A microscopic model of fractionalized Fermi liquid

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.01115
• Title: A microscopic model of fractionalized Fermi liquid
• Authors: Piers Coleman (Rutgers University & Royal Holloway, University of London), Aaditya Panigrahi (Cornell University), Alexei Tsvelik (Brookhaven National Laboratory)
• Classification: cond-mat.str-el (Condensed Matter Physics - Strongly Correlated Electron Systems)
• Publication Date: November 4, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01115v1

Abstract

This short paper establishes a connection between the Kondo lattice model proposed by Coleman et al. in Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 177601 (2022) and the ancilla layer formulation of the Hubbard model recently proposed by Zhang and Sachdev.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Theoretical Requirements for Fractionalized Fermi Liquid (FL)**: The FL concept was originally proposed to explain the satisfaction of the Oshikawa sum rule during the transition from a large Fermi surface to a small Fermi surface in Kondo lattices. In recent years, this concept has regained attention in the study of cuprate superconductors.
2. Challenges from Experimental Observations: In underdoped cuprates, angle-dependent analysis of magnetoresistance reveals the Yamaji effect, indicating that the area of Fermi pockets is proportional to hole density rather than electron density. This angle-dependent resistivity persists to high temperatures, ruling out cell doubling caused by density wave formation. These observations suggest the existence of a phase state where the Fermi surface does not contain the conventional Luttinger volume.
3. Theoretical Challenges: A concrete, solvable microscopic model is needed to realize the FL* phase, in which a charged Fermi liquid coexists with a background spin liquid supporting neutral fermionic excitations that are invisible to ARPES experiments, thereby hiding the missing portion of the Luttinger volume.

Research Motivation

This paper aims to establish a connection between the CPT model (Coleman-Panigrahi-Tsvelik model) and the Zhang-Sachdev ancilla layer model (ALM), demonstrating that the CPT model provides a solvable realization of the FL* phase and provides a microscopic foundation for understanding fractionalized Fermi liquids.

Core Contributions

1. Establishing Model Connections: Explicitly identifies the relationship between the CPT Kondo lattice model and the ALM approach, demonstrating their common characteristics in describing the FL* phase.
2. Providing a Solvable Model: The CPT model serves as a concrete solvable realization of the FL* phase, utilizing the Kitaev method to exactly solve the spin fluid dynamics.
3. Three-Layer Structure Framework: Describes the system as three layers of excitations: a conduction band layer, a spin layer with Heisenberg symmetry (S₁), and a second spin layer (S₂) coupled through anisotropic Kitaev-Ising interactions.
4. Rich Phase Diagram: Identifies a complete phase diagram including conventional Fermi liquid (FL), fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*), and exotic fractionalized superconducting phases.
5. Spin Fractionalization Mechanism: Clarifies how different phase states correspond to different spin fractionalization patterns, particularly in the FL* phase where S₁ spins are "absorbed" into the electron band while S₂ spins form a Kitaev spin liquid.

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

The task of this research is to construct a microscopic solvable model to realize the fractionalized Fermi liquid phase, where:

• Input: A three-layer system—itinerant electrons, Heisenberg spins (S₁), and Kitaev-coupled spins (S₂)
• Output: An FL* phase state with a hidden Fermi surface, satisfying non-conventional Luttinger volume
• Constraints: The model must be exactly solvable and exhibit physical properties consistent with experimental observations

Model Architecture

CPT Hamiltonian

The model is defined on a hyperoctagon lattice, with the total Hamiltonian:

$H_{CPT} = H_c + H_K + H_{YL}$

1. Conduction Band Term: $H_c = -t\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle}(c^\dagger_{i\sigma}c_{j\sigma} + \text{H.c.}) - \mu\sum_i c^\dagger_{i\sigma}c_{i\sigma}$

Describes nearest-neighbor hopping of conduction electrons, where $t$ is the hopping amplitude and $\mu$ is the chemical potential.

2. Kondo Interaction: $H_K = J_K\sum_i (c^\dagger_i \boldsymbol{\sigma} c_i) \cdot \mathbf{S}_{1,i}$

Couples the conduction electron sea to the intermediate layer S₁ spins through antiferromagnetic Kondo interaction with strength $J_K$.

3. Yao-Lee Spin Interaction: $H_{YL} = \frac{K}{2}\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} S^{\alpha_{ij}}_{2,i} S^{\alpha_{ij}}_{2,j} (\mathbf{S}_{1,i} \cdot \mathbf{S}_{1,j})$

where $\alpha_{ij} = x, y, z$ represents anisotropic nearest-neighbor Ising interactions between S₂ orbital components, modulated by Heisenberg interactions between S₁ spins.

Three-Layer Structure

Each lattice site contains three degrees of freedom (see Figure 1a):

• Black circles: Conduction electrons
• S₁ spins: Coupled through Heisenberg exchange
• S₂ spins: Coupled through color-coded Kitaev interactions

Technical Innovations

1. Spin Fractionalization Scheme

In the FL* phase (strong positive $J_K$ region), conventional fractionalization representation is employed:

$\mathbf{S}_1 = \frac{1}{2}f^\dagger_\alpha \boldsymbol{\sigma}_{\alpha\beta} f_\beta, \quad \sum_\alpha f^\dagger_\alpha f_\alpha = 1$

This allows decoupling the Kondo interaction as:

$J_K\sum_i (c^\dagger_i \boldsymbol{\sigma} c_i) \cdot \mathbf{S}_{1,i} \rightarrow \Phi^2/(2J_K) + \Phi(c^\dagger f + f^\dagger c)$

2. Higgs Field Mechanism

Under saddle-point approximation, the Higgs field $\Phi$ acquires a finite expectation value: $\Phi \sim t \exp[-1/(\rho(\epsilon_F)J_K)]$

Both itinerant electrons and holes hybridize with the $f$ operators (i.e., S₁ spins), forming a Kondo insulator—actually two Kondo insulators, one for electrons and one for holes.

3. Emergence of Kitaev Spin Liquid

Projecting the Yao-Lee Hamiltonian onto the Kondo insulator ground state yields a Kitaev spin liquid for S₂ spins:

$\langle 0_{KI}|H_{YL}|0_{KI}\rangle = K^*\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} S^{\alpha_{ij}}_{2,i} S^{\alpha_{ij}}_{2,j} = iK^*\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} u_{ij}\chi_i\chi_j$

where $u_{ij} = \pm1$ is a $Z_2$ static gauge field and $\chi_i$ are Majorana fermions. On the hyperoctagon lattice, the Majorana fermions of the Kitaev spin liquid possess a Fermi surface.

4. Comparison with ALM

Similarities:

• Both employ a three-layer excitation structure
• Decouple auxiliary filled bands from the conduction band through lattice Kondo effect
• The formed conduction band subtracts from the hole Fermi surface, making its area proportional to hole density
• Spin liquid as the hidden component of FL* decouples from Fermi surface counting

Key Differences:

• CPT model exhibits a fractionalized superconducting phase separating FL and FL* phases
• Different global phase diagram structure
• CPT model is exactly solvable on the hyperoctagon lattice

Experimental Setup

Model Parameters

This paper primarily focuses on theoretical model construction, studying the phase diagram at filling corresponding to one electron per lattice site, where the electron subsystem forms a compensated metal.

Phase Identification

Three main phase states are identified by analyzing different regions of $J_K$ and temperature $T$:

1. FL Phase ($J_K < 0$): The electron subsystem decouples from the spin liquid, forming a conventional Fermi liquid with equal-volume electron and hole Fermi surfaces (compensated metal)
2. Fractionalized Superconducting Phase ($0 < J_K < J_c$, low temperature): Nesting between electron and Majorana Fermi surfaces ensures this phase exists
3. FL Phase* ($J_K > J_c$): S₁ spins are absorbed into the electron band, and S₂ spins form a Kitaev spin liquid

Temperature Scales

• $T_K$: Kondo temperature, marking the coupling of spin and electron subsystems
• $T_{c1}$, $T'_{c1}$: Phase transition lines in Yao-Lee and Kitaev spin liquids respectively, marking the rarity of visons

Experimental Results

Main Phase Diagram (Figure 2)

At one electron per lattice site filling, the CPT model exhibits a rich phase diagram:

Temperature Dependence:

• High temperature region ($T > T_K$): Spin and electron subsystems decouple, forming FL₁,₂ phases (Figure 1c)
• Low temperature region ($T < T_K$): System couples; different ground states appear depending on $J_K$ value

Coupling Strength Dependence:

• $J < J_c$: Exotic (fractionalized) superconducting ground state
• $J > J_c$: Fractionalized Fermi liquid FL* ground state (Figure 1b)

Physical Picture of FL* Phase (Figure 1b)

Under large Kondo coupling:

1. S₁ spins are "absorbed" into the electron band, contributing their Luttinger volume
2. S₂ spins create a Kitaev spin liquid—a Majorana thermal metal with a Fermi surface
3. This Majorana Fermi surface is invisible to ARPES, constituting the hidden Luttinger volume

Physical Picture of FL Phase (Figure 1c)

At zero Kondo coupling:

1. Spins do not contribute to the Luttinger volume of the conduction band
2. Forms a Yao-Lee spin liquid rather than a Kitaev spin liquid

Finite Doping Effects

Finite doping effects are discussed in subsequent work 18:

• The superconducting phase may become a pair density wave
• The strong $J_K$ limit becomes a heavy fermion metal
• The orbital Kitaev liquid remains intact

Different Spin Fractionalization Patterns

Different CPT model phases correspond to different spin fractionalization patterns:

• Uniqueness of Spin-1/2: Can be fractionalized as a product of two Majorana fermions (as in the Kitaev model)
• Tensor Product of Two Spins: Can be fractionalized as a bilinear of Majorana fermions of six Majoranas (allowing fermionization of Yao-Lee model)
• This fractionalization pattern is effective in the exotic fractionalized superconducting phase at small $J_K$
• FL* phase employs a more conventional fractionalization pattern (Equation 2)

Related Work

Historical Development of FL* Concept

1. Senthil, Sachdev, Vojta (2003) 1,4: First proposed the fractionalized Fermi liquid concept to explain the large-to-small Fermi surface transition in Kondo lattices
2. Paramekanti & Vishwanath (2004) 6: Extended Luttinger's theorem to $Z_2$ fractionalized phases
3. Tsvelik (2016) 9: Studied fractionalized Fermi liquids in Kondo-Heisenberg models
4. Hazra & Coleman (2021) 10: Studied Luttinger sum rules and spin fractionalization in SU(N) Kondo lattices

Applications in Cuprate Superconductors

5. Bonetti et al. (2025) 2: On critical quantum liquids and high-temperature superconductivity in cuprates
6. Chan et al. (2025) 3: Observation of Yamaji effect in cuprate superconductors, providing experimental motivation

Ancilla Layer Model Approach

7. Zhang & Sachdev (2020) 11,12:
   • Proposed the ancilla layer model (ALM) using auxiliary qubits from pseudogap metal to Fermi liquid
   • Studied deconfinement criticality and ghost Fermi surfaces in metals
   • Auxiliary filled band in ALM decouples through lattice Kondo effect into conduction band and spin liquid

Development of CPT Model

8. Coleman, Panigrahi, Tsvelik (2022) 13: Original CPT model paper, demonstrating pair density waves, odd-frequency pairing, and order parameter fractionalization
9. Hermanns & Trebst (2014) 14: Quantum spin liquid with Majorana Fermi surface on three-dimensional hyperoctagon lattice
10. Panigrahi, Tsvelik, Coleman (2024, 2025) 15,18:
    • Breaking of order fractionalization in CPT model
    • Microscopic theory of pair density waves in spin-orbit coupled Kondo lattices

Kitaev Model Foundations

11. Kitaev (2006) 16: Anyons in exactly solvable models and their extensions
12. Yao & Lee (2011) 17: Fermionic magnons, non-abelian visons, and spin quantum Hall effect in exactly solvable spin-1/2 Kitaev model with SU(2) symmetry

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Model Correlation: The CPT model provides a tractable, microscopically solvable realization of Zhang-Sachdev's ancilla layer model, with both sharing the core physical picture of the FL* phase.
2. Universality of Three-Layer Structure: The FL* phase can be understood as a coupled system of a conduction electron sea with two independent spin layers, one absorbed through Kondo effect and the other forming a decoupled spin liquid.
3. $Z_2$ Characteristics: The $Z_2$ character of FL* in the CPT model may be an interesting property worth investigating in the context of the ALM approach.
4. Advantages of Solvability: By utilizing the Kitaev method on the hyperoctagon lattice, the spin fluid dynamics of the CPT model can be exactly solved, providing exact results beyond mean-field approximation.

Limitations

1. Lattice Structure Constraints: The model is defined on a special hyperoctagon lattice, which is the price for ensuring solvability but limits direct application to real materials.
2. Non-universality of Superconducting Phase: The existence of the fractionalized superconducting phase depends on nesting between electron and Majorana Fermi surfaces, which is not a universal feature.
3. Model Complexity: Although the three-layer structure provides a clear physical picture, it involves multiple interaction parameters, and experimental realization may be challenging.
4. Differences with ALM: While sharing core physics, the global phase diagrams differ, particularly the existence of the superconducting phase makes the two models differ in quantitative predictions.

Future Directions

1. Study of $Z_2$ Characteristics in ALM: Explore the correspondence and significance of the $Z_2$ character of FL* in the CPT model within the ancilla layer model approach.
2. Generalization to More Realistic Lattices: Investigate how to apply the physical insights of the CPT model to lattice structures closer to real materials.
3. Dynamical Properties: Deeply study the dynamical response functions of the FL* phase and establish more direct connections with experimental techniques such as ARPES and neutron scattering.
4. Finite Temperature Properties: Systematically study the properties of phase transition lines $T_{c1}$, $T'_{c1}$ and their experimentally observable effects.
5. Topological Properties: Deeply explore the topological properties of vison excitations and $Z_2$ gauge structures and their experimental detection methods.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth:
   • Establishes profound connections between two important theoretical frameworks (CPT and ALM)
   • Provides the first exactly solvable microscopic model of the FL* phase
   • Clearly elucidates different spin fractionalization patterns and their physical consequences
2. Physical Insights:
   • Three-layer structure provides an intuitive picture for understanding the FL* phase
   • Clearly distinguishes visible Fermi surface (electrons) from hidden Fermi surface (Majoranas)
   • Reveals the central role of Kondo effect in realizing the FL* phase
3. Methodological Innovation:
   • Cleverly utilizes the Kitaev method to achieve exact solvability on special lattices
   • The construction of embedding Yao-Lee spin liquid into Kondo lattice is creative
   • Higgs field mechanism provides an effective approach to handling Kondo interactions
4. Experimental Relevance:
   • Directly connected to recent experimental observations in cuprate superconductors (Yamaji effect)
   • Predicted phase diagram features can in principle be verified through multiple experimental techniques
   • Provides microscopic foundation for understanding non-conventional Luttinger volume
5. Writing Quality:
   • Despite profound content, the expression is clear and concise
   • Figures (Figures 1 and 2) effectively convey the core physical picture
   • Connections with related literature are appropriately organized

Shortcomings

1. Model Applicability:
   • The special nature of the hyperoctagon lattice limits the universality of the model
   • The correspondence between the model and real cuprate materials needs further establishment
   • Quantitative relationships between model parameters and experimentally measurable quantities are not sufficiently clear
2. Insufficient Technical Details:
   • As a short paper, many technical details (such as specific steps of exact solution) are not elaborated
   • Specific properties of Majorana Fermi surface (shape, dispersion relation) are not provided
   • Analysis of microscopic mechanisms and critical behavior of phase transitions is limited
3. Experimental Predictions:
   • Lacks quantitative predictions for specific experimentally observable quantities
   • Discussion of how to experimentally distinguish the FL* phase from other possible phases is insufficient
   • Specific suggestions for material realization are limited
4. Comparison with ALM:
   • Differences between the two models and their physical origins are not discussed in sufficient depth
   • Guidance on when CPT model predictions are more reliable versus when ALM is more applicable is lacking
5. Numerical Results:
   • No numerical calculation results are provided to verify analytical theory
   • Specific values and dependencies of critical points $J_c$ in the phase diagram are not given

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution:
   • Provides an important solvable model example for fractionalized Fermi liquid theory
   • Promotes cross-understanding between different theoretical frameworks (CPT and ALM)
   • May inspire construction of more solvable models
2. Experimental Impact:
   • Provides theoretical support for explaining anomalous Fermi surfaces in cuprate superconductors
   • May guide new experimental exploration directions, particularly searching for evidence of hidden Fermi surfaces
   • Provides guidance for studying exotic quantum phases in strongly correlated systems
3. Methodological Value:
   • Demonstrates how to use exactly solvable models to study complex quantum phases
   • Application of Kitaev method to Kondo lattice problems may have broad generalization value
   • Systematic analysis of spin fractionalization schemes provides a framework for related research
4. Reproducibility:
   • Model definition is clear; in principle can be independently studied by other researchers
   • Relies on detailed results of published CPT model 13,15,18
   • Exact solvability ensures reliability of theoretical predictions

Applicable Scenarios

1. Strongly Correlated Electron Systems:
   • Quantum critical behavior in heavy fermion materials
   • Fermi surface reconstruction in Kondo lattice systems
   • Systems with coexisting local moments and itinerant electrons
2. Cuprate Superconductors:
   • Microscopic understanding of pseudogap phase
   • Origin of small Fermi pockets
   • Explanation of non-conventional Luttinger volume
3. Quantum Spin Liquids:
   • Theoretical models for Kitaev materials
   • Spin liquids with Majorana Fermi surfaces
   • Experimental detection of fractionalized excitations
4. Topological Quantum States:
   • Physical realization of $Z_2$ gauge structures
   • Dynamics of vison excitations
   • Coexistence of topological order and Fermi liquid
5. Theoretical Method Development:
   • Construction techniques for exactly solvable models
   • Benchmarking for large-N or other controlled approximation methods
   • Verification of numerical methods (DMRG, quantum Monte Carlo)

References

This paper cites 18 key references, covering:

Foundational Theory (1970s-2000s):

• Luttinger's theorem and its generalization to fractionalized phases

Fractionalized Fermi Liquid Theory (2003-2021):

• 1,4-10 Pioneering work by Senthil, Sachdev, Vojta and others

Experimental Observations (2025):

• 3 Observation of Yamaji effect in cuprates

Ancilla Layer Model (2020):

• 11,12 ALM theory by Zhang and Sachdev

CPT Model Series (2022-2025):

• 13,15,18 Original work by Coleman, Panigrahi, Tsvelik

Exactly Solvable Models (2006-2014):

• 14,16,17 Kitaev model and Yao-Lee spin liquid

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics short paper that makes important contributions in establishing connections between different theoretical frameworks. While lacking certain technical details as a short paper, the core ideas are expressed clearly, providing an important solvable model example for understanding fractionalized Fermi liquids. This work has potential significant impact on both strongly correlated electron system theory and cuprate superconductor research.