PAGE: Prompt Augmentation for text Generation Enhancement

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13880
• Title: PAGE: Prompt Augmentation for text Generation Enhancement
• Authors: Mauro José Pacchiotti, Luciana Ballejos, Mariel Ale (Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Argentina)
• Classification: cs.CL cs.AI
• Institution: Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Centro de I+D de Ing. en Sistemas de Información, Santa Fe, Argentina
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13880

Abstract

Recent natural language generation models have demonstrated superior performance in text generation tasks. However, when faced with domain-specific tasks or special requirements, these models may underperform or require substantial additional data for fine-tuning. This research proposes PAGE (Prompt Augmentation for text Generation Enhancement), a framework that assists these models through simple auxiliary modules. These auxiliary modules are lightweight models, such as classifiers or extractors, capable of providing reasoning information extracted from input text. The output of auxiliary modules is used to construct enriched inputs, thereby improving the quality and controllability of generated text. Unlike other generation-assisted methods, PAGE does not require auxiliary generative models; instead, it proposes a simpler, modular, and easily adaptable architecture for different tasks.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. Insufficient Task-Specific Performance: Although large language models (LLMs) excel at general text generation tasks, they often underperform when facing domain-specific or specially-constrained tasks
2. High Fine-tuning Costs: Traditional solutions involve retraining or fine-tuning models, which require substantial high-quality data and computational resources
3. Resource Constraints: Many application scenarios lack sufficient training data and computational capacity

Research Motivation

• Reduce Resource Requirements: Provide a method to improve generation quality without large-scale retraining
• Enhance Controllability: Augment inputs with structured information to make generation more controllable and precise
• Modular Design: Create a flexible architecture easily adaptable to different tasks
• Interpretability: Employ simple and interpretable auxiliary modules for easy understanding and debugging

Core Contributions

1. Propose PAGE Framework: An innovative prompt augmentation architecture that improves text generation quality through simple auxiliary modules
2. Modular Design: Unlike other methods, PAGE does not rely on auxiliary generative models but uses lightweight classifiers and extractors
3. Resource-Friendly: Significantly reduces requirements for training data and computational resources
4. Practical Validation: Proof-of-concept in software requirements engineering using EARS syntax for structured requirement generation
5. Performance Improvement: Achieves significant improvements over baseline methods on ROUGE metrics (ROUGE-1 improvement of 65.41%, ROUGE-2 improvement of 205.62%)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Raw text descriptions (e.g., natural language requirement descriptions) Output: Structured, high-quality text (e.g., requirement expressions conforming to specific grammar specifications) Objective: Enhance input prompts through auxiliary information to improve generation quality without retraining the main model

Model Architecture

The PAGE framework comprises three core components:

1. Auxiliary Module

• Function: Perform reasoning on input text and extract structured information
• Types:
  • Classifier: Assign relevant labels to input text
  • Entity Extractor: Identify and classify key entities in text
  • Sentiment Analyzer: Detect sentiment orientation or intent in text
• Characteristics: Lightweight, highly interpretable, low training cost

2. Prompt Composer

• Function: Combine auxiliary module outputs with original text to construct augmented prompts
• Implementation: Use configurable templates to integrate structured information into inputs
• Output: Enriched contextual prompts providing more guidance information for the generative model

3. Generative Model

• Function: Generate final text based on augmented prompts
• Characteristics: Can use any existing LLM without modification or retraining
• Techniques: Support zero-shot, one-shot, few-shot and other prompting techniques

Workflow

Raw Text → Auxiliary Module → Structured Information
    ↓           ↓
    └→ Prompt Composer ←┘
           ↓
    Augmented Prompt → Generative Model → Final Output

1. User provides raw text input
2. Auxiliary modules process input in parallel, generating structured reasoning information
3. Prompt composer combines original text with auxiliary information
4. Generative model produces final output based on augmented prompts

Technical Innovations

1. Lightweight Assistance: Compared to using large auxiliary generative models, PAGE employs simple lightweight components like classifiers
2. Modular Architecture: Each component can be independently optimized and replaced with strong adaptability
3. No Retraining Required: The main generative model remains unchanged; performance improvement is achieved solely through prompt augmentation
4. High Interpretability: Auxiliary module outputs are explicit text structures, facilitating understanding and debugging

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• Sources: Integrated from multiple datasets
  • PURE dataset: Public requirement document collection
  • Software Functional Requirements dataset
  • Requirements from public specification documents
• Scale: 253 instances
• Structure:
  • Raw requirement expressions (without specific syntax structure)
  • EARS category labels
  • Manually written EARS syntax requirement expressions
• Category Distribution: Covers five EARS categories (Ubiquitous, Event-driven, State-driven, Unwanted, Optional)

Evaluation Metrics

ROUGE metric family is used to assess generation quality:

• ROUGE-1: Word-level overlap
• ROUGE-2: Bigram matching
• ROUGE-L: Longest common subsequence, measuring structural preservation

Each metric computes three dimensions: Precision, Recall, and F1-Score.

Comparison Methods

Three experimental groups are designed for comparison:

1. Zero-shot Baseline: Direct LLM usage without any augmentation
2. Ideal Upper Bound: Using correct labels from the dataset as auxiliary information
3. Complete PAGE Implementation: Using trained classifiers as auxiliary modules

Implementation Details

• Auxiliary Classifier: Random Forest model
  • Maximum depth: 10
  • Minimum samples for split: 5
  • Number of estimators: 100
  • Accuracy: 82.35%
• Generative Model: Llama 3.1-8B, deployed locally via Ollama
• Data Split: 80% training, 20% testing, 5-fold cross-validation

Experimental Results

Main Results

Performance Improvement Analysis

Improvement magnitude relative to baseline methods:

• ROUGE-1: 65.41% improvement
• ROUGE-2: 205.62% improvement
• ROUGE-L: 92.79% improvement

PAGE achieves performance close to the ideal upper bound, falling short by only 2-4 percentage points, demonstrating the method's effectiveness.

Case Analysis

Example 1 (Ubiquitous category):

• Original input: "The system shall allow a customer to place an order online"
• Zero-shot output: Complex structured description (Actor, Event, Role, etc.)
• PAGE output: "The system shall always allow a customer to place an order online"
• Expected output: "The system shall allow a customer to place an order online"

Example 2 (Event-driven category):

• Original input: "When a driver completes a ride, the system shall allow the driver to leave a review"
• Zero-shot output: "The Driver shall be enabled to submit a review after successfully completing a ride"
• PAGE output: "When a ride is completed, the Application shall enable the driver to leave a review"

Experimental Findings

1. Critical Role of Auxiliary Modules: Classification accuracy directly impacts final generation quality
2. Significant Few-shot Learning Effects: Providing relevant examples substantially improves generation structure
3. Modular Architecture Advantages: Enables independent evaluation and optimization of component contributions
4. Resource Efficiency: Avoids high costs of large model retraining

Related Work

Generation Enhancement Methods

• Du et al.: Combining explicit prompts and external semantic knowledge to improve text reasoning
• He et al.: Using BERT-encoded human summaries to guide GPT-2 generation
• Zeldes et al.: Auxiliary Tuning technique, combining auxiliary models at the logits layer

Knowledge-Enhanced Generation

• Zhang et al.: IAG framework using auxiliary generative models for knowledge induction
• Liao et al.: Awakening Augmented Generation, activating latent knowledge through auxiliary tasks

PAGE's Uniqueness

Compared to existing methods, PAGE's advantages include:

1. No requirement for auxiliary generative models, reducing complexity
2. Use of lightweight, interpretable auxiliary components
3. Modular design easily adaptable to different tasks
4. Low resource requirements, suitable for practical applications

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Effectiveness Validation: PAGE significantly outperforms baseline methods in software requirement generation tasks
2. Resource-Friendly: Achieves performance improvement through simple auxiliary modules, avoiding retraining costs
3. Architectural Advantages: Modular design provides good interpretability and adaptability
4. Practical Value: Provides a viable solution for text generation optimization in resource-constrained environments

Limitations

1. Auxiliary Module Dependency: Generation quality is constrained by auxiliary module accuracy
2. Domain Specificity: Current validation is limited to requirements engineering domain
3. Dataset Scale: Experimental dataset is relatively small (253 instances)
4. Evaluation Metric Limitations: Primarily relies on ROUGE metrics, lacking human evaluation

Future Directions

1. Framework Implementation: Develop a Python software framework providing reusable PAGE implementation
2. Multi-domain Validation: Test framework effectiveness across more application domains
3. Auxiliary Module Optimization: Research more efficient auxiliary module design strategies
4. Evaluation System Refinement: Introduce more comprehensive evaluation metrics and human assessment

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: Proposes a unique lightweight auxiliary augmentation solution
2. High Practical Value: Addresses resource constraints in real-world applications
3. Reasonable Design: Modular architecture facilitates understanding, implementation, and extension
4. Sufficient Experiments: Designs reasonable comparative experiments including ideal upper bound analysis
5. Significant Results: Achieves substantial performance improvements across multiple metrics

Weaknesses

1. Limited Validation Scope: Validation conducted only in one specific domain (requirements engineering)
2. Small Dataset: 253 instances may be insufficient to fully validate method generalization capability
3. Insufficient Baseline Comparisons: Lacks direct comparison with other prompt augmentation methods
4. Lacking Theoretical Analysis: Insufficient in-depth explanation of why the method is effective
5. Missing Human Evaluation: Relies entirely on automatic metrics, lacking expert assessment

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new research direction for text generation enhancement
2. Practical Value: Offers practical solutions for generation optimization in resource-constrained scenarios
3. Reproducibility: Clear method description with relatively simple implementation
4. Extensibility: Framework design demonstrates good extensibility

Applicable Scenarios

1. Professional Domain Text Generation: Such as technical documentation, legal documents requiring specific formats
2. Resource-Constrained Environments: Application scenarios where large model fine-tuning is infeasible
3. Rapid Prototyping: Applications requiring quick task adaptation
4. High Interpretability Requirements: Scenarios requiring understanding of generation processes

References

The paper cites multiple important related works, including:

• Foundational work on Transformer architecture (Vaswani et al., 2017)
• Major large language models (GPT, BERT, T5, Llama, etc.)
• EARS requirement syntax specification (Mavin et al., 2009)
• ROUGE evaluation metrics (Lin, 2004)
• Related generation enhancement methods, etc.

Overall Assessment: This is a research paper proposing an innovative method. The PAGE framework provides new insights for text generation enhancement. While there is room for improvement in validation scope and theoretical analysis, its practical value and technical innovation merit recognition. This method is particularly suitable for application scenarios requiring rapid task adaptation with limited resources.