Higher Power Polyadic Group Rings

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14029
• Title: Higher power polyadic group rings
• Author: Steven Duplij (Yantai Research Institute, Harbin Engineering University & Center for Information Technology, University of Münster)
• Classification: math.RA (Ring and Algebra)
• Submission Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv submission)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14029

Abstract

This paper introduces and systematically develops the theory of polyadic group rings, which represents a higher-arity generalization of classical group rings $\mathcal{R}[\mathsf{G}]$. The author constructs fundamental operations for these structures, defining $m_r$-ary addition and $n_r$-ary multiplication for polyadic group rings $\mathrm{R}^{[\mathbf{m}_r,\mathbf{n}_r]}=\mathcal{R}^{[m_r,n_r]}[\mathsf{G}^{[n_g]}]$ constructed from $(m_r, n_r)$-rings and $n_g$-ary groups. The core achievement is the derivation of "quantization" conditions that interrelate these arities, governed by the principle of arity freedom and extended to operations with higher-order polyadic powers. The author establishes key algebraic properties, including complete associativity conditions and the existence of zero and unit elements. The concepts of polyadic augmentation maps and augmentation ideals are generalized, providing a bridge to classical theory. The framework is elucidated through explicit examples, consolidating the theoretical constructions. This work establishes new foundations in ring theory with potential applications in cryptography and coding theory.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Limitations of Classical Group Ring Theory: Traditional group rings $R[G]$ are constructed based on binary operations. While widely applied in modern algebra (representation theory, homological algebra, algebraic topology), their binary structure limits the capacity to describe more complex algebraic phenomena.
2. Rise of Polyadic Algebraic Structures: The theory of polyadic algebraic structures (pioneered by Dörnte and Post) reveals phenomena absent in the binary case, such as polyadic groups lacking unique identity elements or inverses in the classical sense, with their structure governed by the more general concept of quasiidentity elements.
3. Theoretical Gap: Although binary group ring theory and polyadic structure theory have each developed maturely, their synthesis—polyadic group ring theory—remains largely unexplored.

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: Fills an important gap in algebraic theory, introducing a new category of algebraic objects to ring theory
2. Application Prospects: The complex non-binary operations of polyadic group rings provide a promising algebraic platform for coding theory and post-quantum cryptography
3. Practical Value: As demonstrated by Duplij and Guo (2025), direct applications of polyadic algebraic structures in cryptography validate the timeliness and relevance of this foundational research

Core Challenges

Constructing polyadic group rings $\mathcal{R}^{[m_r,n_r]}[\mathsf{G}^{[n_g]}]$ faces fundamental challenges: the arities of the initial structures are not independent; they are constrained by the requirement that the resulting object must be a ring-like structure with well-defined $m_r$-ary addition and $n_r$-ary multiplication.

Core Contributions

1. Rigorous Definition of Polyadic Group Rings: Formally constructs the $m_r$-ary addition and $n_r$-ary multiplication operations of polyadic group rings, carefully accounting for the arities of the underlying ring and group
2. Derivation of Quantization Conditions: Derives precise "quantization" conditions relating the arities $(m_r, n_r)$ of the group ring to the initial ring arities $(m_r, n_r)$ and initial group arity $n_g$, including new cases with higher-order polyadic power operations
3. Establishment of Key Properties: Proves under which conditions these structures are completely associative and possess analogues of zero and unit elements
4. Generalization of Classical Concepts: Defines and studies polyadic augmentation maps and polyadic augmentation ideals, generalizing core tools of classical theory
5. Provision of Concrete Examples: Elucidates the theory through concrete non-trivial examples involving non-derived polyadic rings and finite polyadic groups, with explicit product calculations demonstrating the operation of the construction

Methodological Details

Task Definition

Construct a mapping from $(m_r, n_r)$-rings $\mathcal{R}^{[m_r,n_r]}$ and $n_g$-ary groups $\mathsf{G}^{[n_g]}$ to polyadic group rings $\mathrm{R}^{[m_r,n_r]} = \mathcal{R}^{[m_r,n_r]}[\mathsf{G}^{[n_g]}]$ such that the resulting structure possesses well-defined polyadic operations and algebraic properties.

Theoretical Framework

1. Polyadic Structure Foundations

• Polyadic Operations: An $n$-ary operation is defined as a mapping $\mu_n: S^{\times n} \to S$
• Polyadic Associativity: Defined through invariant relations $\mu_n[x, \mu_n[y], z] = \text{invariant}$
• Admissible Length: Compositions of polyadic multiplication are possible only for $L_{\text{admiss}}(n, \ell_\mu) = \ell_\mu(n-1) + 1$ elements

2. Polyadic Group Ring Construction

Definition: A polyadic group ring is a polyadic algebraic structure with three sets and six operations: $\mathrm{R}^{[m_r,n_r]} = \langle R, \mathcal{R}, G | \nu_R^{[m_r]}, \mu_R^{[n_r]}, \rho_R^{[k_\rho]} | \nu_R^{[m_r]}, \mu_R^{[n_r]} | \mu_G^{[n_g]} \rangle$

3. Operation Definitions

$m_r$-ary Addition: $\nu_R^{[m_r]}[r(\vec{r}_{\vec{g}}^{(\alpha_1)}, \vec{g}), \ldots, r(\vec{r}_{\vec{g}}^{(\alpha_{m_r})}, \vec{g})] = \Sigma_i \nu_R^{[m_r]}[r_{g_i}^{(\alpha_1)}, \ldots, r_{g_i}^{(\alpha_{m_r})}] \bullet g_i$

$n_r$-ary Multiplication: $\mu_R^{[n_r]}[r(\vec{r}_{\vec{g}}^{(\alpha_1)}, \vec{g}), \ldots, r(\vec{r}_{\vec{g}}^{(\alpha_{n_r})}, \vec{g})] = \Sigma_{i_1}\ldots\Sigma_{i_{n_r}} \mu_R^{[n_r]}[r_{g_{i_1}}^{(\alpha_1)}, \ldots, r_{g_{i_{n_r}}}^{(\alpha_{n_r})}] \bullet \mu_G^{[n_g]}[g_{j_1}, \ldots, g_{j_{n_g}}]$

Technical Innovations

1. Principle of Arity Freedom

Permits arbitrary choice of initial arities, with structural constraints emerging from general dependency relations, leading to "quantization rules" that prohibit certain arity combinations.

2. Higher-Order Polyadic Powers

For cases with polyadic power $\ell_m > 1$, quantization conditions are established: $m_r = \ell_m(m_r - 1) + 1$$n_r = \ell_n(n_r - 1) + 1 = \ell_g(n_g - 1) + 1$

3. Generalization of Quasiidentity Element Theory

In the polyadic case, invertibility is not associated with unit elements but is determined by quasiidentity elements $\bar{x}$: $\mu_n[\bar{x}, x^{n-1}] = x$

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Method

This paper employs a purely theoretical approach, verifying the correctness and completeness of the theory through constructive proofs and concrete examples.

Example Construction

1. Example 6.1: Polyadic group ring of a $(2,3)$-ring with a 3-ary group
2. Example 6.2: Verification of the higher-order polyadic power case

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Quantization Condition Verification

In Example 6.2, quantization conditions are verified:

• Initial ring: $(2,5)$-ring $\mathcal{R}^{[2,5]}$
• Initial group: 3-ary group $\mathsf{G}^{[3]}$
• Polyadic powers: $\ell_n = 1$, $\ell_g = 2$
• Verification: $n_r = 1(5-1) + 1 = 2(3-1) + 1 = 5$ ✓

2. Concrete Calculation Examples

For ternary multiplication of three polyadic group ring elements: $r^{(0)} = (-105j) \bullet g_3 + 40j \bullet g_5 + (-70j) \bullet g_6 + 135j \bullet g_9$

3. Augmentation Map Verification

The kernel of the polyadic augmentation map contains expected elements, verifying the correctness of the theoretical construction.

Theoretical Property Verification

1. Associativity Conditions

Theorem 5.2: When all multiplication arities are equal $n_r = n_r = n_g$, the polyadic group ring is completely associative.

2. Existence of Zero and Unit Elements

• Zero element: $z_R = z_R \bullet \Sigma_i g_i$
• Unit element: $e_R = e_R \bullet e_G$

Related Work

Classical Group Ring Theory

• Bovdi (1974), Passman (1977), Sehgal (1978) and others established foundational theory of binary group rings
• Widely applied in representation theory, homological algebra, and algebraic topology

Polyadic Algebraic Structures

• Dörnte (1929), Post (1940) pioneered polyadic group theory
• Leeson and Butson (1980) developed polyadic ring theory
• Duplij (2022) systematized polyadic algebraic structure theory

Application Development

• Duplij and Guo (2025) demonstrated direct applications of polyadic structures in cryptography
• Potential applications in coding theory and post-quantum cryptography

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully establishes a complete theoretical framework for polyadic group rings
2. Derives quantization conditions governing admissible arities
3. Proves key algebraic properties and generalizes classical concepts
4. Provides concrete examples verifying theoretical constructions

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Polyadic operations are significantly more complex to compute than binary cases
2. Theoretical Completeness: Certain advanced properties (such as representation theory, homological theory) remain unexplored
3. Application Verification: The effectiveness in practical applications requires further verification

Future Directions

1. Representation Theory: Representation theory of polyadic group rings remains completely unexplored
2. Homological Theory: Study of homology and other homological invariants
3. Cryptographic Applications: Construction of new cryptographic primitives
4. Coding Theory: Development of nonlinear codes and modeling of complex systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Fills an important gap in algebraic theory, establishing an entirely new category of algebraic objects
2. Mathematical Rigor: Proofs are rigorous, definitions are clear, and theoretical constructions are complete
3. Practical Value: Provides new mathematical tools for modern cryptography and coding theory
4. Systematicity: Forms a complete theoretical system from foundational definitions to concrete examples

Weaknesses

1. Computational Complexity: Practical computation of polyadic operations may be prohibitively complex, limiting practical applications
2. Limited Examples: Provided examples are relatively simple; behavior in more complex cases remains unclear
3. Insufficient Application Verification: While cryptographic applications are mentioned, deeper application analysis is lacking

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Opens new research directions in algebra
2. Interdisciplinary: Connects pure mathematics with applied mathematics (cryptography, coding theory)
3. Long-term Value: Establishes foundations for future theoretical development and practical applications

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Further development in algebra, ring theory, and group theory
2. Cryptography: Design of new cryptographic primitives in post-quantum cryptography
3. Coding Theory: Construction and analysis of nonlinear codes
4. Complex Systems: Complex systems requiring polyadic relationship modeling

References

This paper cites 18 important references, primarily including:

• Classical group ring theory: Bovdi (1974), Passman (1977), Sehgal (1978)
• Polyadic structure theory: Dörnte (1929), Post (1940), Duplij (2022)
• Applied research: Duplij and Guo (2025) on polyadic cryptography

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically significant and innovative paper that successfully establishes a complete theoretical framework for polyadic group rings. Although practical application verification requires further strengthening, its theoretical contributions and potential application value make it an important advance in the field of algebra. This work not only advances the development of pure mathematical theory but also provides new mathematical tools for modern cryptography and coding theory.