Reinforcement Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Spatio-Temporal Echocardiography Segmentation

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14244
• Title: Reinforcement Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Spatio-Temporal Echocardiography Segmentation
• Authors: Arnaud Judge, Nicolas Duchateau, Thierry Judge, Roman A. Sandler, Joseph Z. Sokol, Christian Desrosiers, Olivier Bernard, Pierre-Marc Jodoin
• Classification: eess.IV cs.AI cs.CV
• Published Journal: IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14244
• Code Link: https://github.com/arnaudjudge/RL4Seg3D

Abstract

This paper proposes RL4Seg3D, an unsupervised domain adaptation framework for 2D+temporal echocardiography segmentation. The method addresses domain adaptation challenges in spatio-temporal data through reinforcement learning, particularly addressing segmentation performance degradation in echocardiography caused by artifacts and noise. RL4Seg3D integrates novel reward functions and fusion mechanisms, enhancing the precision of critical anatomical landmarks while processing full-resolution input videos. The method not only improves accuracy, anatomical validity, and temporal consistency, but also provides robust uncertainty estimators that can further enhance segmentation performance at test time.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Domain Adaptation Challenges: Traditional domain adaptation methods lack reliability in target domains, which is particularly critical in medical image segmentation where accuracy and anatomical validity are paramount
2. Spatio-Temporal Data Complexity: In spatio-temporal data, the lack of temporal consistency significantly degrades segmentation quality
3. Echocardiography Specificity: Artifacts and noise in echocardiography further impede segmentation performance

Research Significance

• Medical image segmentation requires extensive expert annotation, which is costly and time-consuming to acquire
• Annotation of 2D+temporal sequences is more difficult than static 2D images
• Clinical applications demand high precision and anatomical validity

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Temporal Inconsistency in 2D Methods: Processing each frame independently results in temporal incoherence
2. Information Loss from Downsampling: Existing methods typically operate on low-resolution inputs
3. Lack of Anatomical Constraints: Traditional methods struggle to ensure anatomical validity
4. Limitations of Foundation Models: Models like SAM exhibit temporal inconsistency issues in video segmentation

Core Contributions

1. Extended Reinforcement Learning Segmentation Framework: Extends RL4Seg to 3D spatio-temporal segmentation, supporting multiple simultaneous reward mechanisms
2. Full-Resolution Video Processing: Enables coherent processing of complete-resolution input videos with newly designed temporal consistency and critical landmark accuracy reward templates
3. Enhanced Uncertainty Estimation: Extends the uncertainty estimation capability of reward networks to achieve pixel-level spatio-temporal segmentation confidence assessment
4. Test-Time Optimization Mechanism: Introduces test-time optimization leveraging uncertainty estimation to improve performance on challenging videos
5. Large-Scale Validation: Validates method effectiveness and scalability on over 30,000 echocardiography videos

Methodology Details

Task Definition

• Input: Source domain annotated data $D_S = \{(x_S^{(i)}, y_S^{(i)})\}_{i=1}^n$ and target domain unannotated data $D_T = \{x_T^{(j)}\}_{j=1}^m$
• Output: Accurate, anatomically valid, and temporally consistent segmentation results on the target domain
• Constraints: No target domain annotations required; maintain anatomical validity and temporal coherence

Model Architecture

3D Segmentation Reinforcement Learning Framework

1. State Definition: $s$ represents a temporal slice of 2D+temporal images containing consecutive full-resolution frames
2. Action Definition: $a$ represents the corresponding continuous segmentation map
3. Policy Network: $\pi: \mathbb{R}^{H \times W \times T} \rightarrow [0,1]^{K \times H \times W \times T}$, implemented based on 3D U-Net
4. Reward Function: $r(s,a): \mathbb{R}^{2 \times H \times W \times T} \rightarrow [0,1]^{H \times W \times T}$
5. Value Function: $V^\pi(s): \mathbb{R}^{H \times W \times T} \rightarrow [0,1]^{H \times W \times T}$

Reward Fusion Mechanism

The advantage function is defined as: $A(s,a)_{i,j,t} = \left(\min_{r_{i,j,t} \in R_{i,j,t}} r_{i,j,t} - C_{KL_{i,j,t}}\right) - V^\pi(s)_{i,j,t}$

where the minimum operation ensures the policy corrects based on the most severe error at each pixel.

Technical Innovations

1. Multiple Reward Mechanisms

• Anatomical Reward ($r_{ANAT}$): Adaptive network guiding domain adaptation based on anatomical metrics
• Landmark Reward ($r_{LM}$): Alignment reward targeting critical anatomical landmarks such as mitral valve commissure
• Temporal Penalty ($P_{Temporal}$): Static reward mechanism assessing temporal consistency through 8 temporal metrics

2. Temporal Sliding Window

• Uses 4 consecutive full-resolution frames as temporal slices
• Random slice extraction during training; sequential computation with Gaussian averaging fusion during inference

3. Uncertainty Estimation and Test-Time Optimization

• Leverages anatomical reward network to provide pixel-level uncertainty estimation
• Temperature scaling for model confidence calibration
• Sequence-specific optimization for challenging videos

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Source Domain ($D_S$): 579 fully annotated echocardiography videos from Lyon University Hospital, France
   • Contains apical four-chamber (A4C) and apical two-chamber (A2C) views
   • Good image quality with mostly visible anatomical structures
2. Target Domain ($D_T$): 31,053 unannotated heterogeneous videos
   • From 357 outpatient centers across 22 US states
   • Contains A4C and A2C views
   • Test set: 128 expert-validated complete videos

Evaluation Metrics

1. Segmentation Quality: Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance (endocardium, epicardium)
2. Anatomical Validity: Validity percentage based on 10 anatomical standards
3. Temporal Validity: Consistency percentage based on 8 temporal smoothness attributes
4. Landmark Accuracy: "Mistakes per Cycle (MpC)" metric for mitral valve commissure landmark

Comparison Methods

• Baseline Methods: 3D U-Net, nnU-Net
• Foundation Models: MedSAM, SAMUS, MemSAM
• Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: MaskedSSL, UA-MT, RL4Seg (2D)

Implementation Details

• Training Environment: Approximately 32 NVIDIA A100 GPUs
• Training Time: Approximately 2 days, including 2-3 RL iteration cycles
• Batch Size: 1 (due to varying image dimensions)
• Distributed parallel training for improved efficiency

Experimental Results

Main Results

Ablation Studies

1. Anatomical Reward Only: Dice 93.5%, anatomical validity 98.4%
2. Anatomical + Landmark Reward: Dice 94.2%, landmark error significantly reduced to 1.1
3. Adding Temporal Penalty: Temporal validity improved to 88.3%
4. Test-Time Optimization: Further improvement to 93.0% temporal validity

Case Analysis

• Temporal Consistency: RL4Seg3D significantly reduces temporally inconsistent frames compared to 2D methods (from 2.7 frames to 0.4 frames)
• Uncertainty Estimation: Expected Calibration Error (ECE) of 3D anatomical reward network is 0.054, superior to traditional uncertainty methods
• Test-Time Optimization: Successfully corrects errors in 22 initially invalid videos, improving multiple metrics

Related Work

Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Methods

1. Representation Learning: Masked reconstruction, contrastive learning
2. Pseudo-Labeling Methods: Self-learning, teacher-student architectures, confidence thresholding
3. Image-to-Image Translation: Diffusion models, GAN methods

Foundation Models

1. SAM Series: Application of MedSAM, SAMUS in medical images
2. Video SAM: MemSAM improving temporal consistency through memory modules

Reinforcement Learning Applications in Medical Imaging

1. Landmark Detection: Multi-scale deep reinforcement learning
2. RLHF: Learning from human feedback, similar to ChatGPT training methodology
3. RL4Seg: Reinforcement learning framework for 2D segmentation

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. RL4Seg3D achieves optimal performance across multiple metrics, approaching the upper bound of inter-expert variability
2. Multiple reward fusion mechanisms effectively address different types of segmentation errors
3. 3D convolutions and temporal constraints significantly improve temporal consistency
4. Uncertainty estimation and test-time optimization further enhance method practicality

Limitations

1. Computational Resource Requirements: Requires substantial GPU resources for distributed training
2. Batch Size Constraints: Batch size limited to 1 due to varying image dimensions
3. Time Complexity: End-to-end training requires approximately 2 days
4. Residual Errors: Primarily minor temporal inconsistencies caused by rapid cardiac motion

Future Directions

1. More Comprehensive Temporal Reward Mechanisms: Handling rapid cardiac motion
2. Extension to Volumetric Data: 3D medical image segmentation
3. Multi-Modal Fusion: Combining other medical imaging modalities
4. Real-Time Applications: Optimizing inference speed for clinical real-time applications

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Method Innovation: First to extend reinforcement learning to 3D spatio-temporal medical image segmentation with ingeniously designed reward fusion mechanisms
2. Experimental Sufficiency: Validation on over 30,000 videos with multiple comparison methods and detailed ablation studies
3. Clinical Relevance: Focuses on clinically critical metrics such as anatomical validity and temporal consistency
4. Technical Completeness: Provides practical features including uncertainty estimation and test-time optimization

Weaknesses

1. High Computational Complexity: Requires substantial computational resources, potentially limiting practical application
2. Data Dependency: Despite being unsupervised domain adaptation, still requires high-quality source domain annotations
3. Evaluation Limitations: Relatively small test set (128 videos) may affect result generalizability
4. Method Complexity: Coordination of multiple components may increase hyperparameter tuning difficulty

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides a new reinforcement learning paradigm for medical image domain adaptation
2. Practical Value: Directly applicable to clinical echocardiography analysis
3. Reproducibility: Complete code implementation provided
4. Inspirational Value: Provides reference framework for other spatio-temporal medical imaging tasks

Applicable Scenarios

1. Medical Image Segmentation: Particularly for dynamic medical images requiring temporal consistency
2. Domain Adaptation Tasks: Cross-hospital and cross-device medical image analysis
3. Quality Control: Automatic quality assessment using uncertainty estimation
4. Clinical Decision Support: Providing reliable segmentation results to support clinical decisions

References

1. Judge et al. "Domain adaptation of echocardiography segmentation via reinforcement learning." MICCAI 2024.
2. Painchaud et al. "Echocardiography segmentation with enforced temporal consistency." IEEE TMI 2022.
3. Kirillov et al. "Segment anything." ICCV 2023.
4. Isensee et al. "nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation." Nature Methods 2021.

Summary: The proposed RL4Seg3D represents an important contribution to the medical image segmentation field, ingeniously addressing domain adaptation challenges in spatio-temporal medical images through a reinforcement learning framework. The method demonstrates technical innovation, comprehensive experimental validation, and convincing results. Despite limitations such as high computational complexity, its potential for clinical application and contribution to field advancement are noteworthy.