A Scalable MVDR Beamforming Algorithm That is Linear in the Number of Antennas

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14802
• Title: A Scalable MVDR Beamforming Algorithm That is Linear in the Number of Antennas
• Authors: Sanjaya Herath, Armin Gerami, Kevin Wagner, Ramani Duraiswami, Christopher A. Metzler
• Category: eess.SP (Signal Processing)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14802

Abstract

Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) beamforming is widely employed in array systems for interference suppression. However, applying MVDR to large-scale arrays presents computational challenges, with computational complexity scaling cubically with the number of antenna elements. This paper proposes a scalable MVDR beamforming approach specifically designed for large-scale arrays. The method targets scenarios where the signal of interest is below the noise floor (e.g., GPS), leveraging the Sherman-Morrison formula, low-rank singular value decomposition (SVD) approximation, and algebraic manipulation. Through this approach, computational complexity is reduced from cubic to linear in the number of antennas. The computational efficiency and beamforming accuracy of the proposed method are evaluated through simulations and compared with conventional MVDR approaches. The method significantly reduces computational burden while maintaining high beamforming accuracy for large-scale arrays.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this research is the computational complexity of conventional MVDR beamforming in large-scale antenna arrays. Specifically:

1. Computational Complexity Bottleneck: Traditional MVDR requires computing the inverse of the covariance matrix with complexity O(M³), where M is the number of antennas
2. Real-time Requirements: Frequent covariance matrix updates in dynamic environments make real-time implementation challenging
3. Large-scale Array Trend: Modern radar, sonar, and wireless communication systems employ increasingly large antenna arrays (hundreds to thousands of elements)

Importance Analysis

The significance of this problem is reflected in:

• Broad Applicability: MVDR is widely applied in radar target detection, acoustic scene analysis, and other domains
• Technology Development Needs: Large-scale antenna arrays provide high spatial resolution and strong interference suppression capabilities
• Real-time Processing Requirements: Many application scenarios demand real-time beamforming processing

Limitations of Existing Methods

Existing approaches in the literature have the following limitations:

1. Algorithmic Methods: Nyström-based low-rank approximation, QR decomposition, and others still exhibit high computational complexity
2. Distributed Methods: Require complex communication protocols and synchronization mechanisms
3. Deep Learning Methods: Require large amounts of training data with limited generalization capability

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a Linear-Complexity MVDR Algorithm: Reduces computational complexity from O(M³) to O(MK²), where K≪M
2. Combines Multiple Mathematical Techniques: Skillfully integrates Sherman-Morrison formula, low-rank SVD approximation, and algebraic manipulation
3. Optimized for Specific Scenarios: Specifically designed for signal-below-noise-floor scenarios, such as GPS applications
4. Maintains High Beamforming Accuracy: Achieves performance comparable to conventional MVDR while significantly reducing computational complexity
5. Provides Complete Algorithm Framework: Delivers complete procedures for initialization, updates, and weight calculation

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Consider an array comprising M isotropic antennas receiving a signal of interest from target direction θ₀ and L interference signals from directions θ₁, θ₂, ..., θₗ. The received signal vector at time t is:

$x_t = a(\theta_0)s_0(t) + \sum_{l=1}^{L} a(\theta_l)s_l(t) + s_n(t)$

where a(θᵢ) is the steering vector, s₀(t) is the signal of interest, sₗ(t) are interference signals, and sₙ(t) is noise.

The solution for the conventional MVDR beamformer is: $w = \frac{R^{-1}a(\theta_0)}{a(\theta_0)^H R^{-1}a(\theta_0)}$

Model Architecture

1. Recursive Covariance Matrix Update

Using recursive update rule with forgetting factor α: $R_{n+1} = \alpha R_n + (1-\alpha)x_n x_n^H$

2. Sherman-Morrison Formula Application

Updating the inverse of the covariance matrix using the Sherman-Morrison formula: $R_{n+1}^{-1} = \frac{R_n^{-1}}{\alpha} - \frac{(1-\alpha)}{\alpha} \frac{R_n^{-1}x_n x_n^H R_n^{-1}}{\alpha + (1-\alpha)x_n^H R_n^{-1}x_n}$

3. Low-rank SVD Approximation

K-rank approximation of the covariance matrix: $R \approx U_K D_K U_K^H$

where U_K ∈ C^{M×K} contains the first K eigenvectors and D_K ∈ C^{K×K} contains the first K eigenvalues.

4. Dimensionality-Reduced Update Rule

Through low-rank approximation, the update rule becomes: $D_{K,n+1}^{-1} = \frac{D_{K,n}^{-1}}{\alpha} - \frac{(1-\alpha)}{\alpha} \frac{D_{K,n}^{-1}U_K^H x_n x_n^H U_K D_{K,n}^{-1}}{\alpha + (1-\alpha)x_n^H U_K D_{K,n}^{-1}U_K^H x_n}$

Technical Innovations

1. Dimensionality Reduction Strategy: Avoids explicit formation of M×M covariance matrix through K≪M low-rank approximation
2. Incremental Update Mechanism: Achieves O(MK²) complexity updates utilizing the Sherman-Morrison formula
3. Scenario-Specific Optimization: For signal-below-noise-floor scenarios, K can typically be set to L+1
4. Algorithm Integration: Organically combines SVD, Sherman-Morrison formula, and recursive updates

Experimental Setup

Simulation Parameters

• Array Configuration: Uniform Linear Array (ULA) with half-wavelength antenna spacing
• Number of Antennas: M = 50, 75, 100 (main experiments), extended to 500 (complexity testing)
• Signal Settings:
  • Target signal: 10 km distance, 500 m/s tangential velocity
  • Transmitted signal: Linear frequency modulation pulse, 300 MHz bandwidth, 100 ms pulse duration
  • SINR: -10 dB
  • Sampling rate: 1 MHz
• Algorithm Parameters:
  • Forgetting factor α = 0.99
  • Low-rank dimension K = 10
  • Number of snapshots: 1000

Evaluation Metrics

1. Main Lobe Width (MLW): Angular width of the beam pattern main lobe
2. Side Lobe Level (SLL): Power level of side lobes relative to main lobe
3. Null Depth: Power level of nulls relative to main lobe
4. Computation Time: Total time for executing 10,000 time steps
5. SINR Gain: Ratio of output SINR to input SINR

Comparison Methods

• Conventional MVDR: Standard covariance matrix inversion method
• Execution Time Comparison: Tested on AMD EPYC 7443 24-core processor

Experimental Results

Main Results

Beamforming Accuracy Comparison

Computational Complexity Analysis

• Conventional MVDR: O(M³) complexity with execution time scaling as M³
• Proposed Method: O(MK²) complexity with execution time scaling linearly with M
• Performance Improvement: For M=500 arrays, computation time is reduced by several orders of magnitude

Beam Pattern Analysis

Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method performs comparably to conventional MVDR in:

1. Main Lobe Steering: Correctly steers the main lobe toward the target direction
2. Null Formation: Effectively forms nulls in interference signal directions
3. Overall Beam Pattern Shape: Highly consistent with conventional MVDR

Long-term Performance Analysis

Through simulation over 100,000 time steps, the following observations are made:

1. SINR Degradation: SINR gain decreases with prolonged use
2. Reinitialization Effect: SINR gain recovers after reinitialization at the 50,000-step mark
3. Reinitialization Cost: The O(M²) complexity of reinitialization remains lower than the O(M³) complexity of conventional methods

Related Work

Algorithmic Methods

1. Nyström Low-rank Approximation: Uses low-rank approximation to reduce computational and storage overhead
2. QR Decomposition Methods: Dynamically tracks speech and noise variations
3. SMI-MVDR: Recursive implementation using Cholesky decomposition and Householder transformations

Distributed Methods

1. Message Passing Algorithms: Implements distributed beamforming through local node communication
2. ADMM Methods: Distributes computational load across multiple processors

Deep Learning Methods

1. Deep Adversarial Reinforcement Learning: Enhances large-scale MIMO beamforming capabilities
2. Convolutional Neural Networks: Reduces training complexity and addresses large-scale antenna array calibration

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Significant Complexity Reduction: Reduces complexity from O(M³) to O(MK²), achieving linear scalability
2. Maintains High Beamforming Accuracy: Achieves performance comparable to conventional MVDR on key metrics such as main lobe width and side lobe level
3. Applicable to Real-time Applications: Provides a feasible solution for real-time MVDR beamforming in large-scale arrays

Limitations

1. Restricted Application Scenarios: Specifically designed for signal-below-noise-floor scenarios with limited effectiveness for signal-above-noise-floor cases
2. Long-term Performance Degradation: Requires periodic reinitialization to maintain SINR gain
3. Initialization Overhead: Initial SVD computation still requires O(M³) complexity

Future Directions

1. Extension to Signal-Above-Noise-Floor Scenarios
2. More Efficient Initialization Methods: Such as randomized SVD approaches
3. Adaptive Reinitialization Strategy: Automatically triggers reinitialization based on performance degradation

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Theoretical Innovation: Skillfully combines multiple mathematical tools to solve practical problems
2. High Practical Value: Addresses the key computational bottleneck of MVDR for large-scale arrays
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Validates the method from multiple perspectives including accuracy, complexity, and long-term performance
4. Algorithm Completeness: Provides complete algorithm procedures and implementation details

Weaknesses

1. Limited Application Scenarios: Only applicable under specific signal conditions
2. Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks theoretical guarantees for convergence and stability
3. Limited Guidance on Parameter Selection: Lacks theoretical guidance for choosing K value
4. Missing Hardware Verification: Only simulation results available; lacks validation on actual hardware platforms

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new perspectives for large-scale array beamforming
2. Engineering Value: Promising applications in radar, sonar, wireless communications, and other domains
3. Reproducibility: Clear algorithm description facilitates reproduction and improvement

Applicable Scenarios

1. GPS Reception: Typical signal-below-noise-floor scenario
2. Weak Signal Detection: Applications requiring strong interference suppression
3. Large-scale Antenna Arrays: Systems with hundreds to thousands of antennas
4. Real-time Processing Requirements: Applications sensitive to computational latency

References

The paper cites 21 relevant references covering beamforming theory, large-scale array processing, SVD algorithms, and other aspects, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a paper of significant practical value in the signal processing field. Through clever mathematical techniques, it addresses the computational bottleneck of MVDR beamforming for large-scale arrays. While it has limitations such as restricted application scenarios, it provides valuable contributions to the field's development.