A Search for Ultra-Light Vector Dark Matter with a Rotating Torsion Balance

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.21764
• Title: A Search for Ultra-Light Vector Dark Matter with a Rotating Torsion Balance
• Authors: M.P. Ross, E.A. Shaw, C. Gettings, S.K. Apple, I.A. Paulson, J.H. Gundlach
• Institution: Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, University of Washington, Seattle
• Classification: hep-ex (High Energy Physics - Experiment), astro-ph.IM (Astrophysics - Instrumentation), gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Submission Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21764

Abstract

This study employs a rotating torsion balance apparatus equipped with baryon number minus lepton number (B-L) component dipoles to search for ultra-light vector dark matter. The research covers candidate particle masses in the ultra-low mass range of 1.3×10⁻²² to 1.9×10⁻¹⁸ eV. The experiment establishes constraints on the coupling strength between each dark matter candidate particle and B-L number, achieving peak sensitivity of gB-L ≤ 9×10⁻²⁶, representing a threefold improvement over previous limits.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem

Despite widespread evidence for dark matter's existence, all direct detection experiments to date have been unsuccessful. This leaves a vast parameter space for non-conventional dark matter candidates, among which ultra-light dark matter (ULDM) represents an underexplored frontier.

2. Research Significance

• Mass Range: ULDM candidate particles can have masses ranging from 10⁻²² eV to 1 eV, far below traditional WIMP candidates
• Classical Field Behavior: If dark matter consists entirely of such particles, the dark matter density observed in the Milky Way would be sufficient for ULDM to behave as a classical field
• Characteristic Frequency: ULDM fields possess a characteristic frequency fDM ≃ mDMc²/h, linking particle mass to observable frequencies

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Traditional dark matter detection experiments primarily target heavier particles such as WIMPs
• Detection techniques for ultra-light mass ranges remain relatively limited
• Static torsion balance experiments face frequency limitations when detecting extremely low-mass dark matter

4. Motivation for This Study

• Investigate the coupling of vector ULDM particles with B-L number
• Employ rotational modulation techniques to extend the detectable mass lower limit
• Fill unexplored regions in the dark matter parameter space

Core Contributions

1. First Application of Rotating Torsion Balance to Search for B-L Coupled Vector ULDM: Applies rotational modulation techniques to ULDM searches, covering a mass range of 1.3×10⁻²² to 1.9×10⁻¹⁸ eV
2. Significant Sensitivity Enhancement: Achieves coupling strength constraints of gB-L ≤ 9×10⁻²⁶ at peak sensitivity, representing approximately 3-fold improvement over previous limits
3. Extended Detection Range: Through rotational modulation techniques, enables detection of lower-mass dark matter candidates compared to static torsion balance experiments
4. Long-Term Data Accumulation: Utilizes one full year of data from July 2024 to July 2025, obtaining valid data despite harsh conditions including construction noise
5. Three-Dimensional Field Direction Analysis: Independently fits ULDM fields in three directions (X, Y, Z) of the Earth-centered coordinate system, providing comprehensive constraints

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Angular displacement measurements from the rotating torsion balance, recording the angular displacement of the pendulum relative to the vacuum chamber during turntable rotation

Output: 95% confidence level upper limits on coupling strength gB-L for different mass ULDM candidates

Constraints:

• Mass range limited by dataset length (low-mass end) and turntable frequency (high-mass end)
• Must exclude signals near the diurnal frequency (4.8×10⁻²⁰ eV) caused by Earth's rotation

Theoretical Foundation

ULDM Interaction Model

The differential acceleration produced by a vector ULDM field on a pair of test masses is:

$\Delta\vec{a} \simeq A \cdot g_{B-L} \cdot \Delta(B-L) \cdot \hat{a}$

where:

• A = 4.9×10¹¹ m/s² is a reference acceleration dependent on local dark matter density
• gB-L is the coupling constant between ULDM and B-L number
• Δ(B-L) is the difference in B-L number between test masses
• â is the direction of the ULDM vector field

Torque Expression

The observed torque is fitted as:

$\tau = Am r\Delta(B-L) \left(g^X_{B-L}\vec{X}\cdot\vec{p} + g^Y_{B-L}\vec{Y}\cdot\vec{p} + g^Z_{B-L}\vec{Z}\cdot\vec{p}\right)$

where:

• m is the test mass
• r is the moment arm (1.9 cm)
• p⃗ is the horizontal vector perpendicular to the pendulum dipole
• X⃗, Y⃗, Z⃗ are unit vectors in the Earth-centered coordinate system

Experimental Apparatus Architecture

1. Torsion Balance Pendulum

• Test Mass Configuration: 8 test masses, 4 beryllium (Be) and 4 aluminum (Al), arranged in dipole configuration
• B-L Difference: ΔB-L = 0.0359
• Suspension System: 22 μm thick, 1 m long fused silica fiber
• Key Parameters:
  • Spring constant κ = 7.1×10⁻¹⁰ N·m/rad
  • Quality factor Q = 1.1×10⁵
  • Resonance frequency ω₀ = 2π×0.69 mHz
  • Moment of inertia I = 3.78×10⁻⁵ kg·m²

2. Vacuum and Shielding System

• Vacuum Level: < 0.2 mPa, maintained by ion pumps
• Magnetic Shielding: Multi-layer magnetic shielding reduces magnetic field interference
• Thermal Shielding: Thermal enclosure controls temperature gradients

3. Rotation Platform

• Turntable Frequency: ωTT = 0.46 mHz
• Rotation Speed Stability: FPGA controller maintains speed variations below 0.1 nrad/√Hz
• Tilt Control: Dual tiltmeters with thermal expansion feet, precision 0.5 μrad/√Hz

4. Angular Readout System

• Measurement Method: Autocollimator measures pendulum angle relative to vacuum chamber
• Noise Performance: Below 1 mHz limited by thermal noise; approximately 0.5 fN·m/√Hz at 0.46 mHz

Technical Innovations

1. Rotational Modulation Technique

• Principle: Rotation modulates the component dipole's orientation relative to the ULDM signal direction
• Advantages: Enables detection of ULDM candidates below turntable frequency, extending mass lower limit
• Modulation Pattern:
  • Z component: Modulated by field characteristic frequency and turntable rotation
  • X and Y components: Additionally modulated by Earth's rotation

2. Three-Dimensional Field Decomposition

• Coordinate System Choice: Earth-centered coordinates (Z along Earth's rotation axis, X toward vernal equinox, Y orthogonal)
• Projection Transformation: Uses Astropy library to project unit vectors to laboratory coordinate system
• Independent Fitting: Independently fits coupling strengths in X, Y, Z directions, then averages squared values

3. Data Quality Control

• Segmented Fitting: Divides data into segments of two turntable periods, each fitted independently
• Fitting Function: Includes turntable frequency harmonics (ωTT, 2ωTT, 3ωTT, etc.) and torsional resonance harmonics (ω₀, 2ω₀, 3ω₀, etc.)
• Outlier Removal:
  • Fitting residuals exceeding 99th percentile of χ² distribution
  • Torque amplitudes outside 95% confidence interval
• Data Retention Rate: 68% of raw data passes quality control

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• Acquisition Period: July 7, 2024 to July 7, 2025, continuous operation for one year
• Pendulum Flips: 180° flips performed on July 31, 2024, February 15, 2025, and May 1, 2025 to minimize systematic errors
• Environmental Interference:
  • Active construction site within 100 m causes severe noise
  • Multiple hardware failures result in data loss
  • Instrument achieves thermal noise-limited performance during weekends and holidays when construction ceases
• Valid Data: 68% of data passes quality screening

Analysis Strategy

• Time Window: Divides one turntable period amplitude data into 30-day segments
• Mass Sampling: Mass interval of 2.6×10⁻²² eV
• Mass Range Limitations:
  • Low-mass end: Limited by dataset length (1.3×10⁻²² eV)
  • High-mass end: Limited by turntable frequency (1.9×10⁻¹⁸ eV)

Calibration Methods

Absolute torque calibration is accomplished through three methods:

1. Known apparatus parameters
2. Turntable speed variations
3. Injected gravitational torque

Detailed information is provided in reference 9.

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Coupling Strength Constraints

• Peak Sensitivity: gB-L ≤ 9×10⁻²⁶ (95% confidence level)
• Mass Range: 1.3×10⁻²² to 1.9×10⁻¹⁸ eV
• Improvement Factor: Approximately 3-fold improvement over previous limits

2. Frequency Dependence

• Overall Characteristic: Constraints do not exhibit strong frequency dependence
• Dominant Factors:
  • Torsion balance thermal noise at turntable frequency
  • Data acquisition duration
• Diurnal Frequency Peak: Peak appears at 4.8×10⁻²⁰ eV, corresponding to Earth's diurnal frequency; the experiment cannot distinguish dark matter signals at this mass from Earth's rotation modulation

3. Torque Measurements

Figure 3 displays measured torque amplitude over one turntable period for one year:

• Distribution Characteristics: Consistent with Gaussian distribution
• Amplitude Range: -40 to +40 fN·m
• Noise Sources: Construction activities and hardware failures result in many days of data being discarded
• Optimal Performance: Achieved thermal noise limit during construction cessation periods (weekends, holidays)

Comparison with Previous Work

According to Figure 4, this study's constraints are compared with the following experiments:

1. MICROSCOPE: Satellite experiment providing constraints at higher mass ranges
2. Shaw et al. (2022): Previous torsion balance experiment; this study improves upon its results across most mass ranges
3. Zimmermann et al.: Dwarf galaxy observations provide lower mass limit of approximately 2.2×10⁻²¹ eV
4. LISA Pathfinder: Space gravitational wave detector data analysis
5. Combined best direct detection limits: Integrated best direct detection constraints

Advantages of This Study:

• Provides the most stringent direct detection constraints in the 1×10⁻²¹ to 1×10⁻¹⁸ eV range
• Extends the achievable mass range for torsion balance dark matter searches
• Provides new constraints at the ultra-low mass end (< 1×10⁻²¹ eV)

Experimental Findings

1. No Signal Evidence: No evidence for ULDM signals found across the entire search mass range
2. System Stability: Despite severe environmental interference, the experiment maintains good systematic control through data quality control and periodic pendulum flips
3. Thermal Noise Limitation: Under optimal operating conditions, experimental performance reaches thermal noise limit, validating apparatus design performance
4. Earth's Rotation Blind Zone: An unavoidable blind zone exists near the diurnal frequency, an inherent limitation of ground-based rotating experiments

Related Work

1. ULDM Detection Techniques

Atomic Interferometry

• Zhou et al. (2024): Dark matter search using ytterbium atomic interferometer
• Advantages: High-precision quantum sensing
• Applications: Suitable for dark matter detection in specific mass ranges

Torsion Balance Experiments

• Shaw et al. (2022): Static torsion balance search for ultra-low mass boson dark matter
• Sun et al. (2025): Differential torsional sensor direct detection of ultra-light vector dark matter
• This Study's Improvement: Extends mass lower limit through rotational modulation

Gravitational Wave Interferometers

• KAGRA O3GK (2024): Uses gravitational wave detector data to search for ultra-light vector dark matter
• LISA Pathfinder (Frerick et al. 2024): Utilizes space mission data to set new limits on general dark photons

2. Theoretical Foundation

ULDM Theoretical Framework

• Graham et al. (2016): Proposes direct dark matter detection using accelerometers, providing theoretical foundation for this study
• Key Concept: Vector particles coupled to B-L number as dark matter candidates
• Hui (2021): Review of wave dark matter, providing extensive theoretical background

3. Astrophysical Constraints

• Zimmermann et al. (2025): Dwarf galaxy observations suggest dark matter mass exceeds 2.2×10⁻²¹ eV
• Complementarity: Astrophysical constraints and laboratory detection provide complementary information

Advantages Relative to Prior Work

1. Mass Coverage: Provides the most stringent laboratory constraints in the 10⁻²¹ to 10⁻¹⁸ eV range
2. Rotational Modulation: Technical innovation enables detection of lower masses
3. Long-Term Operation: One year of data accumulation provides statistical significance
4. Three-Dimensional Analysis: Provides comprehensive constraints on ULDM field direction

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. No Signal Detection: No evidence for B-L coupled ULDM found in the mass range 1.3×10⁻²² to 1.9×10⁻¹⁸ eV
2. Constraint Setting: Establishes 95% confidence level upper limits on coupling strength between ULDM and B-L number, with peak sensitivity gB-L < 9×10⁻²⁶
3. Performance Enhancement: Achieves approximately 3-fold improvement over previous limits, extending the achievable range for torsion balance dark matter searches
4. Parameter Space Constraint: Constrains candidate particles at the ultra-low end of the possible dark matter mass spectrum

Limitations

1. Environmental Interference

• Construction Noise: Nearby construction activities severely impact data quality, with only 68% of data usable
• Hardware Failures: Multiple equipment failures result in data loss
• Improvement Potential: Better site selection or longer operation time could enhance statistical precision

2. Mass Range Limitations

• Low-Mass End: Limited by dataset length (requires longer observation to detect lower frequencies)
• High-Mass End: Limited by turntable rotation frequency (0.46 mHz)
• Diurnal Frequency Blind Zone: Cannot distinguish dark matter signals from Earth's rotation effects near 4.8×10⁻²⁰ eV

3. Specific Coupling Assumptions

• B-L Coupling: Experiment specifically targets B-L number coupling; cannot constrain other coupling mechanisms
• Vector Field: Assumes vector dark matter; not applicable to scalar or tensor candidates

4. Ground-Based Experiment Limitations

• Earth's Rotation Modulation: Inevitably introduces diurnal and annual frequency modulation
• Gravitational Gradient: Requires compensation and shielding

Future Directions

1. Apparatus Upgrades

• ULDM-Specific Pendulum: Design optimized B-L dipole configuration
• Higher Rotation Speed: Increase turntable frequency to probe higher mass ranges
• Lower Noise: Improve thermal control and vibration isolation

2. Extended Observation Time

• Multi-Year Data: Accumulate longer observation periods to enhance low-mass sensitivity
• Better Site Selection: Choose locations remote from construction and environmental interference

3. Exploration of Other Couplings

• Different Component Dipoles: Test other material combinations to explore different coupling mechanisms
• Multiple Materials: Employ more diverse test mass materials

4. Joint Analysis

• Multi-Experiment Data: Combine data from different detector types
• Astrophysical Constraints: Integrate laboratory and astronomical observation results

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation

• Rotational Modulation Application: Innovatively applies rotational modulation to ULDM searches, breaking through static torsion balance mass lower limits
• Three-Dimensional Field Analysis: Independently analyzes ULDM fields in three Earth-centered coordinate directions, providing comprehensive field direction constraints
• Long-Term Stable Operation: Maintains one-year continuous operation under harsh environmental conditions, demonstrating robust experimental design

2. Experimental Sufficiency

• Systematic Error Control: Effectively suppresses systematic errors through periodic pendulum flips (three 180° flips)
• Multiple Calibrations: Uses three independent methods to calibrate torque measurements, enhancing result credibility
• Rigorous Data Screening: Employs dual criteria based on χ² fitting and amplitude distribution to remove anomalous data
• Detailed Parameter Characterization: Table I comprehensively lists all critical apparatus parameters

3. Result Convincingness

• Significant Improvement: 3-fold sensitivity enhancement is substantively meaningful
• Broad Coverage: Nearly 4 orders of magnitude mass range coverage
• Statistical Consistency: Figure 3 shows measurement results consistent with Gaussian distribution, with no obvious anomalous signals
• Theoretical Comparison: Results complement astrophysical constraints (Zimmermann et al.)

4. Writing Clarity

• Clear Structure: Logical flow with well-organized hierarchy from motivation to results
• Information-Rich Figures:
  • Figure 1 intuitively displays experimental geometry
  • Figure 2 details apparatus structure
  • Figure 3 shows raw data quality
  • Figure 4 comprehensively compares different experimental results
• Precise Theoretical Expression: Equations (1)-(3) clearly define the physical model

Weaknesses

1. Methodological Limitations

• Single Coupling Mechanism: Only probes B-L coupling; lacks constraint ability for other possible interaction mechanisms
• Dark Matter Type Restriction: Specifically targets vector dark matter; cannot detect scalar or other forms
• Ground-Based Experiment Inherent Limitations: Diurnal frequency blind zone is unavoidable

2. Experimental Setup Defects

• Environmental Noise: 32% data loss due to construction noise significantly impacts statistical precision
• Site Selection Issue: Proximity to construction site is an avoidable design flaw
• Hardware Reliability: Multiple hardware failures indicate room for improvement in system stability

3. Insufficient Analysis Depth

• Systematic Error Discussion: Quantitative assessment of various systematic error sources lacks detail
• Sensitivity Optimization: Insufficient discussion of further optimization strategies to achieve higher sensitivity
• Theoretical Uncertainty: Lacks discussion of uncertainty in reference acceleration A = 4.9×10¹¹ m/s²
• Blind Zone Treatment: Limited discussion of physical significance of diurnal frequency blind zone and possible solutions

4. Result Presentation

• Missing Error Bars: Constraint curves in Figure 4 do not display uncertainty ranges
• Lack of Case Studies: No specific examples of data fitting or residual analysis provided
• Frequency Dependence: Physical interpretation of constraint curve shape is relatively brief

Impact Assessment

1. Contribution to Field

• Parameter Space Filling: Fills important mass range gap in ultra-light dark matter searches
• Technical Demonstration: Proves effectiveness of rotational modulation technique in ULDM searches
• Benchmark Setting: Provides new sensitivity benchmark for future experiments
• Theoretical Constraint: Provides strong experimental constraints on B-L coupled dark matter models

2. Practical Value

• Existing Apparatus Reuse: Demonstrates multi-purpose capability by conducting ULDM search using apparatus built for other purposes (Ref. 9)
• Transferable Technology: Rotational modulation method applicable to other precision measurement experiments
• Upgrade Potential: Clearly indicates pathways for further improvement through ULDM-specific pendulum design

3. Reproducibility

• Detailed Parameters: Table I provides all critical apparatus parameters
• Open Data: Provides GitHub code and data repository (https://github.com/EotWash/ULDM_NewWash)
• Transparent Methods: Analysis procedures clearly described
• Limitation: Some technical details (specific data processing algorithms) require reference to other literature

4. Subsequent Research Directions

• Direct Inspiration: Encourages other teams to develop rotating ULDM detectors
• Technical Reference: Provides design guidance for next-generation torsion balance experiments
• Theory Development: May promote further research on B-L coupled dark matter theory
• Cross-Disciplinary Application: Precision torsion balance technology potentially applicable to other fundamental physics measurements

Applicable Scenarios

1. Dark Matter Search

• Ultra-Light Mass Range: Particularly suitable for dark matter candidates in 10⁻²² to 10⁻¹⁸ eV mass range
• Vector Field: Specifically targets vector-type dark matter
• B-L Coupling Models: Tests specific theoretical models

2. Precision Measurement

• Weak Force Detection: Technology generalizable to other weak force measurements
• Equivalence Principle Testing: Traditional application of torsion balance apparatus
• Long-Range Interactions: Search for new long-range forces

3. Technology Validation

• Rotational Modulation Method: Provides reference for other experiments requiring modulation techniques
• Noise Suppression: Strategies for signal extraction in high-noise environments
• Long-Term Stability: Experience with long-term operation of precision instruments

4. Inapplicable Scenarios

• High-Mass Dark Matter: Cannot probe candidate particles with eV-scale or higher masses
• Non-Vector Dark Matter: Insensitive to scalar or tensor-type dark matter
• Non-B-L Coupling: Cannot constrain other types of interactions

References

Key Citations

1. Graham et al. (2016), Phys. Rev. D 93:075029 - Proposes theoretical framework for direct dark matter detection using accelerometers; provides theoretical foundation for this study
2. Shaw et al. (2022), Phys. Rev. D 105:042007 - Previous torsion balance ULDM search; direct predecessor to this work
3. Ross et al. (2025), arXiv:2509.10701 - Study using same apparatus for long-range dark matter interaction search; provides detailed apparatus description
4. Hui (2021), Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59:247 - Review of wave dark matter; provides extensive theoretical background
5. Frerick et al. (2024), Phys. Lett. B 848:138328 - LISA Pathfinder constraints on general dark photons; provides space experiment comparison
6. Zimmermann et al. (2025), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134:151001 - Dwarf galaxy observation constraints on dark matter mass lower limit

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality experimental physics paper making substantive contributions to ultra-light dark matter searches. Despite severe environmental interference, the research team successfully completed one year of data acquisition and obtained meaningful results. The application of rotational modulation technique represents an important innovation, significantly extending torsion balance experimental detection capabilities. The paper's primary value lies in filling a gap in the dark matter parameter space and establishing new benchmarks for future experiments. Recommended future work should focus on improving experimental environment, extending observation time, and exploring ULDM-optimized pendulum designs.