Quantitative stability of a class of explicit steady Euler flows in a disk

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14394
• Title: Quantitative stability of a class of explicit steady Euler flows in a disk
• Authors: Fatao Wang, Guodong Wang
• Classification: math.AP (Analysis of PDEs)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14394

Abstract

This paper provides a concise proof of $L^2$ orbital stability for a class of explicit steady Euler flows in a disk by establishing quantitative estimates. The main idea is to utilize conserved quantities of the Euler equations, including kinetic energy, enstrophy, and the fluid impulse moment. The results demonstrate that stronger radial symmetry leads to weaker stability.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

This paper investigates the stability of steady-state solutions to the two-dimensional incompressible Euler equations in the unit disk $D \subset \mathbb{R}^2$. The Euler equations in vorticity form are considered: $\partial_t\omega + v \cdot \nabla\omega = 0$ where $v = \nabla^{\perp}G\omega$, and $G$ is the inverse operator of $-\Delta$ under zero Dirichlet boundary conditions.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Importance: The stability problem for Euler equations is a classical problem in fluid mechanics, crucial for understanding the long-time behavior of fluids.
2. Existing Limitations: Current stability results are primarily qualitative, lacking quantitative characterization of how perturbations evolve over time.
3. Methodological Innovation: Existing approaches rely heavily on compactness arguments, making it difficult to obtain precise stability estimates.

Specific Research Objects

The paper focuses on the explicit steady-state solution space constructed from Bessel functions: $V := \text{span}\{J_0(jr), J_1(jr)\cos\theta, J_1(jr)\sin\theta\}$ where $j = j_{1,1} \approx 3.831706$ is the first positive zero of $J_1$.

Core Contributions

1. Quantitative Stability Estimates: Provides the first quantitative $L^2$ orbital stability estimates for specific steady Euler flows in a disk, improving upon previous qualitative results.
2. Effective Utilization of Conserved Quantities: Innovatively combines three conserved quantities—kinetic energy, enstrophy, and fluid impulse moment—to control orbital parameters.
3. Relationship Between Radial Symmetry and Stability: Reveals an important phenomenon: stronger radial symmetry leads to weaker stability, which has profound implications for stability theory.
4. Technical Method Improvement: Compared to higher-order Casimir invariants, using the linear functional $I(\omega) = \int_D |x|^2\omega dx$ significantly simplifies calculations.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Setup

Consider the rotational orbit: $\mathcal{O} := \{AJ_0(jr) + BJ_1(jr)\cos(\theta + \alpha) | \alpha \in \mathbb{R}\}$ where $A, B \in \mathbb{R}$ and $B \geq 0$ are fixed parameters.

Core Technical Framework

1. Poincaré-Type Inequalities

Two key Poincaré-type inequalities are established:

• For $v \in \dot{L}^2(D)$: $\int_D vGv dx \leq \frac{1}{\Lambda_1}\int_D v^2 dx$
• For $v \in E_1^{\perp}$: $\int_D vGv dx \leq \frac{1}{\Lambda_2}\int_D v^2 dx$

where $\Lambda_1 = j^2$ and $E_1 = V$.

2. Coordinated Use of Conserved Quantities

Three conserved quantities are utilized:

• Kinetic Energy: $E(\omega) = \frac{1}{2}\int_D \omega G\omega dx$
• Enstrophy: $J(\omega) = \int_D \omega^2 dx$
• Fluid Impulse Moment: $I(\omega) = \int_D |x|^2\omega dx$

3. Energy-Casimir Method

A modified energy-Casimir functional is defined: $EC(v) := 2E(v) - \frac{1}{\Lambda_1}J(v) = \int_D vGv dx - \frac{1}{\Lambda_1}\int_D v^2 dx$

Technical Innovations

1. Parameter Control Strategy: Controls the radial parameter $A$ via $I$ and the azimuthal parameter $B$ via $J$, avoiding complex higher-order Casimir calculations.
2. Hierarchical Analysis Method:
   • First handles the zero-mean perturbation case
   • Then addresses general perturbations through rotational transformations
3. Quantitative Estimation Technique: Establishes explicit relationships between perturbation parameters and initial perturbations.

Main Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Result)

Let $\mathcal{O}$ be given by (1.5), where $A, B \in \mathbb{R}$ and $B \geq 0$. Then:

(i) When $B \neq 0$: There exists a constant $C > 0$ such that $\text{dist}_2(\omega_0, \mathcal{O}) \leq \varepsilon \Rightarrow \text{dist}_2(\omega_t, \mathcal{O}) \leq CB^{-1}(A^2 + B^2)^{1/2}\varepsilon + CB^{-1}\varepsilon^2$

(ii) When $B = 0$: There exists a constant $C > 0$ such that $\text{dist}_2(\omega_0, \mathcal{O}) \leq \varepsilon \Rightarrow \text{dist}_2(\omega_t, \mathcal{O}) \leq C|A|^{1/2}\varepsilon^{1/2} + C\varepsilon$

Key Technical Results

Proposition 3.1 (Quantitative Stability of $V$)

For zero-mean solutions $\omega_t \in \dot{L}^2(D)$: $\text{dist}_2(\omega_t, V) \leq \sqrt{\frac{\Lambda_2}{\Lambda_2 - \Lambda_1}}\text{dist}_2(\omega_0, V)$

Lemmas 4.3 and 4.4 (Parameter Estimates)

• Radial Parameter Control: $|A - A'| \leq C\varepsilon$
• Azimuthal Parameter Control:
  • When $B \neq 0$: $|B - B'| \leq CB^{-1}(A^2 + B^2)^{1/2}\varepsilon + CB^{-1}\varepsilon^2$
  • When $B = 0$: $|B'| \leq C|A|^{1/2}\varepsilon^{1/2} + C\varepsilon$

Experimental Verification and Theoretical Analysis

Mathematical Verification

The paper verifies all results through rigorous mathematical proofs, including:

1. Verification of Bessel Function Properties:
   • Computation of $\int_0^1 r^3 J_0(jr) dr \neq 0$
   • Application of orthogonality relations
2. Precise Calculation of Conserved Quantities:
   • $I(\tilde{\omega}_t) = 2\pi A \int_0^1 r^3 J_0(jr) dr$
   • $J(\tilde{\omega}_t) = A^2\|J_0(jr)\|_{L^2}^2 + B^2\|J_1(jr)\cos\theta\|_{L^2}^2$

Stability Behavior Analysis

The results reveal important physical phenomena:

• Non-radial Flows ($B \neq 0$): Perturbations grow at rate $O(\varepsilon)$
• Radial Flows ($B = 0$): Perturbations grow at rate $O(\varepsilon^{1/2})$, exhibiting weaker stability

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Arnold's Energy-Casimir Method 1,2: Established the theoretical foundation for fluid stability research
2. Wirosoetisno and Shepherd 14: First proposed using higher-order Casimirs to control orbital parameters
3. Elgindi 7: Established quantitative $L^2$ orbital stability on the torus

Technical Comparison

• This Paper vs. Higher-Order Casimir Method: Uses the linear functional $I$ instead of complex quartic Casimirs, yielding simpler calculations
• This Paper vs. Compactness Methods: Provides quantitative estimates rather than qualitative results
• This Paper vs. Torus Case: Adapts to the special properties of disk geometry

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Quantitative Stability: Provides the first precise stability estimates for steady Euler flows in a disk
2. Symmetry Effects: Stronger radial symmetry leads to weaker stability
3. Method Effectiveness: Coordinated use of conserved quantities is an effective approach for orbital stability problems

Limitations

1. $L^2$ Restriction: Results apply only to the $L^2$ norm; generalization to general $L^p$ norms is difficult
2. Specific Geometry: The method is specifically tailored to disk geometry; extension to other domains requires additional work
3. Specific Solution Class: Only considers specific solution spaces constructed from Bessel functions

Future Directions

1. Geometric Generalization: Apply the method to arbitrary two-dimensional tori
2. Dimensional Extension: Consider analogous problems for three-dimensional Euler equations
3. Nonlinear Stability: Investigate more general nonlinear stability problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Provides the first quantitative orbital stability estimates, filling a theoretical gap
2. Clever Methodology: Ingeniously utilizes the fluid impulse moment, a simple conserved quantity, avoiding complex calculations
3. Profound Results: Reveals deep relationships between symmetry and stability
4. Rigorous Proofs: Mathematical proofs are complete and rigorous with careful handling of technical details

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applicability: Applies only to specific solution classes and geometry
2. Non-optimal Constants: Constants in the proof may not be optimal
3. Insufficient Physical Interpretation: The physical mechanism behind radial symmetry inducing instability is not thoroughly explained

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new quantitative tools for fluid stability theory
2. Methodological Value: The employed methods may apply to stability analysis of other conservation law systems
3. Application Prospects: Provides theoretical guidance for numerical simulations and practical fluid problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Partial differential equations theory, particularly stability analysis of fluid mechanics equations
2. Numerical Computation: Provides stability guarantees for numerical solutions of Euler equations
3. Physical Applications: Prediction of long-time behavior of ideal fluids

References

The paper cites important literature in the field, including Arnold's classical works, Elgindi's torus results, and related research by Wang et al. These citations adequately reflect the position of this work within the academic context of the field.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper that makes important contributions to fluid mechanics stability theory. Although the applicability of the results is limited, its quantitative nature and the revealed relationship between symmetry and stability possess significant theoretical value. The technical methods employed also provide new perspectives for investigating related problems.