On the order of lazy cellular automata

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14841
• Title: On the order of lazy cellular automata
• Authors: Edgar Alcalá-Arroyo, Alonso Castillo-Ramirez (Universidad de Guadalajara, México)
• Classification: cs.FL (Formal Languages), math.DS (Dynamical Systems), math.GR (Group Theory), nlin.CG (Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases)
• Publication Date: October 17, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14841

Abstract

This paper investigates the most fundamental family of cellular automata defined on arbitrary group universes $G$ and alphabets $A$: lazy cellular automata. These cellular automata typically act as the identity mapping on configurations $A^G$, writing a fixed symbol $a \in A$ only when reading the unique active transition $p \in A^S$. Despite the relatively simple dynamical behavior of lazy cellular automata, subtle problems arise due to complete dependence on the choices of $p$ and $a$. The paper studies the order of lazy cellular automata $\tau: A^G \to A^G$, defined as the cardinality of the set $\{\tau^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\}$. In particular, it establishes general upper bounds on the order of $\tau$ and proves that this bound is attainable when $p$ is a quasi-constant pattern.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: This paper investigates the order of lazy cellular automata, namely the cardinality of the set of all power mappings of a cellular automaton. This is an important concept for understanding the algebraic and dynamical properties of cellular automata.
2. Problem Significance:
   • The order of a cellular automaton captures important features of its dynamical behavior
   • Kůrka's theorem states that one-dimensional cellular automata have finite order if and only if they are equicontinuous
   • Lazy cellular automata represent the most fundamental non-trivial family of cellular automata; understanding their properties facilitates the study of more complex cellular automata
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Previous research has primarily focused on the one-dimensional case with interval neighborhoods
   • A general theory for the order of lazy cellular automata on arbitrary group universes remains incomplete
   • Complete characterization in the quasi-constant pattern case is lacking
4. Research Motivation:
   • Establish a general theory for the order of lazy cellular automata on arbitrary group universes
   • Complete the analysis in the quasi-constant pattern case
   • Provide foundational tools for broader cellular automata research

Core Contributions

1. Established general upper bounds for the order of lazy cellular automata: In Theorem 2, upper bounds on the order are provided using properties of the unique active transition $p$ and the written symbol $a$.
2. Proved that lazy cellular automata with finite order have period 1: Proposition 2 establishes that if a lazy cellular automaton has finite order, then its period must be 1.
3. Completely characterized the order of lazy cellular automata with quasi-constant patterns: Theorem 1 provides complete analysis in three cases, substantially generalizing previous results.
4. Provided sufficient conditions for idempotence: Corollary 3 gives sufficient conditions for lazy cellular automata to be idempotent.
5. Constructed lazy cellular automata with arbitrary given order: It is proved that for each $n \geq 2$, there exists a lazy cellular automaton of order $n$.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Study the order of lazy cellular automata $\tau: A^G \to A^G$, defined as: $\text{ord}(\tau) := |\{\tau^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\}|$

where lazy cellular automata are defined through local maps $\mu: A^S \to A$ satisfying:

• $e \in S$ (the group identity is in the neighborhood)
• There exists a unique active transition $p \in A^S$ such that: $\forall z \in A^S, \mu(z) = z(e) \Leftrightarrow z \neq p$

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Basic Properties Analysis

Lemmas 1-3 establish fundamental properties of lazy cellular automata:

• Pattern occurrence characterization: Pattern $p$ appears in configuration $x$ if and only if $x \neq \tau(x)$
• Support set monotonicity: For written symbol $a$, $\text{supp}_a(\tau^i(x)) \subseteq \text{supp}_a(\tau^j(x))$ when $i \leq j$

2. Order Upper Bound Theory

Define the set $S_b := p^{-1}\{b\} = \{s \in S : p(s) = b\}$, establishing upper bound conditions:

Theorem 2: The order is at most the minimum $n \geq 2$ satisfying: for each word $(s_1, \ldots, s_{n-1}) \in (S_a)^{n-1}$, there exist $1 \leq i \leq j \leq n-1$ such that:

1. $(s_j \cdots s_i)^{-1} \in S_b^{-1}S_a$ for some $b \in A \setminus \{a\}$; or
2. $(s_j \cdots s_i)^{-1} \in S_{b_1}^{-1}S_{b_2}$ for some distinct $b_1, b_2 \in A \setminus \{a\}$

Technical Innovations

1. Group-theoretic methods: Utilize algebraic structures of groups to analyze iterative behavior of cellular automata
2. Pattern tracking techniques: Determine order by tracking the evolution of active patterns through iterations
3. Quasi-constant pattern classification: Conduct detailed analysis based on different cases of non-constant elements
4. Constructive proofs: Establish exact order values through explicit configuration construction

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Examples

The paper validates theoretical results through multiple concrete examples:

1. ECA rules 236 and 136: Demonstrate how to identify lazy cellular automata and determine their unique active transitions
2. Idempotence examples: Verify conditions of Corollary 3 through specific neighborhoods and patterns
3. Arbitrary order construction: Show how to construct lazy cellular automata with specified order

Analysis Methods

• Use strong induction to prove key properties
• Establish necessary conditions through proof by contradiction
• Prove sufficient conditions constructively

Main Results

Complete Characterization of Quasi-constant Patterns

Theorem 1: Let $\tau: A^G \to A^G$ be a lazy cellular automaton with quasi-constant unique active transition $p \in A^S$ and written symbol $a$, with $r \in S$ being a non-constant element:

1. Case 1: If $a \neq p(s)$ for all $s \in S$, then $\text{ord}(\tau) = 2$
2. Case 2: If $r \neq e$ and $a = p(r)$, then $\text{ord}(\tau)$ is finite if and only if there exists $n \geq 2$ such that $r^n \in S$. In this case: $\text{ord}(\tau) = \min\{n \geq 2 : r^n \in S\}$
3. Case 3: If $r = e$ and $a = p(s)$ for all $s \in S \setminus \{e\}$, the finiteness condition is more complex, involving subword analysis

Periodicity Properties

Proposition 2: If lazy cellular automaton $\tau$ has finite order, then its period is 1, i.e., there exists $n$ such that $\tau^n = \tau^{n+1}$.

Construction Results

Corollary 4: For any $n \geq 2$, if group $G$ contains an element of order greater than $n$, then there exists a lazy cellular automaton of order $n$.

Related Work

1. Cellular automata theory foundations: Based on classical texts by Ceccherini-Silberstein and Coornaert
2. Lazy cellular automata: Introduced by Castillo-Ramirez et al. in studying idempotent cellular automata
3. One-dimensional case: Previous work primarily focused on $G = \mathbb{Z}$ with interval neighborhoods
4. Dynamical properties: Related to Kůrka's classical results on equicontinuity and finite order relationships

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Established a general theoretical framework for the order of lazy cellular automata on arbitrary group universes
2. Completely resolved the order computation problem in the quasi-constant pattern case
3. Proved that unlike the one-dimensional interval neighborhood case, lazy cellular automata of arbitrary finite order can be constructed

Limitations

1. For general patterns (non-quasi-constant), only upper bounds rather than exact characterizations are available
2. The conditions in Theorem 2 may be difficult to verify in practical applications
3. Some constructions require specific group structures

Future Directions

The paper proposes two open problems:

1. Problem 1: Completely characterize the idempotence of lazy cellular automata
2. Problem 2: Investigate whether lazy cellular automata and reversible cellular automata can generate all cellular automata

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical completeness: Provides complete theory for the quasi-constant pattern case
2. Methodological innovation: Skillfully combines group theory, dynamical systems, and formal language theory
3. Precise results: Provides not only existence but also exact computational formulas
4. Clear exposition: Logically rigorous with detailed complete proofs

Weaknesses

1. Limited scope: Main results restricted to quasi-constant patterns
2. Computational complexity: Verification of certain conditions may be computationally complex
3. Practical applications: Connection between theoretical results and practical applications needs strengthening

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new analytical tools for cellular automata theory
2. Methodological value: Group-theoretic methods may apply to broader cellular automata research
3. Subsequent research: Provides important foundation for resolving open problems

Applicable Scenarios

• Research on algebraic properties of cellular automata
• Finiteness analysis of dynamical systems
• Formal language and automata theory
• Discrete dynamics of group actions

References

The paper cites classical literature in cellular automata theory, including:

• Ceccherini-Silberstein & Coornaert's cellular automata monograph
• Wolfram's pioneering work on elementary cellular automata
• Kůrka's important theorem on equicontinuity
• Authors' previous research on lazy cellular automata

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to cellular automata theory, particularly in order computation and quasi-constant pattern analysis. Despite certain limitations, it establishes a solid foundation for further research in this field.