
• Title: Information-Theoretic Criteria for Knowledge Distillation in Multimodal Learning
• Authors: Rongrong Xie¹, Yizhou Xu², Guido Sanguinetti¹
• Institutions: ¹SISSA (International School for Advanced Studies, Italy), ²EPFL (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne)
• Classification: cs.LG (Machine Learning)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13182

Abstract

With the rapid growth of multimodal data, cross-modal knowledge distillation (KD) has garnered significant attention as a technique to enhance model performance by transferring information from information-rich "teacher" modalities to weaker "student" modalities. However, despite its success in various applications, cross-modal KD does not always guarantee performance improvements, primarily due to the lack of theoretical understanding to guide practice. To address this gap, this paper proposes the Cross-modal Complementarity Hypothesis (CCH): cross-modal KD is effective if and only if the mutual information between teacher and student representations exceeds the mutual information between student representations and labels. The research validates CCH theoretically within a joint Gaussian model and confirms it empirically across diverse multimodal datasets including images, text, video, audio, and cancer-related genomic data.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Core Question: When is cross-modal knowledge distillation effective? Existing research lacks a theoretical framework to predict the success conditions of KD.
2. Practical Challenge: Cross-modal KD sometimes fails or even degrades performance, yet lacks quantitative criteria to determine feasibility in advance.
3. Theoretical Gap: While some empirical studies exist, there is an absence of rigorous analysis frameworks based on information theory.

Research Significance

• Practical Value: In scenarios such as medical diagnosis, expensive modalities (e.g., genetic sequencing) are only available during training and require guidance for learning cheaper modalities.
• Theoretical Significance: Provides an information-theoretic foundation for multimodal learning, bridging the gap between theory and practice.
• Broad Applicability: Spans multiple domains including images, text, audio, video, and biomedical applications.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Primarily attributed to "modality gap" but lack quantitative characterization.
• Proposed solutions (complex fusion strategies, customized loss functions) have unclear generalizability.
• Lack of criteria to determine KD feasibility in advance.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes the Cross-modal Complementarity Hypothesis (CCH): A simple mutual information-based criterion that can determine in advance whether cross-modal KD will succeed.
2. Theoretical Validation: Rigorously proves the validity of CCH within a joint Gaussian model.
3. Extensive Empirical Verification: Validates the practicality of CCH on synthetic data, images, text, video, audio, and cancer genomic data.
4. Practical Guidance: Provides actionable principles for selecting effective teacher modalities.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given two modalities X₁ (teacher) and X₂ (student), where X₁ possesses stronger predictive capability, the objective is to enhance performance on the weak modality X₂ through cross-modal KD. Let H₁ and H₂ denote the representations of X₁ and X₂ respectively, and Y denote the true labels.

Cross-modal Complementarity Hypothesis (CCH)

Core Assumption: Cross-modal knowledge distillation is effective if and only if I(H₁;H₂) > I(H₂;Y).

Intuitive Explanation:

• I(H₁;H₂): Mutual information between teacher and student representations, measuring information overlap between modalities.
• I(H₂;Y): Mutual information between student representations and labels, measuring student predictive capability.
• When the former exceeds the latter, the teacher can provide supplementary label-relevant information that the student lacks.

Theoretical Analysis

Joint Gaussian Model

Assume data {(x₁ᵢ, x₂ᵢ, yᵢ)}ⁿᵢ₌₁ follows a joint Gaussian distribution:

[x₁ᵢ]     [  Σ₁₁  Σ₁₂  Σ₁₃ ]
[x₂ᵢ] ~ N([0], [Σ₁₂ᵀ  Σ₂₂  Σ₂₃])
[yᵢ ]     [Σ₁₃ᵀ  Σ₂₃ᵀ  Σ₃₃ ]

Cross-modal Objective Function

Training objective for the student network:

ŵ = argmin Σᵢ ||yᵢ - w₂ᵀx₂ᵢ||² + λΣᵢ ||w₂ᵀx₂ᵢ - w₁ᵀx₁ᵢ||²

Main Theorem

Theorem 1: Under mild assumptions, if I(w₁ᵀx₁, (w*)ᵀx₂) > I((w*)ᵀx₂, y), then for sufficiently small λ, we have R(λ,w₁) < R₀ (i.e., KD outperforms the baseline without KD).

Technical Innovations

1. Information-Theoretic Perspective: First to quantitatively characterize success conditions of cross-modal KD using mutual information.
2. Theoretical Guarantees: Provides rigorous theoretical analysis under Gaussian assumptions.
3. Practical Criterion: Offers a computable criterion for advance determination without actual training.

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Synthetic Data: Controlled Gaussian regression tasks, n=10000, p=100.
2. Image Data: MNIST (teacher) → MNIST-M (student).
3. Multimodal Data: CMU-MOSEI sentiment analysis dataset (text, visual, audio).
4. Cancer Data: TCGA dataset cohorts BRCA, KIPAN, LIHC (mRNA, CNV, RPPA).

Evaluation Metrics

• Regression Tasks: Mean Squared Error (MSE).
• Classification Tasks: Accuracy, weighted F1 score, AUC.
• Mutual Information Estimation: Using latentmi, MINE, and KSG estimators.

Comparison Methods

• KD vs. no-KD student models.
• Direct fusion vs. fusion+KD.
• Comparison across different teacher modalities.

Implementation Details

• Network Architecture: Teacher and student use identical architectures to isolate MI effects.
• Optimizers: Adam (synthetic data), SGD (images), AdamW (MOSEI).
• Hyperparameters: Temperature T ∈ {1,2,3,4}, distillation weight λ ∈ {0.2,0.3,0.5,0.7,0.8}.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Synthetic Data Validation

• Key Finding: When I(H₁;H₂) > I(H₂;Y), KD significantly reduces MSE; otherwise, no improvement is observed.
• Parameter Impact: Same pattern observed across different λ values.
• Theoretical Consistency: Experimental results perfectly align with Theorem 1.

Image Data Experiments

• MNIST→MNIST-M: Teacher quality controlled via Gaussian blur.
• CCH Validation: Accuracy improvements strictly correspond to the mutual information condition I(H₁;H₂) > I(H₂;Y).
• Performance: When CCH is satisfied, accuracy improves by 0.01-0.035; when violated, it decreases by 0.12-0.46.

CMU-MOSEI Multimodal Experiments

• Modality Ranking: Text > Audio > Visual (ranked by I(H;Y)).
• KD Effects: Text→Visual (accuracy improvement 1.1%), Text→Audio (accuracy improvement 2.3%).
• Noise Experiments: Injecting noise into teacher to verify CCH boundary conditions.

Cancer Data Analysis

• Three Datasets: BRCA, KIPAN, LIHC.
• Consistent Results: Perfect correspondence between CCH conditions and KD effects across all datasets.
• Fusion Strategy: When CCH is satisfied, fusion+KD outperforms direct fusion.

Ablation Studies

1. Temperature Parameter T: Robustness of CCH conditions under different temperatures.
2. Distillation Weight λ: Theoretical predictions more accurate with smaller λ values.
3. Noise Level: Systematic degradation of teacher quality to verify CCH boundaries.
4. Mutual Information Estimators: Three estimators provide consistent relative rankings.

Key Findings

1. Universality of CCH: Perfect correspondence between KD effects and CCH conditions across all experiments.
2. Nonlinear Relationship: Student accuracy exhibits nonlinear response to mutual information differences.
3. Estimator Robustness: Different MI estimators yield consistent conclusions.
4. Practical Value: CCH serves as a practical criterion for selecting teacher modalities.

Related Work

Knowledge Distillation Foundations

• Classical KD: Hinton et al.'s temperature-softened label method.
• Cross-modal Extensions: Generalizing KD to knowledge transfer between heterogeneous modalities.

Modality Gap Problem

• Main Challenge: Modality imbalance and soft label misalignment.
• Existing Solutions: Complex fusion strategies, customized loss functions.
• Limitations: Lack of theoretical guidance and generalizability.

Theoretical Research

• Privileged Information: Vapnik et al.'s theoretical framework.
• Generalized Distillation: Lopez-Paz et al.'s sample complexity analysis.
• Empirical Studies: Xue et al.'s assumptions on label-relevant information sharing.

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper provides for the first time a quantitative criterion based on mutual information with theoretical guarantees and broad applicability.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Validity of CCH: Mutual information criterion accurately predicts cross-modal KD success.
2. Theoretical Foundation: Provides rigorous proof within the joint Gaussian model.
3. Practical Value: Offers actionable design principles for multimodal learning.
4. Broad Applicability: Validated effectiveness across multiple modalities and tasks.

Limitations

1. Theoretical Assumptions: Rigorous proof only holds under Gaussian assumptions.
2. MI Estimation: Mutual information estimation for high-dimensional data remains challenging.
3. Architecture Constraints: Experiments use identical architectures for teacher and student.
4. Computational Overhead: Requires additional mutual information computation.

Future Directions

1. Theoretical Extensions: Generalize to non-Gaussian distributions and more complex models.
2. Efficient Estimation: Develop more accurate high-dimensional mutual information estimation methods.
3. Architecture Research: Explore CCH applicability under different architectures.
4. Application Expansion: Validate CCH practicality in more domains.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: First to propose an information-theoretic framework for cross-modal KD.
2. Rigor: Provides mathematical proofs and extensive experimental validation.
3. Practicality: CCH criterion is simple, easy to use, and has practical guidance value.
4. Comprehensiveness: Systematic study spanning multiple modalities, tasks, and datasets.
5. Reproducibility: Provides detailed experimental settings and code.

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Limitations: Rigorous theory only applies to Gaussian cases; real-world data often violates this assumption.
2. MI Estimation Challenges: Accuracy and computational efficiency issues for high-dimensional mutual information estimation.
3. Architecture Constraints: Experimental design using identical architectures to isolate MI effects limits real-world applicability.
4. Boundary Effects: Behavior near CCH condition boundaries may be unstable.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical perspective for multimodal learning.
2. Practical Guidance: Offers concrete design principles for engineering applications.
3. Research Inspiration: May promote more information-theoretic multimodal research.
4. Cross-domain Value: Has application potential in medical, vision, NLP, and other domains.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Medical Diagnosis: Expensive tests guiding learning from routine tests.
2. Multimodal Fusion: Selecting optimal teacher modality for knowledge transfer.
3. Resource-Constrained Inference: Utilizing rich modalities during training, simple modalities during inference.
4. Cross-domain Adaptation: Knowledge transfer between different modalities.

References

This paper cites important works in knowledge distillation, multimodal learning, and information theory, including:

• Hinton et al. (2015) - Classical knowledge distillation paper.
• Vapnik & Vashist (2009) - Privileged information theory.
• Lopez-Paz et al. (2015) - Generalized distillation framework.
• And relevant literature on multimodal datasets and evaluation methods.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality research paper combining theory and practice, providing important theoretical insights and practical guidance for cross-modal knowledge distillation. The CCH hypothesis is elegant and concise, with sufficient experimental validation, demonstrating significant academic and practical value.