Universal energy-space localization and stable quantum phases against time-dependent perturbations

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14160
• Title: Universal energy-space localization and stable quantum phases against time-dependent perturbations
• Authors: Hongye Yu, Tzu-Chieh Wei
• Classification: quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.stat-mech
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14160v1

Abstract

This paper identifies and proves a universal phenomenon in q-local Hamiltonians—energy-space localization—which survives under general time-dependent perturbations. The evolved state exhibits exponential localization within an energy window of the instantaneous spectrum. This property is universal, and the leakage bound remains invariant under arbitrary monotonic rescaling of evolution time. For spin glass models where configuration space is separated by large energy barriers, localization in energy space can induce genuine localization in configuration space and robustly break ergodicity.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. Stability under time-dependent perturbations: Most proofs of quantum phase stability are limited to static perturbations, whereas perturbations in reality are often time-dependent. Rigorous bounds and mathematical tools for long-time evolution under general time-dependent perturbations are lacking.
2. Limitations of existing methods: Existing methods yield bounds that are power series in evolution time t and eventually diverge as t increases, controlling errors only over constant (or logarithmic in system size) evolution times.
3. Research motivation: The authors approach the problem from a different angle—first identifying which properties survive under general time-dependent perturbations, then using this as guidance to find corresponding models.

Significance

• Uncontrollable effects of time-dependent perturbations (such as high excitations and large heat absorption) may drive states far from initial configurations
• Important practical implications for quantum error correction codes and quantum algorithm design
• Provides new perspectives for analyzing non-equilibrium dynamics of general quantum systems

Core Contributions

1. Identifies and proves universality of energy-space localization: For q-local Hamiltonians, initial eigenstates evolving under general time-dependent Hamiltonians exhibit exponential localization within an energy window of the instantaneous energy spectrum.
2. Establishes rigorous mathematical framework: Provides two main theorems (Theorem 1 and 2) addressing dynamical and static cases respectively, with exponentially small leakage bounds.
3. Proves multiple stability properties of LDPC codes:
   • Exponentially long dynamical localization under general time-dependent perturbations
   • Extends stability of static q-local perturbations to quasi-q-local perturbations
   • Proves robust slow-mixing properties of Gibbs samplers
4. Reveals algorithmic barriers in hard optimization problems: Demonstrates that for classical hard optimization problems with clustered solution spaces, stability becomes an obstacle for Hamiltonian-based quantum algorithms to drive systems away from local minima.

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

Study quantum state evolution under q-local time-dependent Hamiltonians H(t), where:

• Initial state |ψ(0)⟩ is an eigenstate of H(0) with energy E₀
• Hamiltonian satisfies bounded local norm: ‖H(t)‖_loc ≤ M
• Total variation bounded: ∫₀ᵀ ‖dH‖_X ≤ λn

Core Theoretical Framework

Energy-Space Localization Theorem

Theorem 1 (informal statement): Let initial state |ψ(0)⟩ be an eigenstate of H(0) with energy E₀. If the state evolves according to H(t) from t=0 to T, then at any time t, the state is exponentially localized within an energy window E₀⁽ᵈ⁾≡E₀-dn, E₀+dn of the instantaneous spectrum of H(t).

For Cases 1, 2, 4, the leakage ε⁽¹⁾ is bounded by:

ε⁽¹⁾_λ,Δ(d) ≡ exp(-n λ/Δ (d/λ - 1 - ln(d/λ) + o(1)))

For Case 3 (mutually commuting case), the bound can be improved to:

ε⁽²⁾_λ,Δ(d) ≡ exp(-n λ/Δ (d/λ ln(d/λ) - (d/λ - 1)))

Four Case Classification

1. Case 1 (general case): H(t) is q-local, ‖H(t)‖_loc ≤ M
2. Case 2: H(t) = Hc(t) + V(t), where V(t),H'(t) = 0
3. Case 3: Hc(t) mutually commute, V(t),H'(t) = 0
4. Case 4: H'(t) is quasi-q-local

Technical Innovations

1. Moment Estimation Method

The key step is bounding the growth of arbitrary k-th moments ⟨(H(t)-E₀)²ᵏ⟩_t. This is achieved by estimating the growth of nested commutators ad^m_H(t)(H'(t)).

2. Nested Commutator Bounds

For q-local Hamiltonians:

‖ad^m_H̃(t)(∂H(t)/∂t)‖ ≤ m!Δ^m_q ‖∂H(t)/∂t‖_X

For mutually commuting case:

‖ad^m_H̃(t)(∂H(t)/∂t)‖ ≤ Δ^m_q ‖∂H(t)/∂t‖_X

3. Clustering Property

Definition 1 (clustering property): A Hamiltonian H has the clustering property in energy window E₁,E₂ if all eigenstates in this window can be partitioned into clusters {wⱼ} such that:

• Distance between states in the same cluster: D(|φ⟩,|φ'⟩) ≤ ν₁
• Distance between states in different clusters: D(|φ⟩,|φ'⟩) ≥ ν₂

Experimental Setup

Applied Systems

1. LDPC codes: Good classical/quantum LDPC codes with linear soundness
2. Hard optimization problems: q-spin glass, maximum independent set problem
3. Constrained optimization problems: Localization protected by symmetry

Evaluation Metrics

• Leakage bound: Weight bound of eigenstates outside energy window
• Localization time: Time state remains within original cluster
• Mixing time: Time for Gibbs sampler to reach equilibrium

Experimental Results

Stability Results for LDPC Codes

Dynamical Localization

Proposition III.1: For LDPC codes with linear soundness, under time-dependent perturbations, as long as λ < (b-ε₀)/2, the state remains localized near the original codeword for time T ~ (1/λ)e^Ω(n), with leakage e^(-Ω(n)).

Eigenstate Localization

For static Hamiltonian H = Hc + V₀ + Hd, if λ is sufficiently small, each perturbed eigenstate |ψ⟩ is exponentially localized near a codeword |w⟩.

Gibbs Sampler Slow Mixing

Proposition III.4: For H = Hc + V₀, if λ is sufficiently small, its stationary state as a local Gibbs sampler of e^(-βH) has exponentially long mixing time e^Ω(n).

Algorithmic Barriers in Hard Optimization Problems

Proposition IV.1 (solution freezing): If the total variation Λ of Hamiltonian H(t) is below B/2, then any Z-basis ground state initially in cluster w₀ with energy below E_B - 2Λ remains localized in w₀ for time T ~ (1/Λ)e^Ω(Λ/M).

This indicates that quantum algorithms based on Hamiltonians without sufficiently large variation cannot find near-optimal solutions.

Related Work

Quantum Many-Body Localization

• Relationship with MBL: Energy-space localization is compatible with both ETH and MBL
• Connection with prethermalization: Provides rigorous bounds under time-dependent perturbations

Topological Order and Error Correction Codes

• Extends existing LDPC code stability results to quasi-q-local perturbations
• Provides tighter bounds than literature 33

Quantum Algorithms

• Provides performance bounds for Hamiltonian-based quantum algorithms
• Explains why certain algorithms perform poorly in clustered solution spaces

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Universality: Energy-space localization is a universal property of q-local Hamiltonians
2. Robustness: This property remains stable under time-dependent perturbations
3. Applied value: Provides theoretical foundation for error correction code stability and quantum algorithm design

Limitations

1. Clustering requirement: Genuine configuration-space localization requires special clustering properties
2. Perturbation strength constraints: Requires total variation not exceeding a constant fraction of energy barriers
3. Inapplicability to bosonic systems: Bosonic systems with unbounded local norm are not applicable

Future Directions

1. Improved bounds for specific systems: Such as mean-field models, SYK models
2. Integration with other theoretical tools: Lieb-Robinson bounds, operator growth, Krylov subspace methods
3. Mixing within energy windows: Behavior of ETH and MBL within energy windows

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical rigor: Provides first rigorous exponential bounds under time-dependent perturbations
2. Universal applicability: Methods apply to broad class of q-local Hamiltonians
3. Practical significance: Direct applications to quantum error correction and quantum algorithms
4. Mathematical tool value: Provides reusable mathematical framework

Weaknesses

1. Stringent conditions: Some applications require very small perturbation strengths
2. Classical correspondence: Degenerates to classical energy conservation in thermodynamic limit
3. Lack of constructiveness: Primarily existence results; constructing specific examples remains challenging

Impact

• Theoretical contribution: Fills important gap in time-dependent perturbation theory
• Practical value: Provides new tools for quantum computing and quantum information fields
• Interdisciplinary impact: Connects condensed matter physics, quantum information, and computational complexity theory

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum error correction code analysis: Particularly LDPC code stability studies
2. Quantum algorithm design: Understanding limitations of Hamiltonian-based algorithms
3. Many-body quantum systems: Analyzing non-equilibrium dynamics and thermalization processes
4. Spin glass systems: Studying energy landscapes and ergodicity breaking