2025-11-18T01:37:13.872048

Strong Evidence for Cosmic Ray-Supported $\sim$L$^{\ast}$ Galaxy Halos via X-ray \& tSZ Constraints

Ponnada, Hopkins, Lu et al.
Many state-of-the-art galaxy simulations featuring traditional feedback modes have significant challenges producing enough extended soft X-ray ($\sim 0.5-2$ keV) emission at R $\sim 0.5-1$ R$_{\rm vir}$ observed around galaxies with stellar masses M$_{\rm \ast} \lesssim 10^{11} \rm M_\odot$, without violating galaxy mass function constraints. Moreover, thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (tSZ) measurements probing the thermal pressure of similar galaxies indicate it is orders-of-magnitude lower than predictions from simple halo hydrodynamics and many hydrodynamical simulations. We demonstrate that these constraints can be met congruously with a large non-thermal pressure contribution in the form of cosmic rays (CRs) from SNe and/or AGN, which lowers the tSZ signal while CR leptons produce plentiful soft X-rays via inverse Compton scattering of the CMB. The combination of these two observations is far more constraining on the pressure budget of galactic halos than either alone -- if these novel tSZ and X-ray observations are borne out by future studies, then taken together they reveal \textit{the strongest evidence for CR support in halos to date}. Conversely, it is very difficult to produce the extended X-rays via traditional thermal emission without increasing the overall thermal pressure and thus tSZ signal in tandem, making these tensions even worse. Finally, tSZ \& X-rays together unlock a novel observational method to constrain halo CR pressure relative to thermal pressure, with implications for CR transport parameters and AGN feedback energetics across various galaxy mass scales. Taking the currently observed constraints at M$_{\rm halo} \sim 10^{\rm 12} \rm M_\odot$ imply the halo CR pressure must at least be equal to the gas thermal pressure.
academic

Strong Evidence for Cosmic Ray-Supported \simL^{\ast} Galaxy Halos via X-ray & tSZ Constraints

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.13959
  • Title: Strong Evidence for Cosmic Ray-Supported \simL^{\ast} Galaxy Halos via X-ray & tSZ Constraints
  • Authors: Sam B. Ponnada, Philip F. Hopkins, Yue Samuel Lu, Emily M. Silich, Iryna S. Butsky, Dušan Kereš
  • Classification: astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
  • Publication Date: Draft version October 17, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13959

Abstract

State-of-the-art galaxy simulations with conventional feedback schemes struggle to produce sufficient extended soft X-ray (~0.5-2 keV) radiation observed around galaxies with stellar mass M* ≲ 10^11 M⊙ at R ~ 0.5-1 Rvir without violating galaxy mass function constraints. Furthermore, thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (tSZ) measurements, which probe thermal pressure similar to that in galaxy halos, indicate values several orders of magnitude lower than predictions from simple halo hydrodynamics and many hydrodynamic simulations. This paper demonstrates that these constraints can be consistently satisfied through substantial non-thermal pressure contributions in the form of cosmic rays (CRs) from supernovae and/or active galactic nuclei, which suppress the tSZ signal while CR leptons produce abundant soft X-rays through inverse Compton scattering off the CMB. The combination of these two observations provides stronger constraints on galaxy halo pressure budgets than either alone—if these new tSZ and X-ray observations are confirmed by future studies, they collectively reveal the strongest evidence to date for CR-supported halos.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Observational Challenges: Recent observations of low-redshift ~L* galaxies have revealed extensive "cold" gas (T ~ 10^4 K) in the circumgalactic medium (CGM) surrounding galaxies, with densities several orders of magnitude lower than expected for equilibrium with a thermally-virialized CGM, suggesting substantial non-thermal pressure support.
  2. X-ray Observational Difficulties: Recent stacking observations report extended, diffuse CGM X-ray emission around ~L* galaxies, but these extended profiles are typically underpredicted by state-of-the-art cosmological galaxy formation simulations employing various stellar and AGN feedback schemes.
  3. tSZ Signal Suppression: Recent observations indicate systematic suppression of thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (tSZ) signals around ~L* galaxies relative to simulations with thermally-dominated virialized halos.

Research Motivation

This "circumgalactic paradox"—extended X-ray surface brightness profiles suggesting abundant hot gas at large radii, while tSZ measurements indicate thermal pressure several orders of magnitude lower than expected—requires new physical mechanisms for explanation.

Core Contributions

  1. Proposed CR-supported Halo Model: Demonstrates that cosmic ray pressure-dominated galaxy halos can simultaneously explain low tSZ signals and extended X-ray emission.
  2. Established CR Inverse Compton Mechanism: Provides detailed exposition of the physical mechanism by which CR leptons produce soft X-rays through inverse Compton scattering off the CMB.
  3. Provided Strong Constraint Evidence: Joint tSZ and X-ray observations provide the strongest observational evidence to date for cosmic ray support in MW-mass halos.
  4. Developed New Observational Methods: Joint tSZ and X-ray observations provide new methods for constraining halo CR pressure relative to thermal pressure.

Methodology

Task Definition

This study aims to determine the pressure support mechanisms in ~L* galaxy halos through joint analysis of X-ray and tSZ observational constraints, particularly the relative contributions of thermal pressure (P_th) and cosmic ray pressure (P_CR).

Theoretical Framework

Thermally-Dominated Halo Model

For virialized, thermally-balanced halos, hydrostatic equilibrium is determined by:

ρV_c²/r = -dP/dr, P = n_gas k_B T = ρ_gas c_s²

Assuming ρ_gas ∝ r^(-2), the expected tSZ signal is:

Ỹ200 ~ 1.25×10^(-7) arcmin² E(z)^(-2/3)(f_b/⟨f_b⟩)M₂₀₀,₁₂^(5/3)

The corresponding soft X-ray luminosity is:

L^(0.5-2 keV)_(X,CGM)/10⁴⁰ erg s⁻¹ ≈ (f_b/⟨f_b⟩)²M₂₀₀,₁₂ f_q f_profile

Cosmic Ray Pressure-Dominated Halo Model

In CR-supported halos, hydrostatic equilibrium is set by the CR pressure gradient: ∇P_CR = ∇ρV_c²

This results in lower gas temperatures (T_gas ~ several ×10⁴ K - 10⁵ K) and correspondingly lower tSZ signals:

Ỹ200 ~ 2.7×10^(-8) arcmin² E(z)^(-2/3)(f_b/⟨f_b⟩)M₂₀₀,₁₂ T_(PI,5)

CR Inverse Compton X-ray Emission

The X-ray luminosity from CR leptons is primarily determined by the injection rate:

L^(0.5-2 keV)_(X,CGM)/10⁴⁰ erg s⁻¹ ~ f_(profile,CR-IC)[0.09Ṁ*/(M⊙/yr) + 5700ε₋₃⟨Ṁ_BH⟩/(M⊙/yr) + 0.1M*/(10¹¹M⊙)]

Technical Innovations

  1. Multi-Observable Joint Constraints: First systematic combination of tSZ and X-ray observations to constrain CGM pressure structure.
  2. CR-IC Mechanism: Detailed establishment of theoretical framework for CR lepton inverse Compton scattering producing keV X-rays.
  3. Orthogonal Constraint Directions: In the L_X vs Ỹ200 parameter space, the CR model provides constraint directions orthogonal to the thermal model.

Experimental Setup

Observational Data

  1. X-ray Data: eROSITA stacking observations from Zhang et al. (2024a,b), covering galaxies in the MW to M31 mass range.
  2. tSZ Data: Thermal SZ measurements from Das et al. (2025), probing galaxies near M_halo ~ 10^12 M⊙.

Simulation Data

  1. FIRE-2 Simulations: MW-mass halo simulations with and without cosmic rays.
  2. Large-Volume Simulations: Predictions from CAMELS-TNG and CAMELS-SIMBA.

Analysis Methods

Comparison of mock observations from analytical models and numerical simulations to evaluate predictions of different pressure support mechanisms for observables.

Experimental Results

Main Results

tSZ Constraint Analysis

Figure 2 shows comparison of Ỹ200 vs M_halo:

  • Thermal Pressure-Dominated Model: Systematically overpredicts tSZ signal by 1-1.5 orders of magnitude
  • CR Pressure-Dominated Model: Consistent with observational upper limits, particularly at lowest halo masses

X-ray Profile Analysis

Figure 3(a) displays radial X-ray surface brightness (XSB) profiles:

  • Thermal Emission Model: Sharply truncates at R > 100 kpc, inconsistent with observed shallow profiles (SX ∝ r^(-1))
  • CR-IC Model: Remarkably consistent with observations across entire radial range

Joint Constraints

Analysis of L_X,CGM vs Ỹ200 in Figure 4 reveals:

  • Thermal model moves along fixed slope in this parameter space, difficult to satisfy both constraints simultaneously
  • CR model provides orthogonal parameter dependencies, more readily satisfying joint constraints

Quantitative Constraint Results

Based on current observations, constraints on MW-mass halos indicate:

⟨P_CR,CGM⟩ ≥ 1.2 ⟨P_gas,CGM⟩

That is, cosmic ray energy in the CGM is at least 3 times the thermal gas energy.

Ablation Analysis

Sensitivity analysis varying model parameters shows:

  • Changing n_gas or T_gas drives thermal model away from observational constraints
  • Changing P_CR or P_gas moves CR model orthogonally in parameter space, readily satisfying constraints

CGM Observational Studies

  • Optical/ultraviolet spectroscopic surveys reveal ubiquitous "cold" gas in low-redshift ~L* galaxy halos
  • X-ray absorption studies provide upper limits on CGM hot gas
  • Recent tSZ stacking observations show systematic thermal pressure suppression

Cosmic Ray Simulation Studies

  • Most simulations explicitly modeling cosmic rays predict CR pressure-dominated halos
  • CR-supported halos better explain absorption line observations
  • Empirical constraints on CR escape from galaxy disks support CR-IC mechanism

Galaxy Formation Simulations

  • Large-volume simulations (EAGLE, TNG, SIMBA) encounter difficulties in CGM X-ray predictions
  • FIRE simulations demonstrate importance of CR physics for CGM properties

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Strong Observational Evidence: Joint tSZ and X-ray observations provide the strongest evidence to date for cosmic ray support in MW-mass halos.
  2. Theoretical Consistency: The CR-IC mechanism naturally explains extended X-ray emission while maintaining low thermal pressure.
  3. New Observational Methods: Joint tSZ and X-ray observations provide powerful tools for constraining CGM pressure structure.

Limitations

  1. Sample Matching: X-ray and tSZ observations derive from different samples, requiring matched-sample analysis.
  2. Model Assumptions: Analytical models employ simplified spherical symmetry and steady-state assumptions.
  3. Transport Parameters: Substantial uncertainties in CR transport parameters such as diffusion velocity.

Future Directions

  1. Matched-Sample Observations: Joint tSZ and X-ray observations of identical galaxy samples needed.
  2. Large-Volume CR Simulations: Development of large-volume cosmological simulations incorporating CR physics.
  3. Multi-Wavelength Constraints: Combination with independent constraints from weak gravitational lensing, FRBs, etc.
  4. AGN Feedback Mechanisms: Exploration of cosmic rays produced by AGN in galaxy quenching.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. High Innovation: First systematic use of joint tSZ and X-ray constraints to study CGM pressure structure, providing new observational pathways.
  2. Theoretical Rigor: Establishes complete CR-IC theoretical framework from microphysical processes to macroscopic observational predictions.
  3. Sufficient Data: Combines latest observational data with multiple simulation suites for comprehensive analysis.
  4. Significant Results: Provides strong observational evidence for cosmic ray importance in galaxy halos.

Limitations

  1. Sample Constraints: Unmatched X-ray and tSZ observation samples may introduce systematic biases.
  2. Model Simplification: Analytical models neglect dynamical evolution and non-spherical effects.
  3. Parameter Uncertainties: Large uncertainties in CR transport parameters affect quantitative predictions.
  4. Alternative Explanations: Insufficient discussion of other possible non-thermal pressure sources.

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides key observational support for cosmic ray roles in galaxy formation theory.
  2. Observational Methods: Pioneering multi-wavelength observational methods for constraining CGM physics.
  3. Practical Value: Provides important science targets for future X-ray and millimeter-wave observations.

Applicable Scenarios

This method is particularly suitable for:

  • CGM studies of MW to M31-mass galaxies
  • Observational verification of cosmic ray feedback mechanisms
  • Joint analysis of multi-wavelength survey data
  • Observational testing of galaxy formation simulations

References

This paper cites extensive related research, including:

  • Zhang et al. (2024a,b): eROSITA X-ray observations
  • Das et al. (2025): tSZ measurements
  • Hopkins et al. (2025a): CR-IC theoretical framework
  • Related work from major galaxy formation simulation projects (FIRE, EAGLE, TNG, SIMBA)

This research provides important progress in understanding physical processes in galaxy halos, particularly the role of cosmic rays in galaxy evolution. The methodology of constraining CGM properties through joint multi-wavelength observations has broad application prospects and will advance development in related fields.