Reduced constant-cost implementations of Clifford operations using global interactions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13761
• Title: Reduced constant-cost implementations of Clifford operations using global interactions
• Authors: Jonathan Nemirovsky, Lee Peleg, Amit Ben Kish, Yotam Shapira (Quantum Art, Israel)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13761

Abstract

This paper investigates quantum circuits composed of arbitrary single-qubit operations and programmable fully-connected multi-qubit entangling gates, which are native to systems such as ion trap quantum computing platforms. The research demonstrates that any Clifford operation sequence of arbitrary length can be implemented using at most 6 such Clifford multi-qubit entangling gates without requiring auxiliary qubits. Furthermore, any CNOT gate sequence of arbitrary length can be replaced by 5 such Clifford multi-qubit entangling gates. The study also analyzes the qubit driving power required for these implementations and proposes a practical and computationally efficient algorithm for achieving these compilations.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Clifford operations occupy a central position in quantum information processing with widespread applications in:

1. Quantum error correction: Clifford gates form the foundation of stabilizer codes
2. Simulation algorithms: Used for Hamiltonian simulation
3. Pseudo-random unitary generation: Constructing quantum 3-designs
4. Quantum circuit compilation and benchmarking: Serving as fundamental building blocks

Research Motivation

Traditional Clifford operation implementations have the following limitations:

1. Depth dependency: Implementation depth using standard two-qubit gates grows linearly or polynomially with the number of qubits
2. Resource consumption: Requires numerous gate operations, affecting quantum circuit fidelity
3. Hardware constraints: Cannot fully exploit the native capabilities of certain quantum computing platforms

Technical Background

Ion trap quantum computing platforms possess inherent fully-connected properties, enabling multi-qubit gates of the form: $U^{(P)}_{MQ}(\xi) = e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}\sum_{k=1}^n \xi_{kk}P_k - i\frac{\pi}{4}\sum_{k>j} \xi_{kj}P_kP_j}$ where $P \in \{X,Y,Z\}$ are Pauli operators and $\xi$ is a symmetric binary matrix.

Core Contributions

1. Constant-depth implementation: Proposes an algorithm implementing arbitrary Clifford operations using at most 6 multi-qubit gates, achieving a 3-fold improvement over existing techniques
2. CNOT circuit optimization: Proves that any CNOT gate sequence of arbitrary length can be replaced by 5 multi-qubit gates
3. Power efficiency analysis: Investigates the driving power requirements of the implementation scheme, demonstrating equivalence with traditional methods
4. Practical algorithm: Provides a computationally efficient compilation algorithm with practical applicability

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Arbitrary-length Clifford operation sequence Output: Equivalent quantum circuit composed of single-qubit gates and at most 6 multi-qubit gates $U^{(P)}_{MQ}(\xi)$Constraints: No auxiliary qubits required; operational equivalence maintained

Core Methodological Architecture

1. Symplectic Matrix Representation

Clifford operations are represented using symplectic formalism, where n-qubit Pauli operators are expressed as 2n-dimensional binary vectors: $(X_1^{a_1}Z_1^{b_1}) \otimes \cdots \otimes (X_n^{a_n}Z_n^{b_n}) \mapsto (a_1,\ldots,a_n|b_1,\ldots,b_n)$

Clifford operators act linearly on these vectors through symplectic matrices $S \in GL(2n,\mathbb{F}_2)$, satisfying the symplectic condition: $S^T\Omega S = \Omega, \quad \Omega = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & -I_n \\ I_n & 0 \end{bmatrix}$

2. Clifford Decomposition Framework

Arbitrary Clifford operations are decomposed as: $U_C = -L- \; CX \; -CZ- \; L \; -CZ- \; L-$ where:

• $-L-$: Single-qubit gate layers
• $-CX-$: Linear reversible circuits (CNOT layers)
• $-CZ-$: Control-Z gate layers

3. Key Technical Innovations

Linear reversible layer decomposition: The symplectic matrix form of linear reversible layers $-CX-$ is: $S_{CX} = \begin{bmatrix} A & 0 \\ 0 & B \end{bmatrix}$ where $A,B \in \mathbb{F}_2^{n \times n}$ are invertible matrices satisfying $B^TA = A^TB = I_n$.

Symmetric matrix decomposition: Matrix $B$ is decomposed into the product of two symmetric matrices: $B = S_1S_2$, a decomposition that always exists and can be computed efficiently.

Multi-qubit gate implementation: Based on the decomposition $B = S_1S_2$, linear reversible layers can be expressed as: $CX = U^{(X)}_{MQ}(S_2)U^{(Z)}_{MQ}(S_2^{-1})U^{(X)}_{MQ}(S_1 + S_2^{-1})U^{(Z)}_{MQ}(S_1^{-1})U^{(X)}_{MQ}(S_1) \cdot \text{single-qubit corrections}$

or alternatively: $CX = U^{(Z)}_{MQ}(S_2^{-1})U^{(X)}_{MQ}(S_2)U^{(Z)}_{MQ}(S_1^{-1} + S_2)U^{(X)}_{MQ}(S_1)U^{(Z)}_{MQ}(S_1^{-1}) \cdot \text{single-qubit corrections}$

Technical Innovation Points

1. Constant gate count implementation: Through clever symplectic matrix decomposition, arbitrary-depth CNOT circuits are compressed into a fixed number of multi-qubit gates
2. Gate merging optimization: The first decomposition ends with a $U^{(Z)}_{MQ}$ gate, which can be merged with subsequent $-CZ-$ layers, further reducing gate count
3. Symmetry exploitation: When $B$ itself is symmetric, the decomposition simplifies to $S_1 = I$, requiring only 3 multi-qubit gates
4. Power optimization: Through graph traversal methods and virtual qubit permutation optimization of total nuclear norm, driving power is controlled

Experimental Setup

Experimental Design

Data generation: Random linear reversible layer matrices $M$ are generated to construct corresponding CNOT circuits Qubit range: 3 to 63 qubits Baseline comparison: CNOT circuits implemented using standard Gaussian elimination Evaluation metrics: Total nuclear norm $\Omega_{nuc}$ (measuring driving power requirements)

Optimization Strategies

1. Decomposition freedom utilization: Multiple possibilities in $B = S_1S_2$ decomposition are exploited through graph traversal methods to minimize total nuclear norm
2. Qubit permutation: Virtual qubit permutations are used to further reduce nuclear norm
3. Parallel operation merging: Parallel two-qubit gates are merged into multi-qubit gates

Experimental Results

Main Results

Power efficiency comparison:

• Total nuclear norm of the proposed method is comparable to standard Gaussian elimination
• Nuclear norms of both methods scale according to power law $\sim n^{3/2}$
• Fitting parameters: Gaussian elimination $\beta = 1.462 \pm 0.018$, proposed method $\beta = 1.454 \pm 0.003$

Gate count comparison:

• Traditional methods: Gate count grows linearly or polynomially with qubit number or circuit depth
• Proposed method: Fixed 6 multi-qubit gates (for general Clifford operations)
• Improvement factor: 3-fold improvement over existing constant-depth methods

Experimental Findings

1. Resource equivalence: Depth reduction does not introduce additional power overhead
2. Scaling consistency: Both methods exhibit identical asymptotic behavior in power requirements
3. Practical validation: Algorithm performs well on medium-scale quantum systems

Related Work

Current State of Research

1. Linear-depth methods: Early work achieved Clifford compilation with gate count linearly related to qubit number
2. Logarithmic-depth methods: Parallelization techniques reduced depth to logarithmic level
3. Constant-depth methods: Recent work achieved constant depth, though gate count remains substantial

Advantages of This Work

1. Optimal gate count: Achieves minimum gate count among constant-depth methods
2. Practical algorithm: Provides concrete, implementable compilation algorithm
3. Power analysis: First systematic analysis of driving power requirements for constant-depth implementations
4. Hardware adaptation: Fully exploits native capabilities of platforms like ion traps

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Arbitrary Clifford operations can be implemented using at most 6 multi-qubit gates, achieving 1.5 times the theoretical lower bound
2. CNOT circuits can be implemented using 5 multi-qubit gates, significantly reducing circuit depth
3. Power requirements are comparable to traditional methods, achieving reduced depth and execution time without additional power overhead

Limitations

1. Hardware dependency: Method specifically targets quantum platforms with fully-connected capabilities
2. Theoretical gap: Still differs from theoretical lower bound (4 gates)
3. Single-qubit corrections: Requires additional single-qubit gates for phase correction

Future Directions

1. Further optimization: Explore implementation schemes approaching theoretical lower bounds
2. Generalization: Extend to other quantum computing platforms
3. Integrated applications: Combine with universal compilation techniques for broader quantum circuit optimization

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical contribution: Significant theoretical progress in Clifford operation compilation
2. Practical value: Provides directly applicable algorithms and implementation schemes
3. Comprehensive analysis: Considers not only gate count but also practical factors like power requirements
4. Rigorous proof: Provides strict mathematical proofs through symplectic matrix theory

Weaknesses

1. Platform limitations: Primarily applicable to platforms with fully-connected capabilities like ion traps
2. Constant factors: While constant-depth, the constant factor is relatively large
3. Complexity: Algorithm involves complex operations like matrix decomposition, with non-trivial implementation difficulty

Impact

1. Academic impact: Provides new perspectives and methods for quantum circuit compilation theory
2. Practical value: Direct applicability to ion trap quantum computing and related fields
3. Technical advancement: Promotes development of quantum circuit optimization techniques

Applicable Scenarios

1. Ion trap quantum computing: Most direct application scenario
2. Quantum error correction: Clifford-intensive quantum error correction protocols
3. Quantum simulation: Quantum simulation algorithms requiring numerous Clifford gates
4. Quantum benchmarking: Efficient implementation of random Clifford circuits

References

The paper cites 39 relevant references covering multiple fields including quantum circuit compilation, Clifford group theory, and ion trap quantum computing, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.