2025-11-10T02:39:53.675877

Robust extrapolation problem for random processes with stationary increments

Luz, Moklyachuk
The problem of optimal estimation of linear functionals $A ξ=\int_{0}^{\infty} a(t)ξ(t)dt$ and $A_Tξ=\int_{0}^{T} a(t)ξ(t)dt$ depending on the unknown values of random process $ξ(t)$, $t\in R$, with stationary $n$th increments from observations of ttis process for $t<0$ is considered. Formulas for calculating mean square error and spectral characteristic of optimal linear estimation of the functionals are proposed in the case when spectral density is exactly known. Formulas that determine the least favorable spectral densities are proposed for given sets of admissible spectral densities.
academic

Robust Extrapolation Problem for Random Processes with Stationary Increments

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.14003
  • Title: Robust extrapolation problem for random processes with stationary increments
  • Authors: Maksym Luz, Mikhail Moklyachuk (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)
  • Classification: math.ST (Statistics Theory)
  • Published Journal: Mathematics and Statistics 2(2): 78-88, 2014
  • DOI: 10.13189/ms.2014.020204
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14003

Abstract

This paper investigates the optimal estimation problem for linear functionals Aξ=0a(t)ξ(t)dtA\xi=\int_0^{\infty}a(t)\xi(t)dt and ATξ=0Ta(t)ξ(t)dtA_T\xi=\int_0^T a(t)\xi(t)dt of random processes ξ(t) with stationary n-th order increments, based on observations of the process for t<0. When the spectral density is known, formulas are proposed for computing the mean square error and spectral characteristics of optimal linear estimates. For a given set of admissible spectral densities, formulas are proposed for determining the least favorable spectral density.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Core Problem: Investigation of the extrapolation problem for random processes with stationary n-th order increments, particularly optimal estimation of future values (t≥0) based on historical observations (t<0)
  2. Theoretical Foundation: Built upon the theory of stationary random processes pioneered by Kolmogorov, Wiener, Yaglom, and others
  3. Practical Necessity: In practical applications, complete acquisition of spectral density information is often impossible, necessitating robust estimation methods

Research Motivation

  1. Limitations of Classical Methods: Traditional extrapolation methods assume known spectral density, but in practice the spectral density is typically unknown or uncertain
  2. Robustness Requirements: Vastola and Poor demonstrated that inaccurate spectral density estimation leads to significantly increased errors
  3. Theoretical Extension: Extension of minimax robust methods from stationary processes to the more general class of processes with stationary increments

Core Contributions

  1. Established Complete Theoretical Framework: Provided systematic solutions for the linear functional extrapolation problem for random processes with stationary n-th order increments
  2. Derived Optimal Estimation Formulas: When spectral density is known, explicit formulas are provided for computing spectral characteristics and mean square error of optimal linear estimates
  3. Developed Robust Estimation Methods: Proposed minimax-robust methods to address spectral density uncertainty
  4. Determined Least Favorable Spectral Densities: For three important classes of admissible spectral densities (D₀, D_v^u, D_δ), specific forms of least favorable spectral densities are provided

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Observations of random process ξ(t) for t<0, where ξ(t) has stationary n-th order increments Output: Optimal linear estimates of linear functionals Aξ=0a(t)ξ(t)dtA\xi=\int_0^{\infty}a(t)\xi(t)dt and ATξ=0Ta(t)ξ(t)dtA_T\xi=\int_0^T a(t)\xi(t)dtObjective: Minimize mean square error E|Aξ - Âξ|²

Theoretical Foundation

Definition of Stationary Increment Processes

The n-th order increment of random process ξ(t) is defined as: ξ(n)(t,τ)=(1Bτ)nξ(t)=l=0n(1)lCnlξ(tlτ)\xi^{(n)}(t,\tau) = (1-B_\tau)^n\xi(t) = \sum_{l=0}^n (-1)^l C_n^l \xi(t-l\tau)

where B_τ is the backward shift operator with step τ.

Spectral Representation

The spectral representation of a process with stationary n-th order increments is: ξ(n)(t,τ)=eitλ(1eiλτ)n(iλ)n(1+iλ)ndZ(λ)\xi^{(n)}(t,\tau) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{it\lambda} \frac{(1-e^{-i\lambda\tau})^n}{(i\lambda)^n}(1+i\lambda)^n dZ(\lambda)

Core Algorithm Framework

1. Hilbert Space Projection Method

Using Lemma 1 to decompose functional Aξ as: Aξ=BξVξA\xi = B\xi - V\xi where:

  • Bξ=0bτ(t)ξ(n)(t,τ)dtB\xi = \int_0^{\infty} b_\tau(t)\xi^{(n)}(t,\tau)dt (unknown part)
  • Vξ=τn0vτ(t)ξ(t)dtV\xi = \int_{-\tau n}^0 v_\tau(t)\xi(t)dt (known part)

2. Spectral Characteristics of Optimal Estimates

When spectral density is known, the spectral characteristic of optimal estimate B̂ξ is: hτ(λ)=Bτ(λ)rτ(λ)Φτ1(λ)h_\tau(\lambda) = B_\tau(\lambda) - r_\tau(\lambda)\Phi_\tau^{-1}(\lambda)

where:

  • Bτ(λ)=0bτ(t)eiλtdtB_\tau(\lambda) = \int_0^{\infty} b_\tau(t)e^{i\lambda t}dt
  • rτ(λ)=0eiλt(Bτφτ)(t)dtr_\tau(\lambda) = \int_0^{\infty} e^{i\lambda t}(B_\tau\varphi_\tau)(t)dt

3. Mean Square Error Calculation

Δ(f,A^ξ)=12πrτ(λ)2dλ=Bτφτ2\Delta(f,\hat{A}\xi) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |r_\tau(\lambda)|^2 d\lambda = ||B_\tau\varphi_\tau||^2

Robust Estimation Methods

Minimax Criterion

Finding an estimate that simultaneously minimizes the maximum mean square error over all admissible spectral densities: minhHDmaxfDΔ(h;f)\min_{h \in H_D} \max_{f \in D} \Delta(h;f)

Determination of Least Favorable Spectral Density

By solving the conditional extremum problem: DτAWτφ2max,f(λ)=0φ(t)eiλtdt2D||D_\tau AW_\tau \varphi||^2 \to \max, \quad f(\lambda) = \left|\int_0^{\infty} \varphi(t)e^{-i\lambda t}dt\right|^2 \in D

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This paper is primarily theoretical research, verifying the correctness of the methods through rigorous mathematical derivations, including:

  1. Theorem Proofs: Complete proofs of 12 theorems and lemmas
  2. Formula Derivation: Complete derivation process from basic spectral representations to final estimation formulas
  3. Special Case Analysis: Detailed analysis for different classes of admissible spectral densities

Classes of Admissible Spectral Densities

Three important classes of spectral density sets were studied:

  1. D₀ Class: D0={f(λ)12πf(λ)dλP0}D_0 = \{f(\lambda)| \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(\lambda)d\lambda \leq P_0\}
  2. D_v^u Class: Dvu={f(λ)v(λ)f(λ)u(λ),f(λ)dλ=2πP0}D_v^u = \{f(\lambda)|v(\lambda) \leq f(\lambda) \leq u(\lambda), \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(\lambda)d\lambda = 2\pi P_0\}
  3. D_δ Class: Dδ={f(λ)12πf(λ)v(λ)dλδ}D_\delta = \{f(\lambda)| \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |f(\lambda)-v(\lambda)|d\lambda \leq \delta\}

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorems 4-6: Optimal Estimation Formulas

  • Provide explicit expressions for optimal linear estimates of functionals Aξ and A_Tξ
  • Supply computational formulas for spectral characteristics and mean square error
  • Prove the optimality of the estimates

Theorems 7-12: Least Favorable Spectral Densities

For three classes of admissible spectral densities, respectively provide:

  • Specific forms of least favorable spectral densities
  • Existence conditions
  • Computational methods for minimax-robust spectral characteristics

Key Findings

  1. Effectiveness of Decomposition Strategy: Decomposing the original problem into known and unknown parts significantly simplifies the solution process
  2. Saddle Point Property: The least favorable spectral density and minimax-robust spectral characteristic form a saddle point satisfying the saddle point inequality
  3. Role of Operator Equations: Determining least favorable spectral densities through solving eigenvalue problems

Historical Development

  1. Classical Theory: Kolmogorov and Wiener established the theoretical foundation for extrapolation of stationary processes
  2. Increment Process Theory: Yaglom extended the theory to processes with stationary increments
  3. Robust Methods: Grenander first proposed the minimax extrapolation problem

Relationship of This Paper's Contributions to Existing Work

  1. Theoretical Extension: Extension from stationary processes to processes with stationary n-th order increments
  2. Methodological Innovation: Combining Hilbert space projection methods with minimax theory
  3. Application Expansion: Addressing more general linear functional estimation problems

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Established a complete theoretical framework for linear functional extrapolation of random processes with stationary increments
  2. Provided optimal solutions in both spectral-determined and spectral-uncertain cases
  3. Demonstrated the effectiveness and practicality of minimax-robust methods

Theoretical Significance

  1. Mathematical Rigor: All results have rigorous mathematical proofs
  2. Generality: Encompasses multiple important cases of spectral density uncertainty
  3. Completeness: Forms a complete system from theoretical foundations to practical applications

Limitations

  1. Computational Complexity: In some cases, solving complex operator equations is required
  2. Practical Applications: Lacks concrete numerical examples and simulation verification
  3. Assumption Conditions: Requires satisfaction of certain regularity conditions

Future Directions

  1. Numerical Methods: Development of efficient numerical algorithms for solving operator equations
  2. Applied Research: Applications in specific domains (such as finance, signal processing)
  3. Extended Research: Extension to multidimensional processes and nonlinear cases

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Depth: Rigorous mathematical theory with complete and detailed derivations
  2. Methodological Innovation: Clever combination of multiple mathematical tools and theories
  3. Practical Value: Addresses the important problem of spectral density uncertainty in practice
  4. Strong Systematicity: Forms a complete system from fundamental theory to concrete applications

Technical Highlights

  1. Decomposition Strategy: Decomposing complex problems into manageable subproblems
  2. Operator Theory Application: Skillful application of Hilbert space and operator theory
  3. Optimization Methods: Effective combination of variational methods and convex optimization theory

Shortcomings

  1. Lack of Numerical Verification: Theoretical results require support from numerical examples
  2. Computational Feasibility: Practical computation of certain formulas may be difficult
  3. Application Guidance: Lacks detailed analysis of specific application scenarios

Impact Assessment

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical tools for random process theory
  2. Methodological Value: Minimax-robust methods have broad applicability
  3. Foundation for Further Research: Establishes foundation for related research in subsequent studies

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting time series with trends or seasonality
  2. Signal Processing: Signal extrapolation and filtering in noisy environments
  3. Financial Engineering: Risk management and forecasting of financial time series
  4. Engineering Applications: State estimation and prediction in control systems

References

The paper cites 27 important references covering multiple fields including random process theory, minimax methods, and spectral analysis, reflecting the depth and breadth of the research.


Overall Assessment: This is a mathematically rigorous paper in mathematical statistics that makes important contributions to random process extrapolation theory. Although it emphasizes theoretical derivations, it addresses important practical problems and possesses significant theoretical value and potential application prospects.