On the Flexibility Potential of a Swiss Distribution Grid: Opportunities and Limitations

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13449
• Title: On the Flexibility Potential of a Swiss Distribution Grid: Opportunities and Limitations
• Authors: Jan Brändle, Julie Rousseau, Pulkit Nahata, Gabriela Hug (ETH Zürich)
• Classification: eess.SY (Systems and Control), cs.SY (Systems and Control)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13449

Abstract

With the rapid development of distributed renewable energy generation, heating and transportation electrification, the number of flexible devices in modern distribution grids has increased dramatically. Effective utilization of the aggregated flexibility of small-scale distributed resources is crucial for maintaining future grid stability. This study analyzes the aggregated flexibility potential of distribution grids using the Walenstadt distribution network in Switzerland as a case study. The research demonstrates that the integration of devices such as heat pumps and photovoltaic systems significantly enhances distribution grid flexibility. The paper explores the time-varying characteristics of aggregated flexibility, highlighting seasonal variation patterns. Furthermore, future scenario simulations reveal that aggregated flexibility does not grow linearly or monotonically with increasing penetration rates of flexible devices, primarily due to individual feeder congestion issues, underscoring the critical impact of grid topology and network constraints on aggregated flexibility potential.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problems

Modern distribution grids face several key challenges:

• Rapid growth of distributed generation
• Electrification trends in heating and transportation
• Increased system load and heightened uncertainty in generation and consumption
• Increased difficulty in maintaining system stability

2. Problem Significance

Effective utilization of flexible resources is critical for power systems:

• Maintaining balance between generation and consumption
• Supporting stable grid operation
• Participating in balancing markets to provide ancillary services
• Addressing intermittency challenges of renewable energy

3. Limitations of Existing Approaches

Current research exhibits the following shortcomings:

• Heavy reliance on simulation and synthetic data
• Use of artificial network topologies
• Neglect of network topology effects
• Failure to consider time-varying characteristics of loads and generation
• Lack of validation using real distribution grid cases

4. Research Motivation

This paper aims to provide realistic insights into distribution grid flexibility potential through real-world case studies, bridging the gap between theoretical research and practical applications.

Core Contributions

1. Device-level modeling based on real data: Designs device models utilizing historical actual consumption, generation, and device-level data to realistically simulate distribution grid operation
2. Flexibility analysis of Walenstadt medium-voltage distribution network: Calculates and analyzes flexibility of the real distribution grid, particularly time-varying characteristics of flexibility across daily and seasonal timescales
3. Assessment of flexibility evolution under future scenarios: Evaluates how grid flexibility evolves with increased device electrification, highlighting the role of topology and network constraints
4. Introduction of FFOR concept: Proposes the Feasible Flexibility Operating Region (FFOR) concept for improved multi-timestep flexibility visualization

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Distribution grid topology, device parameters, historical operational data, meteorological data

Output: Aggregated flexibility region of the distribution grid at the point of common coupling (PCC)

Constraints: Device technical constraints, network power flow constraints, voltage constraints, energy constraints

Model Architecture

1. Individual Flexible Device Modeling

Battery Energy Storage System (BESS):

• Power constraint: $\sqrt{P_s^2 + Q_s^2} \leq S_{s,max}$
• State-of-charge (SOC) dynamics: $SoC_s^{t+1} = SoC_s^t - \frac{\Delta t P_s^t}{C_s}$
• SOC range: $SoC_{min} \leq SoC_s^t \leq SoC_{max}$

Photovoltaic Systems:

• Active power can be regulated between zero and maximum output
• Reactive power is controllable within defined power factor ranges
• Maximum output varies with solar irradiance

Controllable Loads (Heat Pumps):

• Operate at fixed power factor
• Thermodynamic model: $T_c^{t+1} = T_c^t + \frac{P_{flex,c}^t}{P_{base,c}^t} q_{heat} \Delta t$
• Temperature constraints ensure user comfort

2. Distribution Grid Modeling

Employs linearized power flow equations: $\begin{bmatrix} P^t \\ Q^t \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} P_{ref} \\ Q_{ref} \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} J_{P\theta} & J_{PU} \\ J_{Q\theta} & J_{QU} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \theta^t \\ \Delta U^t \end{bmatrix}$

Constraints include:

• Line capacity constraints: $\sqrt{P_{ik}^2 + Q_{ik}^2} \leq S_{ik,max}$
• Voltage limits: $U_{min} \leq U_i^t \leq U_{max}$

3. FFOR Computation Method

Single-timestep FFOR: Constructs a polytope through iterative optimization: $\min_{P_{pcc}^t, Q_{pcc}^t} \alpha(P_{pcc}^t - P_{base,pcc}^t) + \beta(Q_{pcc}^t - Q_{base,pcc}^t)$ Subject to device constraints, power flow models, and line constraints.

Multi-timestep FFOR: Considers energy coupling constraints and computes sustainable constant power deviations: $\min_{P_{pcc}, Q_{pcc}} \alpha P_{pcc}^{flex,d} + \beta Q_{pcc}^{flex,d}$ Incorporates SOC and temperature constraints to ensure sustained flexibility provision.

Technical Innovations

1. FFOR concept: Compared to traditional FOR, FFOR centers on baseline operation, facilitating flexibility visualization across multiple timesteps
2. Real data-driven modeling: Infers device capacities and distributions from historical data through correlation analysis
3. Multi-timescale analysis: Simultaneously considers short-term capacity constraints and long-term energy constraints
4. Explicit topology constraint modeling: Accurately reflects network topology's limiting effects on aggregated flexibility

Experimental Setup

Dataset

Walenstadt Distribution Network:

• Service population: 5,000+ people
• Voltage levels: 16 kV medium voltage, 400 V low voltage
• Equipment: Numerous photovoltaic installations, heat pumps, 3 utility-level battery storage systems
• Topology: Typical radial structure with single PCC

Measurement Data (Table I):

• Substation: 15-minute resolution active power, apparent power, voltage magnitude, current magnitude
• Photovoltaic generation: 15-minute resolution total generation
• Meteorological data: Ambient temperature, solar irradiance

Evaluation Metrics

• Active/reactive power flexibility magnitude
• Sustainable flexibility duration
• Seasonal variation characteristics
• Device penetration rate impact

Device Capacity Inference Method

Photovoltaic capacity: Analyzes linear correlation between nodal net active power and solar irradiance

Heat pump capacity: Analyzes polynomial relationship between nodal average net active power and ambient temperature during non-solar periods

Implementation Details

• Voltage limits: 0.95-1.05 p.u.
• BESS operating SOC range: 0.4-0.8
• Time resolution: 15 minutes
• Polytope approximation: Regular polygon approximation of nonlinear constraints

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Flexibility Characteristics Analysis (Figure 6)

Case study: September 1, 2021, 14:00:

• FFOR exhibits asymmetry: PV can only reduce output, not increase, causing asymmetric active power flexibility
• Duration effects: Short-term flexibility constrained by capacity, long-term flexibility by energy constraints
• 15-minute flexibility: +6 p.u. / -8 p.u.
• 8-hour sustained flexibility: +2 p.u. / -4 p.u.

2. Heat Pump Flexibility Contribution (Figure 7)

Comparison: November 1, 2021, 19:00:

• Heat pumps significantly enhance flexibility: positive flexibility increases by 0.5 p.u., negative flexibility by 1 p.u. (2-hour duration)
• Heat pump flexibility contribution even exceeds large BESS capacity
• Short-term flexibility gains are asymmetric: constrained by baseline demand and device capacity

3. Seasonal Variation (Figure 8)

Flexibility evolution September-December:

• Winter flexibility increases significantly: heat pump operation provides greater regulation space
• Summer nighttime flexibility is lowest: primarily dependent on BESS
• Daily variation is pronounced: related to load patterns and meteorological conditions

4. Future Scenario Analysis (Figure 9)

Heat pump penetration rate impact:

• Positive flexibility: increases monotonically with heat pump additions, but with decreasing growth rate
• Negative flexibility: exhibits non-monotonic behavior, potentially decreasing
• Key finding: flexibility does not scale linearly with device count

Ablation Studies

Comparative experiments with/without heat pumps quantify the contribution of small-scale distributed flexible resources, demonstrating their importance is comparable to large-scale storage devices.

Case Analysis

Topology constraint effects:

• Upstream feeder constraints limit downstream device flexibility transfer to PCC
• When baseline operation approaches line limits, adding further devices may reduce flexibility
• A single constrained line can prevent device-level flexibility from converting to grid-level flexibility

Experimental Discoveries

1. Nonlinear flexibility characteristics: Aggregated flexibility varies nonlinearly and non-monotonically with device penetration rates
2. Topology dependency: Grid topology and network constraints are determining factors for flexibility potential
3. Time-varying characteristics: Flexibility exhibits significant temporal and seasonal variations
4. Value of small-scale devices: Aggregated small-scale distributed devices can produce flexibility comparable to large-scale storage

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Flexibility quantification methods:
   • Minkowski sum method: Precise but computationally complex, difficult to integrate grid constraints
   • Monte Carlo techniques: Require extensive simulation, may underestimate FOR
   • OPF-based methods: Can explicitly represent grid constraints, computationally efficient
2. FOR computation:
   • Nonlinear AC-OPF: High fidelity but significant computational challenges
   • Linearized power flow: Simplified but reduced accuracy

Advantages of This Work

• Uses real distribution grid and historical data
• Considers time-varying characteristics and network topology
• Proposes FFOR concept for improved visualization
• Provides in-depth analysis of topology constraint effects

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Significant flexibility enhancement: Heat pumps, photovoltaic systems, and other devices significantly extend distribution grid flexibility, with aggregation effects comparable to large-scale storage
2. Time-varying and seasonal characteristics: Flexibility exhibits pronounced temporal variations and seasonal differences, with greater flexibility in winter
3. Nonlinear growth pattern: Flexibility does not scale linearly with device penetration rates, constrained by network topology and constraints
4. Critical role of topology constraints: A single constrained line can significantly limit overall flexibility potential

Limitations

1. Modeling simplifications: Employs linearized power flow model with reduced accuracy
2. Device models: Device parameters inferred from correlation analysis, introducing uncertainty
3. LV network: Low-voltage network modeled as aggregated load, lacking detailed representation
4. User behavior: Insufficient consideration of user behavior effects on flexibility

Future Directions

1. Grid reinforcement vs. flexibility trade-offs: Study trade-offs between using device-level flexibility to defer grid reinforcement versus strategic reinforcement to enhance flexibility
2. Improved modeling: Enhance device parameter inference methods to improve modeling accuracy
3. Multi-level coordination: Investigate TSO/DSO coordination mechanisms
4. Market mechanisms: Explore mechanism design for flexible resources participating in electricity markets

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High practical value: Based on real distribution grid cases, results provide strong practical guidance
2. Methodological innovation: FFOR concept and historical data-based device modeling methods are innovative
3. Comprehensive analysis: Rich analytical dimensions from time-varying characteristics, seasonal variations to future scenarios
4. Important findings: Reveals nonlinear flexibility growth and critical role of topology constraints with significant theoretical value
5. Clear presentation: Well-structured paper with clear figures, accurate expression

Weaknesses

1. Modeling accuracy: Linearized power flow and correlation-based parameter inference may affect result accuracy
2. Case limitations: Based on single distribution grid case, generalizability requires validation
3. Insufficient comparison: Lacks detailed comparison with other flexibility quantification methods
4. Uncertainty discussion: Insufficient discussion of parameter uncertainty effects on results
5. Validation gaps: Lacks actual flexibility activation validation

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Provides important empirical support and methodological innovation for distribution grid flexibility research
2. Practical value: Offers important reference for distribution grid planning and operation
3. Policy implications: Provides guidance for Swiss energy transition policies
4. Reproducibility: Detailed method description ensures good reproducibility

Applicable Scenarios

1. Distribution grid planning: Assess flexibility resource impacts on distribution grid planning
2. Operational optimization: Guide real-time distribution grid operation and flexibility scheduling
3. Market design: Provide technical foundation for distributed resource participation in electricity markets
4. Policy formulation: Support energy transition and electrification policy development

References

This paper cites 11 important references, primarily covering:

• Flexibility quantification methods 2-7
• Distribution grid modeling and optimization 4-5
• Swiss energy policy and data 8-11
• Demand response and heat pump modeling 10-11

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality distribution grid flexibility research paper that provides important empirical insights through real-world case studies. The paper features methodological innovation, in-depth analysis, and conclusions with significant theoretical and practical value. Despite certain limitations in modeling accuracy and case generalizability, its contributions are substantial, significantly advancing both research and practical applications in distribution grid flexibility.