Modules With Descending Chain Conditions on Endoimages

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14477
• Title: Modules With Descending Chain Conditions on Endoimages
• Authors: Theophilus Gera, Manoj Kumar Patel, Ashok Ji Gupta
• Classification: math.RA (Ring Theory and Algebra)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14477

Abstract

This paper investigates endoartinian modules satisfying descending chain conditions on endoimages, establishing new characterizations that unify classical and generalized chain conditions. Over commutative rings, endoartinian property is equivalent to satisfying strong ACCR* conditions with dim(R) = 0 and strong DCCR* conditions. For principal injective rings, endoartinian rings are equivalent to endonoetherian rings. Addressing questions posed by Facchini and Nazemian, the authors provide conditions under which isoartinian and noetherian rings coincide, and classify semiprime endoartinian rings as finite products of matrix rings over division rings. Furthermore, they prove that over principal ideal rings with central idempotents, endoartinian property is equivalent to Köthe rings, characterizing such rings as finite products of artinian serial rings.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Development of Classical Chain Conditions: Noether introduced ascending chain conditions in 1921, and Artin introduced descending chain conditions in 1927, significantly advancing ring structure theory. The Hopkins-Levitzki theorem established the important result that artinian rings must be noetherian.
2. Rise of Generalized Chain Conditions: Varadarajan established connections between Hopfian and co-Hopfian modules. Hmaimou et al. introduced the concept of generalized Fitting modules, encompassing strongly Hopfian and strongly co-Hopfian modules.
3. Intermediate Finiteness Conditions: Facchini and Nazemian proposed in 2016 a framework relaxing the equality requirements of standard chain conditions. Gouaid et al. introduced in 2020 the concept of endonoetherian modules, positioned between isonoetherian and strongly Hopfian structures.

Research Motivation

Endoartinian modules occupy an intermediate position between isoartinian modules and strongly co-Hopfian modules. While classical chain conditions such as artinian property globally control submodule structures, endoartinian property imposes finiteness constraints on the action of the endomorphism ring, capturing internal stabilization phenomena that cannot be observed through submodules alone. The robustness of this structure motivates investigation of its properties and connections to other finiteness conditions.

Core Contributions

1. Established Systematic Theory of Endoartinian Modules: Defined and deeply investigated modules satisfying descending chain conditions on endoimages, filling the theoretical gap between isoartinian and strongly co-Hopfian structures.
2. Complete Characterization over Commutative Rings: Proved that over commutative rings, endoartinian property is equivalent to satisfying strong ACCR* conditions with dim(R) = 0 and strong DCCR* conditions (Theorem 2.11).
3. Hopkins-Levitzki Type Theorem: For right principal injective rings, established equivalence between right endoartinian and right endonoetherian properties (Theorem 2.16).
4. Addressed Facchini-Nazemian Question: Provided structural conditions for semiprime isoartinian rings to be noetherian, and proved equivalence of endoartinian and isoartinian properties over prime rings (Corollary 2.24).
5. Classification of Semiprime Endoartinian Rings: Completely characterized semiprime right endoartinian rings as finite direct products of matrix rings over division rings (Theorem 2.27).
6. Connection with Köthe Rings: Proved that for principal ideal rings with central idempotents, endoartinian property is equivalent to Köthe ring property, characterizing such rings as finite products of artinian serial rings (Theorem 3.2).

Methodology Details

Basic Definitions

Let M be a right R-module, and S = EndR(M) be the endomorphism ring of M.

• Endoartinian Module: If every descending chain of endoimages Im(f₁) ⊇ Im(f₂) ⊇ ⋯ stabilizes, where fᵢ ∈ S.
• Endonoetherian Module: If every ascending chain of endokernels stabilizes.

Key Technical Tools

Fitting-type Decomposition (Lemma 2.3)

For a module M that is both endoartinian and endonoetherian, if {fₙ} ⊆ EndR(M) satisfies fᵢfⱼ = fᵢ₊ⱼ, then there exists n such that: $M = \ker(f_n) \oplus \text{Im}(f_n)$

Characterization of Endoartinian Rings (Proposition 2.7)

A ring R is right endoartinian if and only if for every sequence {aᵢ} ⊆ R, there exists n such that: $a_nR = a_{n+1}R$ Equivalently, there exist b,c ∈ R such that aₙ = aₙ₊₁b and aₙ₊₁ = aₙc.

Connection with Perfect Rings (Proposition 2.8)

A ring R is right endoartinian if and only if R is a left perfect ring.

Technical Innovations

1. Introduction of Endoimage Chain Conditions: By considering images of endomorphisms rather than traditional submodules, the paper reveals internal structural properties of modules.
2. Establishment of Multi-level Equivalences: Establishes equivalence relationships between endoartinian property and other conditions across different ring classes, forming a complete theoretical system.
3. Structural Decomposition Techniques: Utilizes properties of central idempotents and principal ideal rings to achieve precise decomposition of complex ring structures.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

As a pure mathematical theory paper, this work verifies theoretical correctness through:

1. Construction of Counterexamples:
   • Example 2.1(4): Constructs a strongly co-Hopfian but non-endoartinian module
   • Example 2.6: Demonstrates incomparability of endoartinian and endonoetherian modules
   • Example 2.14: Shows failure of endoartinian property under localization
2. Concrete Calculations: Verifies theoretical predictions through explicit calculations with specific rings and modules
3. Counterexample Analysis: Example 3.4 with upper triangular matrix ring T₂(k) demonstrates necessity of assumptions in Theorem 3.2

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Complete Characterization over Commutative Rings (Theorem 2.11)

For a commutative ring R, the following are equivalent:

1. R is endoartinian
2. R satisfies strong DCCR* condition
3. R satisfies strong ACCR* condition and dim(R) = 0

Hopkins-Levitzki Type Equivalence (Theorem 2.16)

For a right principal injective ring R: $\text{Right endoartinian} \Leftrightarrow \text{Right endonoetherian}$

Classification of Semiprime Rings (Theorem 2.27)

For a ring R, the following are equivalent:

1. R is semiprime and right endoartinian
2. R is semisimple
3. R ≅ ∏ᵢ₌₁ⁿ Mₙᵢ(Dᵢ), where Dᵢ are division rings
4. R is right hereditary with soc(R_R) = R having finite length

Structural Findings

1. Inheritance by Direct Summands (Proposition 2.2): Endoartinian property is inherited by direct summands.
2. Chain Conditions on Direct Summands (Proposition 2.5): Endoartinian modules satisfy descending chain conditions on direct summands.
3. Schröder-Bernstein Property (Theorem 2.21): Every endoartinian module satisfies the SB property.

Related Work

Classical Chain Condition Theory

• Noether-Artin Theory: Established foundational framework for noetherian and artinian conditions
• Hopkins-Levitzki Theorem: Proved noetherian property of artinian rings
• Wedderburn-Artin Theorem: Structural classification of semisimple rings

Generalized Chain Conditions

• Varadarajan's Work: Established connections between Hopfian and co-Hopfian modules
• Hmaimou et al.: Introduced generalized Fitting module concept
• Facchini-Nazemian Framework: Chain conditions relaxing equality requirements

Endomorphism Theory of Modules

• Kaidi-Campos: First introduced endonoetherian modules
• Gouaid et al.: Systematically studied properties of endonoetherian rings

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Completeness: Established a complete theoretical system for endoartinian modules, filling the gap between isoartinian and strongly co-Hopfian structures.
2. Structural Characterizations: Provided complete characterizations of endoartinian property over several important ring classes, particularly commutative and semiprime rings.
3. Equivalence Theorems: Established equivalence relationships between endoartinian property and other important properties under appropriate conditions.

Limitations

1. Necessity of Assumptions: Many results require strong assumptions such as principal injectivity, central idempotents, etc.
2. Complexity in Noncommutative Case: Theory becomes significantly more complex over general noncommutative rings, with some problems remaining unresolved.
3. Computational Complexity: Algorithmic complexity of determining whether a given ring is endoartinian is not discussed.

Future Directions

1. Open Problems: The Facchini-Nazemian question about whether semiprime isoartinian rings must be noetherian remains unresolved in the general case.
2. Generalization Directions: Theory could potentially be extended to more general ring or module classes.
3. Application Exploration: Seeking applications of endoartinian property in other mathematical branches.

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: The paper establishes a complete and profound theoretical system, covering everything from basic definitions to deep structural properties.
2. Technical Innovation: The introduction of endoimage chain conditions is innovative, opening new research directions.
3. Completeness of Results: Provides complete characterizations over important ring classes, with strong theoretical completeness.
4. Clear Presentation: Paper has clear structure, precise definitions, and rigorous proofs.

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applications: As pure theoretical research, lacks concrete application background.
2. Computational Aspects: Lacks effective algorithms for determining endoartinian property.
3. Restricted Generalizations: Assumptions in some results are strong, limiting universal applicability of the theory.

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new research directions and tools for ring and module theory.
2. Theoretical Value: Unifies seemingly unrelated concepts, possessing significant theoretical value.
3. Future Research: Provides abundant material and unresolved problems for subsequent research.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Ring Theory Research: Provides new tools for studying ring structures.
2. Module Theory Applications: Potentially useful in studying module decomposition and structure.
3. Algebraic Geometry: May have applications in studying ring structures of algebraic varieties.

References

The paper contains 32 references covering classical literature in ring and module theory, including:

• Anderson & Fuller's Rings and categories of modules
• Lam's A first course in noncommutative rings
• Series of works by Facchini & Nazemian on isoartinian modules
• Classical theorems by Hopkins and Levitzki
• Other related contemporary research results

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality pure mathematics theory paper making significant contributions to ring and module theory. The paper establishes a complete theoretical system for endoartinian modules, resolves several important problems in the field, and provides direction for future research. While lacking direct applications, its theoretical value and academic contributions are substantial.