2025-11-28T00:28:19.408899

Anti-commuting Solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like Matrix Equation

Abdalrahman, Zhu, Ding et al.
We solve the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation $AXA = XAX$ for a general given matrix $A$ to get all anti-commuting solutions, by using the Jordan canonical form of $A$ and applying some new facts on a general homogeneous Sylvester equation. Our main result provides all the anti-commuting solutions of the nonlinear matrix equation.
academic

Anti-commuting Solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like Matrix Equation

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2511.05088
  • Title: Anti-commuting Solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like Matrix Equation
  • Authors: Mohammed Ahmed Adam Abdalrahman (Yangzhou University), Huijian Zhu (Nanfang University), Jiu Ding (University of Southern Mississippi), Qianglian Huang (Yangzhou University)
  • Classification: math.NA (Numerical Analysis), cs.NA (Computational Mathematics), math.RA (Rings and Algebras), nlin.SI (Integrable Systems)
  • Publication Date: Compiled November 10, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05088

Abstract

This paper investigates anti-commuting solutions to the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation AXA=XAXAXA = XAX, where AA is a given general matrix. By leveraging the Jordan canonical form of AA and new results on homogeneous Sylvester equations, the authors completely characterize all solutions satisfying the anti-commuting condition AB=−BAAB = -BA. The main results demonstrate that for a general matrix AA, solving the anti-commuting solution problem can be reduced to a simplified problem related to the zero eigenvalue.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

The Yang-Baxter equation was independently proposed by Yang (1967) and Baxter (1972) and has broad applications in mathematical physics, including knot theory, braid groups, and quantum groups. The Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation AXA=XAXAXA = XAX has attracted widespread attention in linear algebra and numerical analysis over the past decade due to its formal similarity to the original Yang-Baxter equation.

Progress and Limitations of Existing Research

  1. Commuting Solutions: Complete theoretical results exist for commuting solutions satisfying AB=BAAB = BA (references 7,8,11), including spectral solutions and projection-based constructions.
  2. Non-commuting Solutions: Research progress is limited, with only partial results on special matrix classes (elementary matrices, low-rank matrices, matrices with few eigenvalues).
  3. Unresolved Problems: Finding all solutions for general matrices AA remains an open problem.

Research Motivation of This Paper

Inspired by techniques for solving commuting solutions, the authors focus on constructing a special class of non-commuting solutions—anti-commuting solutions (satisfying AB=−BAAB = -BA). This not only advances understanding of non-commuting solutions but also provides an important step toward ultimately solving the general solution problem.

Core Contributions

  1. Complete Characterization of Anti-commuting Solutions: Provides a complete theoretical description of all anti-commuting solutions to the Yang-Baxter-like equation for general matrices (Theorem 3.9).
  2. Problem Reduction: Proves that solving anti-commuting solutions for general matrices AA can be reduced to solving a simplified problem related to the zero eigenvalue. In particular, if AA is non-singular, the zero matrix is the unique anti-commuting solution.
  3. New Results on Homogeneous Sylvester Equations: Establishes general theory for the equation UX=−XVUX = -XV (Theorem 2.6), extending the classical commuting case to the anti-commuting case.
  4. Fundamental Theory of Jordan Blocks: Provides complete characterization of anti-commuting relations at the Jordan block level (Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3), which form the foundation for the main results.
  5. Constructive Solution Method: Provides explicit construction methods from Jordan canonical form to the original matrix, verified through numerical examples.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Input: An n×nn \times n complex matrix AA
Output: All n×nn \times n complex matrices BB satisfying:

  1. ABA=BABABA = BAB (Yang-Baxter-like equation)
  2. AB=−BAAB = -BA (anti-commuting condition)

Overall Strategy

The paper employs a two-step reduction strategy:

Step One: Simplification via similarity transformation

  • Transform AA to its Jordan canonical form J=W−1AWJ = W^{-1}AW
  • The original equation AXA=XAXAXA = XAX is equivalent to JYJ=YJYJYJ = YJY (where Y=W−1XWY = W^{-1}XW)
  • The anti-commuting condition AB=−BAAB = -BA is equivalent to JK=−KJJK = -KJ

Step Two: Decomposition into two subproblems

  • First solve the linear equation JY=−YJJY = -YJ for all solutions
  • Then filter solutions satisfying K(K−J)J=0K(K-J)J = 0 (equivalent condition given by Lemma 3.1)

Core Technical Components

1. Anti-commuting Relations at the Jordan Block Level (Section 2)

Lemma 2.1 (Different Eigenvalues Case): For Jordan blocks Jt(λ)J_t(\lambda) and Js(μ)J_s(\mu) with λ≠−μ\lambda \neq -\mu, the equation Jt(λ)K=−KJs(μ)J_t(\lambda)K = -KJ_s(\mu) has only the zero solution.

Proof Sketch:

  • Rewrite the equation as Jt(0)K=−K[Js(0)+(λ+μ)Is]J_t(0)K = -K[J_s(0) + (\lambda+\mu)I_s]
  • Repeatedly apply this relation using Jt(0)t=0J_t(0)^t = 0 (nilpotency)
  • Obtain 0=(−1)tK[Js(0)+(λ+μ)Is]t0 = (-1)^t K[J_s(0) + (\lambda+\mu)I_s]^t
  • Since λ≠−μ\lambda \neq -\mu, the matrix Js(0)+(λ+μ)IsJ_s(0) + (\lambda+\mu)I_s is non-singular, thus K=0K = 0

Lemma 2.3 (Opposite Eigenvalues Case): If λ=−μ\lambda = -\mu, then Jt(λ)K=−KJs(μ)J_t(\lambda)K = -KJ_s(\mu) has solutions with special structure:

K=[0K^]when  t≤s,orK=[K^0]when  t≥sK = [0 \quad \hat{K}] \quad \text{when} \; t \leq s, \quad \text{or} \quad K = \begin{bmatrix} \hat{K} \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \quad \text{when} \; t \geq s

where K^\hat{K} is an r×rr \times r (r=min⁡{t,s}r = \min\{t,s\}) upper triangular matrix:

\hat{k}_1 & \hat{k}_2 & \hat{k}_3 & \cdots & \hat{k}_{r-1} & \hat{k}_r \\ 0 & -\hat{k}_1 & -\hat{k}_2 & \cdots & -\hat{k}_{r-2} & -\hat{k}_{r-1} \\ 0 & 0 & \hat{k}_1 & \cdots & \hat{k}_{r-3} & \hat{k}_{r-2} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & (-1)^{r-2}\hat{k}_1 & (-1)^{r-2}\hat{k}_2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & (-1)^{r-1}\hat{k}_1 \end{bmatrix}$$ where $\hat{k}_1, \ldots, \hat{k}_r$ are arbitrary complex numbers. #### 2. General Theory of Homogeneous Sylvester Equations **Theorem 2.6** (Main Theoretical Result): For the equation $UX = -XV$, let the Jordan canonical forms of $U$ and $V$ be: $$J_U = \text{diag}[J(\lambda_1), \ldots, J(\lambda_p)], \quad J_V = \text{diag}[J(\mu_1), \ldots, J(\mu_q)]$$ Then the solution $X = PYQ^{-1}$, where the block matrix $Y = [Y_{ij}]$ satisfies: - If $\lambda_i \neq -\mu_j$, then $Y_{ij} = 0$ - If $\lambda_i = -\mu_j$, then $Y_{ij}$ has the structure given in Proposition 2.5(ii) This result extends classical Sylvester equation theory from the commuting case to the anti-commuting case. #### 3. Equivalent Conditions for Yang-Baxter-like Equations **Lemma 3.1**: If $AB = -BA$, then $B$ is a solution to $AXA = XAX$ if and only if: $$B(B-A)A = 0$$ **Proof**: $$ABA - BAB = -BAA + BBA = B(B-A)A$$ Therefore $ABA = BAB \Leftrightarrow B(B-A)A = 0$ ### Main Theorem **Theorem 3.9** (General Case): Let the Jordan canonical form of $A$ be: $$J = \begin{bmatrix} J_0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & J_1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & J_2 \end{bmatrix}$$ where: - $J_0$ corresponds to eigenvalue 0 - $J_1$ corresponds to eigenvalues $\mu_1, \ldots, \mu_{d-2k-1}, \nu_1, \ldots, \nu_k$ - $J_2$ corresponds to eigenvalues $-\nu_1, \ldots, -\nu_k$ - $-\mu_i$ is not an eigenvalue of $J$ Then all anti-commuting solutions are: $$K = \begin{bmatrix} K_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$$ where $K_1$ satisfies $J_0K_1 = -K_1J_0$ and $K_1(K_1 - J_0)J_0 = 0$, i.e., $K_1$ is all anti-commuting solutions to $J_0YJ_0 = YJ_0Y$. **Proof Outline**: 1. Through block matrix analysis, use Lemmas 2.1 and Corollary 2.3 to show all blocks except (1,1) are zero 2. Using the equivalent condition $K(K-J)J = 0$, prove non-zero blocks can only appear at positions corresponding to $J_0$ 3. Reduce the problem to solving the simplified equation corresponding to $J_0$ ## Experimental Setup ### Numerical Examples The paper verifies the validity of theoretical results through two concrete examples. **Example 4.1**: $8 \times 8$ matrix - Jordan canonical form contains three blocks: $J_3(0)$, $J_3(1)$, $J_2(-1)$ - According to Theorem 3.9, all anti-commuting solutions are determined by the block corresponding to $J_3(0)$ **Example 4.2**: $7 \times 7$ matrix - Jordan canonical form is $\text{diag}[J_3(0), J_4(0)]$ - Demonstrates more complex block structure cases - Obtains parametric representation of all anti-commuting solutions by solving equation system (17) ### Computational Steps 1. Compute Jordan canonical form $J$ of $A$ and similarity transformation matrix $W$ 2. Determine block structure of $K$ according to the theorem 3. Solve corresponding linear constraint equations 4. Obtain solutions to the original equation via $B = WKW^{-1}$ ## Experimental Results ### Results for Example 4.1 All anti-commuting solutions have the form: $$K_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & y & x \\ 0 & 0 & -y \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad \forall x, y \in \mathbb{C}$$ Solutions to the original equation are $B = WKW^{-1}$ (the paper provides explicit $8 \times 8$ matrix expressions). ### Results for Example 4.2 Obtains complete parametric representation of four classes of solutions: 1. General case (7 free parameters) 2. Special case 1 (7 free parameters, $k_{41} = -1$) 3. Special case 2 (7 free parameters, $k_{22} \neq 0$) 4. Special case 3 (7 free parameters, $k_{31} \neq 0$) ### Significance of Verification Results - Numerical examples completely align with theoretical predictions - Demonstrates the dimension and structure of solution spaces - Verifies the transformation process from Jordan canonical form to the original matrix - Demonstrates the computability and practicality of theoretical results ## Related Work ### Historical Development of Yang-Baxter Equations - **Yang (1967)** and **Baxter (1972)**: Independently proposed in quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics - **Application Fields**: Knot theory, braid groups, quantum groups, and other mathematical physics domains ### Research Progress on Yang-Baxter-like Matrix Equations #### Research on Commuting Solutions 1. **Ding & Rhee (2013) [4]**: Introduced the concept of spectral solutions 2. **Dong & Ding (2016) [6]**: All commuting solutions for diagonalizable matrices 3. **Dong, Ding & Huang (2018) [7]**: Commuting solutions for nilpotent matrices 4. **Dong & Ding (2020) [8]**: All commuting solutions for general matrices 5. **Dong & Ding (2021) [9]**: Projection-based families of commuting solutions #### Limited Progress on Non-commuting Solutions 1. **Tian (2016) [13]**: All solutions for rank-one matrices 2. **Zhou, Chen & Ding (2017) [17]**: Solutions for rank-two matrices 3. **Zhou & Ding (2018) [18]**: Index-3 nilpotent matrices 4. **Abdalrahman, Ding & Huang (2023) [1]**: Further results for rank-one matrices ### Positioning of This Paper - **Filling Gaps**: First systematic study of anti-commuting solutions, a special class of non-commuting solutions - **Methodological Contribution**: Extends Sylvester equation theory to the anti-commuting case - **Technical Innovation**: Systematic approach using Jordan canonical form and block structure analysis - **Theoretical Completeness**: Provides complete characterization for general matrices ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Completeness Result**: For any given matrix $A$, this paper provides a complete characterization of all anti-commuting solutions to the Yang-Baxter-like equation $AXA = XAX$ 2. **Reduction Principle**: Proves that solving the anti-commuting solution problem for general matrices essentially reduces to solving a simplified problem related to the zero eigenvalue: - If $A$ is non-singular, the zero matrix is the unique anti-commuting solution - If $A$ is singular, all anti-commuting solutions are completely determined by the block corresponding to $J(0)$ 3. **Constructive Method**: Provides explicit construction paths from Jordan canonical form to the original matrix with computational feasibility ### Methodological Contributions **Effectiveness of Two-Step Solution Strategy**: - First step: Solve the linear equation $JY = -YJ$ (using Theorem 2.6) - Second step: Filter solutions satisfying $Y(Y-J)J = 0$ (using Lemma 3.1) - This decomposition transforms the nonlinear problem into manageable linear problems ### Limitations 1. **Theoretical Nature**: While providing complete theoretical characterization, computational complexity for large-scale matrices is not analyzed in detail 2. **Special Structure Dependence**: The method heavily relies on computing the Jordan canonical form, which itself is an ill-conditioned numerical problem 3. **Incompleteness of Non-commuting Solutions**: Anti-commuting solutions represent only a special subclass of non-commuting solutions; there remains distance to finding all solutions 4. **Numerical Stability**: The paper does not discuss algorithmic numerical stability and error analysis 5. **Practical Applications**: Does not explore physical or geometric significance of anti-commuting solutions in practical problems ### Future Directions The paper explicitly identifies two research directions: 1. **Generalization to Other Non-commuting Solutions**: Hopes to extend the method to finding other types of non-commuting solutions 2. **Ultimate Goal**: Find all solutions to the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation (including both commuting and all non-commuting solutions) **Possible Research Paths**: - Study solutions satisfying $AB = \omega BA$ ($\omega$ a root of unity) - Explore geometric structure and topological properties of solution spaces - Develop numerically stable computational methods - Study perturbation theory and sensitivity analysis of solutions ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths #### 1. Strong Theoretical Completeness - Provides complete characterization of anti-commuting solutions without omissions - Logical rigor from special to general cases with complete proofs - Theorem 3.9 as the main result elegantly unifies all cases #### 2. Methodological Innovation - **Sylvester Equation Generalization**: Theorem 2.6 extends classical results from the commuting case to the anti-commuting case, possessing independent value - **Discovery of Equivalent Conditions**: Lemma 3.1 provides the key insight with equivalent condition $B(B-A)A = 0$ - **Hierarchical Reduction Strategy**: Clear and effective reduction from general matrices → Jordan canonical form → block structures → individual Jordan blocks #### 3. Solid Technical Details - Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3 provide very detailed analysis at the Jordan block level - Block matrix analysis (such as the proof of Theorem 3.9) is technically strong and well-handled - Mathematical derivations are rigorous with sufficient justification for each step #### 4. Clear Structure - Logical paper organization: Section 2 establishes foundational theory, Section 3 applies it to the main problem - Progression from simple to complex: first considers individual Jordan blocks, then generalizes to multiple blocks - Numerical examples appropriately verify theoretical results #### 5. Academic Value - Advances research on Yang-Baxter-like equations - Provides important steps toward ultimately solving the general solution problem - Methods may inspire solutions to other matrix equation problems ### Weaknesses #### 1. Missing Computational Complexity Analysis - Does not discuss algorithm time and space complexity - Numerical difficulties of Jordan canonical form computation not sufficiently addressed - Feasibility for large-scale matrices questionable #### 2. Numerical Stability Issues - Numerical computation of Jordan canonical form is ill-conditioned - Paper does not discuss numerical error propagation and control - Lacks error analysis in numerical experiments #### 3. Weak Application Background - Physical or geometric significance of anti-commuting solutions not explored - Connection to applications of the original Yang-Baxter equation unclear - Lacks discussion of practical application scenarios #### 4. Simple Experimental Section - Only two small-scale numerical examples - No comparison with alternative possible methods - No testing of algorithm performance on different matrix classes #### 5. Theoretical Limitations - Only solves anti-commuting solutions, a special subclass - Still far from finding all solutions - Handling of non-diagonalizable matrices depends on Jordan canonical form #### 6. Improvable Writing - Some proofs are lengthy (e.g., proof of Lemma 2.3) - Lacks intuitive geometric or algebraic explanations - Could include more remarks explaining result significance ### Impact Assessment #### Contribution to the Field - **Theoretical Contribution**: First complete solution to the anti-commuting solution problem, filling research gaps - **Methodological Contribution**: Anti-commuting generalization of Sylvester equations may have broader applications - **Inspirational Value**: Provides a model for studying other types of non-commuting solutions #### Practical Value - **Limited Direct Application**: Large-scale practical applications constrained by Jordan canonical form dependence - **Theoretical Tool Value**: May be useful as a theoretical analysis tool for certain special problems - **Educational Value**: Demonstrates comprehensive application of matrix theory and linear algebra techniques #### Reproducibility - **Theoretical Results**: Complete proofs with strong reproducibility - **Numerical Examples**: Specific matrices provided for verification - **Algorithm Implementation**: Clear steps allow implementation, though not provided as code - **Numerical Challenges**: Jordan canonical form numerical computation may affect practical reproducibility ### Applicable Scenarios #### Suitable Application Scenarios 1. **Small-Scale Exact Computation**: When matrix size is small and exact solutions are needed 2. **Symbolic Computation**: Application in symbolic computation systems (Mathematica, Maple) 3. **Theoretical Analysis**: Use as theoretical tool for analyzing solution structure of Yang-Baxter equations 4. **Special Matrix Classes**: For matrices with well-conditioned Jordan canonical forms #### Unsuitable Scenarios 1. **Large-Scale Numerical Computation**: Numerical instability of Jordan canonical form computation 2. **Ill-Conditioned Matrices**: Matrices close to non-diagonalizable 3. **Real-Time Applications**: Potentially high computational cost 4. **Approximate Solutions Sufficient**: Method pursues exact solutions, possibly excessive for approximate problems ### Comparison with Related Work | Aspect | Commuting Solutions [6,7,8] | Special Matrix Solutions [13,17,18] | This Paper (Anti-commuting) | |--------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------| | Completeness | Complete | Partial | Complete | | Generality | General matrices | Special matrices | General matrices | | Method | Jordan form + Sylvester | Direct construction | Jordan form + New Sylvester theory | | Computational Complexity | Moderate | Low | Moderate | | Theoretical Depth | High | Medium | High | ### Overall Assessment This is a **theoretically strong and technically solid** matrix theory paper. Main contributions include: 1. **Complete solution to the anti-commuting solution problem**, representing important progress in Yang-Baxter-like equation research 2. **Establishment of systematic theoretical framework**, particularly the anti-commuting generalization of Sylvester equations 3. **Rigorous proofs and clear structure**, demonstrating high-level mathematical technique Main limitations include: 1. **Limited practical applicability** due to numerical issues with Jordan canonical form 2. **Insufficient application background**, with unclear significance of anti-commuting solutions 3. **Distance from ultimate goal** (finding all solutions) remains substantial **Academic Value Score**: 8.5/10 - Theoretical Completeness: 9/10 - Methodological Innovation: 8/10 - Practical Value: 6/10 - Writing Quality: 8/10 **Recommended Readers**: - Matrix theory researchers - Yang-Baxter equation researchers - Scholars interested in nonlinear matrix equations - Advanced linear algebra course instructors ## Key References [4] J. Ding and N. Rhee, Spectral solutions of the Yang-Baxter matrix equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 402 (2013), pp. 567-573. [6] Q. Dong and J. Ding, Complete commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation for diagonalizable matrices, Computers Math. Appl. 72 (1) (2016), pp. 194-201. [8] Q. Dong and J. Ding, All commuting solutions of a quadratic matrix equation for general matrices, J. Nonlinear Model. Anal. 2(1) (2020), pp. 111-123. [14] C. N. Yang, Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967), pp. 1312-1315. --- **Summary**: This paper completely solves the anti-commuting solution problem for Yang-Baxter-like matrix equations through sophisticated theoretical analysis, demonstrating deep application of matrix theory and linear algebra techniques. While limitations exist in numerical computation and practical applications, its theoretical contributions are significant and provide important foundations for further research on general solutions.