Simulating Mediumband Wireless Communication Systems: A Concise Description

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13532
• Title: Simulating Mediumband Wireless Communication Systems: A Concise Description
• Author: Dushyantha A. Basnayaka (IEEE Senior Member)
• Classification: cs.IT math.IT
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Type: Tutorial Paper with MATLAB Codes
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13532

Abstract

This paper describes the necessary procedures for accurately simulating digital wireless communication systems operating in the mediumband frequency range, targeting both beginners and experts. In research literature, digital wireless communication systems are typically simulated in the discrete-time complex baseband domain, where pulse shaping, upconversion, mixing, carrier synchronization, and symbol timing synchronization are often neglected. While these assumptions are generally sufficient in most cases, capturing the essence of mediumband communication requires detailed simulation of certain physical layer (PHY) operations. This paper concisely describes how to simulate a mediumband wireless communication scenario from a single transmitter (TX) to a single receiver (RX) in MATLAB, with detailed exposition of key PHY subsystem operations. The methodology presented ensures that the simulated system captures the subtle dynamics of mediumband wireless communication, including the deep fade avoidance effect.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The fundamental problem addressed in this paper is how to accurately simulate mediumband wireless communication systems, particularly capturing their unique physical layer characteristics.

Significance

1. Emerging Communication Concept: Mediumband wireless communication is a relatively new concept with unique constraints and characteristics
2. Simulation Accuracy: Traditional discrete-time baseband simulation neglects many important physical layer details
3. Deep Fade Avoidance: Mediumband systems possess unique deep fade avoidance characteristics that cannot be captured in conventional simulations

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Over-Simplification: Traditional simulations assume perfect pulse shaping, carrier synchronization, etc., overlooking critical physical layer operations
2. Lack of Mediumband Characteristics: Existing simulation methods cannot capture the unique dynamic characteristics of mediumband communication
3. Symbol Timing Synchronization: Traditional approaches typically neglect the importance of symbol timing synchronization

Research Motivation

To provide accurate simulation methods for mediumband wireless communication systems for future research, enabling researchers to observe and leverage the unique advantages of mediumband communication.

Core Contributions

1. Complete Simulation Framework: Provides a comprehensive mediumband wireless communication system simulation methodology from transmitter to receiver
2. Detailed Physical Layer Modeling: Includes detailed modeling of key physical layer operations such as pulse shaping and symbol timing synchronization
3. Mathematical Model Derivation: Provides both matrix model and linear model discrete-time mediumband channel models
4. Complete MATLAB Code: Provides thoroughly annotated MATLAB simulation code for easy reproduction and learning
5. Performance Analysis Methods: Describes performance analysis and evaluation methods for mediumband systems

Methodology Details

Task Definition

This paper investigates how to simulate single-input single-output (SISO) wireless communication systems satisfying mediumband constraints, where:

• Input: Digital data sequences and channel parameters
• Output: Bit error rate (BER) performance and received signals
• Constraints: Satisfy mediumband constraint $T_m < T_s < 10T_m$

System Model

Mediumband Constraint Definition

Mediumband wireless communication systems must satisfy the following constraint: $T_m < T_s < 10T_m$

Where:

• $T_m$: Delay spread (time difference between earliest and latest significant multipath components)
• $T_s$: Symbol period

The percentage delay spread (PDS) is correspondingly defined as: $\text{PDS} = \left(\frac{T_m}{T_s}\right) \times 100\%$

Signal Model

The analog complex baseband equivalent form of the received signal is: $r(t) = \sqrt{E_s}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\gamma_n s(t-\tau_n) + w(t)$

Where:

• $E_s$: Symbol energy
• $\gamma_n = \alpha_n e^{-j\phi_n}$: Complex gain of the n-th multipath component
• $s(t)$: Normalized data signal
• $w(t)$: Filtered complex noise process

The data signal is defined as: $s(t) = \sum_k I_k p(t-kT_s)$

Where $p(t)$ is the impulse response of a raised cosine (RC) filter.

Symbol Timing Synchronization

The optimal timing offset is obtained through the following optimization: $\hat{\tau} = \max_t \left|\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\gamma_n R(\tau_n - t)\right|^2$

Where $R(\tau)$ is the autocorrelation function of $s(t)$.

Synchronization is performed separately for I and Q branches: $\hat{\tau}_i = \max_t \left|\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\text{Re}\{\gamma_n\} R(\tau_n - t)\right|^2$$\hat{\tau}_q = \max_t \left|\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\text{Im}\{\gamma_n\} R(\tau_n - t)\right|^2$

Discrete-Time Channel Model

Matrix Model

The sampled received signal can be expressed in matrix form as: $\mathbf{r} = \sqrt{E_s}\mathbf{H}\mathbf{s} + \mathbf{w}$

Where $\mathbf{H}$ is a $B \times B$ Toeplitz channel gain matrix with elements: