Structural origin of resonant diffraction in RuO$_2$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13767
• Title: Structural origin of resonant diffraction in RuO$_2$
• Authors: Connor A. Occhialini, Christie Nelson, Alessandro Bombardi, Shiyu Fan, Raul Acevedo-Esteves, Riccardo Comin, Dmitri N. Basov, Maki Musashi, Masashi Kawasaki, Masaki Uchida, Hoydoo You, John Mitchell, Valentina Bisogni, Claudio Mazzoli, Jonathan Pelliciari
• Classification: cond-mat.str-el (Strongly Correlated Electron Systems)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13767

Abstract

This paper reports a resonant X-ray diffraction (RXD) study of the Ru L$_3$ edge in RuO$_2$ single crystals and (001) epitaxial thin films. Different reflections at $\mathbf{Q} = (100)$ and $(001)$ were investigated as functions of incident energy, azimuthal angle, and temperature. The results demonstrate that the resonant diffraction observed in RuO$_2$ is entirely consistent with resonant charge anisotropy signals originating from structural effects permitted by the parent (non-magnetic) rutile space group $P4_2/mnm$. These findings significantly constrain the magnetic contribution to the resonant diffraction signal and indicate that $\mathbf{k} = 0$ antiferromagnetic order is unlikely to exist in RuO$_2$.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Research Problem

The core issue addressed in this study is determining the origin of the resonant X-ray diffraction (RXD) signal in RuO$_2$: whether it arises from magnetic or structural contributions. This controversy stems from recent contradictory experimental reports regarding the existence of antiferromagnetic order in RuO$_2$.

2. Problem Significance

• Antiferromagnetic Spintronics Applications: RuO$_2$ is considered a prototype material for "altermagnets," which have important potential applications in antiferromagnetic spintronics
• Theoretical Verification: RuO$_2$ has served as a testing platform for verifying theoretical predictions of non-relativistic spin-split antiferromagnets
• Technical Applications: RuO$_2$ has important applications in oxygen evolution reaction catalysis and superconducting thin films

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Neutron Diffraction: Antiferromagnetic signals reported earlier were subsequently attributed to multiple scattering effects
• μSR Experiments: No evidence of magnetic order was found
• RXD Technique: Although highly sensitive to thin film samples, magnetic and structural contributions are difficult to distinguish

4. Research Motivation

Given that RXD is the only technique still claiming to observe magnetic order in RuO$_2$, and given its high sensitivity to thin film samples, there is an urgent need to determine whether the RXD signal truly originates from magnetic order.

Core Contributions

1. Clarified the structural origin of the RXD signal: Through systematic experiments and theoretical calculations, the paper demonstrates that resonant diffraction in RuO$_2$ primarily originates from anisotropic tensor susceptibility (ATS) scattering rather than magnetic scattering
2. Established a method to distinguish magnetic and structural contributions: By exploiting the different azimuthal angle dependencies of magnetic and ATS contributions at different forbidden reflections $\mathbf{Q} = (100)$ and $(001)$, the two effects were successfully separated
3. Provided strict upper limits on magnetic moments: Based on experimental sensitivity, the upper limit for $\mathbf{k} = 0$ antiferromagnetic ordered magnetic moments was determined to be $|m| < 0.1 \mu_B$
4. Clarified methodological issues in altermagnet research: Highlighted important considerations when using RXD techniques on altermagnet candidate materials with similar symmetries

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The objective of this study is to distinguish between magnetic and structural origins of forbidden reflection signals in RuO$_2$ using resonant X-ray diffraction techniques and to determine whether long-range antiferromagnetic order exists.

Experimental Methods

1. Sample Preparation

• Single Crystal Samples: Grown in a tube furnace using oxidative sublimation/crystallization methods, typically smaller than 5 mm
• Thin Film Samples: 18 nm thick (001) RuO$_2$/TiO$_2$ epitaxial films grown by molecular beam epitaxy

2. Measurement Techniques

• Resonant Condition: Ru L$_3$ edge (2p → 4d, ~2.838 keV)
• Scattering Geometry: Incident σ-polarized light with scattered polarization analyzed (σ′/π′) using a graphite analyzer
• Measurement Parameters:
  • Temperature range: 6-340 K
  • Azimuthal angle (ψ) scans: to study angular dependence of scattering intensity
  • Energy scans: to obtain resonant spectra

3. Theoretical Calculations

Using the FDMNES program for:

• Non-magnetic calculations: based on $P4_2/mnm$ space group
• Magnetic calculations: assuming $P4′_2/mnm′$ magnetic space group with c-axis local spins
• Self-absorption corrections: accounting for sample thickness effects

Technical Innovations

1. Dual Forbidden Reflection Contrast Method

The key innovation lies in simultaneously studying two forbidden reflections $\mathbf{Q} = (100)$ and $(001)$:

• $\mathbf{Q} = (100)$: Magnetic and ATS contributions have identical azimuthal angle dependencies ($\cos^2\psi$), making them indistinguishable
• $\mathbf{Q} = (001)$: Magnetic and ATS contributions exhibit different azimuthal angle dependencies and polarization channel behaviors

For $\mathbf{Q} = (001)$:

• ATS scattering: $|F_{\sigma\sigma′}|^2 ∝ |\Delta|^2 \sin^2(2\psi)$, $|F_{\sigma\pi′}|^2 ∝ |\Delta|^2 \sin^2(\theta_b) \cos^2(2\psi)$
• Magnetic scattering: $|F_{\sigma\sigma′}|^2 = 0$, $|F_{\sigma\pi′}|^2 ∝ |f_{xy}|^2$

2. Polarization Ratio Analysis

The intensity ratio $\rho = I_{\sigma\pi′}/I_{\sigma\sigma′}$ at specific angles is defined, with the analyzer extinction ratio limiting the detection of magnetic signals.

3. Resonant Spectrum Comparison

Resonant energy spectra of different forbidden reflections are compared to verify whether they are determined by the same spectral function $f(\omega)$.

Experimental Setup

Data Acquisition

• Facilities: 4-ID (ISR) beamline at NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA and I16 beamline at Diamond Light Source, UK
• Detectors: Silicon drift detector (Amptek) and Merlin4x area detector
• Monochromator: Si(111) double-crystal monochromator with energy bandwidth ~0.5 eV

Measurement Conditions

• Geometric Configuration: Scattering plane contains c-axis (at ψ=0°)
• Polarization Analysis: Graphite (002) reflection as polarization analyzer
• Temperature Control: Closed-cycle optical cryostat (6-340 K)

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Analysis of $\mathbf{Q} = (100)$ Reflection

• Resonant reflection observed in σπ′ channel, persisting even at 300K
• Azimuthal angle dependence follows $I(\psi) ∝ \cos^2\psi$, consistent with expectations for c-axis antiferromagnetic and ATS scattering
• Impossible to distinguish magnetic and structural contributions from this reflection alone

2. Critical Findings for $\mathbf{Q} = (001)$ Reflection

• Azimuthal Angle Dependence: Four-fold symmetry observed in both σσ′ and σπ′ channels, clearly pointing to ATS scattering
• Temperature Dependence: Polarization ratio ρ remains essentially unchanged (~5%) between 9K and 300K
• Resonant Spectrum Consistency: Resonant spectra in σσ′ and σπ′ channels are nearly identical, indicating determination by a single spectral function

3. Quantitative Analysis Results

• Polarization Ratio: At T=9K, ρ~7% at ψ=0° and ~4.8% at ψ=45°
• Magnetic Moment Upper Limit: Based on experimental sensitivity, $|m| < 0.1 \mu_B$
• Temperature Stability: No significant magnetic signal variation across the entire measurement temperature range

4. Thin Film Verification

Results from 18 nm (001) RuO$_2$/TiO$_2$ thin films completely support the single crystal conclusions:

• Identical azimuthal angle dependencies (pure ATS scattering)
• Identical resonant spectrum behavior
• Identical temperature independence

Theoretical Calculation Verification

• FDMNES Calculations: Non-magnetic calculations successfully reproduce the experimental resonant spectra
• Self-Absorption Corrections: Good agreement between theory and experiment after accounting for sample thickness effects
• Magnetic Calculation Comparison: Predicted magnetic scattering at t$_{2g}$ orbital peaks is inconsistent with experiment

Ablation Experiments

Conclusions verified through systematic variation of measurement conditions:

1. Temperature-Dependent Measurements: Consistent results from 6.5K to 340K
2. Azimuthal Angle Sensitivity Tests: Maximum magnetic sensitivity at ψ=45°
3. Energy Dependence Studies: Confirmed structural origin of resonant behavior

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Early Studies (1970s-1990s): RuO$_2$ was considered a Pauli paramagnetic material
2. 2017 Turning Point: Berlijn et al.'s neutron diffraction experiments claimed discovery of antiferromagnetic order
3. Subsequent Controversy: μSR and new neutron diffraction experiments negated the existence of magnetic order

Technical Method Comparison

• Neutron Diffraction: Sensitive to magnetic moments but affected by multiple scattering
• μSR: Sensitive to internal magnetic fields; no evidence of magnetic order found
• RXD: Sensitive to small sample volumes but requires distinguishing magnetic and structural contributions

Theoretical Background

• Altermagnet Theory: Predicts non-relativistic spin splitting and special transport properties
• ATS Scattering Theory: Dmitrienko and Templeton-Templeton theoretical framework

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. The RXD signal in RuO$_2$ primarily originates from structural effects, particularly ATS scattering
2. No significant $k=0$ antiferromagnetic order exists, with magnetic moment upper limit $|m| < 0.1 \mu_B$
3. Single crystal and thin film results are consistent, ruling out sample-dependent effects
4. Provides methodological guidance for altermagnet research

Limitations

1. Magnetic Moment Detection Limits: Although upper limits are provided, extremely weak magnetic order may still exist
2. Temperature Range: Does not cover the reported $T_N > 300K$ region
3. Other Magnetic Structure Possibilities: Primarily addresses $k=0$ antiferromagnetic order; other magnetic structures are not completely ruled out

Future Directions

1. Extension to other altermagnet candidate materials for RXD studies
2. Development of more sensitive magnetic detection techniques
3. Investigation of charge-magnetic interference effects in chiral scattering applications

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation: Clever exploitation of symmetry differences in different forbidden reflections to distinguish magnetic and structural contributions
2. Rigorous Experimental Design: Multi-angle verification (azimuthal angle, temperature, energy, polarization)
3. Sufficient Theoretical Support: FDMNES calculations provide quantitative theoretical expectations
4. Clear Conclusions: Provides decisive evidence for a long-standing controversy
5. Universal Applicability of Methods: Serves as a model for research on other altermagnet materials

Shortcomings

1. Detection Sensitivity Limitations: The 0.1μ$_B$ upper limit remains relatively high
2. Missing High-Temperature Measurements: Does not directly measure temperatures above the reported $T_N$
3. Single Technique Dependence: Primarily relies on RXD technique, lacking direct comparison with other magnetic detection methods

Impact

1. Academic Impact: Clarifies an important controversy in the altermagnet field
2. Methodological Contribution: Provides important guidance for RXD technique applications in magnetic materials research
3. Technical Applications: Influences device design strategies based on RuO$_2$ antiferromagnetism

Applicable Scenarios

1. Magnetic verification of altermagnet candidate materials
2. RXD studies of materials with similar crystal structures
3. Resonant diffraction experiments requiring separation of magnetic and structural scattering contributions

References

This paper cites 54 important references covering key areas including altermagnet theory, experimental studies of RuO$_2$, and RXD technique development. Particularly important works include:

• Theoretical work on altermagnets by Šmejkal et al.
• Initial neutron diffraction study reporting RuO$_2$ antiferromagnetism by Berlijn et al.
• Negative μSR results by Hiraishi et al.
• Pioneering theoretical work on ATS scattering by Dmitrienko

Through carefully designed experiments and rigorous analysis, this research successfully resolves the magnetic controversy surrounding RuO$_2$ and provides important methodological contributions and clear experimental conclusions for the altermagnet research field.