2025-11-10T03:02:02.480547

Tight bounds towards Zarankiewicz problem in hypergraph

Gao, Hou, Huang et al.
The classical Zarankiewicz problem, which concerns the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph without a forbidden complete bipartite subgraph, motivates a direct analogue for hypergraphs. Let $K_{s_1,\ldots, s_r}$ be the complete $r$-partite $r$-graph such that the $i$-th part has $s_i$ vertices. We say an $r$-partite $r$-graph $H=H(V_1,\ldots,V_r)$ contains an ordered $K_{s_1,\ldots, s_r}$ if $K_{s_1,\ldots, s_r}$ is a subgraph of $H$ and the set of size $s_i$ vertices is embedded in $V_i$. The Zarankiewicz number for $r$-graph, denoted by $z(m_1, \ldots, m_{r}; s_1,, \ldots,s_{r})$, is the maximum number of edges of the $r$-partite $r$-graph whose $i$-th part has $m_i$ vertices and does not contain an ordered $K_{s_1,\ldots, s_r}$. In this paper, we show that $$z(m_1,m_2, \cdots, m_{r-1},n ; s_1,s_2, \cdots,s_{r-1}, t)=Θ\left(m_1m_2\cdots m_{r-1} n^{1-1 / s_1s_2\cdots s_{r-1}}\right)$$ for a range of parameters. This extends a result of Conlon [Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. (2022)].
academic

Tight bounds towards Zarankiewicz problem in hypergraph

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.14869
  • Title: Tight bounds towards Zarankiewicz problem in hypergraph
  • Authors: Guorong Gao, Jianfeng Hou, Shuping Huang, Hezhi Wang
  • Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
  • Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14869

Abstract

The classical Zarankiewicz problem studies the maximum number of edges in bipartite graphs that do not contain forbidden complete bipartite subgraphs. This paper generalizes it to hypergraphs. For the complete r-partite r-uniform hypergraph Ks1,,srK_{s_1,\ldots,s_r} where the i-th part has sis_i vertices, the paper defines the Zarankiewicz number z(m1,,mr;s1,,sr)z(m_1,\ldots,m_r; s_1,\ldots,s_r) for r-uniform hypergraphs, which represents the maximum number of edges in an r-partite r-uniform hypergraph with mim_i vertices in the i-th part that does not contain the ordered Ks1,,srK_{s_1,\ldots,s_r}. The main result establishes that within certain parameter ranges: z(m1,m2,,mr1,n;s1,s2,,sr1,t)=Θ(m1m2mr1n11/s1s2sr1)z(m_1,m_2,\cdots,m_{r-1},n; s_1,s_2,\cdots,s_{r-1},t) = \Theta\left(m_1m_2\cdots m_{r-1} n^{1-1/s_1s_2\cdots s_{r-1}}\right) This result generalizes Conlon's 2022 work.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Classical Zarankiewicz Problem: Studies the maximum number of edges z(m,n;s,t)z(m,n;s,t) in bipartite graphs G(m,n)G(m,n) that do not contain the specific complete bipartite subgraph Ks,tK_{s,t}
  2. Turán Theory: The classical Erdős-Stone-Simonovits theorem provides estimates for the maximum number of edges in graphs without given subgraphs
  3. Hypergraph Generalization: Naturally extends the bipartite Zarankiewicz problem to r-uniform hypergraphs

Research Motivation

  1. Theoretical Completeness: The Zarankiewicz problem for hypergraphs is a fundamental problem in combinatorics requiring a complete theoretical framework
  2. Technical Challenges: The generalization from graphs to hypergraphs presents technical challenges requiring novel proof techniques
  3. Application Value: Hypergraphs have important applications in computer science, information theory, and other fields

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. The Kővári-Sós-Turán theorem only provides upper bounds: z(m,n;s,t)=O(mn11/s)z(m,n;s,t) = O(mn^{1-1/s})
  2. Conlon's results apply only to the bipartite case
  3. Lack of tight bound results for the hypergraph case

Core Contributions

  1. Establishes theoretical framework for hypergraph Zarankiewicz problem: Provides precise definitions of ordered complete subgraphs in r-partite r-uniform hypergraphs
  2. Proves hypersaturation theorem: Generalizes the classical Erdős hypersaturation theorem to hypergraphs (Theorem 1.1)
  3. Provides upper bounds: Generalizes the Kővári-Sós-Turán theorem to hypergraphs (Corollary 1.2)
  4. Establishes lower bounds: Uses random algebraic methods to prove matching lower bounds (Theorem 1.3)
  5. Obtains tight bounds: Establishes asymptotically tight bounds within specific parameter ranges (Corollary 1.4)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Parameters m1,,mrm_1,\ldots,m_r (sizes of each part) and s1,,srs_1,\ldots,s_r (sizes of forbidden subgraph) Output: Asymptotic estimate of Zarankiewicz number z(m1,,mr;s1,,sr)z(m_1,\ldots,m_r; s_1,\ldots,s_r)Constraint: Does not contain ordered Ks1,,srK_{s_1,\ldots,s_r} as a sub-hypergraph

Core Definitions

  • r-uniform hypergraph: Hypergraph whose edge set consists of r-element subsets
  • Ordered Ks1,,srK_{s_1,\ldots,s_r}: Complete r-partite r-uniform hypergraph with sis_i vertices in the i-th part embedded in ViV_i
  • Zarankiewicz number: z(m1,,mr;s1,,sr)z(m_1,\ldots,m_r; s_1,\ldots,s_r) is the maximum number of edges satisfying the conditions

Main Technical Methods

1. Hypersaturation Theorem (Theorem 1.1)

Uses induction and double counting techniques:

  • Base case (r=2): Standard double counting using Jensen's inequality
  • Inductive step: Reduces r-hypergraph problem to (r-1)-hypergraph problem via link-hypergraph technique

Key inequality: ts1,1=vV2(d(v)s1)m2(e/m2s1)t_{s_1,1} = \sum_{v \in V_2} \binom{d(v)}{s_1} \geq m_2 \binom{e/m_2}{s_1}

2. Random Algebraic Method (Theorem 1.3)

Generalizes Bukh's random algebraic method to hypergraphs:

Construction process:

  1. Associates vertex classes (up11,,upr1r1)(u^1_{p_1}, \ldots, u^{r-1}_{p_{r-1}}) to (s1s2sr11)(s_1s_2\cdots s_{r-1}-1)-ary polynomials fp1,,pr1f_{p_1,\ldots,p_{r-1}}
  2. Each vertex class connects to the point set: Sp1,,pr1={(x1,,xs1,fp1,,pr1(x1,,xs1)):xiFq}S_{p_1,\ldots,p_{r-1}} = \{(x_1,\ldots,x_{s-1}, f_{p_1,\ldots,p_{r-1}}(x_1,\ldots,x_{s-1})) : x_i \in \mathbb{F}_q\}

Key Lemma 2.5: There exists a polynomial choice such that the dimension of intersection Ta1,a2Ta1,ajT_{a_1,a_2} \cap \cdots \cap T_{a_1,a_j} is at most sjs-j

Technical Innovations

  1. Dimension Control: Controls intersection size through dimension theory in algebraic geometry
  2. Inductive Construction: Progressively selects polynomials while maintaining dimension conditions
  3. Probabilistic Analysis: Uses Lemma 2.1 to estimate the probability that random polynomials pass through specified points

Theoretical Results

Main Theorems

Theorem 1.1 (Hypersaturation Theorem): If an r-partite r-uniform hypergraph H satisfies E(H)c1(i=1r1mi)mr11/(s1s2sr1)|E(H)| \geq c_1 \cdot (\prod_{i=1}^{r-1} m_i) \cdot m_r^{1-1/(s_1s_2\cdots s_{r-1})}, then H contains at least c2i=1r(misi)pi=1rsic_2 \cdot \prod_{i=1}^r \binom{m_i}{s_i} \cdot p^{\prod_{i=1}^r s_i} copies of ordered Ks1,,srK_{s_1,\ldots,s_r}.

Corollary 1.2 (Upper Bound): z(m1,,mr;s1,,sr)=O(m1mr1mr11/(s1sr1))z(m_1,\ldots,m_r; s_1,\ldots,s_r) = O(m_1\cdots m_{r-1} m_r^{1-1/(s_1\cdots s_{r-1})})

Theorem 1.3 (Lower Bound): Under conditions sts \leq t and mnt1/s1/s(s1)m \leq n^{t^{1/s-1}/s(s-1)}, z(m1,,mr1,n;s1,,sr1,t)=Ω(m1mr1n11/(s1sr1))z(m_1,\ldots,m_{r-1},n; s_1,\ldots,s_{r-1},t) = \Omega(m_1\cdots m_{r-1} n^{1-1/(s_1\cdots s_{r-1})})

Corollary 1.4 (Tight Bounds): Under appropriate conditions, the upper and lower bounds match, yielding: z(m1,,mr1,n;s1,,sr1,t)=Θ(m1mr1n11/(s1sr1))z(m_1,\ldots,m_{r-1},n; s_1,\ldots,s_{r-1},t) = \Theta(m_1\cdots m_{r-1} n^{1-1/(s_1\cdots s_{r-1})})

Proof Techniques

Upper Bound Proof (Induction)

  1. Base step: For r=2, use standard double counting
  2. Inductive hypothesis: Assume the theorem holds for r-1
  3. Inductive step:
    • Remove low-degree vertices
    • For each remaining vertex v, consider its link-hypergraph HvH_v
    • Apply inductive hypothesis and Jensen's inequality

Lower Bound Proof (Random Algebraic Method)

  1. Algebraic construction: Uses polynomials over finite fields to construct hypergraphs
  2. Dimension analysis: Proves the algebraic dimension of key intersections
  3. Probabilistic estimation: Uses Lemma 2.1 to control the probability of "bad" events

Classical Results

  1. Kővári-Sós-Turán Theorem: Provides upper bounds for the bipartite case
  2. Erdős-Stone-Simonovits Theorem: Asymptotic formula for Turán numbers in general graphs
  3. Brown-Erdős-Rényi Results: Optimal bounds for K2,tK_{2,t} and K3,tK_{3,t}

Modern Developments

  1. Kollár-Rónyai-Szabó & Alon-Rónyai-Szabó: Algebraic methods
  2. Bukh's Random Algebraic Method: Breakthrough technique, foundation of this paper
  3. Conlon's Work: Tight bounds for bipartite Zarankiewicz problem
  1. Ma-Yuan-Zhang: Lower bounds for hypergraph Turán numbers
  2. Pohoata-Zakharov: Improved parameter conditions
  3. Mubayi: Exponential improvements and related results

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

This paper successfully generalizes the classical Zarankiewicz problem to hypergraphs, establishing asymptotically tight bounds within specific parameter ranges. Main achievements include:

  1. Establishes a complete theoretical framework
  2. Proves matching upper and lower bounds
  3. Generalizes important classical results

Limitations

  1. Parameter Restrictions: Tight bounds hold only within specific parameter range mnt1/s1/s(s1)m \leq n^{t^{1/s-1}/s(s-1)}
  2. Constant Factors: Results are asymptotic; constant factors remain undetermined
  3. Technical Conditions: Requires technical conditions such as minm_i \geq n

Future Directions

  1. Expand Parameter Range: Seek tight bounds under more general conditions
  2. Exact Constants: Determine precise constants in asymptotic formulas
  3. Algorithmic Applications: Apply theoretical results to algorithmic problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Significant Theoretical Contribution: Successfully generalizes an important classical problem to hypergraphs
  2. Technical Innovation: Cleverly combines induction, double counting, and random algebraic methods
  3. Complete Results: Establishes both upper and lower bounds, obtaining tight asymptotic estimates
  4. Rigorous Proofs: Technical details are handled carefully with clear logical flow

Weaknesses

  1. Strong Parameter Restrictions: The applicability of tight bounds is relatively limited
  2. Technical Complexity: The random algebraic method has a high technical threshold
  3. Practical Applications: The connection between theoretical results and practical applications requires further exploration

Impact

  1. Academic Value: Provides important tools and results for extremal hypergraph theory
  2. Technical Impact: The generalized random algebraic method may have broader applications
  3. Future Research: Provides new directions and methods for related problems

Application Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Research: Combinatorics and extremal graph theory research
  2. Algorithm Design: Algorithmic problems requiring avoidance of specific substructures
  3. Coding Theory: Construction and analysis of error-correcting codes

References

The paper cites important literature in the field, including:

  • Classical work by Kővári, Sós, and Turán
  • Bukh's random algebraic method
  • Conlon's bipartite results
  • Recent advances by Mubayi, Pohoata-Zakharov, and others

Remark: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper making important contributions to extremal hypergraph theory. It is technically rigorous with results of significant theoretical value, laying a solid foundation for further development in this field.