2025-11-11T17:10:08.865621

Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States

Bai, Tan, Lapierre et al.
We study quantum quench dynamics in (1+1)-dimensional critical systems, starting from thermal pure states called crosscap states, and evolving them under spatially inhomogeneous Hamiltonians. The spatial inhomogeneity is introduced through a deformation of the Hamiltonian, expressed as linear combinations of the generators of the $SL^{(q)}(2,\mathbb{R})$ subalgebra of the Virasoro algebra. We analyze the free massless Dirac fermion theory and holographic conformal field theory as prototypical examples of integrable and non-integrable dynamics. Consistent with general expectations, "Möbius-type" deformations lead to thermalization in the non-integrable case, and to periodic revivals in the integrable one. In contrast, "sine-square-type" and "displacement-type" deformations prevent both thermalization and scrambling, instead producing late-time, graph-like entanglement patterns. These patterns emerge from the interplay between the deformed Hamiltonian and the crosscap initial state and appear to be universal: they are determined solely by the deformation profile while remaining largely insensitive to microscopic details. Finally, we perform a holographic calculation in three-dimensional gravity using AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$, which reproduces the main features of our (1+1)-dimensional study.
academic

Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.25868
  • Title: Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States
  • Authors: Chen Bai, Mao Tian Tan, Bastien Lapierre, Shinsei Ryu
  • Classification: cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-el hep-th quant-ph
  • Publication Date: October 31, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25868

Abstract

This paper investigates quantum quench dynamics in (1+1)-dimensional critical systems starting from thermal pure states called crosscap states and evolving under spatially inhomogeneous Hamiltonians. Spatial inhomogeneity is introduced through Hamiltonian deformations expressed as linear combinations of generators from the SL(q)(2,R)SL^{(q)}(2,\mathbb{R}) subalgebra of the Virasoro algebra. The authors analyze free massless Dirac fermion theory and holographic conformal field theory as representative examples of integrable and non-integrable dynamics, respectively. Consistent with general expectations, "Möbius-type" deformations lead to thermalization in the non-integrable case and periodic revivals in the integrable case. In contrast, "sine-squared-type" and "shift-type" deformations prevent thermalization and scrambling, instead producing late-time graph-structured entanglement patterns.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this paper is understanding the nonequilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems evolving from initial states with long-range entanglement (crosscap states) under spatially inhomogeneous Hamiltonian evolution, particularly the time evolution behavior of entanglement entropy and mutual information.

Significance

  1. Theoretical Significance: Crosscap states, as single-copy realizations of thermal pure states, provide a new perspective for studying thermalization and scrambling without requiring two system copies as in thermofield double (TFD) states
  2. Experimental Relevance: Recent advances in quantum simulators have made engineering spatially varying Hamiltonians feasible
  3. Fundamental Physics: Exploring quantum dynamics in the absence of translational invariance, revealing novel physical phenomena

Limitations of Existing Approaches

  1. Previous studies of inhomogeneous quantum quenches primarily focused on evolution from short-range entangled states (e.g., boundary states)
  2. Nonequilibrium dynamics of crosscap states remain relatively unexplored, particularly under inhomogeneous evolution
  3. Lack of a systematic theoretical framework for understanding the effects of different types of Hamiltonian deformations

Core Contributions

  1. Systematically studied the dynamics of crosscap states under spatially inhomogeneous evolution, establishing a complete theoretical framework
  2. Discovered late-time graph-structured entanglement patterns that exhibit universality, determined solely by the deformation profile and insensitive to microscopic details
  3. Established connections between the quasiparticle picture and graph theory, describing entanglement structures using circulant graphs
  4. Provided holographic dual calculations, verifying main results through the AdS₃/CFT₂ correspondence
  5. Classified three distinct Hamiltonian types and their corresponding dynamical phases: non-heating, critical, and heating phases

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Study time evolution starting from the regularized crosscap state Ψ(0)=NCeβ4H0C|\Psi(0)\rangle = N_C e^{-\frac{\beta}{4}H_0}|C\rangle under inhomogeneous Hamiltonian H1H_1: Ψ(t)=NCeitH1eβ4H0C|\Psi(t)\rangle = N_C e^{-itH_1} e^{-\frac{\beta}{4}H_0} |C\rangle

Calculate the time dependence of entanglement entropy SA(t)S_A(t) and mutual information IA,B(t)I_{A,B}(t).

Theoretical Framework

1. Crosscap States

Crosscap states satisfy the condition (Lq(1)qLˉq)C=0(L_q - (-1)^q\bar{L}_{-q})|C\rangle = 0, corresponding in lattice description to entangled anti-parallel (EAP) states: EAP=i=1L/212(1i1i+L/2+0i0i+L/2)|EAP\rangle = \bigotimes_{i=1}^{L/2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\rangle_i|1\rangle_{i+L/2} + |0\rangle_i|0\rangle_{i+L/2})

2. Inhomogeneous Hamiltonians

Consider SL(q)(2,R)SL^{(q)}(2,\mathbb{R}) deformations: H1=0Ldxf(x)2π[T(x)+Tˉ(x)]H_1 = \int_0^L dx \frac{f(x)}{2\pi}[T(x) + \bar{T}(x)] where the deformation function is: f(x)=σ0+σ+cos(2qπxL)+σsin(2qπxL)f(x) = \sigma_0 + \sigma_+ \cos\left(\frac{2q\pi x}{L}\right) + \sigma_- \sin\left(\frac{2q\pi x}{L}\right)

Classified into three types based on the second Casimir invariant Δ(2)=σ02+σ+2+σ2\Delta^{(2)} = -\sigma_0^2 + \sigma_+^2 + \sigma_-^2:

  • Δ(2)<0\Delta^{(2)} < 0: Non-heating phase (elliptic type)
  • Δ(2)=0\Delta^{(2)} = 0: Critical phase (parabolic type)
  • Δ(2)>0\Delta^{(2)} > 0: Heating phase (hyperbolic type)

3. Computational Methods

Twist Field Method: Calculate Rényi entanglement entropy using twist field operators: SA(n)(t)=11nlogΨ(t)σn(0,X2)σˉn(0,X1)Ψ(t)S_A^{(n)}(t) = \frac{1}{1-n}\log\langle\Psi(t)|\sigma_n(0,X_2)\bar{\sigma}_n(0,X_1)|\Psi(t)\rangle

Quasiparticle Picture: For integrable systems, entanglement dynamics can be described through quasiparticle motion: SV(n)(t)=ρ0(n){l[x0;L(t,Vc)x0;R(t,V)]+l[x0;R(t,Vc)x0;L(t,V)]}S_V^{(n)}(t) = \rho_0^{(n)}\{l[x_{0;L}(t,V^c) \cap x_{0;R}(t,V)] + l[x_{0;R}(t,V^c) \cap x_{0;L}(t,V)]\}

Holographic Calculation: Use RT/HRT formula to calculate entanglement entropy in AdS₃ geon geometry.

Technical Innovations

  1. Extended the quasiparticle picture to inhomogeneous crosscap quenches, discovering position-dependent group velocities v(x)=±f(x)v(x) = \pm f(x)
  2. Established graph-theoretic description: Late-time entanglement patterns correspond to circulant graphs C(n;a1,a2,)C(n; a_1, a_2, \ldots)
  3. Discovered geodesic mismatch phenomena in holographic geometry, corresponding to graph patterns in CFT

Experimental Setup

System Parameters

  • System size: L=10000L = 10000 (in numerical calculations)
  • Temperature parameter: βL/2\beta \ll L/2 (high-temperature regime)
  • Subsystems: Single interval A=[X2,X1]A = [X_2, X_1] and anti-parallel double intervals ABA \cup B (where B=A+L/2B = A + L/2)

Theoretical Models

  1. Free Dirac fermion CFT (c=1c = 1, integrable)
  2. Holographic CFT (c1c \gg 1, non-integrable)

Representative Examples

Three representative deformations studied:

  1. q-Möbius: f(x)=1tanh(2θ)cos(2qπxL)f(x) = 1 - \tanh(2\theta)\cos(\frac{2q\pi x}{L})
  2. q-SSD: f(x)=2sin2(qπxL)f(x) = 2\sin^2(\frac{q\pi x}{L})
  3. q-Shift: f(x)=sin(2qπxL)f(x) = \sin(\frac{2q\pi x}{L})

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Non-heating Phase (q-Möbius)

  • Free fermions: Entanglement entropy and mutual information exhibit periodic oscillations with period Leff/qL_{\text{eff}}/q
  • Holographic CFT: Mutual information monotonically decays to zero, indicating thermalization and scrambling

2. Critical Phase (q-SSD)

  • Both theories exhibit:
    • Subsystems without fixed points: Entanglement entropy decays to vacuum value
    • Subsystems with fixed points: Logarithmic growth
    • Late-time mutual information approaches finite value determined by graph pattern

3. Heating Phase (q-Shift)

  • Behavior similar to critical phase
  • Specific value of late-time mutual information depends on parity of qq

Graph-Structured Entanglement Patterns

Late-time entanglement structure can be described using circulant graphs:

Hamiltonian Typeqq Evenqq Odd
CriticalC(q;q2+1,q21)C(q; \frac{q}{2}+1, \frac{q}{2}-1)C(q;q12,q32)C(q; \frac{q-1}{2}, \frac{q-3}{2})
HeatingC(2q;q+1,q1)C(2q; q+1, q-1)C(2q;q)C(2q; q)

Holographic Verification

RT/HRT calculations in AdS₃ geon geometry completely reproduce CFT results and reveal:

  • Single-interval entropy controlled by connected phase
  • Phase selection in anti-parallel double-interval entropy determines thermalization

Main Research Directions

  1. Uniform Crosscap Quenches: Recent work 51,52 studied translationally invariant evolution
  2. Inhomogeneous Boundary State Quenches: Literature 8-39 systematically studied evolution from short-range entangled states
  3. Holographic Entanglement Dynamics: References 55,56 established criteria for holographic thermalization

Advantages of This Work

  1. First systematic study of inhomogeneous evolution of crosscap states
  2. Discovery of novel graph-structured entanglement patterns with universality
  3. Establishment of unified description framework for integrable and non-integrable systems

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Universality of Graph-Structured Entanglement Patterns: Late-time entanglement structure is determined solely by the deformation profile and anti-parallel pairing of the initial state, insensitive to microscopic details
  2. Extension of Thermalization Criteria: Under inhomogeneous evolution, mutual information decay remains a reliable indicator of thermalization
  3. Applicability of Quasiparticle Picture: Remains effective in certain non-integrable cases, exceeding traditional expectations

Limitations

  1. Only considers high-temperature regime βL/2\beta \ll L/2
  2. Quasiparticle picture fails for certain parameter combinations
  3. Precise correspondence between graph patterns and holographic geometric phenomena remains unclear

Future Directions

  1. Lattice Model Verification: Realize EAP states in concrete quantum many-body systems and verify predictions
  2. Multipartite Entanglement Probes: Use measures beyond mutual information to characterize graph structures
  3. Dissipative Preparation: Study possibilities of preparing crosscap states through local dissipative engineering
  4. Extension to More General Deformations: Beyond SL(q)(2,R)SL^{(q)}(2,\mathbb{R}) cases

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Establishes complete theoretical framework from CFT to holographic duality
  2. Computational Rigor: Provides detailed analytical calculations, particularly exact results for free fermions
  3. Deep Physical Insights: Discovery of graph-structured entanglement patterns provides new perspective for understanding quantum many-body systems
  4. Methodological Innovation: Extends quasiparticle picture to new physical contexts

Weaknesses

  1. Lack of Experimental Verification: Absence of verification from actual quantum simulators
  2. Limited Parameter Range: Theoretical predictions fail in certain cases
  3. Incomplete Physical Understanding: Deeper physical mechanisms underlying graph pattern emergence require further clarification

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new research direction for nonequilibrium quantum many-body physics
  2. Methodological Value: Combination of quasiparticle picture and graph theory may inspire other research
  3. Practical Prospects: Provides theoretical guidance for entanglement engineering in quantum information processing

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Inhomogeneous quench experiments in cold atom quantum simulators
  2. Study of entanglement dynamics in quantum annealing and adiabatic quantum computation
  3. Information scrambling research in black hole physics and holographic duality

References

This paper cites 103 references spanning multiple fields including quantum quench dynamics, conformal field theory, and holographic duality, providing a solid theoretical foundation for understanding nonequilibrium dynamics of crosscap states.