An On-Sky Atmospheric Calibration of SPT-SLIM

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14220
• Title: An On-Sky Atmospheric Calibration of SPT-SLIM
• Authors: K. R. Dibert et al. (SPT-SLIM Collaboration)
• Classification: astro-ph.IM (Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics), astro-ph.CO (Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14220

Abstract

This paper presents the on-sky responsivity calibration methodology and results for the Shirokoff Line Intensity Mapper (SPT-SLIM) deployed on the South Pole Telescope. SPT-SLIM is a pioneering line intensity mapping experiment utilizing on-chip spectrometer technology, first deployed on the South Pole Telescope during the 2024-2025 Antarctic summer season. During a two-week observing campaign, the research team regularly measured the detector response as a function of telescope elevation angle. By combining in-situ atmospheric opacity measurements, simulated Antarctic atmospheric spectra, and measured detector spectral responses, the team constructed an estimation model for SPT-SLIM detector responsivity to sky loading. This model was subsequently used to calibrate SPT-SLIM lunar observations through cross-validation with known lunar phase function brightness temperatures.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Questions

As a novel on-chip spectrometer experiment, SPT-SLIM requires the establishment of accurate detector calibration methods to convert the frequency shift response of microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs) into effective brightness temperature. This forms the foundation for scientific observations and data analysis.

Problem Significance

1. Technology Verification Requirements: As the first deployed on-chip spectrometer line intensity mapping experiment, its on-sky performance must be validated
2. Calibration Challenges: Traditional fixed-temperature calibration sources failed during initial commissioning, necessitating alternative calibration methods
3. Scientific Applications: Accurate calibration is prerequisite for extracting celestial spectral information and conducting cosmological studies

Limitations of Existing Methods

Traditional millimeter-wave telescopes typically employ fixed-temperature calibration sources; however, SPT-SLIM's fixed-temperature calibrator malfunctioned during initial commissioning and became unavailable. Therefore, an alternative calibration method based on atmospheric loading was required.

Research Motivation

To develop a reliable atmospheric calibration method that not only addresses current calibration requirements but also provides calibration strategy reference for future similar on-chip spectrometer experiments.

Core Contributions

1. Developed an atmospheric-loading-based SPT-SLIM detector calibration method combining in-situ atmospheric measurements and numerical simulations
2. Established a comprehensive optical model including contributions from the main beam and 90° offset sidelobes
3. Implemented MKID response model parameter fitting to obtain detector responsivity estimates
4. Verified calibration accuracy through lunar observation cross-validation, measuring lunar temperature of 285±31 K, consistent with literature values
5. Provided a complete on-chip spectrometer calibration workflow serving as reference for future similar experiments

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Establish the calibration relationship for SPT-SLIM detectors from MKID frequency shift to brightness temperature:

• Input: MKID frequency shift measurements, telescope elevation angle, atmospheric conditions
• Output: Detector responsivity parameters, brightness temperature calibration
• Constraints: Physical consistency, matching with known celestial brightness temperatures

Model Architecture

1. Detector Bandpass Measurement

Detector bandpass measured using Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS), with Lorentzian peak function obtained through optical path difference domain interferogram fitting:

$I(z) = e^{-\sigma_0\pi z/R} \cos(2\pi\sigma_0 z)$

where $z$ is optical path difference, $\sigma_0$ is peak wavenumber, and $R$ is spectral resolution.

2. Atmospheric Loading Model

Combining 850 GHz atmospheric tipping radiometer data and am atmospheric modeling software:

$\text{PWV}[\text{mm}] = -0.2 + \tau_{850}(-0.671 + T_{\text{amb}} \times 0.005)$

Atmospheric temperature model accounting for main beam and sidelobe contributions:

$T_{\text{sky}}(\nu, \theta, \alpha) = \frac{T_0}{1 + \alpha}\left([1-\exp(-\tau(\nu)/\sin(\theta))] + \alpha[1-\exp(-\tau(\nu)/\cos(\theta))]\right)$

where $\alpha$ is the fitted parameter for relative sidelobe gain.

3. MKID Response Model

MKID response to optical power follows:

$f(P) = A\sqrt{P} + f_0$

where $f_0$ is the no-load resonant frequency and $A$ is the responsivity constant.

4. Atmospheric Loading Calculation

Atmospheric loading power on detector:

$P_{\text{atm}}(\theta, \alpha) = \eta_{\text{opt}}k_B \int_{\nu_{\text{wg}}}^{\nu_{\text{filt}}} T_{\text{sky}}(\nu, \theta, \alpha)g_{\text{KID}}(\nu)d\nu$

Technical Innovations

1. Multi-parameter Joint Fitting: Simultaneous fitting of sidelobe gain $\alpha$, responsivity parameter $A$, and no-load frequency $f_0$
2. Optical Sidelobe Modeling: Accounting for 90° offset sidelobe contributions to atmospheric loading
3. Multi-source Data Fusion: Integrating FTS bandpass measurements, atmospheric radiometer data, and numerical simulations
4. Phase and Elevation Angle Corrections: Applying corrections to lunar observations for phase and atmospheric transmission

Experimental Setup

Data Acquisition

• Observation Period: January 2025, two-week campaign
• Atmospheric Response Measurements: 15 measurements at elevation angles 15-80°, 5° intervals
• Lunar Observations: 4 observations at different lunar phases and elevation angles
• Detectors: 251 functional MKIDs, frequency range 110-180 GHz

Instrument Configuration

• Focal Plane: 9 pixels (5 operational), dual-polarization on-chip spectrometer
• Readout System: RF-ICE system
• Operating Temperature: 150 mK
• Atmospheric Monitoring: 850 GHz tipping radiometer

Data Processing

• Frequency Conversion: Voltage signal conversion to MKID fractional frequency shift
• Map Making: 0.5 arcminute pixels, 4th-order polynomial filtering
• Calibration Pipeline: Atmospheric loading model fitting → responsivity calculation → lunar observation calibration

Experimental Results

Primary Results

1. Model Fitting Results

• Sidelobe Gain: $\alpha = 0.22 \pm 0.16$
• Responsivity: Varies with frequency, lower-frequency detectors exhibit higher responsivity
• Fit Quality: Scatter observed between different observations, potentially reflecting model-reality discrepancies

2. Lunar Temperature Measurement

• Measurement Result: $T_{\text{moon}} = 285 \pm 31$ K
• Literature Comparison: Consistent with expected lunar temperature range
• Spectral Features: Temperature reduction observed near 118 GHz oxygen line, consistent with atmospheric transmission expectations

3. Responsivity Characteristics

At different brightness temperatures (10K, 100K, 300K), detector responsivity exhibits:

• Higher responsivity at lower frequencies
• Responsivity decrease with increasing frequency
• Anomalous detector responsivity near 118 GHz oxygen line

Ablation Studies

By varying the sidelobe contribution parameter $\alpha$ in the model, the necessity of sidelobe modeling was verified. Models without sidelobe correction failed to adequately fit observations at different elevation angles.

Case Study

Using the 154 GHz detector as example, demonstrating:

• Frequency response variation pattern with elevation angle
• Consistency across 15 measurements under different atmospheric conditions
• Successful lunar map production and temperature extraction

Related Work

Millimeter-Wave Detector Calibration

Traditional methods primarily employ:

• Fixed-temperature blackbody calibration sources
• Celestial standard sources (e.g., planets)
• Atmospheric loading calibration (e.g., DESHIMA experiment)

Line Intensity Mapping Technology

SPT-SLIM serves as technology demonstration platform for line intensity mapping, with related technologies including:

• On-chip spectrometer design
• MKID array readout
• Spectral data processing

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing methods, this paper's atmospheric calibration approach:

• Does not depend on external calibration sources
• Fully utilizes in-situ environmental data
• Provides comprehensive error analysis

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully developed an atmospheric-loading-based SPT-SLIM calibration method
2. Lunar observations verified calibration accuracy, with measured temperature consistent with expectations
3. Demonstrated feasibility of on-chip spectrometer technology in millimeter-wave astronomy
4. Provided calibration strategy reference for future line intensity mapping experiments

Limitations

1. Unknown Optical Efficiency: Assumes 50% maximum efficiency, actual value may be lower
2. Simplified Sidelobe Modeling: Only considers 90° offset, actual beam pattern may be more complex
3. Atmospheric Model Accuracy: Depends on radiometer measurement and am simulation accuracy
4. Statistical Precision: Only 15 atmospheric measurements, relatively limited sample size

Future Directions

1. Beam Measurements: Complete beam pattern measurements to improve optical model
2. Multi-source Calibration: Cross-validation with additional standard sources
3. Long-term Monitoring: Study of detector responsivity temporal stability
4. Model Refinement: More accurate atmospheric and optical modeling

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation: Creative development of atmospheric calibration method when fixed calibration source failed
2. Systematic Completeness: Complete workflow from detector characterization to scientific validation
3. Sufficient Verification: Independent precision verification through lunar observations
4. Technical Value: Provides important engineering experience for emerging on-chip spectrometer technology

Weaknesses

1. Model Complexity: Multi-parameter fitting may suffer from parameter degeneracies
2. Error Analysis: Quantitative analysis of systematic errors requires greater detail
3. Applicability Range: Method's generalizability needs verification on other telescopes and environments
4. Long-term Stability: Lacks assessment of detector responsivity long-term stability

Impact

1. Technology Advancement: Provides important technical support for millimeter-wave on-chip spectrometer development
2. Methodological Contribution: Atmospheric calibration method generalizable to similar instruments
3. Scientific Value: Validates feasibility of line intensity mapping technology
4. Engineering Significance: Provides design reference for future large-scale line intensity mapping experiments

Applicable Scenarios

1. On-chip Spectrometer Calibration: Direct application to similar superconducting spectrometer systems
2. Millimeter-Wave Astronomical Instruments: Method generalizable to other millimeter-wave detectors
3. Polar Observations: Particularly suitable for observation sites like Antarctica with stable atmosphere
4. Technology Verification: Appropriate for engineering verification and performance assessment of new technologies

References

This paper cites 15 important references covering SPT-SLIM system design, MKID technology, atmospheric modeling, lunar brightness temperature, and other related fields, providing solid theoretical and technical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality instrumentation science paper that demonstrates innovative problem-solving in the face of technical challenges. While certain modeling assumptions and precision limitations exist, it provides valuable engineering experience and calibration methodology for emerging on-chip spectrometer technology, possessing significant technical value and scientific importance.