2025-11-18T20:16:14.046679

Characterizing rectifiability via biLipschitz pieces of Lipschitz mappings on the space

Li, Schul
We give the following characterization of rectifiable metric spaces. A metric space with positive lower Hausdorff density is rectifiable if and only if, for any subset $F$ and $f:F\to Y$, a Lipschitz map into a metric space with positive measure image (of the same dimension), there exists a positive measure subset $A\subset F$ so that $f$ is biLipschitz on $A$. We also give a characterization in terms of a full biLipschitz decomposition. These characterizations are new even for subsets of Euclidean space. One of our tools is Alberti representations. On the way we give a method for constructing independent Alberti representations, which may be of independent interest. We use this to characterize unrectifiable metric spaces as those spaces for which there exist a positive measure subset $S$ and a Lipschitz map $ϕ$ into a lower dimensional Euclidean space so that $S$ is $\cH^1$-null with respect to all curve fragments that are quantitatively transversal to $ϕ$.
academic

Characterizing Rectifiability via BiLipschitz Pieces of Lipschitz Mappings on Metric Spaces

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.13525
  • Title: Characterizing rectifiability via biLipschitz pieces of Lipschitz mappings on metric spaces
  • Authors: Sean Li, Raanan Schul
  • Classification: math.MG (Metric Geometry), math.CA (Classical Analysis)
  • Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13525

Abstract

This paper provides a novel characterization of rectifiable metric spaces: a metric space with positive lower Hausdorff density is rectifiable if and only if for any subset FF and Lipschitz mapping f:FYf:F\to Y (mapping into a metric space with positive measure image), there exists a positive measure subset AFA\subset F such that ff is biLipschitz on AA. The paper also provides a characterization of complete biLipschitz decompositions. These characterizations are new even for subsets of Euclidean space. The authors employ Alberti representations as the primary tool and provide a method for constructing independent Alberti representations.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

  1. Central role of rectifiability theory: Rectifiability is a fundamental concept in geometric measure theory that characterizes the extent to which metric spaces locally resemble Euclidean space.
  2. Significance of biLipschitz decomposition: Kirchheim's classical result (Lemma 1.1) from 1994 shows that any Lipschitz mapping admits a biLipschitz decomposition, i.e., A=NiNEiA = N \cup \bigcup_{i\in\mathbb{N}} E_i, where Hp(f(N))=0\mathcal{H}^p(f(N)) = 0 and fEif|_{E_i} are all biLipschitz.
  3. Limitations of existing theory: While it is known that Lipschitz mappings on rectifiable spaces must admit biLipschitz decompositions, the converse characterization has been missing.

Research Motivation

  1. Seeking complete characterization: This paper aims to provide a complete characterization of rectifiability, namely to prove that the biLipschitz decomposition property is actually equivalent to rectifiability.
  2. Extending existing results: Le Donne, Li, and Rajala proved in 2017 that the Heisenberg group does not satisfy the biLipschitz decomposition property; this paper generalizes this observation to general non-rectifiable spaces.
  3. Innovation in tools: By developing Alberti representation theory, new tools are provided for studying geometric properties of metric spaces.

Core Contributions

  1. Main Theorem (Theorem 1.2): For a compact metric space XX, if 0<Hp(X)<0 < \mathcal{H}^p(X) < \infty and θp(X,x)>0\theta_*^p(X,x) > 0 for Hp\mathcal{H}^p-almost every xXx \in X, but XX is not pp-rectifiable, then there exist a positive measure set FXF \subset X and a Lipschitz mapping f:FYf: F \to Y such that Hdp(f(F))>0\mathcal{H}^p_d(f(F)) > 0 but fAf|_A is not biLipschitz for any positive measure AFA \subseteq F.
  2. Complete characterization of rectifiability (Corollaries 1.3 and 1.4): Two equivalent conditions for rectifiability are provided:
    • Existence of complete biLipschitz decomposition
    • Existence of single biLipschitz pieces
  3. Construction method for independent Alberti representations (Proposition 3.2): A systematic method for constructing independent Alberti representations is provided, which has independent value in geometric measure theory.
  4. Geometric characterization of non-rectifiable spaces (Theorem 1.6): Non-rectifiability is characterized geometrically via transverse curve pieces.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The core task of this paper is to characterize rectifiability of metric spaces. Specifically:

  • Input: Compact metric space (X,d)(X,d) satisfying 0<Hp(X)<0 < \mathcal{H}^p(X) < \infty and positive lower density condition
  • Output: Determine whether XX is pp-rectifiable
  • Constraints: Characterize via the biLipschitz decomposition property of Lipschitz mappings

Core Technical Framework

1. Application of Alberti Representation Theory

An Alberti representation decomposes a measure as an integral of measures on curve pieces: μ(B)=Γ(X)μγ(B)dP(γ)\mu(B) = \int_{\Gamma(X)} \mu_\gamma(B) dP(\gamma)

where PP is a probability measure on Γ(X)\Gamma(X) and μγ\mu_\gamma is the measure on curve γ\gamma.

2. Construction of Singular Sets

A family of singular sets D~(ϕ,κ)\tilde{D}(\phi,\kappa) is defined, containing all sets SS for which curve pieces transverse to Lipschitz mapping ϕ\phi have H1\mathcal{H}^1-measure zero: Tκ(ϕ)={γΓ(X):(ϕγ)(t)κLip(ϕ,γ(x))Lip(γ,x) a.e. t}T_\kappa(\phi) = \{\gamma \in \Gamma(X) : \|(\phi \circ \gamma)'(t)\| \leq \kappa \text{Lip}(\phi, \gamma(x)) \text{Lip}(\gamma, x) \text{ a.e. } t\}

3. Key Techniques in Metric Construction

For non-rectifiable spaces, a new metric dd is constructed through the following steps:

Step 1: Construction of shortcut path system

  • Define sequence {Sk}\{S_k\}, where each Sk={{xi,yi}}i=1mkS_k = \{\{x_i, y_i\}\}_{i=1}^{m_k} is a finite set of point pairs
  • Satisfy condition: yEϕ(x,θk)y \in E_\phi(x, \theta_k) (transverse cone condition)
  • Control scale: λk+1<min{x,y}Skρ(x,y)\lambda_{k+1} < \min_{\{x,y\} \in S_k} \rho(x,y)

Step 2: Define cost function

\alpha_k \rho(x,y) & \text{if } \{x,y\} \in S_k \\ \rho(x,y) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ where $\alpha_k \to 0$. **Step 3: Construct new metric** $$d(x,y) = \inf\{c(\mathbf{x}) : \mathbf{x} \in I(x,y)\}$$ where $I(x,y)$ denotes all paths from $x$ to $y$. ### Technical Innovations #### 1. Multi-scale Analysis Technique Unlike the homogeneous case in [LDLR17] for the Heisenberg group, the spaces considered here are not homogeneous, requiring scales to be collapsed according to location variation. This is achieved through careful construction of the sequence $\{\lambda_k\}$. #### 2. Utilization of Transverse Directions Unlike the "snowflaking" in the vertical direction for the Heisenberg group, this paper collapses points in directions exhibiting non-rectifiability, which are systematically identified through Alberti representation theory. #### 3. David-Semmes Regularity It is proved that the identity map $(F,\rho) \to (F,d)$ is David-Semmes regular (Proposition 6.1), i.e., there exists a constant $C$ such that: $$B_\rho(x,r) \subseteq B_d(x,r) \subseteq B_\rho(y_1,Cr) \cup B_\rho(y_2,Cr) \cup B_\rho(y_3,Cr)$$ ## Main Theorems and Proof Strategy ### Proof Structure of Theorem 1.2 The proof is divided into three key lemmas: **Lemma 7.1**: $(F,d)$ is a metric space - Prove $d(x,y) > 0$ for $x \neq y$ - Use Lemma 6.6 to control path length **Lemma 7.2**: $\mathcal{H}^p_d(F) > 0$ - Establish $\mathcal{H}^p_\rho(F) \lesssim \mathcal{H}^p_d(F)$ via David-Semmes regularity **Lemma 7.3**: For any positive measure $A \subseteq F$, $f|_A$ is not biLipschitz - Utilize the constructed shortcut path system - For density points $x$, find $y', z' \in A$ such that $\rho(y',z') \geq \frac{\beta}{2}r_B$ but $d(y',z') \leq \varepsilon \frac{2\beta+4}{\beta}\rho(y',z')$ ### Key Technical Lemmas **Lemma 4.2** (Lower bound estimate): Under transverse conditions, if a path uses sufficiently few "bad" shortcuts, the length of non-shortcut portions approaches the total distance. **Lemma 6.2** (Cost control): For paths $\mathbf{x}$ satisfying specific conditions, $\rho(x,y) \leq C_2 c(\mathbf{x})$. ## Related Work ### Historical Development 1. **Kirchheim (1994)**: Established biLipschitz decomposition theory for Lipschitz mappings 2. **David-Semmes (1997, 2000)**: Developed "looking down" theory and BPI space concepts 3. **Bate (2015, 2020)**: Important advances in Alberti representation theory 4. **Le Donne-Li-Rajala (2017)**: Proved counterexample for Heisenberg group ### Position of This Work This paper generalizes the specific counterexample in [LDLR17] to general theory, while developing systematic methods for constructing independent Alberti representations, providing new tools for geometric measure theory. ## Applications and Extensions ### Case of Euclidean Space **Theorem 1.7**: For a purely $p$-non-rectifiable subset $E \subset \mathbb{R}^P$, there exist $n$-dimensional planes $W_i$ such that $E$ can be decomposed as $E = \bigcup_i E_i$, where each $E_i$ is $\mathcal{H}^1$-measure zero for all biLipschitz curve pieces transverse to $W_i$. ### Open Problems **Problem 1.9**: Is a rectifiable BPI space the unique minimal "looking down" BPI space? **Problem 1.10**: Is the positive lower density assumption in Theorem 1.2 necessary? ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions This paper completely characterizes rectifiability of metric spaces: a metric space with positive lower Hausdorff density is rectifiable if and only if every Lipschitz mapping on it admits a biLipschitz decomposition. ### Theoretical Significance 1. **Unified rectifiability theory**: Establishes biLipschitz decomposition property as an equivalent characterization of rectifiability 2. **Developed new tools**: The construction method for Alberti representations has independent value 3. **Connected different fields**: Tightly links geometric measure theory with metric geometry ### Limitations 1. **Technical assumptions**: Requires positive lower Hausdorff density condition; its necessity is not fully determined 2. **Construction complexity**: The new metric construction involves complex multi-scale analysis 3. **Computational difficulty**: Practically verifying whether a given space is rectifiable remains difficult ### Future Directions 1. **Removing technical assumptions**: Investigate whether the positive lower density condition can be removed 2. **Algorithmic implementation**: Develop algorithms for practically determining rectifiability 3. **Broader applications**: Apply results to wider geometric and analytical problems ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical completeness**: Provides complete characterization of rectifiability, filling theoretical gaps 2. **Technical innovation**: Develops systematic methods for constructing independent Alberti representations 3. **Rigorous proofs**: Mathematical proofs are detailed and rigorous with fine technical handling 4. **Strong generality**: Results apply to general metric spaces, not limited to specific examples ### Weaknesses 1. **Readability challenges**: The paper is highly technical, requiring deep background in geometric measure theory 2. **Limited practical utility**: Primarily theoretical results with limited direct application scenarios 3. **Assumption conditions**: The necessity of certain technical assumptions requires further investigation ### Impact 1. **Academic value**: Provides important theoretical tools for geometric measure theory 2. **Inspirational significance**: Offers new perspectives for studying geometric properties of metric spaces 3. **Follow-up research**: Expected to stimulate further research in related fields ### Applicable Scenarios The results of this paper are primarily applicable to: 1. Theoretical research in geometric measure theory 2. Analysis of geometric properties of metric spaces 3. Development of Lipschitz mapping theory 4. Related problems in fractal geometry and harmonic analysis --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper that completely resolves the important problem of characterizing rectifiability with significant technical innovations and high theoretical value. Although highly technical, it makes important contributions to geometric measure theory.