Efficient Parallel Samplers for Recurrent-Depth Models and Their Connection to Diffusion Language Models

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.14961
• Title: Efficient Parallel Samplers for Recurrent-Depth Models and Their Connection to Diffusion Language Models
• Authors: Jonas Geiping, Xinyu Yang, Guinan Su
• Classification: cs.LG cs.CL
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14961

Abstract

This paper investigates the connection between language models with recurrent depth (also known as universal transformers or recurrent transformers) and diffusion language models. Recurrent-depth models increase computational capacity through layer repetition, demonstrating advantages in reasoning tasks. Based on the similarities between these two model classes, the authors develop a novel diffusion forcing sampler to accelerate the generation process. The sampler decodes new tokens in each forward pass while recursively optimizing the latent states of these tokens in parallel. Theoretically, under the same time budget, this sampler is more expressive than baseline autoregressive generation. Importantly, the sampler can be directly applied to existing 3.5B-parameter recurrent-depth transformers without any fine-tuning, achieving up to 5× speedup.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Traditional large language models employ fixed-depth neural network architectures with relatively few layers (typically only two digits). While this design performs well in training efficiency and most tasks, it has limitations in complex tasks requiring multi-step logical reasoning, such as mathematics and programming. From a complexity theory perspective, fixed-depth transformers belong to the TC0 complexity class, which has restricted expressive capacity.

Research Motivation

1. Computational Capacity Limitations: Fixed-depth models struggle with multi-step logical chains requiring conceptual leaps
2. Inference Efficiency Issues: Although recurrent-depth models have greater expressive power, generation is slow as each recursion must execute sequentially
3. Parallelization Requirements: Modern GPU architectures provide opportunities for parallel computation, but traditional autoregressive generation cannot fully exploit them

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Chain-of-Thought Approaches: Require externalizing internal reasoning as small steps, increasing sequence length
• Recurrent-Depth Models: While expressively powerful, each recursive step during inference must execute serially, resulting in slow generation
• Traditional Parallelization Methods: Approaches like speculative decoding are primarily designed for fixed-depth models

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Clarifies the connection between recurrent-depth models and diffusion models, establishing a theoretical bridge through diffusion forcing and block/wave-based inference strategies
2. Methodological Innovation: Proposes a diffusion forcing sampler applicable to recurrent-depth models, enabling parallelization of the inference process
3. Experimental Validation: Validates the method's effectiveness on the 3.5B-parameter Huginn-0125 model, achieving approximately 5× speedup on benchmarks including GSM8K, MATH500, HumanEval, and MBPP while maintaining comparable accuracy
4. Practical Value: The sampler can be directly applied to existing recurrent-depth models without retraining or fine-tuning

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given a recurrent-depth model and input prompt x, the objective is to accelerate the text generation process while maintaining generation quality. Specifically, the goal is to generate more tokens within the same time budget, or reduce generation time for the same number of tokens.

Model Architecture

Recurrent-Depth Model Structure

The recurrent-depth model used in this work (Huginn-0125) comprises three main components:

1. Prelude Block P: Projects embedded input tokens to latent space
2. Recurrent Block R: Iterates r times in latent space, performing reasoning through state vector optimization
3. Coda Block C: Processes latent states and produces probability distributions for the next token

Mathematical formulation:

e = P(x)
s₀ ~ N(0, σ²I)
sᵢ = R(e, sᵢ₋₁) for i ∈ {1, ..., r}
p = C(sᵣ)

Diffusion Forcing Sampler Design

The core idea applies diffusion forcing principles to recurrent-depth models, implementing "diagonal" parallelization:

1. Parallel Token Generation: Simultaneously process multiple token positions in each forward pass
2. Iterative Optimization: Progressively optimize latent states of all active tokens through recursive steps
3. Dynamic Freezing: Adaptive exit mechanism based on latent space distance

Technical Innovations

1. Input Injection Mechanism

The recursive process is conditioned on embedded input e, allowing the sampler to perform "path correction" when conditions change without discarding partially computed states.

2. KV Cache Sharing

Different recursion depths can share KV caches, significantly reducing memory usage. Experiments show the model naturally supports KV cache sharing, requiring only storage of the latest recursion's KV states for each token position.

3. Adaptive Exit Strategy

Uses normalized distance in latent space as exit criterion:

δᵢ = ||zᵢ - z_prev,ᵢ||₂ / ||zᵢ||₂

When δᵢ < ε, the corresponding token is frozen and added to the KV cache.

4. Stabilization Components

• Momentum Mechanism: Adds momentum to input condition e: e = η·e_prev + (1-η)·P(y_current)
• Noise Injection: Adds noise at each sampling step: z' = (1-βₜ)z + βₜ·z_noise

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• GSM8K: Mathematical reasoning task using CoT version with 8-shot setting
• MATH500: High-difficulty mathematical problems
• HumanEval: Code generation task
• MBPP: Python programming problems

Evaluation Metrics

• Accuracy: Task-specific accuracy indicators
• Generation Speed (Tokens/Second): Tokens generated per second, measured using CUDA events

Baseline Methods

1. Static Autoregressive (AR): Baseline methods with different recursion steps (r=4,8,32,64)
2. Adaptive Computation AR: Adaptive computation sampler from original work
3. Speculative Decoding: Finely-tuned self-speculative decoding baseline

Implementation Details

• Batch size: 1 (single sequence inference)
• Temperature: 0.2, top-p: 0.95
• Default parameters: r'=4, ε=0.03, βₜ=0, η=0.1
• Maximum wavefront size: 128
• Hardware: A100-40GB GPU

Experimental Results

Main Results

The diffusion forcing sampler achieves significant speedup across all benchmarks:

Ablation Studies

Hyperparameter Sensitivity Analysis

1. Internal Recursion Steps r': Increasing r' improves accuracy but reduces throughput; r'=4 provides optimal balance
2. Exit Threshold ε: Smaller ε values improve accuracy but reduce speed; ε=0.03 is recommended
3. Noise Coefficient βₜ: With smaller r', moderate noise (βₜ=0.2-0.3) aids stability
4. Wavefront Size: 64-128 is optimal for A100 GPU

Model Variant Verification

Robustness verified across different model checkpoints:

• SWA Model: Weight-averaged version
• Math Fine-tuned Model: Version fine-tuned on MetaMath dataset

All variants show consistent 4-5× speedup with accuracy deviation within 0.5-1%.

Theoretical Analysis Verification

Depth vs. Width Scaling

Experiments verify theoretical analysis predictions:

• Prefill Phase: Depth scaling outperforms width scaling
• Decoding Phase: Diffusion forcing sampler achieves better width scaling
• Expressiveness: Under the same time budget, diffusion sampler strictly outperforms autoregressive generation

Related Work

Recurrent Model Research

• Historical Development: Evolution from early RNNs to universal transformers
• Theoretical Foundation: Computational capacity of universal Turing machines and complexity classes
• Practical Applications: Advantages in algorithmic learning and reasoning tasks

Diffusion Language Models

• Continuous-Domain Diffusion: Successful applications in image generation
• Discrete-Domain Diffusion: Challenges and solutions for text generation
• Inference Strategies: Methods including block diffusion and diffusion forcing

Inference Acceleration Techniques

• Speculative Decoding: Utilizing small models for drafting and large models for verification
• Parallelization Strategies: Trade-offs between memory-bound and compute-bound operations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Establishes theoretical connection between recurrent-depth models and diffusion models
2. Practical Value: Achieves 5× inference speedup while maintaining generation quality
3. Generality: Method can be directly applied to existing models without retraining
4. New Perspective: Recurrent-depth models can be viewed as continuous causal diffusion language models

Limitations

1. Batch Processing Constraints: Current implementation only supports single-sequence inference; batch scenarios require complex inference engines
2. FLOP Efficiency: While increasing parallelism, actual FLOP usage increases
3. Hardware Dependency: Optimal parameter settings depend on specific hardware configurations
4. Model Requirements: Requires models satisfying specific architectural requirements (input injection, robust recursion, etc.)

Future Directions

1. Batch Inference Engine: Develop systems supporting large-scale batch inference
2. Architecture Optimization: Design recurrent-depth architectures better suited for diffusion forcing sampling
3. Training Objectives: Explore unrolling objectives in diffusion language modeling
4. Theoretical Deepening: Further investigate theoretical foundations of recurrent-depth models as diffusion models

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First to establish connection between recurrent-depth models and diffusion models, providing new theoretical perspective
2. High Practical Value: Achieves significant inference speedup directly applicable to existing models
3. Rigorous Theory: Provides theoretical analysis of depth vs. width scaling and convergence proofs
4. Comprehensive Experiments: Validates method effectiveness and robustness across multiple benchmarks and model variants

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applicability: Method requires models satisfying specific architectural requirements, limiting generalizability
2. Insufficient Batch Processing Support: Single-sequence inference limits production environment applications
3. Memory Overhead: Despite KV cache sharing, additional latent state storage required
4. Parameter Sensitivity: Multiple hyperparameters require task and hardware-specific tuning

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new intersection point for recurrent-depth and diffusion model research
2. Engineering Value: Offers new technical pathway for large model inference optimization
3. Inspirational Significance: May inspire further research on combining model architectures with sampling strategies
4. Applicable Scenarios: Single-user inference, reasoning-intensive tasks, resource-constrained environments, and research prototyping

References

The paper cites extensive related work, including:

• Dehghani et al. (2019): Original Universal Transformers work
• Chen et al. (2024a): Diffusion Forcing method
• Geiping et al. (2025): Huginn-0125 recurrent-depth model
• Rombach et al. (2022): Latent space diffusion models
• Leviathan et al. (2023): Speculative decoding method

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality research paper with significant contributions in both theoretical innovation and practical value. The paper successfully establishes connections between two important model classes and proposes practical acceleration methods. While certain limitations exist, it provides valuable directions and foundations for future research.