Single-shot antidistinguishability of unitary operations

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14609
• Title: Single-shot antidistinguishability of unitary operations
• Authors: Satyaki Manna, Anandamay Das Bhowmik (Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14609

Abstract

The concept of antidistinguishability captures the ability to exclude certain possibilities in quantum experiments without needing to identify the actual outcome. While antidistinguishability of quantum states has been extensively studied, antidistinguishability of quantum channels remains largely unexplored. This work investigates single-shot antidistinguishability of unitary operations, analyzing two scenarios: antidistinguishability using single-system probes and entangled probes. For sets of three unitary operations, we first prove that all maximally entangled states perform equivalently as probes. In the qubit case, we further establish that maximally entangled probes are always sufficient: if a set of three qubit unitary operations can be antidistinguished using single-system or non-maximally entangled probes, they can also be antidistinguished using maximally entangled probes. However, in higher dimensions, this equivalence fails. In the 3-dimensional case, there exists a set of unitary operations that can be antidistinguished using non-maximally entangled or single-system probes but cannot be antidistinguished using maximally entangled probes.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Distinguishability in quantum theory allows identification of which process from a known set has occurred based on measurement outcomes, while antidistinguishability is a weaker concept that permits negative identification of certain processes. Antidistinguishability requires consideration of at least three distinct processes, since for two processes the concepts of distinguishability and antidistinguishability coincide.

Significance

1. Fundamental Importance: Antidistinguishability has important implications for discussions on quantum state realism
2. Applied Value: Broad applications in quantum information and communication
3. Theoretical Gap: While antidistinguishability of quantum states has been extensively studied, research on antidistinguishability of quantum channels (particularly unitary operations) is nearly absent

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Inherent complexity of quantum channel antidistinguishability problems
• High complexity in handling general quantum channels
• Lack of systematic theoretical framework

Core Contributions

1. Established a theoretical framework for antidistinguishability of unitary operations, reducing it to antidistinguishability problems of corresponding evolved states
2. Proved that all maximally entangled states perform equivalently in antidistinguishing three unitary operations (Theorem 1)
3. Established sufficiency of maximally entangled probes in the qubit case:
   • Three qubit unitary operations antidistinguishable by non-maximally entangled probes are also antidistinguishable by maximally entangled probes (Theorem 2)
   • Three qubit unitary operations antidistinguishable by single-system probes are also antidistinguishable by maximally entangled probes (Theorem 4)
4. Discovered failure of hierarchical structure in higher dimensions: Constructed counterexamples existing in 3 and higher dimensions (Theorems 3, 5)
5. Established closure properties of antidistinguishable unitary operation sets (Theorem 6)
6. Provided methods for constructing antidistinguishable unitary operations from non-antidistinguishable ones (Theorems 7-9)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given r d-dimensional unitary operations {Uₓ} sampled from a prior probability distribution {pₓ}, the goal is to design measurement strategies that enable exclusion of certain unitary operations without requiring accurate identification of the actual unitary operation.

Mathematical Framework

Antidistinguishability Definition

For n quantum states {ρₖ}, antidistinguishability is defined as:

A[{ρk}k, {qk}k] = 1 - min{M} {∑k qk Tr(ρk Mk)}

Conditions for Perfect Antidistinguishability of Three Pure States

For three pairwise non-orthogonal pure quantum states, the necessary and sufficient conditions for perfect antidistinguishability are:

x1 + x2 + x3 < 1
(x1 + x2 + x3 - 1)² ≥ 4x1x2x3

where xᵢ = |⟨ψᵢ|ψⱼ⟩|² represents overlaps between states.

Two Probe Scenarios

Single-System Probes (AS)

AS[{Ux}x, {px}x] = maxρ A[{UxρUx†}x, {px}x]

Entangled Probes (AE)

AE[{Ux}x, {px}x] = maxρAB A[{(Ux⊗1)ρAB(Ux†⊗1)}x, {px}x]

Key Technical Insights

Inner Product Calculation

For spectral decomposition of unitary operations Uᵢ†Uⱼ:

|⟨ψ|Uᵢ†Uⱼ|ψ⟩|² = |con{e^(iθₗᵢⱼ)}|²

where con{·} denotes convex combination of complex numbers.

Role of Maximally Entangled States

For maximally entangled state |Φ⁺⟩ = (1/√d)∑|kk⟩:

|⟨Φ⁺|Uᵢ†Uⱼ|Φ⁺⟩|² = (1/d²)|Tr(Uᵢ†Uⱼ)|²

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Proof Methods

This work primarily employs theoretical analysis and mathematical proofs, verifying conclusions through:

1. Constructive Proofs: Explicit construction of unitary operation sets satisfying specified conditions
2. Inequality Analysis: Utilizing convex combination properties and spectral decomposition
3. Semidefinite Programming Verification: Numerical methods for complex cases

Specific Examples

The paper constructs concrete 3×3 unitary operations:

V₁ = |ω₁⟩⟨1| + |ω₂⟩⟨2| + |ω₃⟩⟨3| + ⋯ + |ωd⟩⟨d|
V₂ = (1/2|ω₁⟩ + √3/2|ω₂⟩)⟨1| + (-√3/2|ω₁⟩ + 1/2|ω₂⟩)⟨2| + |ω₃⟩⟨3| + ⋯
V₃ = (1/2|ω₁⟩ + √3/2|ω₃⟩)⟨1| + |ω₂⟩⟨2| + (-√3/2|ω₁⟩ + 1/2|ω₃⟩)⟨3| + ⋯

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Maximally Entangled State Equivalence (Theorem 1)

Result: All maximally entangled states perform identically in antidistinguishing three unitary operations. Proof: Based on basis-independence properties of the trace.

Hierarchical Structure in Qubit Case (Theorems 2, 4)

Result: For qubit unitary operations:

• Non-maximally entangled probes → Maximally entangled probes feasible
• Single-system probes → Maximally entangled probes feasible

Key Inequality:

g₁ᴹ ≤ g₁ᴺᴹ, g₂ᴹ ≤ g₂ᴺᴹ, g₃ᴹ ≤ g₃ᴺᴹ

Counterexamples in Higher Dimensions (Theorems 3, 5)

Result: For d≥3, there exist unitary operation sets satisfying:

• Antidistinguishable using non-maximally entangled or single-system probes
• Not antidistinguishable using maximally entangled probes

Numerical Verification:

y₁ + y₂ + y₃ = (1-1/d)² + (1-7/4d)² + (1-1/d)² > 1 (when d≥3)

Constructive Results

Closure Properties (Theorem 6)

The union of two antidistinguishable sets of three qubit unitary operations remains antidistinguishable.

Extension Methods (Theorems 7-9)

• Any finite set of qubit unitary operations can be made antidistinguishable by adding one unitary operation
• Tensor products can transform non-antidistinguishable unitary operations into antidistinguishable sets

Related Work

Antidistinguishability of Quantum States

• Caves, Fuchs, Schack (2002): Established foundational theoretical framework
• Heinosaari & Kerppo (2018): Pure state antidistinguishability conditions
• Johnston, Russo, Sikora (2025): Tight bounds and cyclic sets

Distinguishability of Unitary Operations

• Acín (2001): Statistical distinguishability of unitary operations
• Piani & Watrous (2009): Role of entangled states in channel discrimination
• Manna, Bhowmik, Saha (2025): Limitations of maximally entangled states in unitary operation discrimination

Novelty of This Work

1. First systematic study of antidistinguishability of unitary operations
2. Established probe hierarchies
3. Discovered dimension-dependent property differences

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Maximally Entangled State Equivalence: All maximally entangled states perform identically in three-unitary antidistinguishability
2. Qubit Sufficiency: Maximally entangled probes are always sufficient for qubit unitary operations
3. Dimension Dependence: Probe hierarchical structure changes in higher dimensions
4. Construction Methods: Provided multiple methods for constructing antidistinguishable unitary operation sets

Limitations

1. Dimensional Constraints: Main results focus on low-dimensional cases (qubits and 3-dimensional systems)
2. Single-Shot Scenario: Considers only single measurements, not multiple rounds
3. Specific Structure: Constructed counterexamples possess particular mathematical structures

Future Directions

1. Higher-Dimensional Characteristics: Antidistinguishability features of higher-dimensional unitary operations
2. Multiple-Round Scenarios: Antidistinguishability under multiple measurements
3. Resource Theory: Resource-theoretic formulation of antidistinguishability
4. General Channels: Extension to general quantum channels

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: All conclusions supported by rigorous mathematical proofs
2. Clear Structure: Systematic progression from simple to complex with distinct hierarchical organization
3. Significant Innovation: First systematic investigation of an important but previously overlooked problem
4. Complete Methodology: Includes both positive results and counterexample constructions

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applications: Primarily theoretical results; practical application scenarios remain to be explored
2. Computational Complexity: Some results rely on numerical verification, lacking analytical expressions
3. Generalization Difficulty: Fundamental obstacles in extending from qubits to higher dimensions

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Adds new research direction to quantum information theory
2. Methodological Inspiration: Provides paradigm for studying antidistinguishability of quantum channels
3. Practical Value: Furnishes theoretical foundation for related problems in quantum communication and quantum computing

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum Communication: Channel identification and error detection
2. Quantum Computing: Process verification in quantum algorithms
3. Fundamental Research: Investigation of foundational quantum theory problems

References

This paper cites 49 relevant references spanning multiple fields including quantum state distinguishability, quantum channel theory, and quantum information processing, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper making systematic contributions to an important but previously understudied area of quantum information theory. The mathematical derivations are rigorous, the conclusions carry significant theoretical importance, and the work establishes foundation for subsequent research.