Electron Transport in Junctions Between Altermagnets

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14868
• Title: Electron transport in junctions between altermagnets
• Authors: Shubham Ghadigaonkar, Sachchidanand Das, Abhiram Soori (University of Hyderabad)
• Classification: cond-mat.mes-hall, cond-mat.mtrl-sci
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14868

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical investigation of electron transport in junctions between two altermagnets (AMs) in both strong and weak altermagnetic phases. The charge and spin conductivity variations as a function of the Néel vector angle θ between the two AMs are analyzed. In the strong AM phase, charge conductivity vanishes as θ→π, while it remains finite in the weak AM phase. The introduction of a normal metal between two AMs leads to Fabry-Pérot-type oscillations in charge conductivity. In the strong phase, transport is dominated by spin-up electrons, whereas in the weak phase both spin channels contribute. These results highlight the potential of AM-based heterostructures in spintronics applications, such as spin filters and quantum interference-based spintronic devices.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

1. Emerging Properties of Altermagnets: Altermagnets, as a new class of materials with d-wave magnetic ordering, combine characteristics of ferromagnets and antiferromagnets. Despite zero net spin polarization, they can carry spin currents under voltage bias.
2. Spintronics Application Requirements: Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) form the foundation of spintronic devices. While traditional ferromagnet/insulator/ferromagnet structures have been extensively studied, AM-based structures offer new possibilities.
3. Tunable Spin Transport: The orientation of the Néel vector can be controlled through spin-orbit torques or ultrafast optical excitation, providing opportunities for realizing tunable spin-dependent transport.

Limitations of Existing Research

• While AM junctions with normal metals, ferromagnets, and superconductors have been studied, systematic theoretical investigations of AM-AM junctions remain limited
• Lack of in-depth understanding of transport behavior differences between different AM phases (strong vs. weak)
• Insufficient quantitative analysis of Néel vector angle dependence

Research Motivation

This work aims to systematically investigate electron transport in AM-AM junctions using a continuum model, with particular focus on how the relative orientation of Néel vectors affects charge and spin conductivity, thereby providing theoretical foundations for designing AM-based spintronic devices.

Core Contributions

1. Established a theoretical framework for AM-AM junctions: Derived Hamiltonians for strong and weak AM phases based on continuum models with appropriate boundary conditions.
2. Revealed distinct transport mechanisms in the two AM phases:
   • Strong phase: Charge conductivity completely vanishes at θ=π, with transport dominated by a single spin channel
   • Weak phase: Charge conductivity remains finite at θ=π, with contributions from both spin channels
3. Discovered Fabry-Pérot interference effects in AM/NM/AM structures: The introduction of a normal metal layer induces quantum interference oscillations in conductivity, with oscillation frequency dependent on the AM phase type.
4. Provided design guidance for spin filters and quantum interference devices: Tunable spin-dependent transport and interference effects can be achieved by adjusting the Néel vector angle.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of electron transport properties in junctions between two altermagnets with different Néel vector orientations, including:

• Input: Néel vector angle θ, AM strength parameter tJ/t, energy E
• Output: Charge conductivity G, spin conductivity Gs
• Constraints: Probability current conservation, spin conservation (within respective AM regions)

Model Architecture

1. Hamiltonian Construction

Weak AM Phase (0 ≤ tJ < t):

HW(χ) = -(tσ0 - tJσχ)a²∂²x - (tσ0 + tJσχ)a²∂²y

Strong AM Phase (tJ > t ≥ 0):

HS(χ) = -[(tJ-t)(∂x - iπ/a)² + (tJ+t)∂²y]a² |↑χ⟩⟨↑χ|
        -[(tJ+t)∂²x + (tJ-t)(∂y ± iπ/a)²]a² |↓χ⟩⟨↓χ|

where σχ = σz cosχ + σx sinχ, and χ denotes the Néel vector direction.

2. Boundary Conditions

Based on probability current conservation, the boundary conditions at x=0 are:

ψ(0⁻) = cψ(0⁺)
c[(tσ0 - tJσz)a∂xψ + taq0ψ]₀⁻ = (tσ0 - tJσθ)a∂xψ|₀⁺

3. Scattering Wave Functions

For spin-up electrons incident from the left, the scattering wave function takes the form:

ψ(x) = (e^(ikx↑x) + r↑↑e^(-ikx↑x))|↑⟩ + r↓↑e^(ikx↓x)|↓⟩  (x < 0)
      = t↑↑e^(ikx↑x)|↑θ⟩ + t↓↑e^(ikx↓x)|↓θ⟩             (x > 0)

Technical Innovations

1. Unified phase description framework: Through continuum approximation, the tight-binding model is transformed into an effective low-energy Hamiltonian that uniformly describes both strong and weak phases.
2. Spin-dependent boundary conditions: Accounts for spin basis transformations resulting from Néel vector orientation differences, properly handling spin matching issues at the interface.
3. Comprehensive transport analysis: Simultaneously calculates charge and spin currents, revealing their distinct behaviors in different phases.

Experimental Setup

Computational Parameters

• Energy scale: E = t (weak phase), E = tJ (strong phase)
• Interface parameters: c = 1, q0 = 1/a (typical values)
• AM strength ratio: tJ/t = 0.2-0.8 (weak phase), tJ/t > 1 (strong phase)
• Normal metal parameters: t0 = 0.1tJ, chemical potential μ tunable

Evaluation Metrics

1. Differential charge conductivity:

   G = (e/8π²√(t²-tJ²)) ∫ dα [Jc↑(α) + Jc↓(α)]
   

2. Spin conductivity:

   Gs± = (e/8π²√(t²-tJ²)) ∫ dα [Js±↑(α) + Js±↓(α)]
   

Comparative Analysis

• Comparison of transport behavior between strong and weak phases
• Impact comparison with and without normal metal layer
• Systematic analysis of different Néel vector angles θ

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Transport in Weak AM Phase

• Charge conductivity: Maximum at θ=0, monotonically decreases with increasing θ, but remains finite at θ=π
• Spin conductivity: Equal in left and right regions at θ=0; equal in magnitude but opposite in sign at θ=π
• tJ dependence: Larger tJ values lead to more pronounced θ-dependent conductivity variations

2. Transport in Strong AM Phase

• Charge conductivity: Maximum at θ=0, completely vanishes as θ→π
• Spin selectivity: Transport almost entirely dominated by spin-up electrons
• Symmetry: Spin conductivity in left and right regions is completely identical

3. Fabry-Pérot Effect in AM/NM/AM Structures

• Oscillation period: ΔL = π/q ≈ 2.22a (theoretical) vs 2.212a (numerical)
• Chemical potential dependence: Δq = π/L, oscillation amplitude stabilizes with increasing μ
• Phase dependence: Oscillations more pronounced in strong phase, both spin channels contribute in weak phase

Ablation Studies

1. tJ=0 limit: Conductivity independent of θ, corresponding to normal metal behavior
2. Effects of c and q0 parameters: Interface transparency and impurity strength affect overall conductivity magnitude but do not alter θ dependence
3. Energy dependence: Qualitative behavior remains consistent across different energies

Case Studies

• θ=0: Spin orientations in both AM regions aligned, transmission maximized
• θ=π: Transmission completely blocked in strong phase, finite transmission remains in weak phase
• Intermediate angles: Spin overlap gradually decreases, conductivity varies smoothly

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Fundamental AM properties: Šmejkal et al. established the basic theoretical framework for AMs
2. AM heterostructure research: Interfaces between AMs and normal metals, ferromagnets, and superconductors have been studied
3. Magnetic tunnel junctions: Research on both traditional FM/I/FM structures and emerging AM-based MTJs

Unique Contributions of This Work

• First systematic study of transport properties in AM-AM junctions
• Revelation of fundamental differences between strong and weak phases
• Complete analysis of Fabry-Pérot effects in AM structures

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Phase-dependent transport mechanisms: The strong phase exhibits complete spin filtering effect, while the weak phase allows transmission through both spin channels
2. Angle-tunable conductivity: Continuous control from maximum transmission to complete blocking can be achieved by adjusting the Néel vector angle
3. Quantum interference effects: Fabry-Pérot oscillations introduced by the normal metal layer provide new design concepts for quantum interference devices

Limitations

1. Model simplifications: Continuum approximation employed, neglecting lattice details and disorder effects
2. Temperature effects: Finite-temperature thermal excitation and decoherence effects not considered
3. Actual material parameters: The correspondence between theoretical parameters and actual AM material parameters requires further establishment

Future Directions

1. Investigate effects of spin-orbit coupling and disorder scattering
2. Study transport properties at finite temperature and frequency dependence
3. Explore three-dimensional AM structures and more complex heterostructures

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Complete theoretical framework: Starting from tight-binding models and deriving systematic methods for treating AM junctions through continuum approximation
2. Clear physical picture: Fermi surface analysis clearly explains transport mechanism differences between phases
3. Detailed calculations: Thorough derivation of boundary conditions and scattering coefficient calculations provided
4. Guidance for applications: Provides clear theoretical guidance for designing AM-based spintronic devices

Weaknesses

1. Lack of experimental verification: As a purely theoretical work, lacks comparison with experimental results
2. Unclear material parameters: Relationship between theoretical parameters tJ, t and actual materials not sufficiently clarified
3. Neglected three-dimensional effects: Two-dimensional model may not fully capture behavior of actual three-dimensional materials

Impact

1. Academic value: Provides important supplement to AM transport theory, particularly the first systematic study of AM-AM junctions
2. Application prospects: Offers new design concepts for spin filters, spin valves, and quantum interference devices
3. Reproducibility: Complete theoretical derivations and clear numerical methods facilitate reproduction and extension by other researchers

Applicable Scenarios

1. Spintronic device design: Particularly suitable for applications requiring tunable spin filtering effects
2. Quantum computing: Coherent transport properties of AM junctions may have applications in quantum information processing
3. Fundamental physics research: Provides theoretical foundation for understanding transport properties of novel magnetic materials

References

Key references include:

1. Šmejkal et al. series on fundamental AM theory (Phys. Rev. X 2022)
2. Das and Soori's prior work on AM heterostructures (J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2023)
3. Classical theoretical work on magnetic tunnel junctions (Julliere, Miyazaki, et al.)
4. Experimental studies on AM materials (MnTe, RuO2, etc.)

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to the emerging field of altermagnets research, particularly in understanding transport mechanism differences between different AM phases. While having certain limitations as a purely theoretical work, its complete theoretical framework and clear physical picture provide important guidance for subsequent experimental research and device applications.