2025-11-23T09:46:17.410003

Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes

Robin, Savage
Non-local magic and anti-flatness provide a measure of the quantum complexity in the wavefunction of a physical system. Supported by entanglement, they cannot be removed by local unitary operations, thus providing basis-independent measures, and sufficiently large values underpin the need for quantum computers in order to perform precise simulations of the system at scale. Towards a better understanding of the quantum-complexity generation by fundamental interactions, the building blocks of many-body systems, we consider non-local magic and anti-flatness in two-particle scattering processes, specifically focusing on low-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering and high-energy Moller scattering. We find that the non-local magic induced in both interactions is four times the anti-flatness (which is found to be true for any two-qubit wavefunction), and verify the relation between the Clifford-averaged anti-flatness and total magic. For these processes, the anti-flatness is a more experimentally accessible quantity as it can be determined from one of the final-state particles, and does not require spin correlations. While the MOLLER experiment at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility does not include final-state spin measurements, the results presented here may add motivation to consider their future inclusion.
academic

Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.23426
  • Title: Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes
  • Authors: Caroline E. P. Robin (Universität Bielefeld & GSI Helmholtzzentrum), Martin J. Savage (University of Washington)
  • Categories: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), nucl-th (Nuclear Theory)
  • Publication Date: October 28, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23426
  • Institution Code: IQuS@UW-21-111

Abstract

This paper investigates non-local magic and anti-flatness in two-particle scattering processes, which are important measures of quantum wavefunction complexity. The research focuses on low-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering and high-energy Møller scattering (electron-electron scattering), discovering that non-local magic is precisely four times the anti-flatness (for arbitrary two-qubit wavefunctions), and verifying the relationship between Clifford-averaged anti-flatness and total magic. Importantly, anti-flatness can be determined by measuring individual final-state particle spins without requiring spin correlations, making it experimentally more accessible.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

  1. Generation mechanisms of quantum complexity: Understanding how fundamental interactions produce quantum complexity in few-body and many-body systems is key to designing efficient quantum simulation strategies.
  2. Complexity measures beyond entanglement: Neither entanglement entropy nor magic alone fully captures quantum state complexity. Both high-entanglement low-magic states and high-magic low-entanglement states can be efficiently prepared using classical resources. True quantum complexity is driven by their interplay.
  3. Physical significance of non-local magic: Non-local magic represents magic that cannot be eliminated through local operations, representing the system's intrinsic quantum complexity and being a key feature for future quantum advantage.

Research Importance

  • Quantum simulation requirements: Systems with sufficiently large non-local magic require quantum computers for large-scale accurate simulation
  • Fundamental physics understanding: Revealing the different capabilities of strong and electromagnetic interactions in generating quantum complexity
  • Experimental feasibility: Anti-flatness is more easily measured than non-local magic, providing a viable pathway for experimental verification

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • Computing non-local magic requires minimization over local operations with rapidly growing computational cost
  • Previous research primarily focused on total magic or entanglement entropy, insufficiently considering the separation of local and non-local magic
  • Lack of systematic comparison of different fundamental interactions' abilities to generate quantum complexity

Core Contributions

  1. Discovery of exact relationship: Proves that for arbitrary two-qubit states, non-local linear magic equals exactly four times anti-flatness: Mlin(NL)(∣ψ⟩)=4FA(∣ψ⟩)M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}}(|\psi\rangle) = 4 F_A(|\psi\rangle)
  2. Verification of theoretical relationships: Numerically verifies the relationship between Clifford-averaged anti-flatness and total magic: ⟨FA(Γ∣ψ⟩)⟩C=c(d,dA)Mlin(∣ψ⟩)\langle F_A(\Gamma|\psi\rangle)\rangle_C = c(d, d_A) M_{\text{lin}}(|\psi\rangle), where c(4,2)=1/10c(4,2) = 1/10
  3. Revelation of physical differences: Discovers significant differences between nuclear force and quantum electrodynamics in generating non-local magic:
    • Nucleon-nucleon scattering can disentangle maximally entangled states and produce non-local magic
    • Møller scattering cannot disentangle maximally entangled initial states, with all produced magic being local
  4. Proposal of experimental scheme: Demonstrates that anti-flatness can be obtained through measuring individual final-state particle spins, providing motivation for including spin measurements in experiments like MOLLER
  5. Systematic classification analysis: Groups 60 stabilizer states and systematically analyzes the magic, entanglement, and anti-flatness characteristics of different initial state groups after scattering

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework

Stabilizer Rényi Entropy and Magic

The paper employs linear magic measure MlinM_{\text{lin}}, based on expectation values of generalized Pauli operators:

ΞP=cP2/d,cP=⟨ψ∣P^∣ψ⟩\Xi_P = c_P^2/d, \quad c_P = \langle\psi|\hat{P}|\psi\rangle

where P^ij=σi⊗σj\hat{P}_{ij} = \sigma_i \otimes \sigma_j, σ∈{X^,Y^,Z^,I^}\sigma \in \{\hat{X}, \hat{Y}, \hat{Z}, \hat{I}\}.

Linear magic is defined as: Mlin(∣ψ⟩)=1−ξ,ξ=d∑PΞP2M_{\text{lin}}(|\psi\rangle) = 1 - \xi, \quad \xi = d\sum_P \Xi_P^2

For stabilizer states, ξ=1\xi = 1, thus Mlin=0M_{\text{lin}} = 0; non-stabilizer states satisfy 1/d2≤ξ<11/d^2 \leq \xi < 1.

Non-Local Magic

Non-local magic is defined through minimization over local unitary transformations:

Mi(NL)(∣ψ⟩)=min⁡U^A⊗U^B[Mi(NL)(U^A⊗U^B∣ψ⟩)]M^{(NL)}_i(|\psi\rangle) = \min_{\hat{U}_A\otimes\hat{U}_B} [M^{(NL)}_i(\hat{U}_A \otimes \hat{U}_B |\psi\rangle)]

This is a basis-independent quantity, equivalent to optimizing six Euler angles on two Bloch spheres for two-qubit systems.

Anti-Flatness

Anti-flatness is defined as the variance of the reduced density matrix:

FA(∣ψ⟩)=⟨ρA2⟩−⟨ρA⟩2=Tr(ρA3)−(TrρA2)2F_A(|\psi\rangle) = \langle\rho_A^2\rangle - \langle\rho_A\rangle^2 = \text{Tr}(\rho_A^3) - (\text{Tr}\rho_A^2)^2

where ρA=TrBρAB\rho_A = \text{Tr}_B \rho_{AB}. Anti-flatness vanishes when the entanglement spectrum is flat (no entanglement or no magic).

Scattering Process Modeling

Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering

The S-matrix form for low-energy S-wave nucleon-nucleon scattering:

e^{2i\delta_1} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & \frac{1}{2}(e^{2i\delta_1} + e^{2i\delta_0}) & \frac{1}{2}(e^{2i\delta_1} - e^{2i\delta_0}) & 0\\ 0 & \frac{1}{2}(e^{2i\delta_1} - e^{2i\delta_0}) & \frac{1}{2}(e^{2i\delta_1} + e^{2i\delta_0}) & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & e^{2i\delta_1} \end{pmatrix}$$ where $\delta_{0,1}$ are phase shifts in the S=0 and S=1 spin channels. #### Møller Scattering In the high-energy limit ($m_e \to 0$), the helicity amplitude matrix is: $$\mathcal{A} \propto \begin{pmatrix} -8\csc^2(\theta) & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -2\cot^2(\theta/2) & 2\tan^2(\theta/2) & 0\\ 0 & 2\tan^2(\theta/2) & -2\cot^2(\theta/2) & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -8\csc^2(\theta) \end{pmatrix}$$ The final-state wavefunction is $|\chi\rangle = \mathcal{N}\mathcal{A}|\psi\rangle$ (normalized). ### Magic Power Definition To isolate interaction-induced changes, the average magic power is defined: $$M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}}(\hat{S}) = \frac{1}{36}\sum_{i=1}^{36} M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}}(\hat{S}|\psi_i\rangle)$$ $$F_A(\hat{S}) = \frac{1}{36}\sum_{i=1}^{36} F_A(\hat{S}|\psi_i\rangle)$$ Averaging only over 36 tensor product stabilizer states (excluding entangled states) isolates entanglement generation effects. ## Experimental Setup ### Stabilizer State Classification The paper systematically studies 60 two-qubit stabilizer states (Table I): - **36 tensor product states**: Constructed from tensor products of 6 single-qubit stabilizer states - **24 entangled states**: Maximally entangled but magic-free stabilizer states ### Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering Groups **Group-1** (6 tensor product states, 6 entangled states): - Representative state: $|\psi_1\rangle = |\uparrow\rangle \otimes |\uparrow\rangle$ - Characteristic: $M_{\text{lin}} = M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = F_A = 0$ (produces no magic) **Group-2** (6 tensor product states, 6 entangled states): - Representative state: $|\psi_2\rangle = |\uparrow\rangle \otimes |\downarrow\rangle$ - Characteristic: $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = M_{\text{lin}} = \frac{1}{4}\sin^2(4\Delta\delta)$ (all non-local magic) **Group-3** (24 tensor product states, 8 entangled states): - Representative state: $|\psi_3\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|\uparrow\rangle + |\downarrow\rangle] \otimes |\uparrow\rangle$ - Characteristic: $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = \frac{1}{3}M_{\text{lin}}$ (non-local magic comprises 1/3 of total magic) where $\Delta\delta = \delta_1 - \delta_0$ is the phase shift difference. ### Møller Scattering Groups Divided into five main groups (Group-1 through Group-5), with Group-5 further subdivided into 5a and 5b: - **Group-1,2,3,4**: Final states contain only non-local magic ($M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = M_{\text{lin}}$) - **Group-5a,5b**: Final states contain both local and non-local magic ### Numerical Methods - Uses Nijmegen Nijm93 phase shift data (fitted to experimental data) - Computes non-local magic through optimization over 6 Euler angles - Estimates Clifford average using $5\times 10^3$ random Clifford gate samples ## Experimental Results ### Main Findings in Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering #### Quantitative Relationships In all cases, the following is verified: $$4F_A(\hat{S}) = M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}}(\hat{S}) = \frac{1}{48}(11 + 5\cos(4\Delta\delta))\sin^2(2\Delta\delta)$$ Total magic power is: $$M_{\text{lin}}(\hat{S}) = \frac{3}{20}(3 + \cos(4\Delta\delta))\sin^2(2\Delta\delta)$$ #### Momentum Dependence (Figure 1) - In the region $p_{\text{lab}} \lesssim 150$ MeV, approximately 1/3 of magic is non-local - Entanglement power: $E(\hat{S}) = \frac{1}{6}\sin^2(2\Delta\delta)$ - The ratio of non-local magic to total magic varies with momentum #### Effects of Entangled Initial States - Group-1 and Group-2: Non-local magic produced from entangled initial states equals that from non-entangled states - Group-3: Entangled initial states produce larger non-local magic with different structure - Nuclear force's disentangling ability is comparable to or stronger than its entangling ability (Figure 5) ### Main Findings in Møller Scattering #### Analytical Results for Each Group **Group-2** (total magic): $$M_{\text{lin}} = \frac{64\sin^4(\theta)\cos^2(\theta)}{(\cos(2\theta) + 3)^4}$$ **Group-3**: $$M_{\text{lin}} = \frac{1024\sin^4(\theta)(20\cos(2\theta) + \cos(4\theta) + 43)^2}{(12\cos(2\theta) + \cos(4\theta) + 51)^4}$$ **Group-5a** (non-local magic): $$M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = \frac{256\sin^4(\theta)(\cos(2\theta) + 15)^2(28\cos(2\theta) + \cos(4\theta) + 35)}{(\cos(2\theta) + 7)^8}$$ #### Angular Dependence (Figure 2) - Entanglement reaches maximum at $\theta = \pi/2$ (consistent with references [1,2]) - Magic peaks occur at different angles than entanglement, showing more complex structure - Magic in Group-1 through Group-4 is entirely non-local #### Key Physical Differences When scattering from entangled initial states (Figure 4): - **Møller scattering**: Produces no non-local magic; particles remain maximally entangled; final state is a stabilizer state in different local bases - **NN scattering**: Can disentangle maximally entangled particles and produce non-local magic - Disentanglement power: Møller scattering ≈ 0, NN scattering comparable to entanglement power ### Clifford Average Verification Figure 3 verifies the theoretical relationship: $$\langle F_A(\Gamma|\chi\rangle)\rangle_C = \frac{1}{10}M_{\text{lin}}(|\chi\rangle)$$ For final states of Group-5a and 5b, statistical results from $5\times 10^3$ random Clifford gate samples perfectly match theoretical predictions. ### Experimental Feasibility Analysis #### Anti-Flatness Measurement The reduced density matrix can be reconstructed from single-particle spin measurements: $$\rho_A = \frac{1}{2}\sum_i \langle\sigma_i\rangle_A \sigma_i$$ Measuring spin components in three orthogonal directions suffices to estimate anti-flatness. #### Candidate States for Experiments **NN scattering**: - Group-1: $|\uparrow\rangle \otimes |\uparrow\rangle$ - Group-2: $|\uparrow\rangle \otimes |\downarrow\rangle$ - Group-3: $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|\uparrow\rangle + |\downarrow\rangle] \otimes |\uparrow\rangle$ (requires single-spin $\pi/2$ rotation) **Møller scattering**: Requires polarized initial state preparation capability (available in MOLLER experiment), but currently lacks final-state spin measurement. ## Related Work ### Entanglement Research Lineage 1. **Maximum entanglement discovery**: Cervera-Lierta et al. [1,2] discovered maximum entanglement in Standard Model scattering processes 2. **Symmetry emergence**: Beane et al. [3] connected entanglement fluctuation suppression to emergent global symmetries (beyond explicit Lagrangian symmetries) 3. **Nuclear physics applications**: Extended to large $N_c$ QCD limit [8], SU(N) spin-flavor symmetry groups [3,9], lattice QCD verification [10] ### Magic Research Progress 1. **Theoretical foundations**: Stabilizer Rényi entropy [46-50] provides practically computable magic measures 2. **Physical applications**: - Neutrino system dynamics [51] - Gauge theory thermalization [52] - High-energy particle production and scattering [54-58] - Nuclear and hypernuclear forces [59] - Nuclear structure [41] ### Non-Local Magic Theory 1. **Holographic theory**: Cao et al. [62] proved non-local magic induces gravitational backreaction, necessary for creating multipartite entanglement patterns 2. **Phase transition research**: Transverse-field Ising model [82], matter phases [85] 3. **Computational complexity**: Non-local magic drives quantum advantage [44,61,64-84] ### Anti-Flatness Research - Leone et al. [86,87] established relationships between anti-flatness and total magic - Applications to phase transition detection [89], scrambling [90], thermalization [52] - Provides lower bounds on non-local magic [62] ### Unique Contributions of This Paper - **First systematic comparison**: Different fundamental interactions' (strong vs. electromagnetic) abilities to generate quantum complexity - **Exact relationships**: $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$ holds for arbitrary two-qubit states - **Experiment-oriented**: Emphasizes experimental measurability of anti-flatness, proposes concrete measurement schemes ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Universal relationship**: Non-local linear magic is precisely four times anti-flatness, a relationship holding for arbitrary two-qubit wavefunctions 2. **Differences between fundamental forces**: - Nuclear force can disentangle maximally entangled states and produce non-local magic - Quantum electrodynamics (Møller scattering) cannot disentangle maximally entangled initial states; produced magic is entirely local 3. **Experimental feasibility**: Anti-flatness can be obtained through single-particle spin measurements, more easily implemented than CHSH measurements requiring two-particle spin correlations 4. **Symmetry connections**: Minimum entanglement power (identical or $\pi/2$-differing phase shifts) correlates with emergent symmetry, simultaneously minimizing non-local magic power ### Theoretical Significance #### Quantum Complexity Generation Mechanisms The research reveals different roles of fundamental interactions in quantum complexity generation: - **Strong interaction**: In low-energy nucleon scattering, approximately 1/3 of magic is non-local (at $p_{\text{lab}} \lesssim 150$ MeV) - **Electromagnetic interaction**: In high-energy Møller scattering, magic produced from entangled initial states is entirely local #### Symmetry and Quantum Complexity The paper conjectures deep connections between symmetry and quantum complexity: - Wigner SU(4) symmetry (nucleon-nucleon) and SU(16) symmetry (hyperon-nucleon) correspond to vanishing entanglement power - These symmetries simultaneously minimize non-local magic power - Since large-scale non-local magic states cannot be efficiently prepared with classical resources, this connection is more fundamental than pure entanglement ### Limitations 1. **Model simplifications**: - NN scattering considers only S-wave, excluding P-wave, SD mixing (tensor force), and higher partial waves - Møller scattering uses leading-order perturbation theory ($\mathcal{O}(e^2)$), excluding higher-order corrections 2. **System scale**: - Only two-particle systems studied; many-body effects not addressed - Definition and computation of non-local magic in many-body systems more complex 3. **Experimental conditions**: - MOLLER experiment currently lacks final-state spin measurement - Preparing specific stabilizer initial states in nucleon scattering may face technical challenges 4. **Theoretical completeness**: - Although $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$ relationship verified, lacks rigorous proof - Physical meaning of Clifford average requires further clarification ### Future Directions 1. **Theoretical extensions**: - Prove mathematical rigor of $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$ relationship - Extend to multi-qubit systems and multi-partition cases - Include more complete scattering amplitudes (higher-order corrections, more partial waves) 2. **Other physical processes**: - Study other QED processes (e.g., $e^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^-$) - Consider weak interaction and gravity contributions - Explore quantum complexity in heavy-ion collisions 3. **Experimental implementation**: - Add final-state spin measurement capability to MOLLER experiment - Design nucleon scattering experiments to verify theoretical predictions - Develop stabilizer state preparation and measurement techniques 4. **Many-body systems**: - Study how two-body scattering accumulates quantum complexity in many-body systems - Connect scattering processes to magic in nuclear structure - Explore magic's role in thermalization and phase transitions 5. **Quantum simulation**: - Use non-local magic to guide classical-quantum hybrid simulation strategies - Optimize quantum resource allocation - Design observables sensitive to magic ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths #### 1. Significant Theoretical Contributions - **Discovery of universal relationship**: $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$ for arbitrary two-qubit states is an important theoretical result - **Conceptual unification**: Unifies non-local magic, anti-flatness, entanglement, and symmetry in a single framework - **Physical insights**: Systematically reveals quantum information characteristics of different fundamental forces #### 2. Methodological Innovation - **Systematic classification**: Groups 60 stabilizer states, each with identical magic characteristics, simplifying analysis - **Analytical-numerical combination**: Provides analytical expressions for some cases, numerical optimization for complex ones - **Experiment-oriented**: Emphasizes experimental measurability of anti-flatness, proposes concrete initial state preparation and measurement schemes #### 3. Interdisciplinary Perspective - Integrates quantum information (stabilizer formalism, magic), nuclear physics (phase shift analysis), and high-energy physics (Møller scattering) - Provides new perspective for understanding quantum information characteristics of fundamental interactions - Connects theoretical physics to quantum computing resource requirements #### 4. Experimental Feasibility - Anti-flatness requires only single-particle measurements, more accessible than CHSH measurements requiring two-particle correlations - Proposed initial states are experimentally preparable stabilizer states - Provides clear motivation for including spin measurements in experiments like MOLLER ### Weaknesses #### 1. Theoretical Rigor - **Lack of proof**: Although $M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$ relationship extensively numerically verified, lacks analytical proof - **Universality boundaries**: Unclear whether this relationship holds only for two-qubits or extends to higher dimensions #### 2. Model Simplifications - **NN scattering**: Considers only S-wave, ignoring tensor force and other important effects, limiting applicability in actual energy ranges - **Møller scattering**: Leading-order approximation ignores radiative corrections and higher-order effects - **Unitarity**: T-matrix method maintains unitarity only to $\mathcal{O}(e^4)$ #### 3. Physical Interpretation Depth - **Mechanism understanding**: Why can nuclear force disentangle while electromagnetic force cannot? Underlying physical mechanisms insufficiently discussed - **Symmetry connections**: Entanglement/magic suppression and symmetry emergence connections remain speculative - **Many-body effects**: How two-body scattering results generalize to many-body systems unclear #### 4. Experimental Verification Challenges - **Current experiments**: MOLLER experiment doesn't measure final-state spins; short-term verification difficult - **Nuclear experiments**: Preparing specific polarized initial states and measuring final-state spins in nucleon scattering technically challenging - **Statistical precision**: Number of experimental events needed for reliable anti-flatness measurement not discussed ### Impact Assessment #### Contributions to the Field 1. **Quantum information and particle physics intersection**: - Opens new directions for understanding fundamental interactions using quantum information concepts - May influence research paradigms in quantum field theory and scattering theory 2. **Quantum simulation strategies**: - Non-local magic as resource requirement indicator guides quantum simulation algorithm design - Provides quantitative criteria for determining when quantum computers are necessary 3. **Experimental physics**: - Adds new measurement dimensions to high-energy and nuclear physics experiments - May drive upgrades to experiments like MOLLER to include spin measurements #### Practical Value - **Short-term**: Provides complexity assessment tools for quantum simulation researchers - **Medium-term**: Guides experimental design, particularly for polarized scattering experiments - **Long-term**: May influence understanding of quantum nature of fundamental interactions #### Reproducibility - **Excellent**: Provides detailed mathematical formulas, stabilizer state lists, numerical method descriptions - **Code availability**: Uses Mathematica; methods transparent - **Data sources**: Uses publicly available Nijmegen phase shift data ### Applicable Scenarios #### Direct Applications 1. **Two-particle scattering analysis**: Quantum complexity assessment for any two spin-1/2 particle scattering process 2. **Quantum simulation planning**: Determining whether simulating specific scattering processes requires quantum computers 3. **Experimental design**: Guiding initial state preparation and final-state measurements in polarized scattering experiments #### Potential Extensions 1. **Many-body nuclear systems**: Understanding magic sources in nuclear structure through two-body interactions 2. **Quantum field theory**: Extending to higher loops and non-perturbative effects 3. **Other spin systems**: Scattering processes in atomic, molecular, and condensed matter systems #### Inapplicable Scenarios 1. Strongly coupled systems (non-perturbative regions) 2. Many-body direct interactions (beyond two-body) 3. Open quantum systems (dissipative environments) ### Overall Assessment This is a **high-quality interdisciplinary theoretical work** making substantive contributions at the intersection of quantum information and particle/nuclear physics. Main highlights include: 1. **Discovery of new universal relationship** ($M^{(NL)}_{\text{lin}} = 4F_A$), though lacking rigorous proof, with sufficient numerical evidence 2. **Revelation of quantum information characteristic differences between different fundamental forces**, a finding potentially of profound physical significance 3. **Strong experimental orientation**, with proposed measurement schemes feasible and potentially driving experimental development Main weaknesses are theoretical rigor and depth of physical interpretation requiring strengthening, with experimental verification facing near-term challenges. The paper is suitable for publication in top-tier journals at the intersection of quantum information and high-energy/nuclear physics, valuable reference for both fields. Recommended future work priorities: 1. Prove mathematical rigor of core relationships 2. Deepen physical mechanism understanding 3. Promote experimental collaboration for verification ## Selected References 1. **Cervera-Lierta et al., SciPost Phys. 3, 036 (2017)**: First discovery of maximum entanglement in high-energy physics 2. **Beane et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 102001 (2019)**: Entanglement suppression and emergent symmetry 3. **Leone et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 050402 (2022)**: Introduction of stabilizer Rényi entropy 4. **Cao et al., arXiv:2403.07056 (2024)**: Non-local magic and gravitational backreaction 5. **Tirrito et al., Phys. Rev. A 109, L040401 (2024)**: Quantifying magic through entanglement spectrum flatness 6. **Robin & Savage, arXiv:2405.10268 (2024)**: Magic in nuclear and hypernuclear forces (authors' prior work)