Planetary-mass companions to a retired B star BD+37 3172 and a retired F star BD+42 2315

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13728
• Title: Planetary-mass companions to a retired B star BD+37 3172 and a retired F star BD+42 2315
• Authors: Niedzielski, A., Jaros, R., Paczuski, A., Adamów, M., Wolszczan, A., Villaver, E., Maciejewski, G., Deka-Szymankiewicz, B.
• Classification: astro-ph.SR (Stellar and Stellar Astrophysics), astro-ph.EP (Earth and Planetary Astrophysics)
• Published Journal: Acta Astronomica, Vol. 58 (2008)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13728

Abstract

Radial velocity searches can only detect exoplanets with large orbital separations when sufficiently long time-series data are obtained. Therefore, publishing precise measurements collected in the past remains highly valuable even without achieving definitive detections. This paper presents 309 precise radial velocity measurements (σRV ≈ 5-7 m s⁻¹) of 28 stars conducted between 2004-2013 using the Hobby-Eberly Telescope and its high-resolution spectrograph. Based on the collected observational data, we report the discovery of a low-mass companion to the K-type giant BD+37 3172 (mp sin i = 10.6 MJ, orbital period 1887.76±0.01 days, semi-major axis 4.65 au, eccentricity e = 0.59±0.01), and a planetary-mass companion to the K-type giant BD+42 2315 (mp sin i = 0.55 MJ, orbital period 123.05±0.04 days, semi-major axis 0.55 au, eccentricity e = 0.73±0.03). We also report preliminary detections of two new spectroscopic binary systems: BD+56 2957 (K5) and HD 236555 (G5).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

1. Scarcity of exoplanets around intermediate-mass stars: Among approximately 5,600 known exoplanet host stars, only 43 are intermediate-mass stars (2.2-8 M⊙), with only 10 exceeding 3 M⊙. This represents a significant discrepancy with theoretical expectations.
2. Observational technique challenges: Intermediate-mass stars during the main sequence phase are difficult to measure with precise radial velocities due to rapid rotation and sparse spectral lines.
3. Difficulty in detecting long-period planets: Theory predicts that planets around intermediate-mass stars should be located at larger orbital separations, requiring long-term observations for detection.

Research Motivation

1. Maximizing data value: Historical observational data retain important scientific value even without achieving definitive detections, providing a foundation for future research.
2. Filling observational gaps: By analyzing evolved intermediate-mass stars (red giant phase), we circumvent the observational difficulties of the main sequence phase.
3. Theoretical verification needs: Validating theoretical predictions regarding planet formation and orbital evolution around intermediate-mass stars.

Core Contributions

1. Discovery of important exoplanet systems: Confirmation of a 10.6 Jupiter-mass companion in the BD+37 3172 system, a rare planetary discovery around a high-mass star (3.75 M⊙).
2. Provision of long-term observational dataset: Public release of 309 high-precision radial velocity measurements for 28 stars spanning nearly 10 years of observations.
3. Detection of extreme orbital characteristics: Discovery of BD+42 2315 b, a close-in planet with extremely high eccentricity (e=0.73).
4. Expansion of spectroscopic binary sample: Preliminary identification of two new spectroscopic binary systems.
5. Theoretical prediction validation: The orbital separation of BD+37 3172 b (4.65 au) is consistent with theoretical predictions for planet distribution around intermediate-mass stars.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Identification of planetary-mass and stellar-mass companions around evolved stars through long-term radial velocity monitoring, and determination of their orbital parameters.

Observational Methods

1. Telescope and Instrument Configuration

• Primary instruments: Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) + High Resolution Spectrograph (HRS)
• Observation mode: Queue scheduling mode, resolution R = 60,000
• Calibration method: Iodine gas cell technique (I₂ gas cell technique)
• Supplementary observations: Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) + HARPS-N

2. Data Processing Pipeline

• Radial velocity extraction: Calibration using iodine gas cell technique, precision 5-7 m s⁻¹
• Spectral line bisector analysis: Monitoring stellar activity and background binary effects
• Barycentric correction: Conversion of measurements to solar system barycentric reference frame using Stumpff (1980) algorithm

3. Orbital Analysis Methods

• Hybrid algorithm: Combining PIKAIA genetic algorithm for global search with RVLIN for local refinement
• Uncertainty estimation: Bootstrap method for parameter uncertainty estimation
• Alternative hypothesis testing: Exclusion of stellar activity (e.g., starspots) and other sources of variation

Technical Innovations

1. Long-term data accumulation strategy: Through nearly 10 years of continuous observations, sufficient phase coverage was accumulated to confirm long-period signals.
2. Multiple verification mechanisms:
   • Correlation analysis between radial velocity and spectral line bisector
   • Photometric variability monitoring (SWASP, ASAS data)
   • Estimation and comparison of p-mode oscillation amplitudes
3. Mass and evolutionary state constraints: Accurate determination of host star mass and evolutionary stage by combining stellar parameters from spectroscopic analysis.

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• Observational sample: 28 evolved stars, primarily K-type giants
• Observation timespan: 2004-2013 (approximately 9 years)
• Total observations: 309 radial velocity measurements
• Precision level: 5-7 m s⁻¹

Stellar Sample Characteristics

• Spectral types: Primarily GK-type giants and subgiants
• Magnitude range: <11 mag
• Location: HR diagram regions between main sequence, instability strip, and coronal boundary

Evaluation Metrics

• Signal-to-noise ratio: Ratio of radial velocity semi-amplitude to measurement uncertainty
• Phase coverage: Ratio of observation timespan to orbital period
• Statistical significance: χ² test and p-value analysis

Comparative Analysis

• p-mode oscillations: Comparison with theoretically expected stellar oscillation amplitudes
• Stellar activity: Comparison with spectral line bisector and photometric variability
• Rotation period: Comparison with estimated stellar rotation period

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. BD+37 3172 System

• Host star parameters: M = 3.75±0.86 M⊙, K-type giant
• Companion parameters:
  • Mass: mp sin i = 10.6 MJ
  • Orbital period: 1887.76±0.01 days
  • Semi-major axis: 4.65 au
  • Eccentricity: e = 0.59±0.01
• Radial velocity semi-amplitude: K = 89.94±0.01 m s⁻¹
• Observation coverage: ≈2.5 orbital periods

2. BD+42 2315 System

• Host star parameters: M = 1.38±0.30 M⊙, K-type giant
• Companion parameters:
  • Mass: mp sin i = 0.55 MJ
  • Orbital period: 123.05±0.04 days
  • Semi-major axis: 0.54 au
  • Eccentricity: e = 0.73±0.03
• Radial velocity semi-amplitude: K = 26.7±1.6 m s⁻¹

3. New Spectroscopic Binaries

• BD+56 2957: Companion mass ~1.36 M⊙, orbital period ~4560 days
• HD 236555: Companion mass ~107 MJ, orbital period ~5700 days

Signal Verification

Reliability Verification for BD+37 3172

1. Signal-to-noise ratio analysis: Radial velocity semi-amplitude is 16 times the measurement uncertainty
2. p-mode oscillation comparison: Observed amplitude exceeds theoretical p-mode oscillations by more than a factor of 2
3. Stellar activity exclusion: No significant radial velocity-bisector correlation (r=0.47, p=0.02)
4. Photometric variability: SWASP and ASAS data show no corresponding photometric periodicity

Uncertainty in BD+42 2315

1. Lower signal-to-noise ratio: Radial velocity semi-amplitude is only 4 times the measurement uncertainty
2. Need for additional observations: The signal is relatively weak and requires higher-precision follow-up observations for confirmation

Related Work

Intermediate-Mass Star Exoplanet Search Projects

• BEAST survey: Direct imaging technique search for substellar companions around B-type stars
• Other radial velocity projects: Multiple teams conducting exoplanet searches around evolved stars

Theoretical Research Background

• Kennedy & Kenyon (2008): Prediction that planets around intermediate-mass stars should be at larger orbital separations
• Mordasini et al. (2009): Planet formation and orbital migration theory

Statistical Studies

• Reffert et al. (2015): Discovery of rapid decline in planet occurrence rate for stellar masses >2M⊙
• Wolthoff et al. (2022): Confirmation of similar statistical trends

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Significance of BD+37 3172 b: This is a rare planetary discovery around a high-mass star (3.75 M⊙), with orbital separation consistent with theoretical predictions.
2. Extreme characteristics of BD+42 2315 b: This planet resides in the "avoidance zone" with extremely high eccentricity, potentially facing tidal evolution threats.
3. Value of observational data: Long-term radial velocity data are crucial for detecting long-period planets.

Limitations

1. Uncertainty in BD+42 2315 signal: Due to the relatively weak signal, higher-precision follow-up observations are needed for confirmation.
2. Sample size constraints: The sample of 28 stars is relatively small, limiting the reliability of statistical analysis.
3. Complexity of evolutionary effects: The influence of stellar evolution on planetary orbits remains incompletely understood.

Future Directions

1. Follow-up observations for confirmation: Particularly higher-precision radial velocity monitoring of the BD+42 2315 system.
2. Expansion of sample size: Increase the observational sample of intermediate-mass evolved stars.
3. Multi-wavelength coordinated observations: Comprehensive studies combining photometry, astrometry, and other techniques.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High scientific value: Discovery of rare planets around high-mass stars is important for understanding planet formation and evolution.
2. Excellent observational quality: Long-term high-precision radial velocity measurements with reliable data quality.
3. Rigorous analysis: Multiple verification methods employed to exclude stellar activity and other interference factors.
4. Open data sharing: Detailed observational data are publicly released, facilitating subsequent research.

Weaknesses

1. Limited statistical sample: The sample of 28 stars is relatively small.
2. Partial result uncertainty: The planetary candidate signal for BD+42 2315 is relatively weak and requires further confirmation.
3. Insufficient theoretical explanation: Limited discussion of formation mechanisms for extreme orbital characteristics (e.g., high eccentricity).

Impact

1. Field contribution: Provides important observational evidence for exoplanet research around intermediate-mass stars.
2. Methodological demonstration: Illustrates the importance of long-term radial velocity monitoring in planet detection.
3. Data legacy: Provides valuable observational resources for future research.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Long-period planet searches: Applicable to exoplanet detection projects requiring long-term monitoring.
2. Evolved star research: Provides observational foundation for studying the effects of stellar evolution on planetary systems.
3. Planet formation theory validation: Provides observational constraints for relevant theoretical models.

References

This paper cites multiple important related studies, including:

• Wolszczan & Frail (1992): First discovery of exoplanets
• Mayor & Queloz (1995): First discovery of planets around main-sequence stars
• Kennedy & Kenyon (2008): Planet formation theory for intermediate-mass stars
• Reffert et al. (2015): Statistical study of planet occurrence rate versus stellar mass

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality observational astronomy paper that discovers important planetary systems through long-term precise radial velocity monitoring, particularly rare planets around high-mass stars. The research methodology is rigorous, data analysis is detailed, and it has significant scientific value for understanding planetary systems around intermediate-mass stars.