Where to Search: Measure the Prior-Structured Search Space of LLM Agents

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14846
• Title: Where to Search: Measure the Prior-Structured Search Space of LLM Agents
• Author: Zhuo-Yang Song
• Classification: cs.AI cs.CL cs.LO
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14846

Abstract

The generate-filter-refine iterative paradigm based on Large Language Models (LLMs) has made progress in reasoning, programming, and program discovery in AI+Science. However, the effectiveness of search depends on where to search, i.e., how to encode domain priors into actionable structured hypothesis spaces. To this end, this paper proposes a compact formal theory to describe and measure LLM-assisted iterative search guided by domain priors. The authors represent agents as fuzzy relational operators on inputs and outputs to capture feasible transformations; agents are thus constrained by fixed safety envelopes. To describe multi-step reasoning/search, the authors weight and sum all reachable paths by a single continuation parameter, yielding a covering generating function; this induces a metric of reachability difficulty; and provides a geometric interpretation of search on graphs induced by safety envelopes.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The core problem this research addresses is: How to systematically measure and describe the search space of LLM agents. Specifically, in LLM-based iterative search processes, search efficiency is fundamentally limited by the question of "where to search," i.e., how to encode domain priors into operationalizable spaces for agents.

Problem Significance

1. Long-horizon task requirements: Long-horizon tasks impose higher demands on safety and controllability, requiring operation within verifiable and controllable boundaries
2. Complexity challenges: Long-horizon problems often involve combinatorial explosions and sparse rewards; pure heuristics or 0/1 scoring are insufficient to quantify reachability difficulty
3. Theoretical gap: Current practice relies primarily on engineering heuristics (prompt design, filters, scoring functions, etc.), lacking a unified language and quantitative tools

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Lack of unified agent-space-search measurement language
• Difficulty in comparably measuring reachability-safety tradeoffs across different agents
• Absence of clear characterization and explanation of agent long-horizon behavioral features

Research Motivation

Establish a concise, computable, model-agnostic formal theory that unifies safety and reachability measurement, provides testable predictions, and offers engineering-applicable design principles.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a compact formal theory: Formalizes agents as fuzzy relational operators and describes iterative search processes through covering generating functions
2. Establishes a unified measurement framework: Introduces continuation parameters and covering indices, providing unified quantification of safety and reachability
3. Provides geometric interpretation: Defines geometric quantities on directed graphs induced by safety envelopes, offering geometric interpretation of search processes
4. Validates theoretical predictions: Verifies testable conclusions through majority voting instantiation, providing external validation

Method Details

Task Definition

• Input space: $C_1$ (agent input space)
• Output space: $C_2$ (agent output space, satisfying $C_2 \subseteq C_1$ to support iteration)
• Objective: Measure and describe iterative search processes under safety constraints

Core Mathematical Framework

1. Agent Representation

Ideal agent defined as a fuzzy relational operator: $T(f,g) := \mu_f(g), \quad \mu_f: C_2 \to [0,1]$

Crisp ideal agent (safety envelope): $\mu_f(g) \in \{0,1\}, \quad 0 \leq T(f,g) \leq T_0(f,g)$

2. Covering Generating Function

Introducing continuation parameter $p \in [0,1]$, define the covering generating function from $f$ to $g$: $P_{f,g}(p) := \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{S_T: f^{(0)}=f, f^{(n)}=g} p^n \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} \mu_{f^{(i)}}(f^{(i+1)})$

When $C_1, C_2$ are countable, it can be expressed in matrix form: $P(p) = \sum_{n \geq 0} p^n M^n = (I - pM)^{-1}$

3. Key Geometric Quantities

• Shortest distance: $d_0(f,g) := \inf\{n \in \mathbb{N}: N_n(f,g) \geq 1\}$
• Number of shortest paths: $N_{d_0}(f,g)$
• Critical parameter: $p_c(f,g) := \inf\{p \in [0,1]: P_{f,g}^{ideal}(p) \geq 1\}$
• Covering index: $R_c(f,g) := 1 - p_c(f,g)$

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Measurement Language

Through fuzzy relational operators, agents are uniformly represented, enabling safety and reachability to be measured using identical mathematical notation and geometric quantities.

2. Continuation Parameter Mechanism

Introducing a single continuation parameter $p$ to weight trajectory lengths, avoiding the complexity of probabilistic interpretation while providing computable measurement methods.

3. Geometric Interpretation

Defining search geometry on directed graphs induced by safety envelopes, transforming abstract search processes into concrete graph-theoretic problems.

4. Testable Hypotheses

Proposes two key hypotheses for iterative agents constructed for LLMs:

• Hypothesis 1: Approximately unidirectional search (closed-loop paths are sparse)
• Hypothesis 2: Low-order terms dominate (excessively long trajectories are relatively rare)

Experimental Setup

Experimental Environment

• Search space: Two-dimensional grid $G_N := \{0,\ldots,N-1\}^2$
• Grid scales: $N = 3, 5, 8$
• Target points: $(1,2), (3,4), (6,7)$ respectively

Agent Construction

1. LLM model ensemble: gpt-4-mini, gpt-4, qwen3, qwen-plus, gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek-v3, grok-4, doubao
2. Majority voting mechanism: For each position $f$, independently sample $m=5$ times and take the mode as decision
3. Ideal agent: $\mu_f^{(t)}(g) := \frac{1}{n}\sum_L \mu_f^{(L,t)}(g)$
4. Safety envelope: $\mu_f^{0,(t)}(g) := \mathbf{1}\{\mu_f^{(t)}(g) > 0\}$

Evaluation Metrics

• Shortest distance $d_0(f,t)$
• Number of shortest paths $N_{d_0}(f,t)$
• Verification inequality: $\log N_{d_0}(f,g) \ll d_0(f,g)$

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Graph Structure Characteristics

Experiments show that LLM-induced safety envelopes produce unidirectional and anisotropic reachable structures on 2D grids, with strictly decreasing Manhattan distance to the target, consistent with Hypothesis 1's finite-term premise.

2. Geometric Relationship Verification

Figure 2 shows the relationship between $(d_0, N_{d_0})$ across three grid scales:

• Data points lie below the theoretically predicted empirical upper bounds
• When $d_0$ is larger, the inequality $\log N_{d_0} \ll d_0$ fits better
• Supports empirical regularities in the small $R_c$ limit

3. Hypothesis Verification

• Unidirectional graph structure: Observed graphs exhibit unidirectional features, supporting Hypothesis 1
• Finite path counting: Finite path counts are consistent with Hypothesis 2's setting
• Complexity dominance: Verifies that complexity (shortest distance) dominates while path diversity is limited

Experimental Findings

1. Threshold behavior: Under small continuation parameters, search is in an insufficiently expanded state, with shortest path terms dominating $P_{f,g}(p)$ behavior
2. Geometric constraints: Semantic constraints from LLMs cause graphs to exhibit unidirectional structure, effectively limiting the search space
3. Reachability patterns: Observed $(d_0, N_{d_0})$ relationships conform to theoretical prediction upper bound trends

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. LLM reasoning paradigms: ReAct, Tree of Thoughts, Chain-of-Thought and other iterative reasoning methods
2. Planning and tool use: Plan-and-Solve, Toolformer, Voyager and other agent frameworks
3. AI+Science applications: LLM applications in program search, algorithm discovery, scientific computing and other domains

Advantages of This Work

• Provides a unified theoretical framework, whereas existing methods are mostly empirical heuristics
• Establishes measurable safety-reachability tradeoff mechanisms
• Offers model-agnostic formal description

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical contribution: Establishes a compact formal theory of LLM-assisted iterative search
2. Measurement tools: Provides operational tools for unified measurement of safety and reachability
3. Geometric insights: Reveals geometric structures and constraint mechanisms of search processes
4. Empirical validation: Verifies testable theoretical predictions through majority voting instantiation

Limitations

1. Experimental scale: Current validation is limited to small-scale 2D grids, requiring verification on larger scales and more complex tasks
2. Model coverage: While multiple LLMs are used, broader model and task coverage is needed
3. Theoretical completeness: Some theoretical predictions (such as direct estimation of $R_c$) have not been fully verified experimentally

Future Directions

1. Detailed experimental validation: Test theoretical validity on more complex tasks
2. Reinforcement learning connections: Link theoretical metrics to reinforcement learning rewards and training processes
3. Practical applications: Apply measurement tools to agent design and training for complex tasks

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong theoretical innovation: First formal measurement theory of LLM agent search spaces
2. Rigorous mathematical framework: Solid mathematical foundation based on fuzzy relational operators and generating functions
3. High practical value: Provides operational measurement tools and design guidance principles
4. Sufficient validation: Provides external validation of theory through concrete instantiation

Weaknesses

1. Limited experimental scale: Validation experiments are relatively simple, lacking tests on complex real-world tasks
2. Hypothesis dependency: Theoretical predictions depend on the satisfaction of specific assumptions (unidirectionality, low-order dominance)
3. Computational complexity: For large-scale problems, computation of generating functions may face complexity challenges

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Provides new theoretical foundation and analytical tools for LLM agent research
2. Practical value: Offers quantitative guidance for agent design in complex tasks
3. Reproducibility: Provides detailed experimental setup and code with good reproducibility

Applicable Scenarios

• LLM agent design requiring safety constraints
• Performance analysis of long-horizon reasoning and planning tasks
• Structured analysis and optimization of complex search spaces
• Comparison and evaluation of multi-agent systems

References

The paper cites 32 related references covering important works in LLM reasoning, reinforcement learning, constrained optimization, fuzzy systems and other domains, providing a solid foundation for theoretical construction.