Tree-Like Shortcuttings of Trees

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14918
• Title: Tree-Like Shortcuttings of Trees
• Authors: Hung Le, Lazar Milenković, Shay Solomon, Cuong Than
• Classification: cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14918

Abstract

This paper investigates the sparse tree shortcutting problem, which concerns sparse 1-spanners of tree metrics with bounded hop diameter. While known constant-hop shortcuttings achieve small sparsity O(log*n), they all contain dense subgraphs (sparsity Ω(log n)), which is a significant drawback in many applications. This paper is the first to systematically study "tree-like" constant-hop tree shortcuttings, focusing on two parameters measuring graph-to-tree distance: arboricity and treewidth. The main contributions include: (1) new upper and lower bound results, including optimal tradeoffs between hop diameter and treewidth; (2) applications in low-dimensional Euclidean and doubling metrics.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Tree Shortcutting Problem: Given a tree T and integer k, construct a graph G such that any two vertices have a path with at most k edges, and distances are preserved.
2. Traditional Tradeoff: Classical work establishes tight tradeoffs between hop diameter and sparsity, achieving constant hop diameter and O(log*n) sparsity.
3. Core Issue: All known constant-hop shortcuttings contain dense subgraphs with Ω(log n) sparsity.

Research Motivation

1. Practical Application Needs: In routing schemes, road networks, and communication networks, limiting hop distance is crucial.
2. Uniform Sparsity: Many algorithms are more efficient on graphs with bounded treewidth and arboricity.
3. Theoretical Gap: Existing methods cannot simultaneously achieve constant hop diameter and uniform sparsity.

Open Problems

The paper addresses three important open problems:

• Question 1: Does there exist a shortcutting with constant hop diameter and arboricity/treewidth o(log n)?
• Question 2: Does there exist a shortcutting with k·t = o((log log n)²)?
• Question 3: Does there exist a compact routing scheme using o(log²n) bits?

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Upper and Lower Bounds:
   • Proves optimal tradeoff between hop diameter and treewidth
   • Provides tight bounds for k = O(log log n)
   • Resolves open problems from FL22b, Le23
2. Construction Algorithms:
   • 3-hop diameter achieving O(log n/log log n) treewidth
   • General k achieving O(k log^(2/k) n) treewidth (even k)
   • O(α_(k/2+1)(n)) arboricity on paths
3. Application Extensions:
   • (1+ε)-spanner construction for doubling metrics
   • 3-hop routing scheme with O(log²n/log log n) bits memory
   • Proof of memory lower bound Ω(log²n/log log n) bits

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Tree Shortcutting: Given tree T=(V,E) and integer k≥1, construct graph G=(V,E') satisfying:

• For any u,v∈V, there exists a path in G with at most k edges
• Path length d_G(u,v) = d_T(u,v)

Target Parameters:

• Treewidth: Minimum bag size in tree decomposition minus 1
• Arboricity: max_{H⊆G} ⌈|E(H)|/(|V(H)|-1)⌉

Core Construction Algorithms

1. Hop Diameter 2 Construction (Lemma 3.2)

Algorithm: Recursive Centroid Decomposition
1. Select centroid vertex v of tree T
2. Connect v to all other vertices
3. Recursively execute on each subtree of T\v

• Treewidth: O(log n)
• Hop Diameter: 2

2. Hop Diameter 3 Construction (Lemma 3.3)

Algorithm: Hierarchical Decomposition
1. Set ℓ₃ = log n/log log n
2. Construct separator set X with |X| = O(ℓ₃)
3. X forms a clique internally
4. Each component connects to at most 2 vertices in X
5. Recursively execute on components

• Treewidth: O(log n/log log n)
• Hop Diameter: 3

3. General k≥4 Construction (Lemma 3.4)

Algorithm: Parameterized Recursion
1. Set ℓₖ such that log ℓₖ = (k/(k-2))^((k-2)/2) (log n)^((k-2)/k)
2. Construct separator set X with |X| = O(ℓₖ)
3. Connect X using k-2 hop algorithm
4. Components connect to vertices in X
5. Recursively process components

Technical Innovations

1. Hierarchical Recursive Framework: Balances treewidth and hop diameter by controlling recursive parameters ℓₖ
2. Tree Decomposition Construction: Clever bag design ensures treewidth bounds
3. Lower Bound Techniques: Proves tight lower bounds through clique minor arguments

Theoretical Analysis

Upper Bound Results (Theorem 1.1)

For k = O(log log n), every n-vertex tree admits a hop diameter k shortcutting with treewidth:

• Even k: O(k log^(2/k) n)
• Odd k≥3: O(k(log n/log log n)^(2/(k-1)))

Lower Bound Results (Theorem 1.2)

Any hop diameter k shortcutting of an n-point path has treewidth at least:

• When k ≤ 2/(ln(2e)) ln log n: Ω(k log^(2/k) n)
• When k > 2/(ln(2e)) ln log n: Ω((log log n)²/k)

Key Lemmas

Lemma 3.1: For parameter ℓ, there exists separator set X with |X| ≤ 2n/(ℓ+1)-1 such that each connected component of T\X:

• Has size at most ℓ
• Has at most 2 edges to X
• Connected X vertices have ancestor relationship

Application Extensions

1. Spanner for Doubling Metrics (Theorem 1.5)

For even k and ε∈(0,1/6), an n-point metric of doubling dimension d admits a (1+ε)-spanner with:

• Hop Diameter: k
• Arboricity: ε^(-O(d))α_(k/2+1)(n)

2. Routing Scheme (Theorem 1.8)

Every n-vertex tree admits a 3-hop routing scheme with:

• Stretch: 1
• Memory: O(log²n/log log n) bits per vertex

3. Memory Lower Bound (Theorem 1.9)

There exists a tree family such that any stretch-1 fixed-port labeling routing scheme requires:

• Memory Lower Bound: Ω(log²n/log log n) bits

Experimental Setup

This paper is primarily theoretical, focusing on algorithm construction and theoretical analysis without large-scale experimental evaluation. All construction algorithms can be implemented in linear time.

Related Work

Classical Work

• Yao 1982: Range queries on paths, first establishes tradeoff
• Chazelle 1987: Extension to arbitrary trees
• Alon-Schieber 1987: Semigroup product queries, inverse Ackermann bounds
• Bodlaender et al. 1994: Optimal tradeoff relations

Modern Developments

• Arya et al. 1995: (1+ε)-spanners for Euclidean metrics
• Filtser-Le 2022: Low treewidth embeddings
• Kahalon et al. 2022: Compact routing schemes

This Paper's Contributions

Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to:

1. Systematically study "tree-like" shortcuttings
2. Prove 3-hop diameter breaks the log n barrier
3. Establish optimal tradeoff between hop diameter and treewidth

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Breakthrough Result: 3-hop diameter suffices to achieve o(log n) treewidth
2. Optimal Tradeoff: Establishes tight bounds within O(log log n) hop range
3. Practical Algorithm: Provides memory-optimal routing scheme

Limitations

1. Graph Family Restrictions: Low treewidth shortcuttings cannot extend to planar graphs or Euclidean metrics
2. Constant Factors: Constants in constructions may be large
3. Implementation Complexity: While theoretically linear time, practical implementation may be complex

Future Directions

1. Improve constant factors
2. Extend to other graph families
3. Applications in practical systems
4. Dynamic maintenance algorithms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: First to prove uniform sparsity achievable under constant hop diameter
2. Technical Innovation: Hierarchical recursive framework is general-purpose
3. Completeness: Provides matching upper and lower bounds
4. Application Value: Resolves multiple open problems

Weaknesses

1. Experimental Absence: Lacks practical performance evaluation
2. Constant Optimization: Constants in constructions may not be practical
3. Extensibility: Main results limited to tree metrics

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new tools for graph algorithm theory
2. Application Prospects: Potential applications in network routing and data structure design
3. Methodology: Hierarchical recursive techniques may apply to other problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Network design requiring low hop diameter
2. Graph algorithms requiring uniform sparsity
3. Compact data structure design
4. Routing protocols in distributed systems

References

The paper cites key works in the field, including:

• Classical shortcutting work: Yao82, Cha87, AS87, BTS94
• Geometric spanners: ADM+95
• Modern embedding theory: FL22b, KLMS22
• Tree cover constructions: CCL+23, CCL+24

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical computer science paper achieving significant breakthroughs on the classical tree shortcutting problem. The paper demonstrates high technical depth, substantial theoretical contributions, and provides new research directions and technical tools for related fields.