Open case for a closed universe

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.13971
• Title: Open case for a closed universe
• Authors: Nathan L. Burwig, Damien A. Easson (Arizona State University)
• Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13971

Abstract

This paper establishes a novel cosmological no-go theorem: spatially flat (k=0) and open (k=-1) Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) non-static spacetimes cannot simultaneously satisfy non-singularity, geodesic completeness, and the averaged null energy condition (ANEC). Equivalently, any dynamical flat or open universe that is complete must violate ANEC. In contrast, closed universes (k=+1) uniquely permit non-singular, geodesically complete solutions satisfying ANEC, with global de Sitter space representing a canonical saturating case. Furthermore, the authors analytically demonstrate that positive spatial curvature naturally mimics the phenomenology of phantom dark energy (w<-1), introducing a 1% level bias in flat model reconstructions of w(z).

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The central question addressed by this research is: whether there exist completely non-singular cosmological models that neither violate fundamental energy conditions nor compromise geodesic completeness?

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Foundation: The classical Hawking-Penrose singularity theorem demonstrates that spacetimes satisfying energy conditions in general relativity typically contain singularities
2. Cosmological Implications: Understanding the initial conditions and evolutionary history of the universe, particularly the avoidance of Big Bang singularities
3. Observational Motivation: Recent DESI BAO data combined with CMB and supernova constraints indicate a trend toward w(z)<-1, suggesting possible phantom bias

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. BGV Theorem: Although not requiring energy conditions, it still predicts past incompleteness of inflationary universes
2. Classical Singularity Theorems: Depend on pointwise energy conditions, easily violated by quantum fluctuations
3. Existing Non-singular Models: Typically require violation of fundamental energy conditions or introduction of exotic matter

Core Contributions

1. Establishment of New No-Go Theorem: Proves that flat and open FRW spacetimes cannot simultaneously satisfy non-singularity, geodesic completeness, and ANEC
2. Identification of Closed Universe Uniqueness: Demonstrates that only k=+1 universes can simultaneously satisfy these three conditions
3. Provision of Analytical Curvature-Phantom Bias Formula: First analytical derivation of how spatial curvature produces apparent w<-1 effects in flat model analysis
4. Establishment of New Eternal Cosmology Classification: Reclassifies cosmological models based on ANEC consistency

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

Investigation of FRW spacetime compatibility under three conditions:

• Non-singularity: Bounded curvature invariants
• Geodesic Completeness: All geodesics can be infinitely extended
• ANEC Consistency: Energy flux integral along complete null geodesics is non-negative

Core Theorem

Main Theorem (Flat/Open FRW): For non-static FRW spacetimes with k=0 or k=-1, if null geodesic completeness is satisfied, then: $I_{\text{ANEC}} := \lim_{T_{\pm}\to\pm\infty} \int_{T_-}^{T_+} \frac{\rho(t) + p(t)}{a(t)} dt < 0$

Proof Methods

Flat Case (k=0)

Core identity: $\int_{T_-}^{T_+} \frac{\rho + p}{a} dt = -2\left[\frac{H}{a}\right]_{T_-}^{T_+} - 2\int_{T_-}^{T_+} \frac{H^2}{a} dt$

Boundary Control Lemma: Under bounded curvature and null completeness conditions, either $\int H^2/a \, dt = +\infty$ (yielding $I_{\text{ANEC}} = -\infty$), or boundary terms vanish and the integral converges.

Open Case (k=-1)

Contains additional negative curvature contributions: $\int_{T_-}^{T_+} \frac{\rho + p}{a} dt = -2\int_{T_-}^{T_+} \frac{H^2 + 1/a^2}{a} dt - 2\left[\frac{H}{a}\right]_{T_-}^{T_+}$

The negative curvature term $1/a^2$ further strengthens the conclusion.

Closed Case (k=+1)

Geometric identity: $I_{\text{ANEC}}(T) = -2\left[\frac{H}{a}\right]_{-T}^T + 2\int_{-T}^T \left(\frac{1}{a^3} - \frac{H^2}{a}\right) dt$

The positive curvature term $1/a^3$ can compensate for the negative $H^2/a$ term, allowing $I_{\text{ANEC}} \geq 0$.

Technical Innovations

1. Affine Parameterization of ANEC Integral: Using $d\lambda = a \, dt$ ensures correct integration along null geodesics
2. Boundary Term Control: Key insight regarding asymptotic behavior of boundary terms under completeness conditions
3. Geometric Decomposition of Curvature Effects: Explicit separation of spatial curvature contributions to the ANEC integral

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Model Verification

Example 1: Flat cosh bounce

Scale factor: $a(t) = h^{-1}\cosh(ht)$

• Non-singular bouncing cosmology
• Geodesically complete
• ANEC violation: $I_{\text{ANEC}} = -\pi h^2 < 0$
• Requires phantom matter support

Example 2: Closed cosh bounce (global de Sitter)

Same scale factor in k=+1 case:

• $\rho + p = 0$ (saturating ANEC)
• $I_{\text{ANEC}} = 0$
• Supported by positive cosmological constant

Example 3: Past-eternal inflation model

Scale factor: $a(t) = a_0\sqrt{\tanh(t/\alpha) + c}$, $c > 1$

• Flat case: $I_{\text{ANEC}}^{(k=0)} < 0$ (ANEC violation)
• Closed case: $I_{\text{ANEC}}^{(k=1)} = +\infty$ (strong ANEC satisfaction)

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. Rigor of No-Go Theorem: In flat/open universes, completeness strictly implies $I_{\text{ANEC}} < 0$
2. Specialness of Closed Universe: k=+1 is the unique geometry permitting simultaneous satisfaction of all three conditions
3. de Sitter Saturation: Global de Sitter space realizes the boundary case $I_{\text{ANEC}} = 0$

Observational Predictions: Curvature-Induced Phantom Bias

For a truly curved ΛCDM universe: $H^2(z)/H_0^2 = \Omega_{m,0}(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{\Lambda,0} + \Omega_{k,0}(1+z)^2$

Under flat model fitting, the effective equation of state becomes: $w_{\text{eff}}(z) = -1 + \frac{1}{3} \frac{\ln[\Omega_{\Lambda,0} + \Omega_{k,0}(1+z)^2] - \ln[\Omega_{\Lambda,0} + \Omega_{k,0}]}{\ln(1+z)}$

Instantaneous equation of state: $w_{\text{inst}}(z) = -1 + \frac{2}{3} \frac{\Omega_{k,0}(1+z)^2}{\Omega_{\Lambda,0} + \Omega_{k,0}(1+z)^2}$

Numerical Predictions

• For $\Omega_{k,0} \sim -0.004$, at z=1:
  • $w_{\text{eff}} \simeq -1.008$
  • $w_{\text{inst}} \simeq -1.016$
• 1% level systematic bias effect

Related Work

Development of Singularity Theorems

1. Hawking-Penrose Theorem: Based on pointwise energy conditions and trapped surfaces
2. BGV Theorem: Depends only on average expansion, requires no energy conditions
3. Present Work: Focuses on ANEC, a weaker yet more robust condition

Non-singular Cosmological Models

1. Emergent Universe Models: Work by Ellis-Maartens et al.
2. Past-Complete Inflation: Constructions by Lesnefsky-Easson-Davies
3. Eternal Universes: Classification by Easson-Lesnefsky

Energy Condition Research

1. Quantum Field Theory Foundations of ANEC: Wald-Yurtsever, Fewster et al.
2. Causality and ANEC: Wall's proof of generalized second law
3. ANEC at Spacetime Boundaries: Graham-Olum's non-chronological averaging conditions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Geometric Determinism: Spatial geometry (k value) fundamentally determines the possibility of non-singular complete cosmologies
2. Central Role of ANEC: Compared to classical energy conditions, ANEC provides more precise physical constraints
3. Theoretical Advantages of Closed Universe: Positive curvature is geometrically necessary for realizing completely regular cosmologies
4. Observational Testability: Curvature effects produce observable systematic biases in precision cosmology

Limitations

1. Strength of ANEC Assumption: Although weaker than pointwise conditions, ANEC violation realization in quantum field theory remains controversial
2. FRW Symmetry Restrictions: Results limited to highly symmetric spacetimes
3. Classical Gravity Framework: Does not account for possible quantum gravity corrections
4. Observational Constraints: Current observations strongly support a nearly flat universe

Future Directions

1. Quantum Gravity Corrections: Investigation of how quantum effects modify these conclusions
2. Observational Verification: Direct testing of spatial curvature in future precision surveys
3. Generalization to Other Symmetries: Extension to Bianchi models and more general cases
4. Realization of ANEC Violation: Exploration of consistent ANEC violation mechanisms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor: Complete theorem proofs with careful boundary condition treatment
2. Deep Physical Insights: Reveals profound connections between spatial geometry and energy conditions
3. Observational Relevance: Provides testable observational predictions
4. Theoretical Unification: Connects classical singularity theorems, modern cosmology, and quantum field theory

Weaknesses

1. Practical Limitations: Tension between closed universe predictions and current observational flatness
2. ANEC Foundations: Physical necessity of ANEC remains theoretically controversial
3. Model Dependence: Results strongly depend on FRW symmetry assumptions
4. Missing Quantum Effects: Classical framework may fail near Planck scales

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new perspective on cosmological singularity problem
2. Observational Motivation: Provides strong theoretical motivation for precise spatial curvature measurement
3. Cross-disciplinary Connections: Links gravitational theory, quantum field theory, and observational cosmology
4. Future Research Direction: Points toward new directions in non-singular cosmology research

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Cosmology Research: Provides guiding principles for constructing non-singular models
2. Observational Data Analysis: Reminds consideration of curvature effects in dark energy analysis
3. Quantum Gravity Theory: Provides classical benchmarks for quantum gravity models
4. Precision Cosmology: Tests spatial curvature in future high-precision observations

References

The paper cites extensive relevant literature, including:

• Original works on Hawking-Penrose singularity theorem 1-6
• BGV theorem and applications 7-9
• Non-singular cosmological models 10-14
• Quantum field theory foundations of ANEC 15-19
• Latest DESI observational data 21-22
• Phantom dark energy theory 23-26

This work provides a precise mathematical answer to a fundamental question in cosmology—the compatibility of non-singularity and completeness—while establishing concrete connections between theoretical predictions and observational data. Despite certain limitations, its rigorous mathematical framework and profound physical insights make it an important contribution to modern cosmological theory.