2025-11-24T09:04:18.006238

On FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces in $\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n$ and new area-minimizing cones

Cui
Via a new isoparametric foliation in $\mathbb{S}^n(1) \times \mathbb{S}^n(1)$, we find many new area-minimizing cones by applying Lawlor's curvature criterion, especially codimension-two area-minimizing cones in $\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}$ for $n\geq 63$. This new isoparametric foliation is a further restriction of the Ferus-Karcher-Münzner isoparametric foliation to $\mathbb{S}^n(1) \times \mathbb{S}^n(1) \subset \mathbb{S}^{2n+1}(\sqrt{2})$, which can also be defined on general $\mathbb{S}^n(a) \times \mathbb{S}^n(b)(a>0,b>0)$, and it extends the recent classification results of F. Urbano for $n=2$.
academic

On FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n and new area-minimizing cones

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.14650
  • Title: On FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n and new area-minimizing cones
  • Author: Hongbin Cui (University of Science and Technology of China)
  • Classification: math.DG (Differential Geometry)
  • Publication Date: October 16, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14650

Abstract

By constructing new isoparametric foliations in Sn(1)×Sn(1)\mathbb{S}^n(1) \times \mathbb{S}^n(1), the author applies Lawlor's curvature discriminant criterion to discover numerous new area-minimizing cones, particularly codimension-2 area-minimizing cones in R2n+2\mathbb{R}^{2n+2} for n63n \geq 63. This new isoparametric foliation arises from a further restriction of the Ferus-Karcher-Münzner (FKM) isoparametric foliation on Sn(1)×Sn(1)S2n+1(2)\mathbb{S}^n(1) \times \mathbb{S}^n(1) \subset \mathbb{S}^{2n+1}(\sqrt{2}), can also be defined on general Sn(a)×Sn(b)\mathbb{S}^n(a) \times \mathbb{S}^n(b), and generalizes the classification results of F. Urbano for the case n=2n=2.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Significance of area-minimizing cones: As solutions to the Plateau problem, area-minimizing surfaces possess at least one tangent cone at each interior singularity as a blow-up limit, and these cones themselves are area-minimizing. Studying area-minimizing cones helps understand the structure of singularities in area-minimizing surfaces.
  2. Limitations of existing results:
    • Regular area-minimizing hypersurface cones primarily come from homogeneous examples (such as Simons cones) and isoparametric cones
    • In high codimension cases, known codimension-2 area-minimizing cones are extremely limited outside of complex algebraic varieties
    • The examples of Cheng and Lawlor may be the only known codimension-2 area-minimizing cones that are not complex algebraic varieties
  3. Research motivation: To find new codimension-2 minimal cones in R2n+2\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}, particularly those appearing as subcones within the Simons cone CnC_n.

Core Contributions

  1. Construction of new isoparametric foliations: Defined FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n, which arise from restrictions of FKM isoparametric polynomials
  2. Discovery of numerous new area-minimizing cones:
    • For the irreducible case k=1k=1 with δ(m)64\delta(m) \geq 64
    • For the reducible case k2k \geq 2 with kδ(m)484k\delta(m) \geq 484
  3. Proof of isonormality: Established that FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n are isonormal
  4. Application of Lawlor's discriminant criterion: Systematically computed vanishing angles and normal radii, verifying area-minimizing conditions
  5. Generalization of Urbano's results: Extended the classification for n=2n=2 to general dimensions

Detailed Methodology

Problem Formulation

To find new codimension-2 area-minimizing cones in R2n+2\mathbb{R}^{2n+2}, with particular focus on cones whose links are minimal hypersurfaces in Sn(1)×Sn(1)S2n+1(2)\mathbb{S}^n(1) \times \mathbb{S}^n(1) \subset \mathbb{S}^{2n+1}(\sqrt{2}).

Core Mathematical Framework

1. Split Form of FKM Isoparametric Polynomials

For FKM isoparametric polynomials, the author defines their split form on Rn+1×Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1}:

F(x,y)=x,y2+q=1m1Aqx,y2F(x,y) = \langle x,y \rangle^2 + \sum_{q=1}^{m-1} \langle A_q x, y \rangle^2

where {A1,A2,,Am1}\{A_1, A_2, \ldots, A_{m-1}\} is a family of antisymmetric representations of the Clifford algebra Clm1\text{Cl}_{m-1} on Rkδ(m)\mathbb{R}^{k\delta(m)}.

2. Isonormality Condition

Definition of isonormal hypersurface: For a hypersurface MM in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n, if Urbano's product angle function C=PN,N0C = \langle PN, N \rangle \equiv 0, then MM is called isonormal.

Key Lemma 1.2: An isonormal minimal hypersurface in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n is also a minimal hypersurface in S2n+1(2)\mathbb{S}^{2n+1}(\sqrt{2}).

3. Computation Formula for Second Fundamental Form

Theorem 2.3: For a non-trivial algebraic hypersurface MM in Sn×Sn\mathbb{S}^n \times \mathbb{S}^n given by regular level sets of a function FF, the squared norm of its second fundamental form is:

B2=1ˉF2[12ΔˉˉF2ˉF,ˉΔˉF(n1)ˉF2ˉˉF222ˉF2+ˉˉF2,ˉF24ˉF4]||B||^2 = \frac{1}{|\bar{\nabla}F|^2}\left[\frac{1}{2}\bar{\Delta}|\bar{\nabla}F|^2 - \langle\bar{\nabla}F, \bar{\nabla}\bar{\Delta}F\rangle - (n-1)|\bar{\nabla}F|^2 - \frac{|\bar{\nabla}|\bar{\nabla}F|^2|^2}{2|\bar{\nabla}F|^2} + \frac{\langle\bar{\nabla}|\bar{\nabla}F|^2, \bar{\nabla}F\rangle^2}{4|\bar{\nabla}F|^4}\right]

Technical Innovations

  1. Splitting technique: Decomposing high-dimensional FKM isoparametric polynomials into bihomogeneous polynomials on product spaces
  2. Exploitation of isonormality: Using the isonormality condition to ensure that submanifolds remain minimal in higher-dimensional spheres
  3. Systematic application of Lawlor's discriminant criterion: Precise computation of vanishing angle and normal radius estimates

Experimental Framework

Theoretical Verification Framework

This is primarily a theoretical work, with "experiments" manifested in mathematical proofs and computational verification:

  1. Vanishing angle estimation: Using Lawlor's tables and formulas to compute vanishing angle estimates
  2. Normal radius calculation: Determining precise normal radii through geometric analysis
  3. Verification of dimensional constraints: Checking dimensional constraints under different parameters

Key Computational Steps

Step One: Second Fundamental Form Analysis

  • Computing the slice geometry of minimal FKM isoparametric hypersurfaces Σ\Sigma
  • Proving that the maximum norm of the shape operator is α2=6(n1)\alpha^2 = 6(n-1)
  • Obtaining vanishing angle estimates from Lawlor's table: θarctan11n\theta \leq \arctan \frac{11}{n} (when n11n \geq 11)

Step Two: Normal Radius Calculation

Using properties of antisymmetric representations of Clifford algebras, proving that the normal radius is: N=arctanc1c=arctanm1nmN = \arctan\sqrt{\frac{c}{1-c}} = \arctan\sqrt{\frac{m-1}{n-m}} (except for the special case (m,n)=(9,15)(m,n) = (9,15))

Step Three: Verification of Lawlor Condition

Verifying the critical inequality 2θN2\theta \leq N:

  • Irreducible case (k=1k=1): Requires n63n \geq 63
  • Reducible case (k2k \geq 2): Requires n483n \geq 483

Experimental Results

Main Theorems

Theorem 1.7: The minimal cone C(Σ)Ckδ(m)1C(\Sigma) \subset C_{k\delta(m)-1}C(Σ)={(x,y)Rkδ(m)×Rkδ(m):x,y2+q=1m1Aqx,y2=m1n1x2y2 and x=y}C(\Sigma) = \left\{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^{k\delta(m)} \times \mathbb{R}^{k\delta(m)} : \langle x,y\rangle^2 + \sum_{q=1}^{m-1}\langle A_q x, y\rangle^2 = \frac{m-1}{n-1}|x|^2|y|^2 \text{ and } |x|=|y|\right\}

is area-minimizing under the following conditions:

  • (i) Irreducible case k=1k=1, δ(m)64\delta(m) \geq 64
  • (ii) Reducible case k2k \geq 2, kδ(m)484k\delta(m) \geq 484

Theorem 1.8: The minimal product cone is area-minimizing when dimC21\dim C \geq 21.

Concrete Application Examples

Using the Clifford algebra dimension table:

  • For m=11m=11, δ(11)=64\delta(11)=64, yielding the first example at n=63n=63
  • For m=2,k=242m=2, k=242, kδ(2)=484k\delta(2)=484, yielding an example at n=483n=483

Important Findings

  1. Numerous new examples: First construction of non-homogeneous codimension-2 area-minimizing cones for n63n \geq 63
  2. Unified framework: Provides a systematic method for constructing and verifying area-minimizing cones
  3. Dimensional lower bounds: Provides concrete dimensional lower bounds, though possibly not optimal

Historical Development

  1. Simons cones: The first class of regular area-minimizing cones, discovered in solving the Bernstein problem
  2. Lawson's calibration method: Proved that many homogeneous minimal hypersurfaces produce area-minimizing cones
  3. Isoparametric cones: Complete classification of isoparametric area-minimizing cones by Wang and others
  4. High codimension cases: Examples of Cheng and Lawlor for codimension-2

Innovations of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper:

  • First constructs codimension-2 area-minimizing cones in a non-homogeneous setting
  • Extends FKM theory to product spaces
  • Provides a systematic construction method

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Successfully constructed numerous new codimension-2 area-minimizing cones
  2. Established the framework of FKM isoparametric theory in product spaces
  3. Verified the validity of Lawlor's discriminant criterion in the new setting

Limitations

  1. Dimensional constraints: Requires substantially large dimensions (n63n \geq 63 or n483n \geq 483)
  2. Optimality of bounds: The given dimensional lower bounds may not be optimal
  3. Computational complexity: Involves complex Clifford algebra computations

Future Directions

  1. Improved dimensional bounds: More refined numerical computations may reduce dimensional requirements
  2. Generalization to other spaces: Consider more general product manifolds
  3. Classification problems: Complete classification of isoparametric hypersurfaces in product spaces

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical depth: Organically combines multiple profound geometric theories (FKM theory, Lawlor's discriminant criterion, isoparametric geometry)
  2. Computational rigor: Detailed calculations and estimates, particularly precise analysis of vanishing angles and normal radii
  3. Important results: First construction of non-homogeneous codimension-2 area-minimizing cones in high dimensions
  4. Methodological innovation: Clever application of splitting techniques and isonormality conditions

Weaknesses

  1. High dimensional requirements: Practical applications limited by high-dimensional constraints
  2. Technical threshold: Requires deep background in differential geometry and algebra
  3. Computational complexity: Involves extensive technical computations with potential room for improvement

Impact

  1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new construction methods for area-minimizing cone theory
  2. Methodological value: Isonormality techniques may apply to other geometric problems
  3. Generalization potential: Opens new directions for research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

  • Research in minimal surface theory in differential geometry
  • Geometric variational problems
  • Applications of Clifford algebras in geometry
  • Development of isoparametric geometry theory

References

The paper cites extensive relevant literature, including:

  • Pioneering work of Lawlor on area-minimizing cones
  • Classical literature on FKM isoparametric theory
  • Recent advances by Urbano and others in product space geometry
  • Foundational literature on area-minimizing theory

This paper possesses significant theoretical value in the field of differential geometry, solving a difficult geometric problem through clever mathematical construction and making substantial contributions to the development of the field.