An Enhanced Shifted QR Algorithm for Efficient Eigenvalue Computation of Square Non-Hermitian Matrices

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13409
• Title: An Enhanced Shifted QR Algorithm for Efficient Eigenvalue Computation of Square Non-Hermitian Matrices
• Authors: Chahat Ahuja (IIIT Delhi), Partha Chowdhury (IIIT Delhi), Subhashree Mohapatra (IIIT Delhi)
• Classification: math.NA (Numerical Analysis), cs.NA (Computational Mathematics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13409

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel approach based on an enhanced shifted QR algorithm for computing eigenvalues of non-Hermitian matrices. Existing QR algorithms exhibit slow convergence when handling non-Hermitian matrices, whereas the proposed method significantly accelerates convergence speed while maintaining computational accuracy. Although primarily focused on medium to large-scale non-Hermitian matrices, the algorithm demonstrates substantial improvements even on larger matrices (such as 50×50).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The eigenvalue problem involves finding a scalar λ and vector v such that Av = λv. When matrices become extremely large or ill-conditioned, eigenvalue computation faces convergence difficulties.

Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: Eigenvalue computation is a fundamental problem in linear algebra and numerical analysis
2. Practical Value: Widely applicable in quantum computing, spectral clustering, large-scale numerical solutions of differential equations, and other fields

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Hermitian Matrix Advantages: For Hermitian matrices where A = A^H, efficient QR algorithms exist due to favorable spectral properties (real eigenvalues, orthogonal eigenvectors)
2. Non-Hermitian Matrix Challenges: Complex eigenvalues and non-orthogonal eigenvectors make the problem significantly more complicated
3. Convergence Issues: Existing algorithms converge slowly on non-Hermitian matrices with insufficient accuracy

Research Motivation

To develop fast and efficient algorithms for computing eigenvalues of non-Hermitian matrices while ensuring numerical stability, through advanced shifting strategies and early deflation techniques to reduce computational complexity.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Enhanced Shifted QR Algorithm: Combines Wilkinson shift strategy with early deflation techniques, significantly accelerating eigenvalue computation convergence for non-Hermitian matrices
2. Enhanced Numerical Stability: Integrates balancing steps to minimize rounding error sensitivity during iterations
3. Optimized Computational Complexity: Progressively reduces matrix dimensions through efficient deflation of converged eigenvalues
4. Verified Scalability: Validates algorithm performance across matrices of varying dimensions (3×3 to 50×50), demonstrating increasingly pronounced advantages with larger matrix sizes

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

Given an n×n non-Hermitian matrix A ∈ C^(n×n), compute eigenvalues λ₁, λ₂, ..., λₙ ∈ C such that:

Avᵢ = λᵢvᵢ, ∀ i = 1, 2, ..., n

where vᵢ ∈ C^n are the corresponding eigenvectors.

Algorithm Architecture

Classical QR Algorithm Review

The classical QR algorithm achieves convergence through iterative decomposition:

Aₖ = QR
Aₖ₊₁ = RQ

Shifted QR Algorithm

Introduces shift σₖ to accelerate convergence:

Aₖ = QₖRₖ
Aₖ₊₁ = RₖQₖ + σₖI

Wilkinson Shift Strategy

Let B denote the 2×2 lower-right submatrix of A^(k). The Wilkinson shift is defined as:

μ = aₘ - sign(δ)b²ₘ₋₁/(|δ| + √(δ² + b²ₘ₋₁))

where δ = (aₘ₋₁ - aₘ)/2

Deflation Technique

When subdiagonal elements fall below a tolerance threshold (≈10^(-12)), extract the corresponding eigenvalue and reduce matrix dimension:

[λ₁  *   *  ]
[0   λ₂  *  ] → Extract λ₃, reduce matrix to 2×2
[0   0   λ₃]

Technical Innovations

1. Integrated Wilkinson Shift: Ensures rapid convergence toward dominant eigenvalues
2. Early Deflation Strategy: Removes converged eigenvalues after each iteration, progressively reducing computational scale
3. Numerical Balancing: Incorporates balancing steps to ensure numerical stability
4. Adaptive Tolerance Control: Uses convergence tolerance ε and deflation tolerance δ to precisely control algorithm behavior

Experimental Setup

Test Matrices

• Small-scale: 3×3 randomly generated non-Hermitian matrices
• Medium-scale: 7×7 randomly generated non-Hermitian matrices
• Large-scale: 50×50 randomly generated non-Hermitian matrices

Evaluation Metrics

1. Convergence Iteration Count: Number of iterations required for algorithm convergence
2. Subdiagonal Norm Convergence: Speed of matrix transformation toward diagonal form (logarithmic scale)
3. Deflation Count: Number of matrix dimension reductions during algorithm execution

Comparison Methods

• Classical QR algorithm
• Shifted QR algorithm
• Adaptive shifted QR algorithm
• Implicit double-shift QR algorithm
• Improved QR algorithm

Implementation Details

• Maximum Iterations: kₘₐₓ
• Convergence Tolerance: ε = 10^(-10)
• Deflation Tolerance: δ = 10^(-12)
• Programming Implementation: Python, open-source code available on GitHub

Experimental Results

Primary Results

3×3 Matrix Performance

• Enhanced Shifted QR: 6 iterations to convergence
• Adaptive Shifted QR: 41 iterations
• Shifted QR: 24 iterations
• Performance Improvement: 75%-85% convergence acceleration

7×7 Matrix Performance

• Enhanced Shifted QR: 18 iterations to convergence
• Traditional QR Methods: 50-100 iterations
• Improved QR: Similar performance but still inferior
• Performance Improvement: 64%-82% convergence acceleration

50×50 Matrix Performance

• Enhanced Shifted QR: Significantly fewer than 100 iterations
• Traditional Methods: Require 100+ iterations
• Large-scale Advantage: Performance advantage becomes more pronounced with increasing matrix dimensions

Convergence Behavior Analysis

Subdiagonal norm convergence plots demonstrate that the enhanced shifted QR method exhibits the steepest descent trend, indicating rapid matrix transformation to diagonal form.

Experimental Findings

1. Excellent Scalability: Algorithm advantages become more pronounced as matrix dimensions increase
2. Numerical Stability: Maintains computational accuracy while achieving rapid convergence
3. Strong Generality: Demonstrates superior performance across various types of random non-Hermitian matrices

Complexity Analysis

Time Complexity

• Single Iteration: O(n³) (QR decomposition complexity)
• Overall Complexity: Worst-case O(n⁴), typically O(n³) in practice
• Convergence Iterations: Usually O(n) iterations in practice

Space Complexity

• Storage Requirements: O(n²) (storage for matrices Q and R)
• In-place Operations: Direct modification of input matrix A, saving space

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Francis and Kublanovskaya: Established foundations for modern QR algorithm implementation
2. Batterson: Analyzed convergence properties of shifted QR algorithms for 3×3 standard matrices
3. Calvetti: Proposed restarted QR algorithm, enhancing numerical stability through periodic restarts

Modern Improvements

1. Braman et al.: Introduced aggressive early deflation techniques, significantly reducing computational cost of multi-shift QR algorithms
2. Su: Investigated convergence characteristics of multi-shift QR algorithms for symmetric tridiagonal matrices
3. Ahues and Tisseur: Proposed new deflation criteria enhancing robustness of multi-shift QR iterations

Contributions of This Work

Building upon existing research, this paper's algorithm synthesizes optimal shift strategies, early deflation, and numerical balancing techniques, specifically optimized for non-Hermitian matrices.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Significant Performance Improvement: Substantially reduced iteration count compared to traditional methods
2. Good Scalability: Advantages become more pronounced for high-dimensional matrices
3. Numerical Stability: Maintains computational accuracy and robustness

Limitations

1. Limited Test Scope: Primarily tested on randomly generated matrices, lacking validation on structured matrices
2. Theoretical Analysis: Lacks rigorous theoretical proof of convergence
3. Memory Constraints: O(n²) space complexity may become a bottleneck for extremely large-scale matrices

Future Directions

1. Parallel Computing Optimization: Adaptation to high-performance computing environments
2. Adaptive Shift Strategies: Heuristic methods for dynamic shift selection
3. Extended Applications: Processing of non-square and structured matrices
4. Theoretical Refinement: Theoretical analysis of convergence and stability

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: Effectively combines multiple techniques to solve non-Hermitian matrix eigenvalue computation challenges
2. Comprehensive Experiments: Multi-dimensional matrix testing validates algorithm effectiveness
3. High Practical Value: Significant performance improvements have important application value
4. Open-source Implementation: Provides Python code enhancing reproducibility

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Foundation: Lacks rigorous convergence theory analysis
2. Test Limitations: Primarily tested on random matrices, insufficient validation on practical application matrices
3. Limited Baselines: Relatively limited comparison methods, lacking comparison with latest algorithms
4. Parameter Sensitivity: Insufficient analysis of tolerance parameter effects on algorithm performance

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new efficient methods for non-Hermitian matrix eigenvalue computation
2. Practical Value: Significant application potential in quantum computing, machine learning, and other fields
3. Reproducibility: Open-source code and detailed algorithm descriptions facilitate verification and improvement

Applicable Scenarios

1. Scientific Computing: Eigenvalue problems in large-scale numerical simulations
2. Machine Learning: Principal component analysis, spectral clustering algorithms
3. Quantum Computing: Eigenvalue computation of quantum system Hamiltonians
4. Engineering Applications: Structural analysis, vibration mode analysis

References

The paper cites 11 relevant references covering classical QR algorithm theory, modern improvements, and applications, providing solid theoretical foundation for algorithm design. Key references include Watkins' comprehensive survey on QR-type algorithms, improvements by Braman et al. on multi-shift QR algorithms, and Parlett's theoretical work on convergence conditions for Hessenberg matrix QR algorithms.