Evaluating plastic scintillator performance as a substitute of LYSO in SiPM based animal PET scanners: A GEANT4 simulation analysis

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14437
• Title: Evaluating plastic scintillator performance as a substitute of LYSO in SiPM based animal PET scanners: A GEANT4 simulation analysis
• Authors: Davinder Siwal, P. K. Mohanty, D. Bose, A. Jain
• Affiliated Institutions:
  • Department of Physics, Central University of Kashmir
  • Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai
• Classification: physics.ins-det (Instrumentation and Detectors Physics)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14437v1

Abstract

This study systematically investigates the coincidence time resolution (CRT) of LYSO (lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate) and plastic scintillator detector bars within the Geant4 framework. Crystals are coupled to silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) monolithic wafers through appropriate optical coupling for signal readout. The research determines trigger timestamps of back-to-back γ-rays emitted from point sources through bi-exponential shaped electrical pulses, evaluating CRT performance across different plastic scintillator lengths. For a 2×2×10 mm³ LYSO detector, the simulation yields a CRT response of 174 ps, consistent with literature-reported values. To determine plastic scintillator dimensions equivalent to LYSO in 511 keV γ-photon photopeak efficiency, the study tests various bar lengths of commercial BC404 and TIFR Ooty internally developed plastic materials. Results demonstrate that at a 25 keV threshold, the equivalent length of both plastic scintillators (same cross-sectional area) is 4 times that of the LYSO crystal, with corresponding CRT values approximately 300 ps. This indicates that if plastic bars are used to develop animal preclinical PET scanners, the minimum image resolution (FWHM) achievable by a pair of detector elements would be approximately 4.5 cm.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Challenges of Traditional PET Scanners: Traditional animal PET scanners employ LYSO crystals, which despite exhibiting excellent light output, fast decay time, and good energy resolution, are prohibitively expensive, limiting their application in developing countries.
2. Potential of Plastic Scintillators: Plastic scintillators offer significant advantages, including:
   • Cost 80 times lower than lutetium-based crystals
   • Better volume scalability
   • Attenuation length approximately 100 times longer
   • Decay time one order of magnitude faster than LYSO
3. Exploration of Technical Feasibility: Recent research from Jagiellonian University has rekindled interest in applying plastic scintillators to whole-body PET scanners, providing motivation for this study.

Research Significance

This study aims to provide technical support for developing cost-effective animal PET systems within the Indian research environment, possessing important practical value and social significance.

Core Contributions

1. Established a comprehensive Geant4 simulation framework: Systematically simulated photon transport, SiPM response, and signal processing for both LYSO and plastic scintillator detectors.
2. Validated simulation model accuracy: LYSO detector CRT simulation results (174 ps) show high consistency with literature-reported values.
3. Determined equivalent dimensions for plastic scintillators: Discovered that plastic scintillators require 4 times the length of LYSO to achieve comparable detection efficiency.
4. Evaluated two plastic scintillator materials: Comparative analysis of commercial BC404 and TIFR Ooty developed plastic materials, finding comparable performance.
5. Provided cost-benefit analysis: Supplied technical parameters and performance expectations for practical application of animal PET systems.

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Foundation: Photon Transport Theory

The research is based on the photon dispersion theory model established by Seifert et al., employing multivariate Gaussian density functions to describe the probability distribution of photon arrival times:

$P[t | t_{annih}] = \frac{1}{\sqrt{(2\pi)^j |\Sigma|}} \cdot \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}(t - \mu - t_{annih})^T\Sigma^{-1}(t - \mu - t_{annih})\right)$

where the Fisher information matrix is: $I(t_{annih}) = 1^T\Sigma^{-1}1 = \sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}(\Sigma^{-1})_{ij}$

and the Cramér-Rao lower bound is: $\sigma_{lb}^2 = \frac{1}{I(t_{annih})}$

Geant4 Simulation Implementation

Geometric Modeling

• Detector Configuration: A pair of scintillator bars positioned at 78 mm radial distance (typical gantry radius of animal PET scanners)
• Packaging Material: 50 μm thick epoxy resin reflective coating
• Optical Coupling: 200 μm optical grease layer + 150 μm thick SiPM wafer
• Surface Treatment: Considering crystal surface roughness, employing microfacet angular scattering parameter σα

Material Properties Configuration

Multi-threading Optimization

Implemented G4MTRunManager with 24-thread parallel processing, significantly reducing photon tracking simulation time.

SiPM Signal Modeling

Photon Arrival Time Calculation

$t_{arriv} = t_\gamma + \Delta t_{Lt} + t_{ps}$

where:

• $t_\gamma$: γ-ray interaction time
• $\Delta t_{Lt}$: photon transport time
• $t_{ps}$: SiPM propagation time (Gaussian distribution, σ = 80 ps)

Single Photoelectron Response Function

Employing bi-exponential pulse model: $f_{SER} = A \cdot \left[\exp\left(-\frac{t-t_{arriv}}{\tau_d}\right) - \exp\left(-\frac{t-t_{arriv}}{\tau_r}\right)\right]$

Parameter settings: rise time τr = 500 ps, decay time τd = 5 ns.

Signal Processing

• Quantum Efficiency: 35%
• Energy Resolution: 11% (at 511 keV)
• System Bandwidth: 1 GHz
• Electronics Time Dispersion: 57 ps (FWHM)

Experimental Setup

Simulation Configuration

• Geant4 Version: 4.10.07.p02
• Hardware Platform: Intel 6-core (12th generation Core i5) + 16 GB RAM + Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
• Parallel Processing: 24 threads
• Event Count: 4,615 full-energy coincident γ-ray events
• Photon Statistics: Minimum 300 photon arrivals at SiPM per event

Evaluation Metrics

• Coincidence Time Resolution (CRT): $CRT(FWHM) = 2.35 \times \sqrt{\sigma_{t1}^2 + \sigma_{t2}^2 + \sigma_{jitter}^2}$
• Detection Efficiency: $\epsilon_{Compton} = \frac{\text{Compton continuum events}}{\text{isotropic emission events}}$
• Spatial Resolution: $\Delta r = \frac{c\Delta t}{2}$

Comparison Benchmarks

• LYSO crystals (2×2×10 mm³) as reference standard
• Literature-reported CRT values for simulation validation

Experimental Results

LYSO Detector Validation

• Simulation CRT Result: 174 ps
• Literature-Reported Value: 175 ps
• Validation Conclusion: Simulation model is accurate and reliable

Plastic Scintillator Performance Analysis

Optical Time Dispersion

• Optical time dispersion of plastic scintillators exhibits near-linear relationship with bar length
• Due to longer absorption length, photon time dispersion in plastic materials is broader than LYSO

CRT Performance Comparison

Detection Efficiency Analysis

• Equivalent Length Requirement: Plastic scintillators require 40 mm length to achieve detection efficiency comparable to 10 mm LYSO (0.5×10⁻³%)
• Efficiency-Time Resolution Trade-off: 20 mm plastic bars can achieve time resolution comparable to LYSO, but detection efficiency is only 40% of LYSO

Image Resolution Prediction

Animal PET scanners using 40 mm plastic bars are expected to achieve minimum image resolution (FWHM) of approximately 4.5 cm.

Related Work

PET Detector Technology Development

Traditional animal PET scanners primarily employ LYSO crystal arrays, with typical CTR values of 1-4 ns. Related research reports:

• 3×3×10 mm³ LYSO + SensL SiPM: 190 ps CTR
• 4 mm² cross-section bars: 171.6 ps at 15 mm length, 179 ps at 20 mm length

Plastic Scintillator PET Applications

The pioneering work by the Jagiellonian University team has rekindled interest in plastic scintillator applications in PET imaging, particularly for whole-body PET scanners.

Theoretical Modeling Methods

This study employs the photon dispersion theory established by Seifert et al., which establishes a lower bound for time resolution and is widely recognized as the standard theoretical framework.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Technical Feasibility: Plastic scintillators are viable as LYSO substitutes for animal PET scanners
2. Performance Trade-offs: 40 mm plastic bars can achieve detection efficiency comparable to LYSO, but CRT degrades to 300 ps
3. Cost Advantages: Plastic scintillators offer significant cost advantages, suitable for resource-limited environments
4. Material Equivalence: TIFR Ooty developed plastic materials demonstrate performance comparable to commercial BC404

Limitations

1. Spatial Resolution Constraints: 300 ps CRT corresponds to 4.5 cm image resolution, lower than traditional LYSO systems
2. Simulation Simplifications: Does not account for SiPM dark current, optical crosstalk, afterpulsing, and other effects
3. Single Geometric Configuration: Only investigated specific detector geometry and configuration

Future Directions

1. MOBY Phantom Imaging Studies: Conduct phantom imaging validation using 2×2×40 mm³ plastic bars
2. Gantry Design Optimization: Explore different grid designs and gantry configurations to optimize performance
3. Experimental Validation: Perform actual hardware testing to verify simulation results

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigorous Methodology: Established a comprehensive theory-simulation-validation framework with reliable methodology
2. High Practical Value: Provides feasible technical solutions for cost-sensitive application scenarios
3. Detailed Simulation: Considers multiple physical processes including photon transport, surface reflection, and SiPM response
4. Sufficient Validation: Verified simulation model accuracy through comparison with literature values

Weaknesses

1. Significant Performance Compromise: Plastic scintillators exhibit lower time resolution and spatial resolution than LYSO
2. Limited Application Scenarios: 4.5 cm image resolution may restrict applications requiring fine imaging
3. Lack of Experimental Verification: Entirely simulation-based, lacking actual hardware test data
4. Rough Cost Analysis: While mentioning cost advantages, lacks detailed economic analysis

Impact

1. Technical Contribution: Provides new design concepts for PET detector technology
2. Social Value: Facilitates promotion of PET imaging technology in resource-limited regions
3. Academic Significance: Provides theoretical foundation for plastic scintillator applications in medical imaging

Applicable Scenarios

1. Animal Research: Suitable for animal metabolism studies with non-stringent spatial resolution requirements
2. Educational Training: Can serve as verification platform for PET imaging principles teaching and training
3. Technology Validation: Serves as validation platform for new algorithms and reconstruction techniques
4. Resource-Limited Environments: Suitable for budget-constrained research institutions and developing countries

References

The paper cites 25 important references covering multiple fields including PET imaging, scintillator physics, and Geant4 simulation, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a technically sound and practically valuable applied physics research paper. While compromises exist in performance, it provides valuable technical solutions for specific application scenarios with important social significance and promotion potential.