2025-11-15T20:22:12.317171

The Formation Rate and Luminosity Function of Fast X-ray transients from Einstein probe

Guo, Zeng, Wei et al.
Following its launch on January 9, 2024, the Einstein Probe (EP) telescope has detected hundreds of fast X-ray transients (FXTs), yet their physical origins remain elusive. Understanding their luminosity function and formation rate is crucial for elucidating their nature. Based on the latest catalog of EP-detected FXTs, we present, a model-independent, non-parametric approach to derive the luminosity function and formation rate of FXTs. Our analysis reveals significant cosmological luminosity evolution, characterized by a scaling relationship of $(1+z)^{3.58}$. After accounting for this evolution, we establish that the local luminosity function is best represented by a broken power law, with a break luminosity of $(4.17 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{46}$ erg/s. The formation rate exhibits a gentle decline with redshift, following the relation $(1+z)^{-0.21}$, yielding a local rate of approximately $28.0_{-16.4}^{+27.3}$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$. This rate is comparable to that of low-luminosity long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs). Our findings indicate a potential correlation between FXTs and LGRBs, supporting the majority of FXTs may be linked to collapsar progenitors.
academic

The Formation Rate and Luminosity Function of Fast X-ray Transients from Einstein Probe

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.13533
  • Title: The Formation Rate and Luminosity Function of Fast X-ray Transients from Einstein Probe
  • Authors: Yizhou Guo, Houdun Zeng, Junjie Wei, Hao Zhou, Zhiping Jin, Xuefeng Wu, Daming Wei
  • Classification: astro-ph.HE (High-Energy Astrophysics)
  • Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (Draft version)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13533

Abstract

Since its launch on January 9, 2024, the Einstein Probe (EP) telescope has detected hundreds of Fast X-ray Transients (FXTs), yet their physical origins remain elusive. This study derives the luminosity function and formation rate of FXTs based on the latest FXTs catalog detected by EP, employing model-independent non-parametric methods. The analysis reveals significant cosmological luminosity evolution characterized by a scaling relation of (1+z)3.58(1+z)^{3.58}. After accounting for this evolution, the local luminosity function is best represented by a broken power law with a break luminosity of (4.17±0.34)×1046(4.17 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{46} erg/s. The formation rate exhibits a gradual decline with redshift, following a (1+z)−0.21(1+z)^{-0.21} relation, with a local rate of approximately 28.0−16.4+27.328.0_{-16.4}^{+27.3} Gpc−3^{-3} yr−1^{-1}. This rate is comparable to that of low-luminosity long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs), suggesting potential correlations between FXTs and LGRBs and supporting the hypothesis that most FXTs may be associated with core-collapse progenitors.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Questions

  1. Unclear Physical Origins of FXTs: Fast X-ray transients are soft X-ray bursts in the 0.5-4 keV band with durations ranging from minutes to hours. Although discovered decades ago, their origins remain unclear.
  2. Ambiguous Relationship with GRBs: Early studies suggested FXTs might be related to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), but not all FXTs observed by EP display gamma-ray emission, complicating their relationship with GRBs.
  3. Lack of Statistical Characterization: Understanding the luminosity function and formation rate of FXTs is crucial for elucidating their nature, yet previous studies lacked sufficiently large samples for statistical analysis.

Research Significance

  • Sample Size Breakthrough: EP's wide-field X-ray telescope (WXT) significantly enhances the detection rate of these transients, providing unprecedented opportunities for statistical studies.
  • Cosmological Implications: Statistical analysis can reveal the cosmological evolution characteristics of FXTs, facilitating understanding of their relationships with other high-energy astrophysical phenomena.
  • Theoretical Validation: Statistical results provide observational constraints for theoretical models of FXTs.

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • Narrow Field-of-View Constraints: Early missions such as Ginga, GRANAT/WATCH, and HETE-2 were unable to rapidly expand FXTs research samples due to field-of-view limitations.
  • Observational Biases: Biases produced by different observational instruments affect the reliability of statistical analysis.

Core Contributions

  1. First Systematic Statistical Analysis: Conducts the first model-independent non-parametric statistical analysis based on a sample of 31 FXTs with confirmed redshifts detected by EP.
  2. Discovery of Significant Luminosity Evolution: Identifies a cosmological luminosity evolution relation of (1+z)3.58(1+z)^{3.58} for FXTs.
  3. Establishment of Luminosity Function: Derives a broken power-law model for the local luminosity function with a break luminosity of (4.17±0.34)×1046(4.17 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{46} erg/s.
  4. Determination of Formation Rate: Obtains a local formation rate of 28.0−16.4+27.328.0_{-16.4}^{+27.3} Gpc−3^{-3} yr−1^{-1}, comparable to low-luminosity LGRBs.
  5. Revelation of FXTs-LGRBs Association: Provides observational evidence that FXTs may be associated with core-collapse progenitors.

Methodology

Data Sample Definition

The study employs the unified processing catalog of FXTs detected by EP provided by Q. Wu & EP Collaboration et al. (2025), containing 107 events. From this, 31 FXTs with confirmed redshifts are selected as the analysis sample, larger than the sample collected by B. O'Connor et al. (2025).

X-ray luminosity calculation formula: LX=4πdL2(z)FWXT,avg(1+z)2−ΓWXTL_X = \frac{4\pi d_L^2(z) F_{WXT,avg}}{(1+z)^{2-\Gamma_{WXT}}}

where dL(z)d_L(z) is the luminosity distance, FWXT,avgF_{WXT,avg} is the time-averaged X-ray flux, and ΓWXT\Gamma_{WXT} is the photon index.

Non-parametric Statistical Methods

Efron-Petrosian Method

Used to assess the correlation between luminosity and redshift through the modified Kendall τ test: τ=∑i(Ri−Ei)∑iVi\tau = \frac{\sum_i(R_i - E_i)}{\sqrt{\sum_i V_i}}

where RiR_i is the normalized rank of the source within its associated set, Ei=ni+12E_i = \frac{n_i+1}{2}, and Vi=ni2−112V_i = \frac{n_i^2-1}{12}.

Luminosity Evolution Function

A simple power-law model g(z)=(1+z)kg(z) = (1+z)^k is adopted, with the evolution index kk determined by minimizing ∣τ∣|\tau|.

Lynden-Bell's c⁻ Method

After removing evolution effects, the cumulative luminosity function is utilized: Ψ(L0i)=∏j<i(1+1Nj)\Psi(L_{0i}) = \prod_{j<i}(1 + \frac{1}{N_j})

where NjN_j represents the number of objects in the new associated set.

Formation Rate Calculation

Cumulative redshift distribution: ϕ(zi)=∏j<i(1+1Mj)\phi(z_i) = \prod_{j<i}(1 + \frac{1}{M_j})

Formation rate: ρ(z)=dϕ(z)dz(1+z)(dV(z)dz)−1\rho(z) = \frac{d\phi(z)}{dz}(1+z)\left(\frac{dV(z)}{dz}\right)^{-1}

Experimental Setup

Dataset Characteristics

  • Sample Size: 31 FXTs with confirmed redshifts
  • Redshift Range: z = 0.082 - 4.859
  • Observation Period: Approximately 600 days (January 9, 2024 to August 31, 2025)
  • Field of View: WXT's 3600 deg² (1.1 sr)

Key Parameters

  • Flux Limit: Flimit=4.5×10−11F_{limit} = 4.5 \times 10^{-11} erg cm⁻² s⁻¹
  • Mean Photon Index: ΓWXT=1.59\Gamma_{WXT} = 1.59
  • Cosmological Parameters: H₀ = 67.4 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹, Ωₘ = 0.315

Experimental Results

Luminosity Evolution

  • Evolution Index: k=3.58−0.51+0.63k = 3.58_{-0.51}^{+0.63} (1σ confidence level)
  • Significance: ∣τ(k=0)∣>1|\tau(k=0)| > 1 indicates strong correlation between luminosity and redshift

Luminosity Function

Broken power-law fit of the cumulative luminosity function:

L_0^{-0.25 \pm 0.01}, & L_0 < L_b^0 \\ L_0^{-0.71 \pm 0.03}, & L_0 > L_b^0 \end{cases}$$ Break Luminosity: $L_b^0 = (4.17 \pm 0.34) \times 10^{46}$ erg/s ### Formation Rate Evolution - **Evolution Index**: $\delta = -0.21 \pm 0.59$ - **Local Formation Rate**: $\rho(0) = 28.0_{-16.4}^{+27.3}$ Gpc⁻³ yr⁻¹ - **Redshift Dependence**: $\rho(z) = \rho(0)(1+z)^{-0.21}$ ### Comparison with Other Astrophysical Objects - **LGRBs**: Evolution factor ~2.5, formation rate 100-700 Gpc⁻³ yr⁻¹ - **Short GRBs**: Evolution factor ~4.5, formation rate 10-80 Gpc⁻³ yr⁻¹ - **FRBs**: Evolution factor ~5, formation rate ~10⁴ Gpc⁻³ yr⁻¹ ## Related Work ### Historical Development - **Early Detections**: Initial discoveries by missions such as Ginga, GRANAT/WATCH, and HETE-2 - **BeppoSAX Contributions**: Aided in identifying X-ray afterglows associated with GRBs - **EP Breakthrough**: The 2024 launch of EP marks significant progress in FXTs research ### Key Findings - **EP240315a**: The first FXT with confirmed optical and radio counterparts, strongly correlated with long GRBs - **Diversity**: Some FXTs lack detectable gamma-ray emission, increasing classification complexity ### Methodological Foundation Non-parametric methods have been widely applied to statistical studies of quasars, GRBs, galaxies, and fast radio bursts. ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Strong Luminosity Evolution**: FXTs display significant luminosity evolution of $(1+z)^{3.58}$, similar to other high-energy transients 2. **Broken Power-Law Luminosity Function**: Low-luminosity end index of -0.25, high-luminosity end index of -0.71, consistent with LGRBs 3. **Formation Rate Characteristics**: Local formation rate comparable to low-luminosity LGRBs, supporting the core-collapse progenitor hypothesis 4. **Cosmological Evolution**: Related to star formation rate at z>1, more similar to GRBs and FRBs at z<1 ### Physical Implications - **Core-Collapse Origins**: Statistical characteristics support FXTs primarily originating from core-collapse progenitors - **FXTs-LGRBs Association**: Lower break luminosity suggests FXTs may be a low-luminosity subset of LGRBs - **Diversity Mechanisms**: Does not exclude the possibility that short GRBs may also contribute to some FXTs ### Limitations 1. **Sample Size Constraints**: The sample of 31 sources is relatively small, with substantial statistical uncertainties 2. **Redshift Bias**: Acquisition of spectroscopic redshifts may introduce selection effects 3. **Evolution Model**: Simple power laws may inadequately describe complex cosmological evolution ### Future Directions 1. **Sample Expansion**: Continued EP observations will significantly increase sample size 2. **Multi-wavelength Studies**: Combining optical and radio observations to better understand physical mechanisms 3. **Theoretical Modeling**: Development of more precise theoretical models for FXTs origins 4. **Statistical Methods**: Exploration of more complex non-parametric and parametric approaches ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Rigorous Methodology**: Employs mature non-parametric statistical methods, avoiding model assumption biases 2. **Data Quality**: Based on EP's unified processing catalog, reducing instrumental biases 3. **Reliable Results**: Adequate statistical significance testing and reasonable confidence intervals 4. **Physical Insights**: Provides important observational constraints on FXTs origins ### Weaknesses 1. **Sample Representativeness**: The 31 sources with redshifts may not fully represent the entire FXTs population 2. **Systematic Errors**: Flux limits and K-corrections may introduce systematic uncertainties 3. **Evolution Complexity**: Single power law may oversimplify actual evolution processes 4. **Physical Interpretation**: Connection between statistical results and physical mechanisms requires further theoretical support ### Impact 1. **Field Contribution**: Establishes statistical foundations for the emerging FXTs research field 2. **Practical Value**: Provides important references for future observation strategies and theoretical models 3. **Reproducibility**: Clear methodology and open data facilitate verification and extension 4. **Cross-disciplinary Significance**: Statistical methods applicable to other transient source studies ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Observation Planning**: Provides references for next-generation X-ray telescope design 2. **Theoretical Validation**: Offers observational constraints for core-collapse and merger theoretical models 3. **Multi-messenger Astrophysics**: Guides electromagnetic counterpart searches for gravitational wave events 4. **Cosmological Research**: Serves as a new cosmological probe for studying galaxy formation and evolution ## References Key references include: - Efron & Petrosian (1992): Theoretical foundations of non-parametric statistical methods - Lynden-Bell (1971): Original paper on the c⁻ method - Yuan et al. (2022, 2025): Einstein Probe mission descriptions - O'Connor et al. (2025): Comparative studies of FXTs and GRBs relationships - Statistical study literature on various high-energy transient sources --- This paper opens new directions for statistical studies of fast X-ray transients. Its rigorous non-parametric methodology and significant physical discoveries will have lasting impacts on high-energy astrophysics. As observational data accumulate, these results will provide important clues for understanding the most extreme astrophysical phenomena in the universe.