Extensibility in Programming Languages: An overview

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13236
• Title: Extensibility in Programming Languages: An overview
• Author: Sebastian Mateos Nicolajsen (IT University of Copenhagen)
• Classification: cs.PL (Programming Languages)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13236

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth exploration of extensibility in programming languages, offering justification for components frequently overlooked in traditional language design. Through a systematic literature review, the author identifies four key extensibility themes: Macros, Modules, Types, and Reflection, highlighting diverse strategies for promoting extensibility. The analysis extends to cross-cutting properties such as Parametricism and First-class citizen behaviour, introducing layers of complexity by emphasizing the importance of customization and flexibility in programming language constructs.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Questions

1. Core Problem: Extensibility in programming languages is frequently overlooked in language design, lacking systematic research and comprehensive summaries
2. Definition Ambiguity: The concept of extensibility is poorly defined in the literature, lacking clear classification and understanding frameworks
3. Practical Demands: Existing programming languages are often constrained by their immutable nature when facing new requirements

Problem Significance

1. Language Limitations: The traditional view treats programming languages as immutable artifacts, which restricts their ability to adapt to new requirements
2. Development Efficiency: Extensibility is the only pathway to improving developer productivity and overcoming language limitations
3. Future Development: Scholars such as Guy Steele argue that designing for language growth (i.e., extensibility) should be a fundamental element of future languages

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Fragmented Research: While concepts such as macros, reflection, functions, and modules are widely studied, research primarily focuses on reusability, modularity, and abstraction rather than extensibility itself
2. Lack of Holistic Perspective: Existing work primarily addresses improvements to extensibility or implementation details, lacking systematic research on extensibility as a concept
3. Insufficient Theory: Extensibility lacks explicit definitions and theoretical foundations compared to concepts such as abstraction

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Classification: Identifies four core extensibility themes (Macros, Modules, Types, Reflection) through literature review
2. Cross-cutting Properties: Discovers and analyzes two important cross-cutting properties (Parametricism and First-class citizen behaviour)
3. Theoretical Framework: Provides a structured framework for understanding extensibility in programming languages
4. Practical Guidance: Offers guidance for future language designers in evaluating and considering language extensibility
5. Research Gap Identification: Identifies underexplored concepts including bootstrapping, compiler hooks, and virtual machines

Methodology Details

Research Method

The paper employs a systematic literature review methodology following the process defined by Kitchenham et al., combined with data coding methods from Grounded Theory.

Literature Collection Strategy

Initial Literature Set

• Data Sources: 10 conferences and journals related to language engineering
• Conferences Include: HOPL, POPL, PLDI, CGO, DLS, GPCE, Onward, SLE, TOPLAS, PACMPL
• Initial Scale: 7,090 papers
• Exclusion Strategy: Excludes conferences focused on specific language paradigms

Screening Process

1. Keyword Screening: Extracts 65 keywords from 19 relevant papers, generating 19 additional keywords
2. Title Screening: Compares keywords with paper titles, filtering to 648 papers
3. Abstract Screening: Compares keywords with abstracts and conclusions, further filtering to 223 papers
4. Quality Assessment: Classifies papers based on whether they describe or discuss extensibility into highly relevant (69 papers) and partially relevant (64 papers)

Data Extraction and Synthesis

• Extraction Method: Extracts all qualitative descriptions and extensibility discussions
• Synthesis Method: Borrows data coding methods from Grounded Theory, employing inductive methods to develop classification systems
• Iterative Refinement: Continuously improves and reassesses classifications upon discovering new information

Experimental Setup

Dataset Characteristics

• Overall Scale: Initial 7,090 papers
• Time Span: Data collected in autumn 2022
• Final Analysis: 133 relevant papers (69 highly relevant + 64 partially relevant)

Quality Assessment Criteria

Primary Questions:

• Does the article discuss extensibility? (directly or indirectly)
• Does the article discuss extensibility concepts?

Secondary Questions:

• Does the article discuss specific extensibility concepts?
• Does the article discuss specific languages and extensibility?

Analysis Framework

Employs inductive methods to identify themes through continuous comparison and classification refinement, ultimately forming a framework of four major themes and two cross-cutting properties.

Experimental Results

Main Findings: Four Core Themes

1. Macros

Motivation: Macros enable language users to create new control mechanisms of almost arbitrary syntactic form, thereby increasing extensibility.

Type Classification:

• Lexical Macros: String-based transformations, syntax-agnostic but do not guarantee syntactic safety
• Syntactic Macros: Operate on abstract syntax trees (AST), ensuring syntactic safety
• Semantic Macros: Provide semantic analysis, such as type checking

Representative Implementations:

• Racket: Modular syntax system
• CPP: Lexical macro engine for C
• LISP: Syntactic macro system
• C++: Templates and concepts (macro-like functionality)

2. Modules

Motivation: Modules structure code, allowing users to group code for providing domain-specific languages or frameworks as packages.

Type System:

• Existential Types: Allow first-class modules but hide implementation details
• Dependent Types: Fully transparent
• Explicit Types: Provide compromise between the two

Design Considerations:

• Hierarchical structure and dependencies
• Handling of nested modules
• Resolution of circular dependencies

3. Types

Motivation: Type systems allow users to make guarantees within the language; combined with properties such as polymorphism and generic programming, they provide predictability and safety for program development.

Polymorphism Classification:

• Ad hoc Polymorphism: Type depends on parameters
• Universal Polymorphism:
  • Parametric Polymorphism: Allows any type as parameter
  • Subtype Polymorphism: Allows type substitution

Generic Programming:

• Different implementation approaches: Virtual machine support (C#) vs. type erasure (Java)
• Structural matching: ML, C++, OCaml, etc.

4. Reflection

Motivation: Reflection enables users to programmatically modify other programming constructs, increasing the modifiability and flexibility of concepts that would otherwise be immutable.

Capability Range:

• Program introspection and modification
• Cloning and extending classes
• Providing clear interfaces to virtual machines

Challenges:

• Performance costs
• Breaking encapsulation
• Meta-stability issues

Cross-cutting Properties

1. Parametricism

Motivation: Parametricism increases the customization capability of constructs, enabling greater reuse and abstraction.

Application Domains:

• Module Parametrization: Such as functor constructs in Standard ML and OCaml
• Type Parametrization: Implemented through polymorphism, such as C++ concepts and Haskell type classes

2. First-class Citizen Behaviour

Motivation: First-class citizen properties enable users to use constructs like other values, allowing dynamic modification of programming constructs.

Implementation Methods:

• First-class Modules: Can be manipulated like data structures
• First-class Types: Mechanisms such as type generators

Underexplored Concepts

1. Bootstrapping: Language self-hosting, eliminating the notion of language immutability
2. Compiler Hooks: Allow users to inject hooks into the compiler
3. Virtual Machines: Provide rich functionality and portability for language experimentation

Related Work

Extensibility Improvement Research

• Daniel Zingaro: Applies Standish's paraphrase, orthophrase, metaphrase concepts to language families
• Sebastian Erdweg and Felix Rieger: Propose the Sugar* framework for reasoning about language extensibility

Expressiveness Problem

• Philip Wadler: Proposes the expressiveness problem on the Java mailing list for measuring programming language extensibility

Educational Resources

• Robert Tennent: "Principles of Programming Languages," describing different components of languages
• Peter Sestoft: "Concepts of Programming Languages," covering similar topics and design decisions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Importance of Extensibility: Extensibility is a key factor in overcoming language limitations and promoting community-driven development
2. Systematic Framework: Four themes (Macros, Modules, Types, Reflection) and two cross-cutting properties provide a structured framework for understanding extensibility
3. Balanced Consideration: Extensibility must be balanced against other quality attributes such as performance, safety, and predictability

Challenges and Trade-offs

Costs of Extensibility

1. Performance Impact: Abstraction and extensibility in Java and C# result in lower performance compared to C
2. Security Risks: User-developed extensions may introduce security vulnerabilities
3. Increased Complexity: May lead to language bloat and context-specific solutions
4. Abstraction Leakage: Abstractions in most languages leak implementation details

Design Recommendations

• Extensibility should be an integrated part of holistic language design
• Language engineers should consider the challenges emphasized
• Balance must be found between extensibility and other quality attributes

Future Directions

1. Deeper Exploration: Concepts such as bootstrapping, compiler hooks, and virtual machines require further research
2. Theory Development: Clearer definitions and theoretical foundations for extensibility are needed
3. Practical Application: More concrete extensibility design guidance for language designers

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Systematicity: First systematic literature review and classification of extensibility in programming languages
2. Clear Framework: Provides a clear analytical framework of four themes plus two cross-cutting properties
3. High Practical Value: Provides valuable references and guidance for language designers
4. Rigorous Methodology: Employs standard systematic literature review methods with transparent and traceable processes
5. Broad Coverage: Encompasses multiple languages and technologies from historical to modern

Limitations

1. Definition Ambiguity: While identifying the ambiguity in extensibility definitions, the paper itself fails to provide more precise definitions
2. Insufficient Empirical Evidence: Lacks quantitative empirical research, relying primarily on qualitative analysis
3. Evaluation Standards: Lacks objective standards for evaluating the effectiveness of different extensibility mechanisms
4. Scope Limitations: Exclusion of some important conferences may miss relevant research
5. Researcher Bias: Single-researcher analysis may introduce subjective bias

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new research perspectives and frameworks for the programming languages research field
2. Practical Value: Significant reference value for language designers and tool developers
3. Inspirational Significance: May inspire further in-depth research on language extensibility
4. Educational Value: Can serve as important reference material for programming language courses

Applicable Scenarios

1. Language Design: Design of new programming languages and improvements to existing languages
2. Tool Development: Design of extension mechanisms for development tools such as IDEs and compilers
3. Academic Research: Further research in programming language theory and practice
4. Education and Training: Development of programming language courses and training materials

References

The paper contains 135 references covering multiple aspects including programming language history, design principles, and concrete implementations, providing a comprehensive literature foundation for extensibility research. Key references include:

• Standish (1975): Early work on extensible programming language design
• Steele (1998): Important perspectives on language growth
• Various HOPL papers: Provide valuable resources on language history and design ideas

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality survey paper that provides an important theoretical framework and practical guidance for research on programming language extensibility. Despite some limitations, its systematic approach and clear analytical framework make it a significant contribution to the field. It holds important reference value for language designers, researchers, and students alike.