Predicting Task Performance with Context-aware Scaling Laws

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14919
• Title: Predicting Task Performance with Context-aware Scaling Laws
• Authors: Kyle Montgomery, David Park, Jianhong Tu, Michael Bendersky, Beliz Gunel, Dawn Song, Chenguang Wang
• Classification: cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG
• Publication Date: October 16, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14919
• Code Link: https://github.com/wang-research-lab/context-scaling

Abstract

Traditional neural network scaling laws have revolutionized our understanding of large language models by linking upstream metrics (such as cross-entropy loss) to design factors (such as model size, training data, and compute). However, these conventional laws fail to capture downstream task performance, where context plays a critical role. This paper proposes an intuitive and interpretable framework that models downstream performance as a joint function of training compute and provided context. The authors validate this framework empirically by fitting it on extended context variants of Llama-2-7B and Llama-2-13B across 65,500 unique instances spanning three tasks: arithmetic reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and machine translation. Results demonstrate that the framework accurately models in-distribution downstream performance, generalizes across three orders of magnitude of training compute, and reliably extrapolates performance as context quantity increases.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Traditional neural network scaling laws primarily focus on upstream metrics (such as cross-entropy loss), but in practical applications, downstream task performance often diverges from these upstream trends. Existing work on predicting downstream performance typically relies on overly complex methods with poor interpretability.

Research Significance

1. Practical Necessity: Accurate downstream performance estimation can guide model development and identify emergent or saturation phenomena on certain tasks with fewer expensive experiments
2. Theoretical Gap: Existing scaling laws overlook context length, a critical factor in downstream task performance
3. Design Guidance: Understanding the interaction between compute and context utilization is essential for designing efficient long-context LLMs

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Chen et al. (2024): Uses a two-stage approach with upstream loss as an intermediary, which is overly complex
2. Ye et al. (2023): Uses multilayer perceptrons to predict BIG-Bench performance, lacking interpretability
3. Traditional Scaling Laws: Completely ignore the impact of context length

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Context-aware Scaling Laws Framework: Extends traditional neural scaling laws to downstream tasks by incorporating context length and context constraints, providing more accurate LLM performance modeling
2. Large-scale Empirical Validation: Fitted across 3 tasks on extended context windows of Llama-2 models, demonstrating the generalizability of scaling laws across 3 orders of magnitude of training compute, 4 orders of magnitude of context length, and different context extension techniques
3. Interpretable Theoretical Tool: Provides an interpretable framework for understanding the interaction between compute, context, and downstream performance, offering guidance for future long-context LLM design

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Predict downstream task performance P as a function of training compute C, input context length n_pmt, and model context limit n_ctx.

Model Architecture

The core formula is:

P(C, n_pmt, n_ctx) = [1 - exp(-A(C/C_c)^α)] × [1 - exp(-B(n_pmt/n_c_pmt)^β)] × σ(n_pmt - n_ctx)

Where:

• First Term: Saturating power law term for training compute C, with parameters A, C_c, α
• Second Term: Saturating power law term for context length n_pmt, with parameters B, n_c_pmt, β
• Third Term: Sigmoid penalty term that reduces performance when n_pmt > n_ctx

Design Principles

1. Multiplicative Form: Compute and context are complementary rather than additive; significant deficiency in one dimension limits gains from the other
2. Saturating Power Laws: Exponential formulation ensures predicted performance remains below theoretical maximum of 1.0
3. Penalty Mechanism: When context exceeds model limits, generated tokens fall outside the range the model can reliably predict, causing sharp performance degradation

Technical Innovations

1. Joint Modeling: First to unify training compute and context length in a single model
2. Interpretability: Provides intuitive functional form compared to existing complex methods
3. Boundary Handling: Effectively manages context limit boundary conditions through the sigmoid term

Experimental Setup

Datasets

Evaluated 12 models (Table 1) on 65,500 instances across 3 tasks:

1. Arithmetic Reasoning: 3,550 test instances
   • GSM8K, MATH, AQUA-RAT, DeepMind Math
   • Context padded with up to 511 demonstrations
2. Commonsense Reasoning: 1,750 test instances
   • PIQA, SIQA, OpenBookQA, HellaSwag, WinoGrande, ARC-Easy/Challenge, CommonSenseQA
   • Context padded with up to 511 demonstrations
3. Machine Translation: 1,250 instances
   • WMT-14 (German, French, Hindi, Czech, Russian → English)
   • Evaluated using BLEU-4 scores

Model Configuration

Based on Llama-2-7B and Llama-2-13B, with context windows extended to 8k, 16k, 32k, 64k, 128k tokens using YaRN technique.

Evaluation Metrics

• Arithmetic and commonsense reasoning: Accuracy
• Machine translation: BLEU-4 score
• Prediction error: Mean absolute prediction error |P - P̂|

Fitting Process

Two-stage optimization:

1. Global Search: Using SciPy's differential_evolution
2. Local Optimization: Using curve_fit for precise fitting

Experimental Results

Main Results

Achieved excellent fitting on three tasks:

• Arithmetic Reasoning: Mean prediction error 0.010
• Commonsense Reasoning: Mean prediction error 0.037
• Machine Translation: Mean prediction error 0.007

Generalization Capability Verification

1. Training Compute Generalization (Section 4.1)

Verified on 5 test models spanning 3 orders of magnitude:

• Qwen2.5-0.5B to Llama-2-70B
• Most prediction errors within 5 percentage points
• Better generalization on arithmetic reasoning and machine translation

2. Context Length Generalization (Section 4.2)

Retained observations exceeding 10,000 tokens for verification:

• Arithmetic reasoning: Prediction error 0.017
• Commonsense reasoning: Prediction error 0.067
• Machine translation: Prediction error 0.006

3. Context Extension Technique Generalization (Section 4.3)

Compared YaRN and position interpolation techniques with similar prediction errors, indicating method robustness to context extension techniques.

Ablation Study

Verified importance of sigmoid penalty term:

• With penalty term: Prediction error 0.010
• Without penalty term: Prediction error 0.029

Related Work

Traditional Scaling Laws

• Hestness et al. (2017), Kaplan et al. (2020): Established relationships between upstream performance and model design factors
• Hoffmann et al. (2022): Applied to training compute-optimal LLMs

Downstream Performance Prediction

• Wei et al. (2022), Hu et al. (2024): Focused on "emergent" abilities in LLMs
• Chen et al. (2024), Ruan et al. (2024): Adopted two-stage approaches
• This Work: First to introduce context length dependency

Context Extension Techniques

• Training-free Methods: InfLLM, LM-Infinite, etc.
• Position Encoding Rescaling: Position interpolation, YaRN, etc.
• This Work's Choice: Used YaRN for context extension

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Downstream performance can be accurately modeled as a joint function of training compute and context
2. The framework demonstrates good generalization across wide ranges of compute and context length
3. Performance benefits from increased compute and relevant context, but exhibits saturation points

Limitations

1. Assumptions: Relies on assumptions that performance scales with training compute and context, which may not hold in extreme scaling scenarios
2. Unconsidered Factors: Pretraining data mixture, post-training alignment, architectural choices, and other factors are not explicitly considered
3. Compute Range: The fitted compute range is relatively narrow; generalization beyond this range is unknown

Future Directions

1. Investigate how other factors (such as instruction tuning and alignment) affect identified parameters
2. Extend to larger ranges of training compute
3. Explore applicability in adversarial attack scenarios

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: First to incorporate context length into scaling laws, filling an important theoretical gap
2. Practical Value: Provides interpretable framework guiding long-context LLM design
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Large-scale validation on 65,500 instances across multiple tasks and models
4. Strong Generalization: Demonstrates good generalization across multiple dimensions
5. Method Simplicity: Offers intuitive interpretable functional form compared to existing complex methods

Weaknesses

1. Model Limitations: Validated only on Llama-2 series models, lacking broader model family verification
2. Task Coverage: Covers only 3 task types; applicability to other NLP tasks remains unknown
3. Theoretical Foundation: Lacks deep theoretical explanation for why the specific functional form was chosen
4. Parameter Interpretation: Insufficient analysis of physical meaning and interrelationships of parameters

Impact

1. Academic Value: Opens new directions in scaling law research, expected to attract broad attention
2. Practical Guidance: Provides quantitative tools for industry to design long-context models
3. Reproducibility: Provides complete code and detailed experimental settings for easy reproduction and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Model Design: Guides computational resource allocation for long-context LLMs
2. Performance Prediction: Estimates model performance before expensive large-scale training
3. Task Analysis: Understands task sensitivity to context length
4. Resource Optimization: Optimizes context window size under given compute budgets

References

1. Kaplan, J., et al. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv:2001.08361.
2. Chen, Y., et al. (2024). Scaling laws for predicting downstream performance in llms. arXiv:2410.08527.
3. Peng, B., et al. (2024). YaRN: Efficient context window extension of large language models. ICLR.
4. Wei, J., et al. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. TMLR.
5. Touvron, H., et al. (2023). Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv:2307.09288.

This paper makes important contributions to scaling law research by systematically incorporating context length into downstream task performance prediction for the first time, providing valuable theoretical tools and practical guidance for designing and optimizing long-context LLMs.