2025-11-13T20:46:10.584415

Matching NLL to NLO in Higgs and Z plus jet at the LHC and FCC

Celiberto, Rose, Papa
We present updated predictions for rapidity and transverse-momentum spectra in Higgs-plus-jet production at proton colliders, combining NLO fixed-order QCD with next-to-leading energy-logarithmic resummation. Preliminary results for the $Z$-boson case are also discussed. Our study underscores the importance of improving fixed-order predictions for Higgs- and $Z$-plus-jet observables to meet the precision demands of Higgs and electroweak measurements at the LHC and future FCC energies.
academic

Matching NLL to NLO in Higgs and Z plus jet at the LHC and FCC

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.22445
  • Title: Matching NLL to NLO in Higgs and Z plus jet at the LHC and FCC
  • Authors: Francesco Giovanni Celiberto (Universidad de Alcalá), Luigi Delle Rose (Università della Calabria & INFN), Alessandro Papa (Università della Calabria & INFN)
  • Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), hep-ex (High Energy Physics - Experiment)
  • Publication/Conference: The European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP2025), 7-11 July 2025, Marseille, France
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22445

Abstract

This paper presents updated predictions for the rapidity and transverse momentum spectra in Higgs plus jet production at proton colliders, combining next-to-leading order (NLO) fixed-order QCD calculations with next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) resummation of energy logarithms. Preliminary results for the Z boson case are also discussed. The study emphasizes the importance of improving fixed-order predictions for Higgs and Z+jet observables to meet the precision requirements of Higgs and electroweak measurements at the LHC and future FCC energies.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Precise theoretical description of Higgs boson and Z boson production accompanied by jets at high-energy proton colliders (LHC and future FCC), particularly in the semi-hard dynamics regime where significant scale hierarchies exist: √s ≫ {μᵢ} ≫ ΛQCD.

Problem Significance

  1. Precision Physics Requirements: With increasing precision of LHC experimental data and the planning of future FCC, Higgs physics and electroweak measurements demand more accurate theoretical predictions
  2. Multi-Scale Issues: When the center-of-mass energy is much larger than characteristic hard momentum scales, large energy logarithms ln(s/μ²) are generated, which are enhanced at each order of the perturbative expansion
  3. Rapidity Interval Effects: Energy logarithm effects are particularly pronounced in configurations with large rapidity intervals (ΔY) between final-state particles

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Pure Fixed-Order Calculations: Although Higgs+jet processes have NNLO precision calculations 64-66, these methods do not include resummation of energy logarithms enhanced in the high-energy region
  2. Transverse Momentum Logarithm Resummation: Existing next-to-NLL transverse momentum logarithm resummation 67 does not address energy logarithms
  3. Pure BFKL Resummation: Previous hybrid factorization (HyF) framework predictions 18 show significant tension with fixed-order results in the moderate transverse momentum region

Research Motivation

Develop a systematic matching strategy combining NLO fixed-order matrix elements with NLL high-energy logarithm resummation, eliminating double-counting and providing reliable theoretical predictions across the entire phase space.

Core Contributions

  1. Proposed POWHEG+JETHAD Matching Method: First systematic combination of POWHEG fixed-order framework with JETHAD high-energy resummation framework, achieving NLL/NLO⁻ precision
  2. Resolved Theoretical Consistency Issues: Through precise subtraction of double-counting contributions, resolved tension between pure HyF predictions and fixed-order results in the moderate pₜ region
  3. Provided LHC and FCC Predictions: Detailed predictions for Higgs+jet rapidity interval (ΔY) and transverse momentum (pₕ) spectra at 14 TeV LHC and 100 TeV FCC energies
  4. Quantified Resummation Effects: Systematic analysis of high-energy resummation contributions across different kinematic regions, finding 30-50% corrections in the peak region
  5. Extended to Electroweak Bosons: Laid foundation for similar analysis of Z boson plus jet processes

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Calculate differential cross sections for Higgs boson (or Z boson) production accompanied by jets in proton-proton collisions:

  • Input: Proton beam energy √s, PDF sets, renormalization/factorization scales
  • Output: Differential cross sections dσ/dΔY and dσ/dpₕ
  • Kinematic Constraints:
    • Higgs transverse momentum: 10 < pₕ < 2Mₜ GeV
    • Jet transverse momentum: 20 < pⱼ < 60 GeV (ΔY spectrum) or 35 < pⱼ < 60 GeV (pₕ spectrum)
    • Rapidity range: |yₕ| < 2.5, |yⱼ| < 4.7

Theoretical Framework

Hybrid Factorization (HyF) Form

In the HyF framework, the cross section is expressed as: σ=∫dxadxb fa(xa)fb(xb) Ca⊗GNLL⊗Cb\sigma = \int dx_a dx_b \, f_a(x_a) f_b(x_b) \, \mathcal{C}_a \otimes \mathcal{G}_{\text{NLL}} \otimes \mathcal{C}_b

Where:

  • fa,bf_{a,b}: Collinear parton distribution functions (PDFs)
  • Ca,b\mathcal{C}_{a,b}: Emission functions (impact factors), further factorable into convolutions of PDFs and hard scattering coefficient functions
  • GNLL\mathcal{G}_{\text{NLL}}: NLL BFKL Green's function, resumming energy logarithms

Matching Formula

The core matching strategy of this paper can be expressed as:

dσNLL/NLO−(ΔY,ϕ,s)=dσNLO(ΔY,ϕ,s)+[dσNLL−(ΔY,ϕ,s)−ΔdσNLL/NLO−(ΔY,ϕ,s)]\boxed{ \begin{aligned} d\sigma^{\text{NLL/NLO}^-}(\Delta Y, \phi, s) &= d\sigma^{\text{NLO}}(\Delta Y, \phi, s) \\ &\quad + \left[d\sigma^{\text{NLL}^-}(\Delta Y, \phi, s) - \Delta d\sigma^{\text{NLL/NLO}^-}(\Delta Y, \phi, s)\right] \end{aligned} }

Meaning of Each Term:

  1. dσ^NLO (gray): Pure fixed-order NLO prediction generated via POWHEG (without parton shower)
  2. dσ^NLL⁻ (red): Complete NLL⁻ high-energy resummation prediction computed via JETHAD (based on HyF)
  3. Δdσ^NLL/NLO⁻ (orange): Expansion of NLL⁻ resummation at NLO order, i.e., O(αₛ³) truncation
  4. Bracketed Term (blue): Pure resummation contribution after removing double-counting
  5. dσ^NLL/NLO⁻ (green): Final matched result

Technical Implementation Details

BFKL Resummation

  • Employs Balitsky-Fadin-Kuraev-Lipatov (BFKL) equation 4,5 for energy logarithm resummation
  • At NLL precision, resummation takes the form αsnln⁡n−1(s/Q2)\alpha_s^n \ln^{n-1}(s/Q^2) logarithmic terms
  • BFKL Green's function describes gluon ladder evolution in rapidity space

Precision Levels

  • NLL/NLO⁺: Both emission functions at NLO precision (target precision, not yet fully implemented)
  • NLL/NLO⁻: One emission function at NLO, the other at LO (current precision in this paper)
  • Limitation Reason: Complete NLO corrections to Higgs emission function 68-71 not yet integrated into JETHAD framework

Subtraction Scheme

Through precise expansion of NLL⁻ resummation to fixed order, identifies and subtracts contributions overlapping with NLO fixed order, ensuring:

  • In small ΔY region: Results approach fixed-order predictions
  • In large ΔY region: Resummation effects dominate
  • In intermediate region: Smooth transition

Technical Innovations

  1. Dual Framework Integration: First seamless combination of event generator-level fixed-order calculations (POWHEG) with analytical resummation (JETHAD)
  2. Precise Subtraction: Identifies double-counting through analytical expansion, avoiding inconsistencies from naive addition
  3. Multi-Scale Treatment: Correctly handles both collinear logarithms (DGLAP) and energy logarithms (BFKL) simultaneously
  4. Differential Predictions: Maintains capability for fully differential cross section calculations
  5. Systematic Uncertainties: Evaluates theoretical uncertainties through renormalization/factorization scale variations (1 < Cμ < 2)

Experimental Setup

Datasets and Inputs

  • PDF Set: NNPDF4.0_nlo
  • Collision Energy:
    • LHC: √s = 14 TeV
    • FCC (nominal): √s = 100 TeV
  • Higgs Mass: Standard Model value
  • Top Quark Mass: Mₜ ≈ 173 GeV

Kinematic Cuts

Rapidity Interval Spectrum (Figure 1):

  • Higgs transverse momentum: 10 < pₕ < 2Mₜ GeV
  • Jet transverse momentum: 20 < pⱼ < 60 GeV
  • Rapidity range: |yₕ| < 2.5, |yⱼ| < 4.7
  • Rapidity interval: ΔY = yₕ - yⱼ ∈ 2, 6

Transverse Momentum Spectrum (Figure 2):

  • Jet transverse momentum: 35 < pⱼ < 60 GeV
  • Rapidity range: Same as above
  • Fixed rapidity interval: ΔY = 3
  • Higgs transverse momentum: pₕ ∈ 10, 200 GeV

Computational Tools

  • JETHAD v0.5.0m: High-energy resummation calculation framework 55,59,72-74
  • POWHEG: NLO fixed-order matrix element generation 79-81
  • Without Parton Shower: To isolate pure effects of fixed order and resummation

Theoretical Uncertainty Assessment

  • Scale Variation: Simultaneous variation of renormalization and factorization scales, Cμ ∈ 1, 2
  • Central Scale Choice: Typical hard scale (e.g., transverse momentum)
  • Uncertainty Bands: Shaded regions in figures represent scale variation ranges

Experimental Results

Main Results

Rapidity Interval Spectrum (Figure 1)

14 TeV LHC (Left Panel):

  • Cross Section Magnitude: Decreases from ~10 pb at ΔY=2 to ~0.1 pb at ΔY=6
  • Resummation Enhancement: res./exp. ratio increases monotonically from ~0.8 at ΔY=2 to ~1.2 at ΔY=6
    • Indicates significant resummation effects in large rapidity interval region (~20% enhancement)
  • Matching Quality: match./res. ratio approaches 1 at large ΔY
    • Indicates that at high-energy limit, resummation contributions dominate and fixed-order corrections become secondary
  • Theoretical Uncertainty: Scale variation induces uncertainty of approximately 10-15%

100 TeV FCC (Right Panel):

  • Cross Section Magnitude: Approximately one order of magnitude higher than LHC (~100 pb at ΔY=2)
  • Qualitative Behavior: Similar to LHC but effects less pronounced
  • Phase Space Effects: Wider phase space relatively suppresses resummation effects
  • Uncertainty: Comparable to LHC

Transverse Momentum Spectrum (Figure 2)

14 TeV LHC (Left Panel):

  • Peak Position: Approximately at pₕ ~ 50-70 GeV
  • Resummation Corrections: match./f.o. ratio shows:
    • Peak region: 30-50% enhancement
    • Low pₕ region (< 50 GeV): More significant corrections
    • High pₕ region (> 100 GeV): Ratio approaches 1
  • Uncertainty Growth: Uncertainty band significantly widens in high pₕ region
    • Reflects increasing importance of collinear logarithms (DGLAP) and threshold effects
  • Key Improvement: Tension in high pₕ tail compared to reference 18 Figure 8 is noticeably reduced

100 TeV FCC (Right Panel):

  • Cross Section Magnitude: 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than LHC
  • Peak Position: Slightly shifts toward higher pₕ
  • Correction Pattern: Qualitatively similar to LHC but quantitatively more moderate
  • High pₕ Behavior: match./f.o. ratio remains closer to 1 across entire range

Key Physical Insights

  1. Importance of Energy Logarithms:
    • In large ΔY region (ΔY > 4), resummation contribution of energy logarithms ln(s/pₜ²) reaches 20%
    • Effects strengthen with increasing √s, but relative contributions are diluted by phase space expansion
  2. Transverse Momentum Dependence:
    • Peak region (pₕ ~ pⱼ): Energy logarithms most important, 30-50% corrections
    • Corresponds to optimal multi-Regge kinematics configuration
    • High pₕ region: Collinear and threshold logarithms dominate
  3. Matching Consistency:
    • Successfully eliminates inconsistency between pure HyF and fixed order in moderate pₜ
    • Achieves smooth transition across all kinematic regions

Comparison with Existing Results

  • vs. Pure NLO: Provides significant improvement in semi-hard region
  • vs. Pure NLL: Maintains correct normalization in fixed-order dominated region
  • vs. Reference 18: Resolves tension in high pₕ tail
  • vs. NNLO Fixed Order 64-66: Complements with energy logarithm effects, mutually supplementary

Related Work

BFKL and High-Energy Resummation

  1. Theoretical Foundation:
    • BFKL equation 4,5: Fundamental framework of high-energy QCD
    • Development history of LL and NLL precision
  2. Application Fields 6-17:
    • Low-x gluon density probing
    • Forward physics processes
    • High-energy QCD phenomenology

Hybrid Factorization Framework

  1. HyF Development 18,19:
    • Unified treatment of collinear and high-energy dynamics
    • Related methods for single particle production 20-22
  2. Successful Applications:
    • Mueller-Navelet jet correlations 24-30
    • Forward Drell-Yan processes 31,32
    • Light and heavy-light hadrons 33-51
    • Quarkonia and exotic hadrons 51-62

Higgs+Jet Theoretical Studies

  1. Fixed-Order Calculations:
    • NNLO precision 64-66: Current highest fixed order
    • Complete NLO QCD corrections
  2. Resummation Techniques:
    • Transverse momentum logarithm resummation 67: Next-to-NLL precision
    • Soft gluon resummation 85-87: Threshold region
  3. Emission Function Calculations:
    • NLO corrections to Higgs impact factor 68-71
    • Two-loop Higgs impact factor 23: Next-to-NLL precision

Matching Methods

  1. POWHEG Formalism 79-81:
    • Standard method for NLO and parton shower matching
    • Event generator level implementation
  2. Alternative Matching Schemes:
    • Combination of high-energy and collinear resummation 21,22
    • MC@NLO and other frameworks

Relative Advantages of This Work

  1. Systematicity: First systematic combination of fixed-order event generation with high-energy analytical resummation
  2. Precision: Achieves NLL/NLO⁻ precision, paving way for NLL/NLO⁺
  3. Consistency: Resolves tensions from previous methods
  4. Universality: Method extensible to other electroweak boson processes

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Methodological Achievement:
    • Successfully developed POWHEG+JETHAD matching strategy
    • Achieved NLL/NLO⁻ precision Higgs+jet predictions
    • Systematically eliminated double-counting, ensuring theoretical consistency
  2. Physical Results:
    • Rapidity interval spectrum: ~20% resummation enhancement in large ΔY region
    • Transverse momentum spectrum: 30-50% corrections in peak region
    • FCC energy effects qualitatively similar but quantitatively more moderate
  3. Theoretical Improvements:
    • Significantly reduced tension between pure HyF and fixed order
    • Provides reliable predictions across entire kinematic range
    • Supports precision Higgs physics with solid theory

Limitations

  1. Precision Constraints:
    • Currently only achieves NLL/NLO⁻ precision (one emission function at LO)
    • Complete NLO Higgs emission function not yet integrated
  2. Kinematic Range:
    • Increased uncertainty in high pₜ region
    • Collinear and threshold logarithms require additional treatment
    • Extremely low pₜ region may require transverse momentum resummation
  3. Process Coverage:
    • Z boson results preliminary in nature
    • W boson and other electroweak processes not yet included
  4. Finite Mass Effects:
    • Complete treatment of heavy quark mass effects 88-91 still in progress
    • Currently uses effective field theory approximation
  5. Uncertainty Assessment:
    • Only considers scale variation uncertainties
    • PDF uncertainties not included
    • Higher-order uncertainty estimates potentially incomplete

Future Directions

The paper explicitly proposes the following development plans:

  1. Precision Enhancement:
    • Complete NLL/NLO⁺ Implementation: Integrate complete NLO Higgs emission function 68-71
    • Next-to-NLL Precision: Utilize two-loop impact factor 23
  2. Physical Effects:
    • Finite Mass Effects: Complete treatment including heavy quark masses 88-91
    • Electroweak Corrections: Systematic inclusion of electroweak loop corrections
  3. Process Extension:
    • Complete Z Boson Analysis: From preliminary results to full predictions
    • W Boson: Extension to charged current processes
    • Diboson Production: VV+jet processes
  4. Technical Development:
    • Parton Shower Matching: Incorporate PS effects for hadronization
    • NLO+PS+NLL: Triple matching
    • Uncertainty Quantification: More systematic error assessment
  5. Phenomenological Applications:
    • LHC Run 3 Data Comparison: Comparison with latest experimental data
    • FCC Studies: Provide benchmark predictions for future collider
    • New Physics Searches: Utilize improved predictions for beyond-Standard-Model signal discovery

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Methodological Innovation:
    • Novel Matching: First systematic combination of POWHEG and JETHAD, filling gap in the field
    • Theoretical Rigor: Precise treatment of double-counting, ensuring consistency across kinematic regions
    • Universal Framework: Method generalizable to other processes with broad applicability
  2. Technical Implementation:
    • Numerical Stability: Robust results across wide kinematic range
    • Uncertainty Assessment: Systematic scale variation study
    • Open-Source Tools: Based on public JETHAD framework, strong reproducibility
  3. Physical Insights:
    • Multi-Scale Understanding: Clear demonstration of relative importance of energy logarithms and collinear logarithms in different regions
    • Quantitative Predictions: Specific correction magnitudes (30-50% at peak)
    • Future Colliders: Provides critical input for FCC physics case
  4. Presentation Quality:
    • Clear Figures: Ratio plots intuitively show contributions of each component
    • Consistent Notation: Clear correspondence between formula (1) and figure legends
    • Physical Interpretation: Each result has clear physical explanation

Weaknesses

  1. Precision Limitations:
    • Asymmetric Precision: NLL/NLO⁻ rather than complete NLL/NLO⁺
    • Single-Loop Bottleneck: NLO corrections to Higgs emission function not fully integrated
    • Insufficient Impact Assessment: Lack of quantification of expected improvements from upgrade to NLO⁺
  2. Uncertainty Analysis:
    • Single Source: Only considers scale variation
    • Missing PDF Uncertainties: Important omission for precision physics
    • Higher-Order Estimates: Lacks discussion of NNLO or N²LL estimates
  3. Kinematic Coverage:
    • High pₜ Uncertainty: Significant uncertainty increase in high transverse momentum region but lacks detailed discussion
    • Extreme Regions: Reliability in extremely low pₜ and extremely large ΔY not fully verified
    • Cut Dependence: Insufficient systematic study of different cut choices
  4. Experimental Comparison:
    • Missing Experimental Data: No comparison with existing LHC data (possibly due to data limitations)
    • Observable Selection: No discussion of experimentally optimal observables
    • Detector Effects: Experimental acceptance and resolution not considered
  5. Z Boson Analysis:
    • Preliminary Nature: Z+jet results only mentioned in abstract, virtually no detailed presentation in main text
    • Unfulfilled Promise: Title mentions Z boson but content almost entirely Higgs
  6. Theoretical Discussion:
    • Relation to Other Resummations: Insufficient discussion of interplay with transverse momentum resummation 67
    • Power Corrections: Non-logarithmic higher-order corrections not addressed
    • Small-x Evolution: Interface with DGLAP evolution not detailed

Impact

  1. Contribution to Field:
    • Methodological Benchmark: Establishes new standard for high-energy resummation and fixed-order matching
    • Higgs Physics: Provides critical theoretical input for LHC Run 3 and HL-LHC Higgs precision measurements
    • FCC Studies: Important predictions for 100 TeV future collider physics case
  2. Practical Value:
    • Short Term: Direct application to LHC data interpretation, especially forward detectors (CASTOR, ZDC)
    • Medium Term: Supports HL-LHC precision electroweak measurement programs
    • Long Term: Provides theoretical foundation for FCC design and physics studies
  3. Reproducibility:
    • Tool Availability: Based on public JETHAD framework
    • Method Transparency: Formula (1) clearly defines matching procedure
    • Parameter Clarity: All cuts and input parameters explicitly specified
    • Potential Obstacles: POWHEG-JETHAD interface may require specialized development
  4. Citation Potential:
    • Methodological Citations: Expected to become standard reference for high-energy matching
    • Phenomenological Citations: Theory reference for experimental groups analyzing Higgs+jet data
    • Review Citations: Important literature for future high-energy QCD and Higgs physics reviews

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Ideal Applications:
    • Large Rapidity Intervals: ΔY > 3 processes where energy logarithms dominate
    • Semi-Hard Scales: pₜ in tens to hundreds of GeV, avoiding extreme regions
    • Forward Physics: One particle central, another forward
    • LHC and FCC: High-energy proton collider environments
  2. Cautious Use:
    • High pₜ Tail: pₜ > 200 GeV, requires additional threshold resummation
    • Extremely Low pₜ: pₜ < 20 GeV, may require transverse momentum resummation
    • Small Rapidity Intervals: ΔY < 2, fixed order may suffice
    • Heavy-Ion Collisions: Requires nuclear PDF and saturation effects
  3. Inapplicable Scenarios:
    • Pure Threshold Region: Near production threshold, soft gluon resummation more important
    • Extreme Small-x Region: Requires nonlinear small-x evolution (CGC)
    • Hadronization-Sensitive Processes: Requires complete parton shower and hadronization model
    • Precise Normalization: Current NLL/NLO⁻ precision may be insufficient
  4. Extension Directions:
    • Other Electroweak Bosons: W, Z, γ + jet
    • Diboson Production: VV + jet (V = W, Z, γ, H)
    • Heavy Quarks: top/bottom + jet
    • New Physics: Supersymmetric particles, new gauge bosons, etc.

Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality theoretical physics methodology paper making important progress in matching high-energy QCD with fixed-order calculations. Main strengths include:

  • Filling methodological gaps
  • Solving practical physics problems (HyF vs. fixed-order tension)
  • Providing critical tools for precision Higgs physics

Main limitations are current precision (NLL/NLO⁻) and missing Z boson analysis. However, the paper clearly outlines development roadmap and the methodological framework is established.

Recommendation Index: ★★★★☆ (4/5)

  • For high-energy QCD theorists: Must read
  • For Higgs phenomenology researchers: Important reference
  • For experimental physicists: Valuable theoretical predictions
  • For general high-energy physics readers: Technically demanding but important impact

Selected References

Core Methodology Literature

  • 18 F. G. Celiberto et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 293 (2021) - First HyF application to Higgs+jet
  • 79-81 POWHEG series - Standard method for NLO and parton shower matching
  • 4,5 BFKL equation original papers - Theoretical foundation of high-energy resummation

Higgs Physics Related

  • 64-66 NNLO Higgs+jet calculations - Current highest fixed-order precision
  • 67 P. F. Monni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 252001 (2020) - Transverse momentum logarithm resummation
  • 68-71 Higgs emission function NLO corrections - Critical input for future NLL/NLO⁺

FCC Physics Case

  • 1-3 FCC Conceptual Design Report series (2025) - Future 100 TeV collider planning

Report Generation Note: This report is based on in-depth analysis of the full paper, including methodology details, numerical results, and physical interpretation. Evaluation aims for objectivity, acknowledging both innovative contributions and improvement opportunities.