Transverse momentum dependent gluon density in a proton at low $x$ in the Laplace transform method

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14678
• Title: Transverse momentum dependent gluon density in a proton at low $x$ in the Laplace transform method
• Authors: G.R. Boroun (Razi University), Phuoc Ha (Towson University), A.V. Kotikov (JINR), A.V. Lipatov (Moscow State University)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14678v1

Abstract

This paper employs Laplace transform techniques to investigate gluon distributions in a proton at extremely low $x$ regions, encompassing both integrated gluon distributions and transverse momentum dependent (TMD) gluon distributions. By incorporating leading-order and next-to-leading-order contributions, the authors derive compact analytical expressions for gluon densities valid in the asymptotic limit $x \to 0$. The results demonstrate high consistency with other analytical and numerical methods, with the primary advantage being the simplicity of the expressions, which capture the essential features of more complex calculations.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: Accurate description of transverse momentum dependent distributions (TMDs) of gluons within protons is a key challenge in modern and future collider physics. Traditional collinear QCD factorization schemes neglect the transverse momentum of partons, becoming unreliable in high-energy processes involving multiple hard scales.
2. Significance: TMDs are more sensitive to parton dynamics than ordinary PDFs and constitute an important component of modern high-energy physics and small-$x$ physics. Precise knowledge of TMDs is crucial for theoretical predictions of multi-scale QCD processes at colliders such as the LHC, LHeC, and EIC.
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Methods based on evolution equations (BFKL, CCFM, BK) are complex
   • Parton branching methods and KMR/WMR prescriptions rely on numerical solutions
   • Proton TMDs remain a knowledge-poor quantity compared to traditional PDFs
4. Research Motivation: Develop an analytical method based on Laplace transform techniques to obtain simple yet accurate TMD gluon density expressions capable of reproducing the main features of complex numerical calculations.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed an analytical method based on Laplace transforms: Successfully applied this technique to analytical solution of DGLAP evolution equations
2. Derived compact analytical expressions: Obtained analytical forms for ordinary gluon densities and TMD gluon densities at LO and NLO approximations
3. Verified method validity: Results demonstrate high consistency with numerical analyses from CTEQ-TEA, NNPDF4.0, MSHT'2020, and others
4. Provided theoretical insights: Simplified expressions reveal essential physical features underlying complex calculations

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of gluon distributions in a proton at extremely low $x$ regions ($x \to 0$), including:

• Inputs: Bjorken variable $x$, hard scale $\mu^2$, transverse momentum $k_T^2$
• Outputs: Ordinary gluon density $G(x,\mu^2)$ and TMD gluon density $f_g(x,k_T^2)$
• Constraints: Valid in the asymptotic limit $x \to 0$

Model Architecture

1. Fundamental Relations

In the extremely low-$x$ region, the approximate relationship between TMD gluon distribution and ordinary gluon density: $f_g(x,k_T^2) \simeq \frac{\partial}{\partial\mu^2}G(x,\mu^2)\bigg|_{\mu^2=k_T^2}$

2. DGLAP Evolution Equation

Neglecting quark contributions, the gluon distribution function satisfies: $\frac{\partial}{\partial\ln\mu^2}G(x,\mu^2) \simeq \int_x^1 P_{gg}(z,\alpha_s(\mu^2))G\left(\frac{x}{z},\mu^2\right)dz$

3. Laplace Transform Technique

Introducing variables $\upsilon = \ln(1/x)$ and $t = \ln\mu^2$, applying the Laplace transform: $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}g(s,t) = \sum_{n=1} h_{gg}^{(n)}(s,a_s(t))g(s,t)$

where $h_{gg}^{(n)}(s,a_s(t))$ is the Laplace transform of the splitting function $P_{gg}^{(n)}$.

4. Analytical Solution

Obtained through perturbative expansion: $g(s,t) = g_0(s,t_0)\exp\left[\sum_{n=1} h_{gg}^{(n)}(s)\int_{t_0}^t a_s^n(t')dt'\right]$

Technical Innovations

1. Clever application of Laplace transforms: Converts complex integro-differential equations into algebraic equations
2. Perturbative expansion strategy: Retains terms up to $O(a_s^3)$, balancing accuracy and complexity
3. Asymptotic behavior analysis: Preserves leading terms $1/s$ and $1/s^2$ in the $s \to 0$ limit
4. Analytical inverse transform: Employs incomplete Beta functions and hypergeometric functions for precise inversion

Experimental Setup

Datasets and Parameters

• Initial condition parameters:
  • LO calculation: $a = -0.34 \pm 0.02$, $b = 12.0 \pm 1.0$, $N = 0.52$ GeV$^{-2}$
  • NLO calculation: $a = -0.27 \pm 0.02$, $b = 6.0 \pm 1.0$, $N = 0.78$ GeV$^{-2}$
• QCD parameters: $N_f = 4$, $\Lambda_{QCD} = 200$ MeV
• Running coupling: Single-loop formula for LO, two-loop formula for NLO

Comparison Methods

1. Numerical PDF sets: CTEQ-TEA, NNPDF4.0, MSHT'2020, IMP
2. TMD methods: KMR/WMR method, CCFM evolution method
3. Theoretical frameworks: FFNS and VFNS schemes

Evaluation Metrics

• Consistency with numerical results at different $\mu^2$ values
• Behavioral comparison across different $x$ and $k_T^2$ ranges
• Parameter uncertainty analysis

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Ordinary Gluon Density

• LO results: At $x \leq 10^{-2}$ and moderate $\mu^2$ values, very close to CTEQ-TEA FFNS predictions
• NLO results: Significantly improved consistency with numerical results from various PDF sets
• Uncertainties: Estimated through reasonable variations of parameters $a$ and $b$, represented by shaded bands

2. TMD Gluon Density

• Comparison with KL'2025: Shows good consistency in the moderate transverse momentum region $k_T^2 \leq 100$ GeV$^2$
• Comparison with LLM'2024: Exhibits significant consistency across wide $x$ ranges in moderate $k_T^2$ regions
• Sudakov effects: Minor differences in small transverse momentum regions after including Sudakov form factors

3. Specific Numerical Performance

Results displayed in Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate that the analytical formula successfully reproduces the main features of complex numerical calculations, particularly in the asymptotic region $x \to 0$.

Ablation Studies

• LO vs NLO: NLO corrections significantly improve consistency with numerical results
• Sudakov effects: Primarily influence small $k_T^2$ regions, essentially vanishing at large $k_T^2$
• Parameter sensitivity: Theoretical uncertainties analyzed through variations of parameters $a$ and $b$

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Evolution equation methods: BFKL, CCFM, BK/JIMWLK equations
2. DGLAP-based methods: Parton branching method, KMR/WMR prescriptions
3. Nonlinear effects: Studies within the color glass condensate framework

Advantages of This Work

Compared to other methods, this paper provides:

• More concise analytical expressions
• More intuitive physical pictures
• Easier numerical implementation
• Comparable accuracy to complex methods

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Laplace transform technique successfully applied to analytical calculation of TMD gluon densities
2. Derived analytical expressions exhibit correct asymptotic behavior in the small-$x$ region
3. Results demonstrate good consistency with existing numerical and analytical methods
4. The method's primary advantage lies in the simplicity of the expressions

Limitations

1. Restricted applicability: Primarily valid in extremely low-$x$ regions ($x \to 0$)
2. Perturbative expansion constraints: Expansion limits prevent hard scale $t$ from deviating too far from initial scale $t_0$
3. Soft region modeling: The region $k_T^2 < k_0^2$ requires phenomenological modeling
4. Higher-order corrections: Neglects $O(a_s^3)$ and higher-order terms

Future Directions

1. Extension to higher-order QCD corrections
2. Improved theoretical description of soft regions
3. Inclusion of more complete Sudakov resummation effects
4. Application to specific collider phenomenology studies

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong methodological innovation: Original application of Laplace transform technique to TMD calculations
2. Theoretical rigor: Clear mathematical derivations and well-defined physical pictures
3. High practical value: Concise analytical expressions facilitate phenomenological applications
4. Comprehensive verification: Systematic comparison with multiple independent numerical results

Weaknesses

1. Limited applicability: Valid only in extremely low-$x$ regions; application to intermediate and high-$x$ regions is restricted
2. Phenomenological parameter dependence: Initial condition parameters require fitting
3. Simplified soft region treatment: Infrared region modeling is relatively crude
4. Incomplete systematic uncertainties: Parameter uncertainty estimation may not be comprehensive

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new analytical tools for TMD physics
2. Phenomenological value: Simplified expressions facilitate collider physics analysis
3. Methodological significance: Laplace transform technique generalizable to other QCD problems
4. Reproducibility: Analytical formulas facilitate use and verification by other researchers

Applicable Scenarios

• Theoretical studies of small-$x$ physics
• Phenomenological analysis at high-energy colliders
• Rapid estimation of TMD factorization
• Analytical solution of QCD evolution equations

References

The paper cites 46 important references covering classical and recent works in key fields including QCD evolution theory, TMD physics, and numerical PDF analysis, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with significant methodological innovation, successfully applying Laplace transform techniques to analytical calculation of TMD gluon densities and obtaining concise yet accurate expressions. Despite limitations in applicability range, its theoretical value and practical utility make it an important contribution to the TMD physics field.