Symmetry-Protected α-Attractor Hybrid Inflation in Supergravity and Constraints from ACT DR6 and DESI DR2

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2511.05545
• Title: Symmetry-Protected α-Attractor Hybrid Inflation in Supergravity and Constraints from ACT DR6 and DESI DR2
• Author: Swapnil Kumar Singh (B.M.S. College of Engineering, Bangalore)
• Classification: hep-ph astro-ph.CO
• Publication Date: October 31, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05545

Abstract

This paper presents a symmetry-protected supergravity realization combining hybrid α-attractor inflation with constant uplift. The model achieves exact analytical embedding of attractor geometry while maintaining vacuum stability and radiation control. The uplift generated by a hidden Stückelberg U(1)_D sector preserves inflaton dynamics and provides independent tuning of the post-inflationary vacuum energy. The framework yields exact next-to-leading-order predictions for scalar spectral tilt and tensor amplitude, in complete agreement with current ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and Planck data. Radiative and geometric corrections remain exponentially suppressed, ensuring robustness of the inflationary trajectory.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Challenges in Inflation Theory: Classical inflation requires implementation within the supergravity framework but faces the η-problem—first-order corrections from Kähler curvature destroy potential flatness
2. Updated Observational Constraints: Recent ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 data show scalar spectral index n_s = 0.9743 ± 0.0034, exhibiting mild ~2σ tension with Planck data
3. Theoretical Completeness Requirements: Need to construct inflationary models within UV-complete supergravity frameworks that explain observations while maintaining theoretical consistency

Research Motivation

• Geometric Solution: The α-attractor framework provides a geometric resolution to the η-problem through hyperbolic geometry
• Hybrid Inflation Advantages: Hybrid inflation provides a built-in exit mechanism through tachyonic instability of the "waterfall" field
• Observational Compatibility: Construct theoretical models simultaneously satisfying latest CMB and BAO observational constraints

Core Contributions

1. Exact Analytical Embedding: Achieve exact analytical embedding of α-attractor geometry in supergravity, obtaining the rigorous form of E-model plateau potential
2. Separated Uplift Mechanism: Construct completely decoupled constant uplift through hidden Stückelberg U(1)_D sector without affecting inflaton dynamics
3. Closed-Form N-ϕ Mapping: Derive exact closed-form e-folding number-field value relationship incorporating uplift effects
4. Next-to-Leading-Order Predictions: Provide next-to-leading-order analytical predictions for (n_s, r) based on Hubble flow hierarchy
5. Observational Consistency: Demonstrate complete compatibility with ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and Planck data

Methodology Details

Field Theory Construction

Field Content: The model contains four chiral multiplets:

• Inflaton modulus T (parametrizing hyperbolic Kähler manifold)
• Stabilizer field S
• Waterfall field pair (Ψ, Ψ̄) (carrying opposite charges ±1 under U(1)_X)

Kähler Potential:

K = -3α ln(T + T̄) + (T + T̄)^(-3α)(|S|² + |Ψ|² + |Ψ̄|²)

Superpotential:

W = S μ(1 - T^(-1)) + g(1 - T^(-1))ΨΨ̄

Separated Uplift Mechanism

Constant uplift realized through Stückelberg U(1)_D sector:

• Gauge Invariance: δΣ = iq Λ
• Killing Potential: P_D = -q ∂{Σ+Σ̄}k|{⟨Σ⟩} ≡ ξ_eff = constant
• D-term Contribution: V_D = g_D²ξ_eff²/2 ≡ V_up

E-Model Potential Realization

Along the inflationary valley S = Ψ = Ψ̄ = 0, the F-term potential simplifies to:

V_F|_val = μ²|1 - T^(-1)|²

Through canonicalization T = e^(βϕ), β = √(2/3α), obtain the exact E-model plateau:

U(ϕ) = V₀(1 - e^(-βϕ))², V₀ = μ²

Total potential:

V(ϕ) = V₀(1 - e^(-βϕ))² + V_up

Background Dynamics

Field Evolution Equation:

dϕ/dN = -U'(ϕ)/(U(ϕ) + V_up)

Exact N-ϕ Mapping:

N(ϕ; ϕc) = 1/(2β²V₀)[(V₀ + V_up)(uc - u) + V_up ln((uc-1)/(u-1)) - V₀ ln(uc/u)]

where u = e^(βϕ), uc = e^(βϕc)

Slow-Roll Parameters

Exact Expressions:

ε_V = 2β²V₀²(u-1)²/[u⁴(U+V_up)²]
η_V = 2β²V₀(2-u)/[u²(U+V_up)]

Asymptotic Behavior (u ≫ 1):

ε_V ≃ (3α/4N²)(V₀/(V₀+V_up))²
η_V ≃ -1/N

Experimental Setup

Observational Data

• Planck 2018: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra
• ACT DR6: Latest Atacama Cosmology Telescope data
• DESI DR2: Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument baryon acoustic oscillation measurements
• BK18: BICEP/Keck B-mode polarization constraints

Parameter Space

Model characterized by 5 fundamental parameters:

{α, μ, g, g_X, V_up}

Typical parameter ranges:

• α ≲ 1 (Kähler curvature parameter)
• g, g_X ∼ 10⁻³–10⁻² (coupling constants)
• V_up ≲ (0.1–0.3)V₀ (uplift strength)

Evaluation Metrics

• Scalar Spectral Index: n_s
• Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio: r
• Tensor Spectral Index: n_t
• Power Spectrum Amplitude: P_ζ

Experimental Results

Main Predictions

Universal Attractor Relations:

n_s ≃ 1 - 2/N*
r ≃ 12α/N*² × (V₀/(V₀+V_up))²

Numerical Benchmarks (N* = 60):

Observational Compatibility

Consistency with ACT DR6+DESI DR2:

• All benchmark points lie within 68% confidence intervals
• n_s values compatible with higher values preferred by ACT
• Tensor amplitude r within detection range of LiteBIRD and CMB-S4

Parameter Dependence Analysis

1. α Effect: Primarily controls vertical scale of r; smaller α yields smaller r
2. Uplift Effect: Decreasing f (stronger uplift) leads to slight increase in r
3. E-folding Effect: Increasing N* increases n_s and decreases r, following r ∝ N*⁻²

Stability Checks

Radiative Stability: Coleman-Weinberg corrections exponentially suppressed on plateau

ΔV'_CW ∝ e^(-βϕ) ≪ 1

Classicality Condition: Quantum diffusion negligible

ε_V(ϕ) > V(ϕ)/(24π²)

Related Work

α-Attractor Theory

• Kallosh-Linde Framework: Conformally invariant inflationary models
• Geometric Stabilization: Hyperbolic geometry resolution of η-problem
• Universality: Insensitivity to ultraviolet physics

Hybrid Inflation

• Linde's Original Model: Quasi-flat valleys in multi-field potentials
• Supergravity Embedding: Interplay of F-term and D-term contributions
• Waterfall Exit: Built-in termination mechanism via tachyonic instability

Uplift Mechanisms

• Stückelberg Sector: Gauging of axion shift symmetry
• Separated Construction: Avoiding backreaction on inflaton dynamics
• Vacuum Tuning: Independent control of post-inflationary cosmological constant

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Achievement: Construct exact, analytical, and symmetry-protected realization of α-attractor hybrid inflation in supergravity
2. Observational Success: Model predictions in complete agreement with latest CMB and BAO data, including ACT DR6's preference for higher n_s
3. Technical Advantages: Separated uplift mechanism achieves geometric suppression of tensor amplitude rather than fine-tuning
4. Testability: Predicted tensor signal within detection range of future B-mode experiments

Theoretical Significance

Geometric Suppression: Tensor amplitude undergoes geometric suppression through uplift factor (V₀/(V₀+V_up))², preserving robustness of attractor geometry

Radiative Control: Exponentially suppressed quantum corrections ensure technical naturalness of plateau potential

UV Completeness: Framework provides clear path toward string theory moduli stabilization

Limitations

1. Parameter Tuning: Requires appropriate choice of V_up to match observations
2. Reheating Details: Coupling of waterfall field to Standard Model requires further investigation
3. Cosmic String Constraints: Topological defects from U(1)_X breaking must satisfy observational limits

Future Directions

1. String Theory Embedding: Realize separated uplift in KKLT or LVS-type compactifications
2. Reheating Dynamics: Detailed analysis of waterfall field decay to visible sector
3. Observational Tests: Decisive tests using B-mode measurements from LiteBIRD and CMB-S4

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation:
   • First exact supergravity embedding of α-attractor geometry
   • Clever design of separated uplift mechanism avoiding traditional uplift problems
   • Closed-form analytical solutions provide fully controllable theoretical framework
2. Technical Rigor:
   • Complete and exact mathematical derivations without approximations
   • Next-to-leading-order calculations using Hubble flow hierarchy
   • Comprehensive stability and consistency checks
3. Observational Relevance:
   • Detailed comparison with latest observational data
   • Specific predictions for future experiments
   • Systematic analysis of parameter dependencies

Limitations

1. Model Complexity: Requires careful coordination of multiple sectors (inflation, waterfall, uplift)
2. Parameter Space: Five-dimensional parameter space may exhibit fine-tuning issues
3. Reheating Assumptions: Treatment of post-inflationary dynamics relatively simplified

Impact

Theoretical Contribution: Provides new standard paradigm for supergravity inflation theory, combining robustness of α-attractors with controllability of hybrid inflation

Observational Significance: Model predictions directly testable by next-generation CMB experiments, providing clear path for theory-observation interface

Technical Value: Separated uplift technique generalizable to other inflation models with broad application prospects

Applicable Scenarios

1. Precision Cosmology: Research requiring exact theoretical predictions compared with observations
2. Supergravity Phenomenology: Construction and analysis of supersymmetric inflation models
3. Early Universe Physics: Coherent description of inflation-reheating-big bang nucleosynthesis
4. Future Experiment Design: Theoretical benchmarks for B-mode search experiments

References

This paper cites 97 relevant references spanning multiple fields including inflation theory, supergravity, α-attractors, and observational cosmology. Key references include Kallosh-Linde's α-attractor theory, Planck satellite observations, and latest ACT and DESI data releases.