On the Schrödinger and Carroll–Schrödinger Equations: Dualities and Applications

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.21597
• Title: On the Schrödinger and Carroll–Schrödinger Equations: Dualities and Applications
• Authors: José Rojas, Enrique Casanova, Melvin Arias (Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo & Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 27, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21597v1

Abstract

This paper systematically investigates the precise structural relationships between the standard Schrödinger equation and its Carrollian analogue—the Carroll–Schrödinger equation—in 1+1 dimensional spacetime. The research focuses on dualities, potential function mappings, and solution behavior characteristics. The main contributions include: (i) establishing common solution conditions for both dynamics within an operator framework; (ii) constructing potential-dependent reparameterization mappings x=δ(t) that map space-independent Carroll equations to time-independent Schrödinger equations, and deriving Schwarzian relations; (iii) establishing correlations of conserved densities and currents through gauge transformations and coordinate inversions; (iv) deriving Carrollian dispersion relations from the ultra-relativistic limit of energy-momentum bivectors, and obtaining classical limits via Hamilton-Jacobi formalism; (v) establishing unitary evolution of Carroll dynamics on the equal-x Hilbert space L²(Rₜ); (vi) performing gauge reduction for general potentials V(x,t) and establishing Dyson expansion schemes.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This paper addresses the fundamental question: How can one establish mathematically precise structural correspondences between standard Schrödinger quantum mechanics and its ultra-relativistic limit (Carrollian quantum mechanics)?

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Completeness: The Schrödinger equation admits multiple derivation pathways (symmetry construction, canonical quantization, path integrals, etc.), yet the systematic theoretical framework for its ultra-relativistic counterpart—the Carroll–Schrödinger equation—remains incomplete.
2. Physical Significance: The Carroll group is a contraction of the Poincaré group in the c→0 limit, describing dynamics where spacetime roles are interchanged. This framework is increasingly important in gravitation, holographic theory, and dark energy research (references 11-31).
3. Equation Characteristics: The Carroll–Schrödinger equation

   i℃ ∂ₓΨ(x,t) + (ℏ²/2mc²) ∂²ₜΨ(x,t) = 0
   

   
   is first-order in space and second-order in time, forming a stark contrast with the standard Schrödinger equation.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Unclear Correspondences: Although the Carroll–Schrödinger equation has been proposed 32,33, systematic study of precise mapping relationships with the standard Schrödinger equation is lacking.
2. Potential Function Treatment: How to transform external potentials between the two forms, and under what conditions both possess the same type of solutions, has lacked clear answers.
3. Conserved Quantity Relations: The correspondence of probability density and current between the two forms, and the specific implementation mechanism of spacetime role interchange, remain unclear.
4. Hilbert Space Structure: How to correctly establish the inner product structure and unitarity of Carroll dynamics is an unresolved fundamental problem.

Research Motivation

The authors aim to establish a unified 1+1 dimensional framework that systematically traces how potential functions, solutions, currents, inner products, interactions, and classical reductions transform between the two forms, providing a solid mathematical foundation for Carrollian quantum mechanics.

Core Contributions

1. Operator Commutation Conditions: Establishes Ĥ, F̂ = 0 as a sufficient condition for both equations to share solution types, clarifying that potential functions must satisfy Vₛcₕ(t) = Vcₐᵣ(t) + C (both pure time-dependent).
2. Schwarzian Mapping Theory:
   • Constructs potential-dependent coordinate transformation x = δ(t) mapping space-independent Carroll equations to time-independent Schrödinger equations
   • Derives the master equation: {τ,x} + 2E₀²/ℏ² τ'(x)² = -4m/ℏ²(Vₛcₕ(x) - Eₛcₕ)
   • Provides explicit solutions for harmonic oscillators, Coulomb-like potentials, and free particles
3. Conserved Quantity Equivalence: Proves complete equivalence of the two continuity equations through gauge transformation Φ = exp(-i/ℏ ∫Vcₐᵣdt)Ψ and coordinate inversion (x,ct)↔(ct,x).
4. Dispersion Relation Derivation: Derives E² = 2mc³p (requiring mass redefinition m→im) through analytic continuation of Lorentz transformations to the |β|>1 region in the β→∞ limit.
5. Hilbert Space Formalization:
   • Defines equal-x inner product on L²(Rₜ), proving unitarity of x-evolution
   • Identifies self-adjoint evolution operator Hₓ = ℏ²/2mc³(-∂²ₜ) with domain H²(R)
   • Constructs Gaussian wave packet exact solutions and verifies dispersion laws
6. Interaction Treatment Scheme:
   • For general V(x,t), obtains interaction momentum F(x,t) = ∂ₓ∫V(x,τ)dτ through gauge reduction
   • Establishes minimal coupling analogue p → p - F
   • Develops Dyson perturbation expansion in the x-direction

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Schrödinger or Carroll–Schrödinger equation with potential function Output: Equivalent form of the other equation, corresponding potential function, solution mapping relations Constraints: 1+1 dimensional spacetime, potential functions satisfying specific integrability conditions

Operator Framework for Shared Solution Conditions

Operator Definition

Define two differential operators:

Ĥ = p̂²/2m + V̂ₛcₕ(x,t) - Ê  (Schrödinger)
F̂ = c p̂̃ - (Ễ - V̂cₐᵣ(x,t))²/2mc²  (Carroll)

where standard generators are p̂ = -iℏ∂ₓ, Ê = iℏ∂ₜ, while Carroll generators are p̂̃ = +iℏ∂ₓ, Ễ = -iℏ∂ₜ (sign differences reflect spacetime role interchange).

Commutation Analysis

Requiring Ĥ, F̂ = 0 on common invariant kernel D. Direct calculation shows this is equivalent to:

∂ₓVₛcₕ = ∂ₓVcₐᵣ = 0
∂ₜVₛcₕ = ∂ₜVcₐᵣ

That is, both potential functions must be pure time-dependent and differ by a constant: Vₛcₕ(t) = Vcₐᵣ(t) + C.

Stronger Condition

If requiring separated variable solutions Ψ(x,t) = φₖ(x)Tₖ(t) to simultaneously satisfy both equations, one obtains a sign-reversed relationship:

Vcₐᵣ(t) = -Vₛcₕ(t) + C

This "strong correspondence" contrasts with the "weak correspondence" of the commutation condition.

Schwarzian Mapping Construction

Basic Idea

Starting from the separated variable Carroll equation:

(1/2mc³)(-iℏd/dt - Vcₐᵣ(t))²φₜ(t) = p₀φₜ(t)

seek transformation x = δ(t) converting it to the time-independent Schrödinger equation:

-ℏ²/2m d²Ψ/dx² + Vₛcₕ(x)Ψ = EₛcₕΨ

Derivation Process

1. Apply chain rule: ∂²/∂x² = (1/δ̇²)∂²/∂t² - (δ̈/δ̇³)∂/∂t
2. Matching coefficients yields two key relations:

   δ̈/δ̇ = 2i/ℏ Vcₐᵣ(t)  →  δ(t) = C₁ + C₀∫exp(2i/ℏ ∫Vcₐᵣ(s)ds)dt'
   
   Vₛcₕ(x) = Eₛcₕ + 1/2m(δ̇)²[iℏV̇cₐᵣ + V²cₐᵣ - E₀²]|ₜ₌δ⁻¹(x)
   

3. Eliminating Vcₐᵣ yields the Schwarzian differential equation:

   {τ,x} + 2E₀²/ℏ² τ'(x)² = -4m/ℏ²(Vₛcₕ(x) - Eₛcₕ)
   

   
   where τ = δ⁻¹ and {τ,x} = τ'''/τ' - 3/2(τ''/τ')² is the Schwarzian derivative.

Inversion Procedure

Given Vₛcₕ(x), construct δ(t) through the following steps:

1. Solve the auxiliary second-order ODE:

   y''(x) + q(x)y(x) = 0,  q(x) = 2m/ℏ²(Vₛcₕ(x) - Eₛcₕ)
   

2. Take fundamental solution system (y₁, y₂), construct:

   σ(x) = y₁(x)/y₂(x)
   τ(x) = ℏ/E₀ arctan(σ(x))
   δ(t) = τ⁻¹(t)
   

Specific Examples

Harmonic Oscillator Vₛcₕ = ½mω²(x-x₀)²:

• ODE transforms to parabolic cylinder equation
• Fundamental solutions: y₁ = Dᵥ(√2ξ), y₂ = Dᵥ(-√2ξ), where ξ = √(mω/ℏ)(x-x₀)

Coulomb-like Potential Vₛcₕ = α/(x-x₀):

• ODE transforms to Whittaker equation
• Fundamental solutions: y₁ = Mκ,1/2, y₂ = Wκ,1/2

Free Particle Vₛcₕ = 0:

• Fundamental solutions: y₁ = 1, y₂ = x-x₀
• Obtain τ(x) = ℏ/E₀ arctan(1/(x-x₀))

Conserved Quantity Correlations

Carroll Current and Density

Direct calculation yields:

Jˣcₐᵣ = Ψ*Ψ  (spatial current)
ρcₐᵣ = iℏ/2mc³(Ψ*∂ₜΨ - Ψ∂ₜΨ*) + Ψ*ΨVcₐᵣ/mc³  (density, potential-dependent!)

Establishing Equivalence

Two-step transformation:

1. Gauge Transformation eliminates explicit potential dependence:

   Φ = exp(-i/ℏ ∫Vcₐᵣ(x,τ)dτ)Ψ
   

   
   obtaining ρcₐᵣ = iℏ/2mc³(Φ*∂ₜΦ - Φ∂ₜΦ*), Jˣcₐᵣ = |Φ|²
2. Coordinate Inversion (x,ct) ↔ (ct,x): Carroll continuity equation ∂ₓρcₐᵣ + ∂ₜJˣcₐᵣ = 0 precisely transforms to Schrödinger continuity equation form.

Dispersion Relations and Classical Limits

Ultra-boost Derivation

In 1+1 dimensional Lorentz transformation:

E'/c = γ(E/c - βP),  P' = γ(P - βE/c)

Taking the analytic continuation branch |β|>1 with γ = i/√(β²-1), in the β→∞ limit:

E' = -icP,  P' = -iE/c

Combined with free Schrödinger relation E = P²/2m yields:

E²/2mc³ = iP  (requiring m→im)

Hamilton-Jacobi Form

Using WKB wave function Ψ = A exp(iS/ℏ), in the ℏ→0 limit obtain:

1/2mc³(∂S/∂t)² + ∂S/∂x = 0

Separated variable solutions: S(x,t) = -p₀x ± √(2mc³p₀)t, giving inverse relationship:

|p| = mc³/2v²,  E = ±mc³/v

This forms stark contrast with Newtonian case p = mv.

Hilbert Space Structure

Inner Product and Unitarity

On H = L²(Rₜ, dt) define equal-x inner product:

⟨φ,ψ⟩ₜ = ∫φ*(t)ψ(t)dt

Integrating continuity equation ∂ₓρₜ + ∂ₜJₜ = 0 (where ρₜ = |Ψ|²) with boundary conditions Jₜ→0 (t→±∞):

d/dx ‖Ψ(x,·)‖ₕ = 0

proves x-evolution preserves norm.

Evolution Operator

In frequency space (Fψ)(ω) = 1/√(2π) ∫e⁻ⁱωᵗψ(t)dt, -∂²ₜ becomes multiplication by ω², hence:

Hₓ = ℏ²/2mc³(-∂²ₜ) = ʲ/2mc³

is self-adjoint on D(Hₓ) = H²(R). Stone's theorem guarantees Uₓ(a) = exp(-i/ℏ aHₓ) is a strongly continuous unitary group.

Interaction Scheme

Gauge Reduction

For general V(x,t), gauge transformation:

φ(x,t) = exp(i/ℏ ∫V(x,τ)dτ)Ψ(x,t)

eliminates potential from second-order time operator, but introduces memory term in spatial derivative:

i℃∂ₓφ = -ℏ²/2mc² ∂²ₜφ + cF(x,t)φ

where interaction momentum F(x,t) = ∫∂ₓV(x,τ)dτ.

Perturbation Expansion

Decompose cF = g(t) + εη(x), define unperturbed evolution operator U₀(x,x₀) satisfying:

i℃∂ₓU₀ = [-ℏ²/2mc² ∂²ₜ - g(t)]U₀

Dyson series:

φ(x,t) = U₀(x,x₀)φ(x₀,t) - iε/℃ ∫U₀(x,ξ)η(ξ)U₀(ξ,x₀)φ(x₀,t)dξ + O(ε²)

Related Work

Carroll Group and Gravitation

• Dautcourt (1998) 11: First systematic study of ultra-relativistic limits of general relativity
• Hartong (2015) 12: Gauged Carroll algebra, establishing ultra-relativistic gravity framework
• Bergshoeff et al. (2017) 13: Comparative study of Carroll and Galilei gravity
• Hansen et al. (2022) 16: Carroll expansion of general relativity

Carroll Holography

• Duval et al. (2014) 19: Conformal Carroll group and BMS symmetry
• Donnay et al. (2022-2023) 21,22: Carrollian perspective on celestial holography
• Bagchi et al. (2016-2024) 23,24: Holographic duality in flat spacetime

Carroll Fluid Mechanics

• Ciambelli et al. (2018) 20,25: Carrollian fluids and flat holography
• Freidel & Jai-akson (2023-2024) 27,28: Deriving Carrollian fluid mechanics from symmetries
• Armas et al. (2024) 30: Carrollian fluids and spontaneous breaking of boost symmetry

Carroll Quantum Mechanics

• Lévy-Leblond (1965) 10: First proposal of Carroll group as c→0 contraction of Poincaré group
• Najafizadeh (2024-2025) 32,33:
  • Formulating Carroll–Schrödinger equation as ultra-relativistic limit of tachyon equation
  • Proposing Carroll particles as dark matter candidates
  • Main comparison object of this paper
• Dutta et al. (2023) 39: One-loop quantum effects of Carroll scalars
• Casanova et al. (2025) 38: Deriving 3D Carroll–Schrödinger equation from Heisenberg uncertainty principle

Paper Positioning

This paper is the first systematic work establishing precise correspondence relationships between Schrödinger and Carroll–Schrödinger equations, filling the following gaps:

1. Bidirectional potential function conversion algorithms (Schwarzian mapping)
2. Explicit correlations of conserved quantities (gauge + coordinate inversion)
3. Rigorous Hilbert space construction (equal-x inner product, unitarity proof)
4. Complete classification of exact solutions (Gaussian, finite-time quantization)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Hierarchy of Dualities:
   • Weak Correspondence (commutation condition): Vₛcₕ(t) = Vcₐᵣ(t) + C
   • Strong Correspondence (identical separated solutions): Vcₐᵣ(t) = -Vₛcₕ(t) + C
   • Sign difference reflects different physical requirements
2. Schwarzian Bridge: Any static Vₛcₕ(x) can construct corresponding δ(t) through solving auxiliary ODE y'' + qy = 0, realizing Carroll↔Schrödinger mapping.
3. Spacetime Role Interchange:
   • Schrödinger: x-evolution, t labels state
   • Carroll: t-evolution (in x-direction), x labels state
   • Conserved quantities precisely interchange through (x,ct)↔(ct,x)
4. Classical Limit Difference: Carroll particle's p = mc³/2v² inverse relationship is the fundamental distinction from Newtonian mechanics.
5. Mathematical Consistency: All constructions (Schwarzian mapping, gauge transformations, Dyson expansion) are verifiable at analytical and numerical levels.

Limitations

1. Dimensional Restriction:
   • Current framework strictly limited to 1+1 dimensions
   • Higher-dimensional generalization (especially 3+1) faces technical challenges:
     • Does Schwarzian mapping admit multivariable generalization?
     • How to generalize interaction momentum as vector field?
2. Potential Function Types:
   • Schwarzian mapping requires Vₛcₕ(x) solvable via second-order ODE
   • Treatment of non-analytic or singular potentials (e.g., delta function) not discussed
3. Boundary Conditions:
   • Unitarity proof depends on Jₜ→0 (t→±∞) or periodic boundary conditions
   • Self-adjoint extension theory on finite intervals not fully developed
4. Quantum Field Theory:
   • Only single-particle quantum mechanics considered
   • Many-body, second quantization, gauge field coupling not addressed
5. Experimental Observability:
   • No discussion of how to distinguish Carroll from Schrödinger dynamics experimentally
   • Dark matter candidate hypothesis 33 lacks testable predictions

Future Directions

Theoretical Extensions

1. 3+1 Dimensional Formulation:
   • Comparison with 3D proposals in references 32,38
   • Multivariable Schwarzian theory
   • Gauge structure of vector interaction momentum
2. Quantum Field Theory:
   • Fock space construction for Carroll scalar fields
   • Carroll–Dirac equation for fermions
   • Minimal coupling of gauge fields
3. Mathematical Structure:
   • Projective/ray representations of Carroll group
   • Central extensions of Carrollian symmetry algebra
   • Precise relations with BMS group

Physical Applications

1. Condensed Matter Analogues:
   • Carroll symmetry explanation of temporal solitons (references 36,37)
   • Carrollian description of Cherenkov radiation
2. Cosmology:
   • Carroll fluid models for dark energy 31
   • Carroll particle creation in expanding universe
3. Holographic Duality:
   • Wave function realization of flat spacetime holography 20,23,24
   • Celestial holography interpretation 21,22
4. Gravitational Coupling:
   • Generalization of Carroll–Schrödinger equation in curved spacetime
   • Self-consistent coupling with Carroll gravity 12,13

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor

• Operator Theory: Correct application of self-adjoint extensions, domains, Stone's theorem and other functional analysis tools
• Schwarzian Theory: Elegantly linearizes nonlinear mapping problems into second-order ODEs
• Exact Solutions: Closed-form expressions for Gaussian wave packets and finite-time modes fully verifiable

Assessment: Achieves high standards of mathematical physics; all calculations are reproducible.

2. Conceptual Innovation

• Potential-Dependent Mapping: The potential-dependence of x=δ(t) is deep insight, breaking conventional linear transformation thinking
• Interaction Momentum: F(x,t) as analogue of "Carroll electromagnetic potential" is conceptually inspiring
• Spacetime Role Interchange: Precisely realized through gauge + coordinate inversion, rather than vague analogy

Assessment: Provides new understanding framework for Carroll quantum mechanics.

3. Systematic Completeness

Paper covers:

• Equations of motion (operator commutation)
• Solution construction (separated variables, exact solutions)
• Conserved quantities (continuity equations)
• Classical limits (Hamilton-Jacobi)
• Hilbert space (inner product, unitarity)
• Interactions (gauge reduction, perturbation expansion)

Assessment: Forms closed-loop theoretical system, not piecemeal collection of results.

4. Physical Insight

• Dispersion Relation: Novel and natural method through analytic continuation of Lorentz transformation to |β|>1
• Inverse Momentum: p ∝ 1/v² classical limit is hallmark of Carroll dynamics
• Temporal Soliton Connection: Noting structural similarity of equation (8.31) with references 36,37 hints at deeper connections

Assessment: Provides physical intuition beyond technical derivations.

Weaknesses

1. Challenges in Higher-Dimensional Generalization

• Schwarzian Generalization: Section 9 only poses question without providing scheme
• Relation to Existing 3D Proposals: How 3D equations in references 32,38 connect to 1D results unclear
• Technical Obstacles: Multivariable Schwarzian is nontrivial geometric object, possibly requiring complex manifold theory

Impact: Limits universality and practical applicability of results.

2. Depth of Physical Interpretation

• Mass Redefinition: Necessity of m→im (Section 5) lacks deep discussion; does it imply "imaginary mass" of Carroll particles?
• Negative Energy Branch: Physical meaning of double-valued E₀ = ±√(2mc³p₀) not clarified
• Dark Matter Connection: References 33 cited but not expanded; what are testable predictions for Carroll particles as dark matter?

Impact: Weakens physical credibility and testability of theory.

3. Boundary Conditions and Self-Adjointness

• Asymptotic Behavior: For which potentials does Jₜ→0 (t→±∞) hold?
• Finite Intervals: Section 7 mentions periodic/quasi-periodic conditions but lacks detailed analysis
• Singular Potentials: Treatment of delta function, hard-wall potentials missing

Impact: Gaps in completeness of Hilbert space formalization.

4. Numerical Verification

• Special Function Computation: Numerical precision of Dᵥ, Mκ,1/2, Wκ,1/2?
• Schwarzian Inversion: Numerical stability of τ⁻¹ for complex Vₛcₕ(x)?
• Dyson Expansion Convergence: Quantitative estimates of ε range lacking

Impact: Lack of numerical benchmarks limits theoretical application.

5. Experimental Connection

• Observable Quantities: How to experimentally prepare Carroll states? How to measure interaction momentum F?
• Condensed Matter Realization: Temporal soliton analogy (Section 8 end) lacks specific systems
• Astrophysical Application: Specific mechanisms of dark energy application 31 not developed

Impact: Weak bridge between theory and experiment.

Impact Assessment

Contribution to Field

1. Carroll Quantum Mechanics Foundation: This is foundational work alongside 32,33
2. Cross-Disciplinary Tool: Schwarzian mapping technique may inspire other fields (e.g., Schwarzian action in AdS/CFT)
3. Microscopic Realization of Holography: Provides wave function level support for Carrollian holography 20-24

Practical Value

• Short-term: Primarily theoretical tool; 1+1 dimensional restriction limits direct application
• Medium-term: If 3D generalization succeeds, may impact dark energy models and flat holography
• Long-term: If Carroll symmetry realized in condensed matter (e.g., time crystals), paper provides theoretical framework

Reproducibility

• Excellent: All derivations based on elementary differential equations and operator theory, no black boxes
• Good: Special function evaluation requires professional software (Mathematica, Maple)
• Needs Improvement: Lacks open-source code implementing Schwarzian inversion algorithm

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Physics Research:
   • Carroll group representation theory
   • Flat spacetime holography
   • Quantum description of dark energy
2. Mathematical Physics:
   • Applications of Schwarzian differential equations
   • Non-standard Hilbert space structures
   • Supersymmetric Carroll theory 40
3. Condensed Matter Physics (Potential):
   • Symmetry analysis of temporal solitons
   • Spacetime duality in nonlinear optics
   • Carrollian description of topological phase transitions
4. Teaching:
   • Relationship between symmetries and dynamical equations
   • Diversity of classical limits and quantization
   • Applications of functional analysis in quantum mechanics

Key References

10 J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, "Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré," Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré (1965) — Original proposal of Carroll group

12 J. Hartong, "Gauging the Carroll algebra and ultra-relativistic gravity," JHEP (2015) — Modern framework of Carroll gravity

21-22 L. Donnay et al., "Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography," PRL & PRD (2022-2023) — Frontier progress in Carroll holography

31 J. de Boer et al., "Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation," Frontiers in Physics (2022) — Cosmological applications

32 M. Najafizadeh, "Carroll–Schrödinger equation as the ultra-relativistic limit," Sci. Rep. (2025) — Main comparison object of this paper

36-37 G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (2019); Y. Zheng & C. Liu, Frontiers in Physics (2022) — Experimental background of temporal solitons

Summary Assessment

This is a technically solid and conceptually innovative theoretical physics paper, providing important mathematical tools for the emerging field of Carroll quantum mechanics. Schwarzian mapping theory and the interaction momentum scheme are highlights, though higher-dimensional generalization and physical applications require future work. Recommended for researchers interested in symmetries, non-standard quantum mechanics, and holographic duality.

Recommendation Index: ★★★★☆ (4/5)

• Theoretical Depth: ★★★★★
• Practical Value: ★★★☆☆
• Readability: ★★★★☆
• Innovation: ★★★★☆