On relative Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13663
• Title: On relative Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms
• Author: Ali Sait Demir (Istanbul Technical University, Department of Mathematics)
• Classification: math.SG (Symplectic Geometry)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13663

Abstract

This paper investigates the group of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ on a symplectic manifold $M$ that preserve a Lagrangian submanifold $L \subset M$. Using relative versions of Thurston and Banyaga techniques, the author proves that $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ possesses the fragmentation property.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Core issues in automorphism group research: One of the main problems in studying automorphism groups of manifolds is determining whether a group is simple or perfect.
2. Limitations of classical techniques: Thurston's classical techniques require two main properties: fragmentation and transitivity.
3. Complexity of the relative case: $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ is far from transitive due to the requirement of preserving the submanifold, which is the primary reason for its non-simplicity.

Research Motivation

• Extend classical Thurston-Banyaga techniques to the relative setting
• Study structural properties of relative Hamiltonian diffeomorphism groups
• Establish foundations for understanding symplectic geometric group theory under constraints

Core Contributions

1. Proved relative fragmentation theorem: Any relative Hamiltonian diffeomorphism can be decomposed as a product of compactly supported relative Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms.
2. Established relative Weinstein graph theory: Generalized classical Weinstein graph theory to the relative setting.
3. Defined relative Calabi homomorphism: Provided explicit construction of the relative version of the Calabi homomorphism.
4. Provided complete technical framework: Supplied tools for further investigation of relative Hamiltonian group properties.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Setup

Study the Hamiltonian diffeomorphism group on a symplectic manifold $(M^{2n}, \omega)$ that preserves a Lagrangian submanifold $L^n \subset M^{2n}$: $\text{Ham}(M,L) = \{\psi \in \text{Ham}(M) : \psi(L) = L\}$

Core Theorems

Relative Fragmentation Theorem (Theorem 1.1): Let $U = (U_j)_{j \in I}$ be an open cover of a compact connected symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$, and $h \in \text{Ham}(M,L)$. Then $h$ can be written as: $h = h_1 h_2 \cdots h_N$ where each $h_i \in \text{Ham}_c(M,L)$ is supported in some $U_{j(i)}$.

Technical Framework

1. Relative Calabi Homomorphism

For non-compact symplectic manifolds, the relative Calabi homomorphism is defined as: $R : \widetilde{\text{Ham}}_c(M,L) \to \mathbb{R}$$\{\phi_t\} \mapsto \int_0^1 \int_M H_t \omega^n dt$

where $H_t$ is determined by $i_{X_t}\omega = dH_t$.

2. Relative Weinstein Graph

Established correspondence from a neighborhood of the identity in $\text{Symp}_0(M,L)$ to the space of closed 1-forms vanishing on $TL$: $C : \text{Symp}_0(M,L) \to Z^1(M,L)$

3. Key Lemma

Lemma 2.5: Any $h \in \text{Ham}(M,L)$ can be written as a finite product of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms close to the identity, with each corresponding Weinstein form being exact.

Technical Innovations

1. Adaptation to relative setting: Successfully adapted Thurston-Banyaga techniques to the constrained setting, addressing technical difficulties arising from Lagrangian constraints.
2. Application of Palamodov operators: Cleverly employed bounded linear functionals $\tilde{f}$ to construct decompositions.
3. Utilization of relative flux groups: Exploited the countability property of relative flux groups $\Gamma(M,L)$ to ensure constancy of continuous maps.

Experimental Setup

This paper is pure mathematical theoretical research with no numerical experiments. Results are verified through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Main Results

Core Theorem Proof

The fragmentation theorem is proved through the following steps:

1. Decomposition preparation: Use Lemma 2.5 to express $h$ as a product of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms close to the identity.
2. Partition of unity: Construct a partition of unity $\{\lambda_i\}$ subordinate to the open cover.
3. Function construction: Define $\mu_j = \sum_{i \leq j} \lambda_i$ and apply Palamodov operators.
4. Local support: Prove that each decomposition factor $h_i$ is supported in the corresponding open set.

Properties of Relative Calabi Homomorphism

Proved that the relative Calabi homomorphism satisfies in the compact manifold case: $R_{U_i,U_i \cap L}(h_i) = 0$

This is achieved through Calabi's classical result on the completeness of the Lie algebra of compactly supported Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms.

Related Work

Classical Theory Foundations

1. Thurston's work: Classical techniques for simplicity of smooth diffeomorphism groups.
2. Banyaga's contributions: Generalization of Thurston techniques to symplectic diffeomorphism groups.
3. Weinstein's theory: Local theory of symplectic manifolds and Lagrangian submanifolds.

Development of Relative Theory

1. Ozan's work: Establishment of relative flux homomorphism theory.
2. McDuff-Salamon: Systematic introduction to symplectic geometry.
3. Calabi's results: Completeness of the Lie algebra of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Fragmentation property holds: $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ indeed possesses the fragmentation property.
2. Technical framework is complete: Established complete technical tools necessary for studying relative Hamiltonian groups.
3. Successful generalization of classical theory: Demonstrated applicability of Thurston-Banyaga techniques in the constrained setting.

Limitations

1. Absence of transitivity: $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ lacks transitivity, preventing direct application of the complete Thurston-Banyaga program.
2. Perfectness unresolved: Due to failure of KAM theory in the relative case, the perfectness problem for $\text{Ham}(M,L)$ remains open.
3. Non-simplicity established: The non-simplicity of the group is demonstrated through the restriction homomorphism $\phi: \text{Ham}(M,L) \to \text{Diff}^{\infty}(L)$.

Future Directions

1. Perfectness problem: Seek new techniques to resolve the perfectness of relative Hamiltonian groups.
2. More general constraints: Generalize to other types of geometric constraints.
3. Application exploration: Applications in symplectic topology and Hamiltonian dynamics.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical innovation: Successfully generalizes classical theory to the constrained setting, filling theoretical gaps.
2. Technical rigor: Mathematical proofs are complete and rigorous with refined technical handling.
3. Clear structure: Well-organized paper with logical progression from basic concepts to main results.
4. Complete toolkit: Provides comprehensive tools necessary for studying relative Hamiltonian groups.

Weaknesses

1. Limited applications: Primarily theoretical results with practical applications yet to be explored.
2. Incomplete problem resolution: The core perfectness problem remains open.
3. Strong technical dependence: Heavily relies on existing classical results and techniques.

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new tools and perspectives for group-theoretic research in symplectic geometry.
2. Foundation for future research: Establishes basis for further investigation of constrained Hamiltonian systems.
3. Methodological value: Demonstrates methodology for adapting classical techniques to constrained settings.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Symplectic geometry research: Study of symplectic diffeomorphism groups with geometric constraints.
2. Hamiltonian dynamics: Analysis of Hamiltonian systems preserving invariant sets.
3. Geometric group theory: Investigation of structural properties of infinite-dimensional Lie groups.

References

The paper cites the following key references:

1. Banyaga, A. - Structural theory of classical diffeomorphism groups
2. Calabi, E. - Foundational work on automorphism groups of symplectic manifolds
3. McDuff, D. & Salamon, D. - Introduction to symplectic geometry
4. Ozan, Y. - Relative flux homomorphism theory
5. Thurston, W.P. - Pioneering work on structure of volume-preserving diffeomorphism groups

This paper makes important contributions to group-theoretic research in symplectic geometry. While the main problem (perfectness) remains incompletely resolved, it provides a solid theoretical foundation and technical tools for further development in this field.