The Euler characteristic of a triangulated manifold in terms of even-dimensional faces

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.23623
• Title: The Euler characteristic of a triangulated manifold in terms of even-dimensional faces
• Author: Alexey V. Gavrilov
• Classification: math.DG (Differential Geometry)
• Publication Date: October 29, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23623

Abstract

This paper presents a novel formula for the Euler characteristic of even-dimensional triangulated manifolds that depends only on the number of even-dimensional faces. Specifically, for an even-dimensional triangulated manifold M of dimension d, we have χ(M) = ∑(m=0 to d/2) c_m f_{2m}, where f_n denotes the number of n-dimensional faces. A remarkable feature of this formula is that the coefficients c_m are independent of the manifold's dimension d, exhibiting universality.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem Statement

The classical Euler characteristic formula is χ(M) = ∑(n=0 to ∞) (-1)^n f_n, involving faces of all dimensions. This paper aims to prove that for even-dimensional triangulated manifolds, computing the Euler characteristic requires only the count of even-dimensional faces.

2. Problem Significance

• Theoretical Value: The Euler characteristic is one of the most fundamental invariants in topology; any new formula for its computation carries theoretical significance
• Computational Simplification: For high-dimensional manifolds, the new formula reduces the required dimensional range from d+1 to d/2+1
• Structural Insight: The dimension-independence of the formula coefficients suggests underlying combinatorial or topological structures

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Classical formulas require computing faces of all dimensions
• Although Dehn-Sommerville relations provide linear relationships among f-numbers, they must be rederived for each specific dimension
• Previous formulas have coefficients dependent on manifold dimension, lacking universality

4. Research Motivation

Dehn-Sommerville relations reduce the dimension of the f-vector space from d+1 to d/2+1, naturally raising the question: does there exist a formula expressing the Euler characteristic using only even-dimensional f-numbers? Furthermore, do such formula coefficients possess universality?

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves that for even-dimensional semi-Eulerian complexes M, we have χ(M) = ∑(n=0 to d) β_n f_n, where coefficients β_n are defined by Bernoulli numbers and are independent of dimension d
2. Explicit Coefficient Formulas: Provides explicit formulas for coefficients: β_ = 4(2n-1)B_n/n, where B_n are Bernoulli numbers; odd-dimensional coefficients β_n = 0 (except β_{-1} = -2)
3. Generalization to Manifolds with Boundary: Proves that for even-dimensional PL manifolds with boundary, χ(M) = ∑(n=0 to d) β_n(f_n(M) - (1/2)f_n(∂M))
4. Unified Theoretical Framework: Provides a unified framework for understanding Dehn-Sommerville relations and Euler characteristic through h-numbers and polynomial identities

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input: The f-vector (f_0, f_1, ..., f_d) of a triangulated manifold M of even dimension d, where f_n is the number of n-dimensional faces

Output: The Euler characteristic χ(M)

Constraints: M must be a semi-Eulerian complex (the link of any n-dimensional face has the same Euler characteristic as the corresponding dimensional sphere)

Core Mathematical Structures

1. Semi-Eulerian Complexes

Definition: A pure simplicial complex where the link of any n-dimensional face has the same Euler characteristic 1-(-1)^{d+n} as the sphere S^{d-n-1}.

Key Property: Any simplicial complex homeomorphic to a closed manifold is a semi-Eulerian complex (because links have the same homology groups as corresponding spheres).

2. Polynomial Formulation of Dehn-Sommerville Relations

Lemma 1: Define the polynomial p(z) = (1/2)χ(M) + ∑(n=0 to d) f_n z^{n+1}

For even-dimensional semi-Eulerian complexes, this polynomial satisfies the functional equation:

p(z) + (-1)^d p(-1-z) = 0

This identity is an equivalent formulation of Dehn-Sommerville relations, derived from the standard form of h-numbers.

3. Construction of Linear Functionals

Lemma 2: Define a linear map θ: Rz → R such that θ(z^n) = β_

This functional possesses two key properties:

• For polynomials p satisfying p(z) + p(-1-z) = 0, we have θ(p) = 0
• For even polynomials q, we have θ(q) = -2q(0)
• These two properties uniquely determine θ

Proof Strategy

Step One: Establishing Polynomial Identities

From the standard form of Dehn-Sommerville relations:

h_{d+1-n} - h_n = (-1)^n (d+1 choose n)(χ(M) - χ(S^d))

Through the relationship between h-numbers and f-numbers (F(x^{-1}) = ∑h_n x^{d+1-n}, where F(x) = x^{d+1} + ∑f_n x^{d-n}), we derive the polynomial identity of Lemma 1.

Step Two: Constructing Special Linear Functionals

Prove the existence and uniqueness of a linear functional θ whose values on z^n are determined by Bernoulli numbers and satisfy:

• Maps polynomials with symmetry relations to 0
• Maps even polynomials to -2 times their constant term

Step Three: Verifying Functional Properties

The key is proving θ(p) = 0, where p(z) = (1+2z)^m for odd m. Computing:

θ(p) = ∑(n=0 to m) 2^n (m choose n) θ(z^n) 
     = 4∑(n=1 to m+1) (m choose n-1) 2^{n-1}(2n-1)B_n/n
     = 2m! S_m

where S_m is the coefficient of z^{m+1} in the Taylor expansion of -z/cosh(z). Since this function is odd, even-power coefficients vanish.

Step Four: Application to Euler Characteristic

Applying θ to the polynomial p(z) from Lemma 1:

θ(p) = -χ(M) + ∑(n=0 to d) β_n f_n = 0

Thus we obtain the formula of Theorem 1.

Technical Innovations

1. Polynomial Method: Transforms combinatorial problems into functional equations satisfied by polynomials, providing a new perspective on Dehn-Sommerville relations
2. Natural Emergence of Bernoulli Numbers: The connection between coefficients and Bernoulli numbers arises naturally from the Taylor expansion of hyperbolic cosine, not from artificial construction
3. Proof of Dimension-Independence: Through proving the uniqueness of linear functionals, cleverly establishes the universality of coefficients
4. Unified Framework: The method applies not only to closed manifolds but also to manifolds with boundary through the doubling technique

Experimental Setup

This is a pure mathematics theory paper with no experimental setup, datasets, or numerical experiments. All results are obtained through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Verification Examples

The paper provides verification for low-dimensional cases:

Two-dimensional Surfaces (d=2):

• Dehn-Sommerville relation: f_1 = (3/2)f_2
• Euler characteristic: χ(M) = f_0 - (1/2)f_2

Four-dimensional Manifolds (d=4):

• Dehn-Sommerville relations: f_3 = (5/2)f_4 and 2f_1 - 3f_2 + 4f_3 - 5f_4 = 0
• Euler characteristic: χ(M) = f_0 - (1/2)f_2 + f_4

These special cases are consistent with the main theorem, providing intuitive verification of formula correctness.

Experimental Results

Theoretical Results

Main Theorem (Theorem 1): For a semi-Eulerian complex M of even dimension d:

χ(M) = ∑(n=0 to d) β_n f_n

where β_ = 4(2n-1)B_n/n (B_n are Bernoulli numbers), and β_n = 0 for odd n (except β_{-1} = -2).

Corollary (Corollary 1): For an even-dimensional PL manifold M with boundary:

χ(M) = ∑(n=0 to d) β_n(f_n(M) - (1/2)f_n(∂M))

The proof uses the doubling construction: the double M̃ of M is a closed manifold satisfying:

• 2χ(M) = 2χ(M) - χ(∂M) = χ(M̃)
• f_n(M̃) = 2f_n(M) - f_n(∂M)

Specific Coefficient Values

The first few non-zero coefficients are:

• β_{-1} = -2
• β_0 = 4(1)B_1/1 = -2 (using B_1 = -1/2)
• β_2 = 4(3)B_2/2 = 2 (using B_2 = 1/6)
• β_4 = 4(7)B_4/4 = -7/3 (using B_4 = -1/30)

These values can verify the formulas for low-dimensional cases.

Theoretical Verification

Uniqueness: Lemma 2 proves that the linear functional with required properties is unique, guaranteeing the uniqueness and universality of the formula.

Completeness: Any polynomial can be uniquely decomposed as P = p + q, where p satisfies p(z) + p(-1-z) = 0 and q is even. The uniqueness of this decomposition further supports the method's completeness.

Related Work

1. Historical Development of Dehn-Sommerville Relations

Victor Klee (1964):

• First systematically described Dehn-Sommerville relations for all dimensions
• Introduced the concept of semi-Eulerian complexes (Eulerian manifolds)
• Established combinatorial analogues of Poincaré duality

Reference 3: Klee's pioneering work provides the theoretical foundation for this paper.

2. Modern Developments

Novik & Swartz (2009):

• Studied applications of Klee's Dehn-Sommerville relations
• Used the standard formulation of h-numbers
• Reference 5 provides the modern framework used in this paper

Ceballos & Mühle (2021):

• Revisited generalizations of Dehn-Sommerville relations
• Discussed more general cases
• Reference 1 indicates possibilities for further generalizations

3. Triangulation of Topological Manifolds

Galewski & Stern (1980):

• Proved that for simplicial complexes homeomorphic to closed manifolds, the link of any face has the same homology groups as the corresponding sphere
• This result (Reference 2) ensures that triangulated manifolds are semi-Eulerian complexes
• Provides the topological foundation for this paper's applications

4. Related Formulas

O. Knill (2023):

• Equation (2) already appears as Lemma 3 in Reference 4
• However, that reference's formulation excludes cases where d is even and χ(M) ≠ 2
• This paper provides more general and complete treatment

Unique Contributions of This Paper

Compared to related work, this paper's advantages include:

1. Explicit Formulas: Provides clear expressions for coefficients (via Bernoulli numbers)
2. Dimension-Independence: Proves the universality of coefficients, previously unemphasized
3. Unified Method: Provides a unified theoretical framework through the uniqueness of linear functionals
4. Completeness: Covers all even-dimensional semi-Eulerian complexes, including manifolds with boundary

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Core Theorem: The Euler characteristic of even-dimensional triangulated manifolds can be expressed using only even-dimensional face counts, with formula χ(M) = ∑β_n f_n where coefficients are given by Bernoulli numbers
2. Universality: The formula's coefficients are independent of manifold dimension d, a surprising property
3. Wide Applicability: The formula applies to all semi-Eulerian complexes, particularly all triangulable closed manifolds
4. Generalizability: Through the doubling technique, the formula extends to manifolds with boundary

Limitations

The author honestly acknowledges several limitations:

1. Missing Topological Interpretation: The author admits uncertainty about whether the dimension-independence of coefficients has a deep topological explanation or is merely coincidental
2. Conservative Generalization: Although more general Dehn-Sommerville relations could enable further generalizations, the author chose to maintain simplicity of presentation
3. Non-triangulable Manifolds: It is now known that certain topological manifolds do not admit triangulations, though this interesting topic is not discussed
4. Computational Complexity: Although theoretically elegant, computing coefficients related to Bernoulli numbers may not be straightforward in practice

Future Directions

Directions suggested in the paper:

1. Seeking Topological Explanations: Understanding why coefficients exhibit dimension-independence
2. More General Generalizations: Using more general Dehn-Sommerville relations from Reference 1
3. Other Invariants: Applying similar methods to other topological or combinatorial invariants
4. Computational Applications: Developing efficient algorithms based on the new formula

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor

• Complete Proofs: The two lemmas are rigorously proven with clear logic
• Sophisticated Techniques: Cleverly transforms combinatorial problems into polynomial identities and linear functional problems
• Sufficient Detail: Provides detailed calculations for key steps (such as the emergence of Bernoulli numbers)

2. Elegance of Results

• Concise Formula: Simpler than the classical formula for high-dimensional cases
• Universal Coefficients: Dimension-independence is an unexpected and beautiful property
• Unified Framework: Provides a new perspective for understanding Dehn-Sommerville relations

3. Writing Quality

• Clear Structure: Introduction adequately motivates the problem; proof logic flows smoothly
• Rich Examples: Low-dimensional cases help readers understand
• Honest Approach: Acknowledges uncertainty about deeper explanations for certain phenomena

4. Theoretical Value

• Foundational: Concerns the most fundamental invariant in topology
• Interdisciplinary: Connects combinatorics, topology, and analysis (Bernoulli numbers)
• Inspirational: May inspire similar studies of other invariants

Weaknesses

1. Depth of Motivation

While the formula is elegant, the paper insufficiently explains why seeking such a formula is theoretically or practically important. Beyond "natural expectation," deeper motivation is lacking.

2. Topological Insights

The author admits uncertainty about whether dimension-independence has a topological explanation. This suggests the result may be more technical than revealing deep topological structures.

3. Limited Practical Value

• For low-dimensional manifolds, classical formulas are already sufficiently simple
• For high-dimensional manifolds, computing all even-dimensional faces remains a massive undertaking
• Computing Bernoulli numbers themselves has inherent complexity

4. Conservative Generalization

The author mentions that more general Dehn-Sommerville relations could enable further generalizations but chooses not to pursue this. This may limit the result's scope.

5. Lack of Application Examples

No concrete calculations for specific manifolds (such as projective spaces, Grassmann manifolds) are provided, making it difficult to assess practical utility.

Impact

Contribution to the Field

• Theoretical Contribution: Provides new perspective on classical problems, enriching the toolkit of combinatorial topology
• Methodology: The use of polynomial methods and linear functionals may inspire research on other problems
• Completeness: Fills a small gap in the literature (incomplete treatment in Reference 4)

Practical Value

• Computational Tool: May simplify Euler characteristic computation in certain cases
• Pedagogical Value: Demonstrates elegant applications of Dehn-Sommerville relations
• Inspirational: May stimulate similar research on other combinatorial invariants

Reproducibility

• Fully Reproducible: All proofs are pure mathematics, independent of experiments or computation
• Verifiable: Readers can verify the formula on any concrete example
• Code Implementation: Although no code is provided, the formula can be directly programmed

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research

• Studying topological properties of high-dimensional manifolds
• f-vector theory in combinatorial topology
• Further generalizations of Dehn-Sommerville relations

2. Computational Topology

• When even-dimensional faces are known but odd-dimensional faces are difficult to compute
• Computing topological invariants of large-scale triangulations
• Verifying correctness of triangulation algorithms

3. Educational Applications

• As an elegant application of Dehn-Sommerville relations
• Demonstrating connections between combinatorics, topology, and analysis
• Training students in techniques for handling combinatorial problems

4. Inapplicable Scenarios

• Low-dimensional manifolds (d=2,4): classical formulas are already sufficiently simple
• Situations requiring rapid estimation: computing Bernoulli numbers may be slow
• Non-semi-Eulerian complexes: formula does not apply

References

This paper cites five key references:

1. Ceballos & Mühle (2021): Generalizations of Dehn-Sommerville relations, providing direction for further research
2. Galewski & Stern (1980): Classification of triangulations of topological manifolds, proving triangulated manifolds are semi-Eulerian complexes
3. Victor Klee (1964): Pioneering work systematically describing Dehn-Sommerville relations for all dimensions
4. O. Knill (2023): Sphere formulas, containing an early version of equation (2) in this paper
5. Novik & Swartz (2009): Applications of Klee's Dehn-Sommerville relations, providing modern framework

These references constitute the theoretical foundation of this paper, spanning from classical to contemporary research.

Overall Assessment

This is an elegant pure mathematics paper providing a new expression for the classical Euler characteristic formula. Its main strengths are the simplicity of results and universality of coefficients (dimension-independence), with sophisticated proof techniques that cleverly transform combinatorial problems into polynomial identities and linear functional problems.

However, the paper has certain limitations: it lacks deep topological explanations for coefficient universality, has relatively limited practical value (particularly for low-dimensional cases), and provides no application examples for concrete manifolds.

Overall, this is an interesting theoretical result demonstrating beautiful connections between different mathematical branches (combinatorics, topology, Bernoulli numbers), though its impact may be primarily limited to specialists in combinatorial topology. For the broader mathematical community or applied fields, direct impact may be modest.

Recommended for: Mathematicians researching combinatorial topology, polytope theory, or f-vector theory; graduate students interested in Dehn-Sommerville relations; and readers who appreciate elegant mathematical proofs.