Some problems associated with the standardization of the light curve of type 1a supernovae

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13187
• Title: Some problems associated with the standardization of the light curve of type 1a supernovae
• Authors: A. P. Mahtessian, G. S. Karapetian, H. F. Khachatryan, M. A. Hovhannisyan, L. A. Mahtessian, L. E. Byzalov, J. M. Sarkissian
• Classification: astro-ph.HE, astro-ph.CO
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13187v1

Abstract

This study demonstrates that parameters used for standardizing the luminosity of Type Ia supernovae in the SALT2 and SiFTO models exhibit strong dependence on redshift z. Consequently, when standardization is performed with increasing z, the average absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae is artificially increased. This implies that for a given apparent magnitude, they are assigned systematically larger distances than actual, creating an illusion of accelerated recession and necessitating the introduction of anti-gravity concepts (dark energy) to explain the phenomenon. The study further demonstrates that after standardization, Type Ia supernovae no longer serve as standard candles. Therefore, the authors contend that this standardization method is unsuitable for measuring Type Ia supernova distances, and the conclusion regarding cosmic acceleration is thereby called into question.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The core problem addressed by this research concerns systematic biases in the luminosity standardization methodology for Type Ia supernovae in modern cosmology. Specifically, it includes:

1. Anomalous redshift dependence of parameters in SALT2 and SiFTO standardization models
2. Whether the standardization process violates the fundamental assumption of Type Ia supernovae as standard candles
3. The impact of such systematic biases on cosmological parameter estimation and the dark energy concept

Significance

This problem is of paramount importance because:

• Type Ia supernovae are key tools for distance measurement in modern cosmology
• The 1998 discovery based on Type Ia supernovae led to the proposal of the dark energy concept and the theory of cosmic acceleration
• If systematic biases exist in the standardization method, they will directly affect our understanding of fundamental cosmological questions

Limitations of Existing Methods

The existing SALT2 standardization method assumes:

• Supernovae with identical color, shape, and galactic environment possess the same intrinsic luminosity at all redshifts
• Standardization parameters α and β are independent of redshift
• However, previous studies have shown these parameters correlate with host galaxy age and local star formation rate

Research Motivation

The authors' research motivation stems from:

• Previous work discovering correlations between standardization parameters and redshift
• The need for systematic verification of this correlation's universality across different samples
• Assessment of this correlation's impact on cosmological conclusions

Core Contributions

1. Systematic demonstration of redshift dependence of standardization parameters: Significant correlations between standardization parameters in SALT2 and SiFTO models and redshift are discovered in multiple independent Type Ia supernova samples
2. Proposal of the "absolute magnitude test" method: A novel approach for testing whether standardized Type Ia supernovae still satisfy the standard candle assumption
3. Revelation of systematic biases in standardization methods: Proof that existing standardization methods artificially increase the absolute magnitude of high-redshift supernovae, leading to distance overestimation
4. Questioning the conclusion of cosmic acceleration: Based on the discovery of systematic biases, the authors challenge conclusions regarding dark energy and cosmic acceleration derived from Type Ia supernovae

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Research tasks include:

• Input: Light curve data, redshift, and standardization parameters from multiple Type Ia supernova samples
• Output: Correlation analysis between standardization parameters and redshift, relationship between absolute magnitude and redshift
• Constraints: Based on the standard candle assumption, standardized absolute magnitude should be independent of redshift

Analysis Methods

1. Correlation Analysis

Statistical correlation analysis is employed to test the relationship between standardization parameters and redshift:

For the SALT2 model, the following quantities' correlation with redshift z is analyzed:

• $\Delta M = \alpha X_1 - \beta C$
• $\alpha X_1$ (light curve shape parameter)
• $\beta C$ (color parameter)

Statistical significance is assessed via t-test: $t = R_{\Delta M,z}\sqrt{\frac{n-2}{1-R_{\Delta M,z}^2}}$

where the correlation coefficient is: $R_{\Delta M,z} = \frac{\sum(\Delta M_i - \langle\Delta M\rangle)(z_i - \langle z\rangle)}{(n-1)\sigma_{\Delta M}\sigma_z}$

2. Absolute Magnitude Test

The standard candle assumption is verified by calculating absolute magnitude under different cosmological parameters:

$M = m - 5\log D_L - 25$

where the luminosity distance in a flat universe is: $D_L(z,\Omega_M,\Omega_\Lambda) = \frac{c(1+z)}{H_0}\int_0^z \frac{dz'}{[(1+z')^2(1+\Omega_M z') - z'(2+z')\Omega_\Lambda]^{1/2}}$

Technical Innovations

1. Multi-sample verification: Rather than relying on a single sample, correlations are systematically verified across multiple independent samples
2. Absolute magnitude test: An innovative approach to validate standardization method effectiveness by examining redshift dependence of absolute magnitude
3. Evolution model considerations: Possible evolutionary effects on supernova absolute magnitude are considered

Experimental Setup

Datasets

The research employs multiple authoritative Type Ia supernova samples:

1. Pan-STARRS sample: 1,167 photometrically classified Type Ia supernovae
2. JLA sample: Joint light curve and spectroscopic analysis sample from Betoule et al. (2014)
3. Union2 sample: Sample from Amanullah et al. (2010)
4. SNLS sample: Supernova Legacy Survey sample from Guy et al. (2010)

Evaluation Metrics

• Statistical significance: Correlation significance assessed via t-test and p-values
• Correlation coefficient: Quantifies the strength of linear relationship between standardization parameters and redshift
• Absolute magnitude scatter: Evaluates consistency of standardized absolute magnitudes

Comparative Methods

Different cosmological models and standardization strategies are compared:

• With standardization vs. without standardization
• With evolution vs. without evolution
• SALT2 vs. SiFTO standardization methods

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Redshift Dependence of Standardization Parameters

Significant correlations are found in all studied samples:

Pan-STARRS sample:

• Correlation significance of $\Delta M = \alpha X_1 - \beta C$ with redshift: $10^{-22}$
• Correlation significance of $\alpha X_1$ with redshift: $3.4 \times 10^{-3}$
• Correlation significance of $\beta C$ with redshift: $10^{-20}$

Typical results from other samples:

• Union sample: $\Delta M = (0.181 \pm 0.07)z + (-0.265 \pm 0.044)$, $p < 0.02$
• Union2 sample: $\Delta M = (0.193 \pm 0.059)z + (-0.210 \pm 0.030)$, $p < 0.001$
• JLA sample: $\Delta M = (0.264 \pm 0.039)z + (-0.005 \pm 0.016)$, $p \ll 0.001$

2. Absolute Magnitude Test Results

Absolute magnitudes calculated using standardized cosmological parameters from the JLA sample ($\Omega_\Lambda = 0.705, \Omega_M = 0.295$) show strong correlation with redshift, violating the standard candle assumption.

In contrast, parameters obtained using unstandardized methods ($\Omega_\Lambda = 0.505, \Omega_M = 0.495$) yield absolute magnitudes independent of redshift, satisfying the standard candle assumption.

Ablation Studies

Four different model configurations are investigated:

• Case A: $\epsilon = 0; \alpha, \beta \neq 0$ (standard SALT2 standardization, no evolution)
• Case B: $\epsilon = 0; \alpha, \beta = 0$ (no standardization, no evolution)
• Case C: $\epsilon \neq 0; \alpha, \beta \neq 0$ (standardization + evolution)
• Case D: $\epsilon \neq 0; \alpha, \beta = 0$ (no standardization + evolution)

Results demonstrate that only Case D simultaneously satisfies both fitting quality and absolute magnitude test requirements.

Key Findings

1. Universality of systematic bias: Redshift dependence of parameters is found across all studied samples and standardization methods
2. Violation of standard candle assumption: Standardized Type Ia supernovae no longer satisfy the fundamental requirements of standard candles
3. Impact on dark energy density: If supernova evolution is considered without standardization, dark energy density approaches zero

Related Work

Main Research Directions

• Supernova cosmology: Using Type Ia supernovae as standard candles to measure cosmic distances and cosmological parameters
• Photometric standardization methods: Development and improvement of models such as SALT2 and SiFTO
• Systematic error research: Impact of host galaxy effects, selection biases, and other factors on cosmological conclusions

Related Studies

• Lee et al. (2022) discovered strong dependence of the standardization process on progenitor age
• Rigault et al. (2020) found strong dependence of standardization parameters on local specific star formation rate
• These studies provide theoretical support for the findings presented herein

Unique Contributions of This Research

Compared to related work, this study:

1. First systematically demonstrates direct correlation between standardization parameters and redshift
2. Proposes the absolute magnitude test as a novel verification method
3. Directly challenges cosmological conclusions based on standardization

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Systematic redshift dependence of standardization parameters: Standardization parameters in SALT2 and SiFTO models exhibit strong and statistically significant correlation with redshift
2. Standardization violates the standard candle assumption: Standardized Type Ia supernovae no longer satisfy the fundamental requirements of standard candles
3. Cosmic acceleration conclusion is questionable: The conclusions regarding cosmic acceleration and dark energy derived from biased standardization methods warrant reconsideration

Limitations

1. Sample dependence: Although results are verified across multiple samples, unaccounted selection effects may still exist
2. Insufficient theoretical explanation: Lack of deep physical mechanism explanation for why standardization parameters correlate with redshift
3. Limited alternative approaches: While questioning existing methods, the paper lacks completely convincing alternative standardization schemes

Future Directions

1. Deeper understanding of physical mechanisms: Further investigation into the physical causes of redshift dependence of standardization parameters is needed
2. Improved standardization methods: Development of new standardization models that account for redshift dependence
3. Independent verification: Use of other cosmological probes to verify conclusions regarding cosmic acceleration

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Outstanding importance: Challenges fundamental conclusions of modern cosmology, possessing major academic significance
2. Rigorous methodology: Systematic verification using multiple independent samples with standardized statistical analysis
3. Strong innovation: The proposed absolute magnitude test method is novel and effective
4. Consistent results: Consistent conclusions across different samples and methods

Weaknesses

1. Weak theoretical foundation: Lacks deep physical explanation for the observed correlations
2. Insufficient alternative solutions: While identifying problems, the paper lacks completely convincing solutions
3. Possible selection biases: Insufficient discussion of systematic biases potentially introduced by sample selection
4. Controversial conclusions: Challenges to the dark energy concept may provoke intense academic debate

Impact

1. Academic impact: May trigger reconsideration of supernova cosmology methods throughout the research community
2. Practical value: Alerts researchers to systematic biases in standardization methods
3. Controversial nature: The controversial conclusions may limit immediate acceptance
4. Reproducibility: Uses publicly available data, results are reproducible

Applicable Scenarios

1. Type Ia supernova cosmology research: Provides important reference for improving distance measurement methods
2. Cosmological parameter estimation: Systematic biases must be considered when using Type Ia supernova data
3. Standardization method development: Provides guidance for developing new photometric standardization methods

References

The paper cites multiple key studies, including:

• Guy et al. (2007): Original paper on SALT2 standardization method
• Betoule et al. (2014): Important reference for JLA sample
• Lee et al. (2022): Study on standardization parameter dependence on progenitor age
• Rigault et al. (2020): Study on standardization parameter dependence on star formation rate

Overall Assessment: This is a highly controversial yet academically valuable paper. While its conclusions may face scrutiny, the problems it raises and the methods employed possess significant scientific merit and warrant serious consideration and in-depth discussion by the academic community.