Quality assessment of quantum teleportation through the distribution of fidelity

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13600
• Title: Quality assessment of quantum teleportation through the distribution of fidelity
• Authors: D. G. Bussandri, G. M. Bosyk, P. Crespo Del Amo, K. Życzkowski
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13600

Abstract

This study proposes a comprehensive statistical framework that transcends traditional average fidelity benchmarks for assessing single-qubit quantum teleportation performance. The authors first derive closed-form expressions for the complete probability density function of practical teleportation fidelity and apply them to classical measurement-preparation schemes and standard quantum teleportation, considering two relevant noise models: Bell-diagonal resource states and local amplitude damping channels. The results demonstrate that protocols with identical average fidelity may exhibit significantly different statistical behaviors, and relying solely on average fidelity may obscure inherent asymmetries introduced by local noise. Second, the authors introduce certification methods based on prior importance functions (such as Beta distributions), unifying moment-based criteria and threshold-based success probabilities into a single figure of merit.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Quantum teleportation, as a fundamental protocol in quantum information science, has important applications in quantum communication and quantum computing. However, existing evaluation methods rely primarily on a single metric—average fidelity—which presents the following key issues:

1. Missing Statistical Information: Average fidelity only reflects the expected value over infinite protocol executions and cannot reveal the complete statistical characteristics of the fidelity distribution
2. Symmetry Misjudgment: Protocols with identical average fidelity may possess drastically different statistical behaviors, leading to erroneous performance assessments
3. Insufficient Application Specificity: Different application scenarios impose different requirements on fidelity distributions, and a single metric cannot satisfy diverse needs

Research Motivation

The authors note that in practical quantum communication experiments, researchers are often more concerned with whether high-fidelity results can be reliably produced rather than merely achieving a certain average value. For example, a deterministic protocol that consistently produces 0.7 fidelity differs fundamentally in practical value from a protocol with average fidelity 0.7 but high variance.

Core Contributions

1. Complete Statistical Framework: Derives universal expressions for the probability density function of teleportation fidelity (Proposition 1), providing a unified statistical analysis tool for various protocols
2. Classical Protocol Analysis: Provides closed-form solutions for the fidelity distribution of measurement-preparation protocols (Proposition 2), proving that the optimal classical protocol's distribution is $f^{mp}_{opt}(F) = 2F$
3. In-Depth Quantum Protocol Analysis:
   • Fidelity distribution for Bell-diagonal states expressed using complete elliptic integrals (Proposition 3)
   • Complex distribution forms under amplitude damping noise (Proposition 4)
4. Novel Certification Framework: Proposes a protocol certification method based on prior importance functions, unifying moment-based and threshold-based criteria
5. Important Findings:
   • Reveals that the "noise-assisted" effect is actually a product of metric selection rather than a genuine physical advantage
   • Demonstrates that high-fidelity teleportation certification requires stronger entanglement or nonlocality

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Consider a single-qubit teleportation protocol $P^{a→B}$ that transmits the initial state $\rho^a_{\vec{t}}$ to receiver Bob. The protocol is defined by a set of conditional probabilities $p_{j|\vec{t}}$ and output states $\rho^B_{j|\vec{t}}$, where $\vec{t} \in S$ are parameters on the Bloch sphere.

Fidelity is defined as: $F_j(\vec{t}) = F(\rho^a_{\vec{t}}, \rho^B_{j|\vec{t}}) = \frac{1}{2}(1 + \vec{t} \cdot \vec{t}_{j|\vec{t}})$

Core Theoretical Results

Proposition 1 (Universal Distribution Formula): If $F_j(\vec{t})$ is a $C^∞$ function on the Bloch sphere, then the fidelity probability density function is: $f(F) = \sum_j \frac{1}{4\pi} \int dS_j \frac{p_{j|\vec{x}}}{|\nabla F_j(\vec{x})|}$ where $S_j = \{\vec{x} \in S; F_j(\vec{x}) = F\}$.

Proposition 2 (Classical Protocols): The fidelity distribution for measurement-preparation protocols is: $f^{mp}_j(F) = \begin{cases} \frac{c^2_j}{2r_j}\left(1-\frac{\vec{r}_j \cdot \vec{s}_j}{r^2_j}\right) + F\frac{c^2_j \vec{r}_j \cdot \vec{s}_j}{r^3_j}, & F \in [\frac{1-r_j}{2}, \frac{1+r_j}{2}] \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$

The optimal classical protocol ($\vec{r}_j \cdot \vec{s}_j = 1$) simplifies to: $f^{mp}_{opt}(F) = 2F$

Proposition 3 (Bell-Diagonal States): The fidelity distribution for Bell-diagonal resource states is expressed using complete elliptic integrals K(κ): $f^{Bd}(F) = \frac{2K[\kappa]}{\pi\sqrt{\text{related parameters}}}$ where κ depends on the eigenvalues of the correlation matrix.

Certification Framework

Introducing a prior importance function W(F), the performance difference of protocol P relative to the optimal classical protocol is defined as: $\gamma_W(P, P^{opt}_{mp}) = \int^1_0 dF W(F)[f(F) - f^{mp}_{opt}(F)]$

A protocol succeeds if and only if $\gamma_W > 0$.

Using the Beta distribution as the importance function: $W_{\alpha,\beta}(F) = \frac{F^{\alpha-1}(1-F)^{\beta-1}}{B(\alpha,\beta)}$

Experimental Setup

Noise Models

1. Phase Flip Channel: Produces Bell-diagonal states with correlation matrix $w^{pf} = \text{diag}\{1-c_{pf}, c_{pf}-1, 1\}$
2. Depolarizing Channel: Produces Werner states
3. Amplitude Damping Channel: Produces non-Bell-diagonal states with complex asymmetries

Evaluation Metrics

• Traditional average fidelity: $\langle F \rangle$
• Fidelity variance: $\text{Var}(F)$
• Certification metrics based on Beta distribution: $\gamma_{W_{\alpha,\beta}}$
• Threshold success probability: $P(F > F_t)$

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Diversity of Statistical Behaviors

• Under phase flip noise: $f^{pf}(F) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{c_{pf}(2F-2+c_{pf})}}$, with support interval $(\frac{2-c_{pf}}{2}, 1]$
• Under depolarizing noise: Degenerates to a Dirac δ function, exhibiting deterministic behavior
• Under amplitude damping noise: Exhibits highly asymmetric complex distributions

2. Clarification of the "Noise-Assisted" Effect Figure 7 shows that when using the traditional average fidelity criterion (α=2), increasing noise in one subsystem can indeed enhance certification success rate in certain noise regimes. However, when adopting stricter high-fidelity criteria (α>2), this effect completely disappears, revealing its nature as a product of metric selection rather than a genuine physical advantage.

3. Discovery of Asymmetries In the amplitude damping noise case, despite average fidelity remaining symmetric under parameter exchange, the complete fidelity distribution exhibits significant asymmetry. Figure 3 clearly demonstrates drastically different statistical behaviors under identical average fidelity.

Certification Analysis for Bell-Diagonal States

Figure 5 presents certification results within the Bell-diagonal state tetrahedron:

• At α=2: Only separable states (within the octahedron) fail certification
• As α increases: Stronger entanglement or even nonlocality is required for certification
• Nonlocal states violating CHSH inequalities demonstrate remarkable robustness

Related Work

This paper extends the following research directions:

1. Higher-Order Moments of Fidelity: Work by Bang et al. and Ghosal et al. focused on fidelity deviations but did not provide complete distributions
2. Statistics of Quantum State Transfer: Lorenzo et al. studied fidelity distributions in quantum state transfer
3. Noise Effects in Teleportation: Badzia̧g et al. first reported the "noise-assisted" phenomenon; this paper provides a new statistical perspective

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Importance of Statistical Completeness: Average fidelity cannot fully characterize protocol performance; the complete probability distribution provides richer information
2. Application-Oriented Assessment: Different application scenarios require different evaluation criteria; Beta distribution importance functions provide a flexible framework
3. Reexamination of Physical Effects: The "noise-assisted" effect essentially reflects limitations of evaluation metrics rather than genuine physical advantages

Limitations

1. Experimental Verification Challenges: New criteria require estimating complete fidelity distributions rather than relying solely on six mutually unbiased bases
2. Computational Complexity: Some distributions involve special functions like elliptic integrals, increasing computational difficulty
3. Multi-Qubit Extension: The current framework primarily addresses single-qubit systems

Future Directions

1. Experimental Implementation Schemes: Explore efficient methods for estimating new certification metrics experimentally
2. Multi-Qubit Generalization: Extend the statistical framework to multi-qubit teleportation
3. Networked Applications: Apply the evaluation framework in quantum network environments

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides a complete mathematical framework with rigorous proofs for all major results
2. Deep Physical Insights: Reveals fundamental limitations of traditional evaluation methods and clarifies important physical effects
3. High Practical Value: Provides customized evaluation tools for diverse application requirements
4. Comprehensive Analysis: Covers multiple important noise models and protocol types

Weaknesses

1. Experimental Feasibility: Experimental implementation of new methods requires further exploration
2. Computational Efficiency: Certain distribution calculations involve special functions, potentially limiting practical applications
3. Parameter Selection Guidance: Lacks systematic principles for Beta distribution parameter selection

Impact

This work provides a new theoretical foundation for quantum teleportation assessment, likely to advance:

1. Establishment of more precise protocol performance evaluation standards
2. Design of teleportation protocols optimized for specific applications
3. Development of teleportation quality assurance mechanisms in quantum networks

Applicable Scenarios

• Performance assessment of high-precision quantum communication systems
• Statistical analysis of gate operation fidelity in quantum computing
• Optimization design of teleportation protocols in quantum networks
• Robustness analysis of quantum protocols in noisy environments

References

The paper cites 40 relevant references covering theoretical foundations, experimental implementations, and performance assessment of quantum teleportation, providing solid theoretical background for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper of significant theoretical value and practical importance. It is not only mathematically rigorous and complete but also provides profound physical insights, opening new directions for the assessment and optimization of quantum teleportation.