Search potential for $\tilde{b}_{1} \rightarrow t W \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ via $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}$ at the LHC and HL-LHC, with multi-lepton signatures

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13355
• Title: Search potential for $\tilde{b}_{1} \rightarrow t W \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ via $\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}$ at the LHC and HL-LHC, with multi-lepton signatures
• Authors: Alexandra Tudorache, Otilia Ducu (Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering)
• Classification: hep-ex (High Energy Physics - Experiment), hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13355

Abstract

This study explores the discovery potential for sbottom pair production through multi-lepton final states at LHC Run-3 and HL-LHC under R-parity conservation. In this model, the sbottom decays via chargino: $\tilde{b}_1 \to t \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ (branching ratio 100%), with the chargino subsequently decaying to a W boson and the lightest neutralino: $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm \to W \tilde{\chi}_1^0$ (branching ratio 100%). The study considers two LSP mass configurations: a fixed value of 50 GeV, and a scenario where $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ is 100 GeV heavier than $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. Results are presented as exclusion limits in the $\tilde{b}_1$-$\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ and $\tilde{b}_1$-$\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ mass planes, covering three center-of-mass energies and three integrated luminosity scenarios. At HL-LHC, sbottom masses up to 1.28 TeV can be excluded depending on the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass assumption.

Research Background and Motivation

Theoretical Background

1. Importance of Supersymmetry: Supersymmetry (SUSY) is one of the most promising theoretical extensions of the Standard Model, addressing the gauge hierarchy problem and the nature of dark matter through the introduction of a superpartner spectrum.
2. Challenges in Sbottom Searches: As the supersymmetric partner of the bottom quark, sbottom searches face complex decay chains and background suppression challenges, particularly in compressed mass spectrum scenarios.
3. Advantages of Multi-lepton Final States: Multi-lepton final states provide relatively clean experimental signals with reduced backgrounds, particularly suitable for SUSY particle searches via electroweak decays.

Research Motivation

1. Extension of Existing Analyses: Building upon ATLAS's existing 4-lepton and same-sign/three-lepton analyses, exploring search potential under different mass configurations
2. Future Prospects: Providing guidance for SUSY search strategies at LHC Run-3 and HL-LHC
3. Parameter Space Exploration: Systematically investigating exclusion capabilities under different center-of-mass energies and integrated luminosity conditions

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Parameter Space Study: First systematic comparison of search sensitivity for two different LSP mass configurations in multi-lepton final states
2. Unified Multi-Analysis Framework: Reinterpretation of ATLAS's 4-lepton analysis and 2-lepton same-sign/3-lepton analysis within a unified framework
3. Future Projection Predictions: Detailed exclusion limit predictions for LHC Run-3 (13.6 TeV) and HL-LHC (14 TeV) conditions
4. Complementarity Analysis: Revealing complementarity between different signal regions and analysis strategies, particularly in compressed mass spectrum regions
5. Optimization Strategy Recommendations: Providing concrete technical recommendations for future analysis optimization, including machine learning applications

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The research objective is to assess experimental sensitivity for sbottom pair production searches through multi-lepton final states in R-parity conserving SUSY models. Input consists of various SUSY particle mass configurations, with output being mass exclusion limits at a given confidence level.

Model Architecture

Physics Model

The study considers two scenarios:

• Scenario 1: $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm} = m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0} + 100$ GeV (ensuring on-shell W boson)
• Scenario 2: $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0} = 50$ GeV fixed, with $m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm}$ varying independently

Decay Chain

pp → $\tilde{b}_1\tilde{b}_1$ → $t\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm t\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ → $tW\tilde{\chi}_1^0 tW\tilde{\chi}_1^0$

Kinematic Constraints

• Two-body decay condition: $m_{\tilde{b}_1} > m_t + m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm} = 172.76$ GeV $+ m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm}$
• Three-body decay condition: $m_{\tilde{b}_1} > m_W + m_b + m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm} = 84.56$ GeV $+ m_{\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm}$

Simulation Framework

Event Generation

1. MadGraph5_aMC_v3.5.5: Computing matrix elements for sbottom pair production
2. Pythia8: Handling parton shower, hadronization, and SUSY particle decays
3. DELPHES: Fast simulation of ATLAS detector

Analysis Framework

1. SimpleAnalysis: Implementing ATLAS physics object definitions and event selection
2. Signal Region Definition:
   • 4-lepton analysis: SR0$^{\text{loose}}_{\text{bveto}}$, SR0$^{\text{tight}}_{\text{bveto}}$, SR0$_{\text{breq}}$
   • 2-lepton same-sign/3-lepton analysis: Rpc2L1b, Rpc2L2b

Technical Innovations

1. Mass Configuration Comparison: Systematic comparison of search sensitivity between fixed LSP mass and relative mass difference configurations
2. Signal Region Optimization: Enhancing search sensitivity through combination of different signal regions (e.g., SR$_{\text{comb}}$)
3. Kinematic Distribution Analysis: Detailed analysis of kinematic features at different mass points, guiding signal region optimization
4. Background Uncertainty Modeling: Accounting for improved background measurement precision under future high-luminosity conditions

Experimental Setup

Dataset and Simulation Parameters

• Center-of-mass Energy: 13 TeV (Run-2), 13.6 TeV (Run-3), 14 TeV (HL-LHC)
• Integrated Luminosity: 139 fb$^{-1}$, 300 fb$^{-1}$, 3000 fb$^{-1}$
• Sbottom Mass Range: 600-1700 GeV
• LSP/Chargino Mass Range: 50-1425 GeV

Physics Object Definition

• Lepton Selection:
  • 4-lepton analysis: electrons $p_T > 7$ GeV, muons $p_T > 5$ GeV
  • 2-lepton same-sign/3-lepton analysis: leading two leptons $p_T > 20$ GeV, remaining leptons $p_T > 10$ GeV
• Jet Reconstruction: anti-$k_t$ algorithm, $R = 0.4$
• b-tagging: 70% efficiency working point, $p_T > 20$ GeV

Evaluation Metrics

Signal significance $Z$ value is used to assess search sensitivity:

$Z = \pm\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{n\ln\frac{n(b + \sigma^2)}{b^2 + n\sigma^2} - \frac{b^2}{\sigma^2}\ln\frac{b^2 + n\sigma^2}{b(b + \sigma^2)}}$

where $n$ is the number of observed events, $b$ is the expected background events, and $\sigma$ is its uncertainty. $Z = 1.64$ corresponds to the 95% confidence level exclusion threshold.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Benchmark Point Analysis

Using four representative mass points as examples: (750, 625, 50), (750, 550, 50), (750, 400, 50), (750, 50, 50) GeV, the analysis shows:

1. Event Acceptance: Approximately 0.6-1.0% for 4-lepton final states, 3-8% for 2-lepton same-sign final states
2. Kinematic Features:
   • Compressed mass spectrum region: softer lepton and b-jet momenta, lower $E_T^{\text{miss}}$
   • Enhanced region: high jet energy (>300-400 GeV), but relatively low $E_T^{\text{miss}}$

Exclusion Limit Results

Analysis Comparison

1. 4-lepton vs 2-lepton same-sign/3-lepton Analysis:
   • 2-lepton same-sign/3-lepton analysis shows overall stronger sensitivity
   • 4-lepton analysis performs better in $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm < 150$ GeV region (no strict $E_T^{\text{miss}}$ requirement)
2. Scenario 1 vs Scenario 2:
   • Scenario 2 (fixed LSP mass) typically yields stronger exclusion limits
   • Larger mass splitting leads to harder kinematic distributions

Signal Region Complementarity

Different signal regions demonstrate good complementarity:

• Combination of SR0$^{\text{loose}}_{\text{bveto}}$ and SR0$_{\text{breq}}$ extends exclusion range by approximately 50 GeV
• Rpc2L2b performs better in large mass splitting region, Rpc2L1b dominates in other regions

Related Work

ATLAS SUSY Searches

This study builds upon multiple SUSY search analyses from the ATLAS collaboration:

1. ATLAS-CONF-2021-067: 4-lepton final state SUSY search
2. JHEP 06 (2020) 046: Same-sign lepton and jet final state search
3. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40 (2025) 2450172: Preliminary sbottom search work

CMS Related Work

The CMS collaboration employed a similar fixed LSP mass approach in Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 752, providing reference for Scenario 2 in this study.

Theoretical Framework

The study employs standardized cross section calculations and SUSY parameter settings provided by the LHC SUSY Cross Section Working Group.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Search Potential: At HL-LHC conditions (3000 fb$^{-1}$, 14 TeV), sbottom masses up to 1.28 TeV can be excluded
2. Mass Configuration Impact: Fixed LSP mass configuration (Scenario 2) typically provides better search sensitivity
3. Analysis Complementarity: 4-lepton analysis possesses unique advantages in compressed mass spectrum regions
4. Signal Region Optimization: Combining different signal regions significantly enhances search sensitivity

Limitations

1. Theoretical Assumptions: The study assumes specific decay chains with 100% branching ratios; actual SUSY models may be more complex
2. Background Modeling: Simplified background uncertainty scaling employed; actual scenarios may differ
3. Systematic Uncertainties: Insufficient consideration of theoretical and experimental systematic uncertainty evolution
4. Signal Region Optimization: Uses signal regions optimized for Run-2; not re-optimized for high-luminosity conditions

Future Directions

1. Machine Learning Applications: Utilizing ML techniques to optimize signal region definition and background suppression
2. Soft Object Reconstruction: Developing soft b-tagging and low-$p_T$ lepton reconstruction techniques
3. ISR Tagging: Employing ISR jet tagging techniques in compressed mass spectrum regions
4. Joint Analysis: Global fitting combining multiple final states and analysis strategies

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Systematicity: Comprehensive comparison of search sensitivity across different mass configurations, energies, and luminosity conditions
2. Solid Technique: Employs standardized simulation framework and analysis tools, ensuring reliable results
3. High Practical Value: Provides concrete search strategy guidance for future LHC operations
4. In-depth Analysis: Detailed kinematic analysis provides important insights into signal characteristics
5. Complementarity Study: Revealing complementarity between different analysis strategies has important methodological value

Weaknesses

1. Model Limitations: Considers only specific SUSY decay modes, lacking broader model coverage
2. Insufficient Optimization: Signal regions not re-optimized for high-luminosity conditions
3. Simplified Uncertainty Handling: Background uncertainty treatment overly simplified
4. Experimental Realism: Some assumptions (e.g., 100% branching ratios) may be overly idealized

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important experimental sensitivity predictions for SUSY phenomenology research
2. Experimental Guidance: Directly references future analysis strategies for ATLAS and CMS
3. Methodological Innovation: Unified reinterpretation of multi-analysis frameworks has methodological value
4. Reproducibility: Uses standard tools and public data, results easily verifiable and extensible

Applicable Scenarios

1. Experimental Collaborations: ATLAS, CMS, and other experimental groups' SUSY search analysis optimization
2. Theoretical Research: Experimental constraint assessment in SUSY phenomenology studies
3. Future Colliders: Reference for physics potential assessment at future high-energy colliders
4. Educational Research: Typical case study for particle physics experimental analysis methods

References

This study primarily builds upon the following key literature:

1. ATLAS Collaboration, "Search for supersymmetry in events with four or more charged leptons...", JHEP 07 (2021) 167
2. ATLAS Collaboration, "Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with same-sign leptons...", JHEP 06 (2020) 046
3. O. Ducu, "Experimental search potential for sbottom via χ±₁ decays...", Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40 (2025) 2450172
4. LHC SUSY Cross Section Working Group materials and standardized cross section calculations

This study provides important theoretical guidance for SUSY searches at the LHC and HL-LHC, particularly regarding sbottom searches in multi-lepton final states. Its systematic analysis methodology and detailed sensitivity predictions hold significant value for the experimental physics community.