2025-11-20T01:49:14.531671

A Unified Representation and Transformation of Electromagnetic Configurations Based on Generalized Hertz Potentials

Yi
We present a unified framework that fully represents electromagnetic potentials, fields, and sources in vacuum, based on a reinterpretation of the classical Hertz-potential formalism. In this construction, $ϕ$, $A$, $E$, $B$, $ρ$, and $J$ are systematically derived from a single vector wavefield $Γ(x, t)$ (called the "$Γ$-potential"), which is structurally aligned with the classical electric Hertz potential but of broader scope. A surjective mapping is established from such wavefields to all electromagnetic configurations in vacuum (that are sufficiently regular). This mapping induces a well-defined algebraic correspondence between the solution space of Maxwell's equations and the linear space of $C_t^{3} C_x^{3}$ vector wavefields (modulo the relevant symmetries), thereby enabling a framework for structural analysis of electromagnetic fields via their associated wavefields. Gauge freedom and the Lorenz gauge are naturally preserved; charge conservation and Maxwell's equations are inherently encoded in this representation. Building on this framework, we also introduce a transformation that provides a systematic method for generating new electromagnetic solutions from known ones. This transformation, called the "$Γ$-transformation", generalizes classical gauge transformations and may facilitate the exploration of hidden structures and symmetries in the solution space of Maxwell's equations.
academic

A Unified Representation and Transformation of Electromagnetic Configurations Based on Generalized Hertz Potentials

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.13875
  • Title: A Unified Representation and Transformation of Electromagnetic Configurations Based on Generalized Hertz Potentials
  • Author: Ting Yi (Independent Researcher, Irvine, California)
  • Classification: physics.class-ph (Classical Physics)
  • Publication Year: 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13875

Abstract

This paper proposes a unified framework for complete representation of electromagnetic potentials, fields, and sources in vacuum based on a reinterpretation of the classical Hertz potential formalism. In this construction, the scalar potential φ, vector potential A, electric field E, magnetic field B, as well as charge density ρ and current density J, are all systematically derived from a single vector wave field Γ(x,t) (termed the "Γ-potential"). The framework establishes a surjective mapping from the vector wave field to all sufficiently regular vacuum electromagnetic configurations and establishes explicit algebraic correspondence between the solution space of Maxwell's equations and the linear space of Ct3Cx3C_t^3 C_x^3 vector wave fields. Furthermore, the author introduces the "Γ-transformation," providing a systematic method for generating new solutions from known electromagnetic solutions.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Physical phenomena in electromagnetism can be described by six spacetime functions: charge density ρ, current density J, electric field E, magnetic field B, scalar potential φ, and vector potential A. These quantities naturally divide into three conceptual pairs:

  1. Source pair: (ρ, J) - representing charge distribution and its flow
  2. Field pair: (E, B) - representing measurable physical electromagnetic fields
  3. Potential pair: (φ, A) - mathematical constructs for expressing fields

Research Motivation

Comprehensive mathematical relationships exist among these three pairs of quantities, as described by Maxwell's equations and others, indicating structural redundancy in the description. The author argues that:

  1. Maxwell's equations are formally overdetermined
  2. This redundancy suggests that electromagnetic configurations may admit more compact, structurally unified descriptions
  3. Classical Hertz potentials have already demonstrated the possibility of generating scalar and vector potentials from a single vector function
  4. However, the structural perspective of the Hertz formalism has been insufficiently explored in the literature

Limitations of Existing Approaches

  • Traditional Hertz potentials are primarily used as technical tools for solving polarization and radiation problems in homogeneous media
  • Lack of extension to a general representation encompassing complete electromagnetic configurations with arbitrary sources
  • Insufficient exploration of their structural significance

Core Contributions

  1. Proposes the Γ-representation framework: Establishes systematic mapping from a single vector wave field Γ to complete electromagnetic configurations
  2. Proves completeness of representation: Demonstrates sufficiency and necessity through main and inverse theorems
  3. Reveals hierarchical symmetries: Systematically analyzes structural degrees of freedom and invariances in electromagnetic theory
  4. Introduces Γ-transformation: Provides transformation methods for generating new electromagnetic solutions from known ones
  5. Establishes algebraic structure: Creates algebraic correspondence between Maxwell equation solution space and vector field space
  6. Connects classical theory: Analyzes relationships with classical Hertz potentials, demonstrating framework generality

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Construct a unified mathematical framework such that all regular electromagnetic configurations φ, A, E, B, ρ, J in vacuum can be systematically derived from a single Ct3Cx3C_t^3 C_x^3 vector wave field Γ(x,t).

Core Theoretical Construction

Γ-Representation Theorem (Theorem 1)

Let Γ(x,t) ∈ Ct3Cx3C_t^3 C_x^3 be a vector field satisfying the vector wave equation: Γ(x,t)1c22Γt22Γ=G(x,t)\square \Gamma(x,t) \equiv \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\Gamma}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2\Gamma = G(x,t)

Define electromagnetic quantities:

  • Scalar potential: φΓ=Γ\varphi_\Gamma = -\nabla \cdot \Gamma
  • Vector potential: AΓ=1c2ΓtA_\Gamma = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial\Gamma}{\partial t}
  • Electric field: EΓ=1c22Γt2+(Γ)E_\Gamma = -\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\Gamma}{\partial t^2} + \nabla(\nabla \cdot \Gamma)
  • Magnetic field: BΓ=1c2t(×Γ)B_\Gamma = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(\nabla \times \Gamma)
  • Charge density: ρΓ=ε0G\rho_\Gamma = -\varepsilon_0\nabla \cdot G
  • Current density: JΓ=ε0GtJ_\Gamma = \varepsilon_0\frac{\partial G}{\partial t}

Inverse Γ-Representation Theorem (Theorem 2)

For any regular vacuum electromagnetic configuration φ, A, E, B, ρ, J, there exists a corresponding Γ-potential. Construction method:

Fix reference time t0t_0, choose spatial vector field Ft0(x)F_{t_0}(x) such that Ft0(x)=φ(x,t0)\nabla \cdot F_{t_0}(x) = -\varphi(x,t_0), define: Γ(x,t)=Ft0(x)+t0tc2A(x,τ)dτ\Gamma(x,t) = F_{t_0}(x) + \int_{t_0}^t c^2 A(x,\tau)d\tau

Symmetry Analysis

Γ-Representation Invariance Theorem (Theorem 3)

Let Γ1\Gamma_1 and Γ2\Gamma_2 be two Γ-potentials, γ=Γ2Γ1\gamma = \Gamma_2 - \Gamma_1, then:

  1. Complete equivalence: If γ=0\nabla \cdot \gamma = 0 and γt=0\frac{\partial\gamma}{\partial t} = 0, the two configurations are identical
  2. Gauge equivalence: If γ=0\square\gamma = 0 and ×(×γ)=0\nabla \times (\nabla \times \gamma) = 0, the potentials are related through gauge transformations preserving Lorenz gauge
  3. Source equivalence: If γ=0\square\gamma = 0, charge and current densities are identical

Γ-Transformation Framework

Linear Transformations

Based on linearity of electromagnetic equations, define:

  • Fundamental Γ-transformation: [EM]=[EM0]+[EM(Γ)][EM'] = [EM_0] + [EM(\Gamma)]
  • Operator-induced transformation: For linear operators L\mathcal{L} satisfying commutation conditions, [EM(L[Γ])]=L[EM(Γ)][EM(\mathcal{L}[\Gamma])] = \mathcal{L}[EM(\Gamma)]

Recursive Transformations

Vector quantities of electromagnetic configurations can be used as new Γ-potentials:

  • [EM]=[EM]+[EM(E)][EM'] = [EM] + [EM(E)] - Electric field self-referential transformation
  • [EM]=[EM]+[EM(B)][EM'] = [EM] + [EM(B)] - Magnetic field self-referential transformation
  • [EM]=[EM]+[EM(A)][EM'] = [EM] + [EM(A)] - Vector potential self-referential transformation

Theoretical Analysis

Regularity Requirements

To ensure Maxwell equations and related relationships hold in the pointwise sense, minimum regularity thresholds are required:

  • Continuity equation requires: ρCt1Cx0\rho \in C_t^1 C_x^0, JCt0Cx1C_t^0 C_x^1
  • Wave equations for potentials require: ACt2Cx3C_t^2 C_x^3, φ ∈ Ct3Cx2C_t^3 C_x^2
  • The assumption ΓCt3Cx3C_t^3 C_x^3 is sufficient and essentially minimal

Algebraic Structure

The electromagnetic solution space E\mathcal{E} is isomorphic to the quotient space of vector field space: EV/\mathcal{E} \cong \mathcal{V}/\sim where V=Ct3Cx3(R×R3;R3)\mathcal{V} = C_t^3 C_x^3(\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^3; \mathbb{R}^3), and equivalence relation \sim is determined by symmetries.

Helmholtz Decomposition Application

Any Γ-potential can be decomposed as: Γ = Γ_irr + Γ_sol (irrotational + solenoidal parts) The corresponding electromagnetic configuration decomposes into pure electric and pure magnetic parts.

Applications: Electromagnetic Fields in Media

Connection with Classical Hertz Potentials

In isotropic homogeneous linear media:

  1. Electric polarization contribution: Γ-potential Γ_e is related to electric Hertz potential Π_e through temporal scale transformation
  2. Magnetization contribution: Auxiliary Γ-potential transformed to effective Γ-potential via operator L=c2(dτ)(×)\mathcal{L} = c^2(\int \cdot d\tau) \circ (\nabla \times)
  3. Unified approach: Single Γ-potential can be constructed directly from total effective sources without separately treating contributions

Advantages

  • Provides more unified and flexible description than classical Hertz potentials
  • Allows single solution rather than separate treatment of contributions
  • Maintains compatibility with classical results

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Completeness: Γ-representation completely describes all regular vacuum electromagnetic configurations
  2. Unification: Extends traditional three-layer description (sources, fields, potentials) to four-layer structure
  3. Structural insight: Reveals hierarchical symmetries and algebraic structure in electromagnetic theory
  4. Practicality: Provides systematic tools for constructing new solutions and analyzing complex configurations

Limitations

  1. Restricted to regular configurations, excluding spatial or temporal jumps/pulses
  2. Employs non-covariant (3+1) formulation; while convenient for physical interpretation, extensible to covariant form
  3. Some transformations require higher regularity requirements

Future Directions

  1. Covariant generalization: Embed framework into four-dimensional covariant formulation
  2. Topological applications: Utilize Γ-transformation to construct electromagnetic fields with topological structure
  3. Quantum extension: Explore applications in quantum electrodynamics
  4. Numerical methods: Develop computational methods based on Γ-representation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical innovation: Provides new perspective on electromagnetic theory, generalizing Hertz potential concept to general cases
  2. Mathematical rigor: Complete theorem proofs and regularity analysis
  3. Clear structure: Systematically reveals hierarchical symmetries in electromagnetic theory
  4. Practical value: Γ-transformation provides systematic method for constructing new solutions
  5. Classical connection: Maintains compatibility with existing theory while providing more general framework

Weaknesses

  1. Application verification: Lacks concrete physical problem applications
  2. Computational complexity: Does not discuss complexity in practical calculations
  3. Physical interpretation: Physical meaning of Γ-potential requires further clarification
  4. Boundary conditions: Insufficient discussion of boundary condition treatment

Impact

  1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new mathematical framework for electromagnetic theory
  2. Methodological significance: Γ-transformation may inspire similar methods in other physics fields
  3. Educational value: Offers new pathway for understanding electromagnetic theory structure
  4. Technical potential: May play role in electromagnetic field numerical computation and engineering applications

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical electromagnetism research: Analyzing structure and symmetries of complex electromagnetic configurations
  2. Electromagnetic field modeling: Constructing electromagnetic field solutions with specific properties
  3. Topological electromagnetism: Studying electromagnetic fields with topological structure
  4. Educational applications: Facilitating understanding of mathematical structure of electromagnetic theory

References

  1. Aharonov Y. and Bohm D. (1959), Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory
  2. Jackson J. D. (1999), Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed
  3. Stratton J. A. (1941), Electromagnetic Theory
  4. Nisbet A. (1955), Hertzian electromagnetic potentials and associated gauge transformations
  5. Essex E. A. (1977), Hertz vector potentials of electromagnetic theory
  6. Rañada A. F. (1989), A topological theory of the electromagnetic field
  7. Arrayás M. et al. (2017), Knots in electromagnetism

Summary: This is a work of significant theoretical value in classical electromagnetic theory. By reinterpreting and generalizing the Hertz potential concept, it provides a new unified framework for electromagnetic theory. While practical application verification remains to be strengthened, its theoretical contributions and methodological significance merit attention.