2025-11-16T22:49:13.224597

Charged black hole accelerated by spatially homogeneous electric field of Bertotti-Robinson (AdS2 x S2) space-time

Alekseev
A simple exact solution of the Einstein - Maxwell field equations for charged non-rotating black hole accelerated by an external electric field is presented. The background space-time, described by the well known Bertotti-Robinson solution, contains a spatially homogeneous electric field and possess the topology AdS2 x S2. The black hole mass m, its charge e and the value of the background electric field E are free parameters of the constructed solution. In the "rigid" (non-inertial) reference frame comoving a black hole, this solution is static. The value of acceleration of a black hole due to its interaction with the external electric field is determined by the condition of vanishing of conical singularities on the axis of symmetry. The dynamics of a charged black hole in the external electric field is compared with the behaviour of a charged test particle with the same charge to mass ratio.
academic

Charged black hole accelerated by spatially homogeneous electric field of Bertotti-Robinson (AdS₂ × S²) space-time

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2511.06082
  • Title: Charged black hole accelerated by spatially homogeneous electric field of Bertotti-Robinson (AdS₂ × S²) space-time
  • Author: G.A. Alekseev (Steklov Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
  • Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
  • Submission Date: November 8, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06082v1

Abstract

This paper presents a simple exact solution to the Einstein-Maxwell field equations, describing a charged non-rotating black hole accelerated by an external electric field. The background spacetime is described by the celebrated Bertotti-Robinson solution, containing a spatially homogeneous electric field with AdS₂ × S² topology. The black hole mass m, charge e, and background electric field strength E serve as free parameters in the construction. In a "rigid" (non-inertial) reference frame comoving with the black hole, the solution is static. The acceleration value of the black hole resulting from its interaction with the external field is determined by the condition for the disappearance of conical singularities on the symmetry axis. The paper compares the dynamics of a charged black hole in an external electric field with the behavior of a charged test particle possessing the same charge-to-mass ratio.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem to be Addressed

This research aims to construct exact solutions describing the interaction of charged black holes with external electric fields, particularly the accelerated motion of black holes in backgrounds with spatially homogeneous electric fields.

Importance of the Problem

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Although perturbative methods are widely used to study black hole interactions with external fields, in strong-field regions, exact solutions are the only alternative to numerical computation.
  2. Scarcity of Exact Solutions: Among the vast number of known exact solutions to Einstein's field equations, solutions describing black holes interacting with external source fields are very rare, and those with dynamical characteristics are even rarer.
  3. Physical Insight: Although exact solutions describe idealized models, they provide profound understanding of physical phenomena in strong gravitational fields.

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Limitations of Melvin Universe: In the Melvin universe, static magnetic/electric fields are uniform only on the symmetry axis and decay rapidly in spatial directions perpendicular to the axis.
  2. Problems with C-metric: The traditional C-metric describing accelerated black holes has acceleration caused by "node" singularities (strings or struts) on the symmetry axis, rather than genuine external field effects.
  3. Non-uniformity of Background Field: Although the generalized Ernst C-metric incorporates electric fields, the spatial non-uniformity of the Melvin universe electric field limits its physical applicability.

Research Motivation

To investigate the dynamics of black holes in background spacetimes with spatially homogeneous magnetic/electric fields, specifically the famous static, conformally flat Bertotti-Robinson spacetime with AdS₂ × S² topology.

Core Contributions

  1. Construction of New Exact Solution: Presents an exact dynamical solution of a Reissner-Nordström black hole immersed in the spatially homogeneous electric field of Bertotti-Robinson spacetime and uniformly accelerated by this field.
  2. Nonlinear Superposition Method: Achieves nonlinear superposition of the black hole field and background field, rather than simple linear combination.
  3. Derivation of Equations of Motion: Derives the black hole's equations of motion from geometric regularity conditions (disappearance of conical singularities on the symmetry axis).
  4. Physical Correspondence: Demonstrates that the black hole's equations of motion reduce to those of a charged test particle in the small black hole limit.
  5. Application of Mathematical Methods: Applies the monodromy transformation method and linear singular integral equation techniques developed by the author to construct the solution.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Construct an exact solution to the Einstein-Maxwell equations describing a charged non-rotating black hole (mass m, charge e) immersed in a Bertotti-Robinson background spacetime with spatially homogeneous electric field (field strength E = 1/b).

Background Spacetime Structure

Bertotti-Robinson Solution (background field, equation 2):

ds² = -(cosh(z/b))² dt² + dρ² + dz² + b²(sin(ρ/b))² dϕ²
Aᵢ = {sinh(z/b), 0, 0, 0}
E_z = 1/b (constant electric field along z-axis)

Key characteristics:

  • The spatial section at t=const is semi-closed in the ρ direction, with closure radius ρ = πb
  • Each {t=const, z=const} section has 2-sphere geometry with radius b
  • Physical meaning of parameter b: as b→∞, the electric field vanishes and spacetime becomes flat

Test Particle Equilibrium Condition: In the static reference frame, a test particle with mass m and charge e at rest on the z-axis has equilibrium position z₀ determined by:

tanh(z₀/b) = e/m  (equation 4)

Note: Equilibrium is possible only for |e| < m particles.

Complete Solution Construction

Solution Form (equations 5-9):

ds² = g_tt dt² + f(dρ² + dz²) + g_ϕϕ dϕ²
A = {A_t, 0, 0, 0}

Using bipolar coordinate systems {x₁, y₁, x₂, y₂} and parameters {b, μ, ν, σ, ℓ}:

Metric Components:

g_tt = -[(x₁² + b²)(x₂² - σ²)/b²] × [numerator/denominator]²
g_ϕϕ = [b²(1 - y₂²)/(x₁² + b²)] × [denominator/numerator]²
A_t = -[complex expression]/b
f = f₀D²/(x₂² - σ²y₂²)

where D is a complex function defined by equation (7).

Coordinate Relations (equations 8-9):

x₁ = -b sinh(z/b),  x₂ = r - m
y₁ = -cos(ρ/b),     y₂ = cos θ

The two sets of coordinates are connected through dual expressions in Weyl coordinates {α, β}.

Physical Meaning of Parameters

The relationship between four independent real parameters {b, μ, ν, ℓ} and physical quantities:

m = μ + νℓ/(1-ν)  (mass)
e = ν√[(ℓ+m)² + b²]  (charge)
σ² = m² - e²  (Reissner-Nordström parameter)
b  (background field parameter, E = 1/b)
ℓ  (black hole position on z-axis, characterizing acceleration)

Technical Innovations

1. Monodromy Transformation Method

  • Each local solution with two commuting isometries and vanishing non-dynamical degrees of freedom is characterized by monodromy data of the associated linear (spectral) problem.
  • Monodromy data: two pairs of holomorphic functions {u₊(w), v₊(w)} and {u₋(w), v₋(w)} of complex spectral parameter w.
  • For static axially symmetric fields, data match analytically: u₊(w) = u₋(w) ≡ u(w), v₊(w) = v₋(w) ≡ v(w).

2. Linear Superposition Principle

Key Innovation: Nonlinear field superposition can be generated from linear superposition of monodromy data:

  • Reissner-Nordström black hole: u(w) = u₁/(w-h), v(w) = v₁/(w-h) (simple pole structure)
  • Bertotti-Robinson field: u(w) = u₀, v(w) = v₀ (imaginary constants)
  • Superposed solution: monodromy data is the sum of the above two

3. Geometric Derivation of Equations of Motion

Regularity Condition: Absence of conical singularities on the symmetry axis requires:

P(z) ≡ lim_{ρ→0} (2πR/L) = 1

where R is the radius of a small circle and L is its circumference.

Calculation yields:

P(z) = [1/cosh(z/b)] √[-f(0,z)g_tt(0,z)]

On different parts of the axis outside the black hole horizon, P takes different constant values P₋ (corresponding to b sinh(z/b) < ℓ-σ) and P₊ (corresponding to b sinh(z/b) > ℓ+σ).

Equation of Motion (equation 10): By requiring P₊ = P₋ = 1:

[(ℓ-σ)² + b²][(ℓ+σ)² + b²] = [√((ℓ+m)² + b²) - e]⁴

This is the equation of motion in the form of an equilibrium condition in the comoving non-inertial frame.

4. Correspondence with Test Particles

For small black holes (linear terms in m and e), the equation of motion (10) simplifies to:

mℓ ≈ e√(b² + ℓ²)

or in z-coordinates (ℓ = b sinh(z₀/b)):

tanh(z₀/b) ≈ e/m  (equation 11)

Perfect Correspondence: This exactly matches the equilibrium condition (4) for test particles!

Experimental Setup

Solution Verification Methods

  1. Direct Substitution Verification: Substitute solution (5)-(9) directly into the electrovacuum Einstein-Maxwell equations.
  2. Limiting Case Verification: Verify three important limits.

Analysis of Limiting Cases

Limit 1: External Electric Field Vanishes (b→∞)

  • External electric field vanishes
  • Solution degenerates to Reissner-Nordström black hole solution (1)

Limit 2: Black Hole Vanishes (e=m=0)

  • σ, μ, ν vanish
  • Solution degenerates to Bertotti-Robinson solution (2)

Limit 3: Schwarzschild Black Hole in Magnetic Field (e→0, ν→0)

  • After coordinate relabeling and electromagnetic field duality rotation
  • Solution degenerates to the solution in reference 10 for Schwarzschild black hole immersed in spatially homogeneous magnetic field

Numerical Example

The case displayed in Figure 1:

  • b = 1
  • m = 0.2
  • e = 0.14
  • ℓ ≈ 0.895

This example satisfies equation of motion (10) and displays contour lines of the metric function log(-g_tt) in the (ρ,z) plane.

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Successful Construction of Exact Solution

  • Successfully constructed an exact solution with four independent parameters {b, m, e, ℓ}
  • Solution is static in the comoving reference frame
  • Solution describes complete nonlinear interaction between black hole and background electric field

2. Physical Significance of Equations of Motion

  • Equation of motion (10) naturally emerges from geometric regularity without additional dynamical assumptions
  • Equation determines the relationship between black hole acceleration and its mass, charge, and background field strength
  • In the small black hole limit, perfectly matches test particle dynamics

3. Geometric Structure Features

From Figure 1:

  • Black hole is located on the symmetry axis
  • Metric functions vary smoothly around the black hole
  • Singularities appear on "antipodal" axes (upper and lower boundaries of the figure), resulting from the semi-closed topology of the background spacetime causing "field lines" to focus there

Physical Insights

1. Acceleration Mechanism

  • Black hole acceleration is entirely produced by interaction with the external electric field
  • No need for "node" singularities (strings or struts) as in C-metric
  • Appropriate parameter choice can eliminate all node singularities

2. Equilibrium Condition

For black holes with charge |e| < m, an equilibrium position exists satisfying:

tanh(z₀/b) = e/m

This is identical to the equilibrium condition for charged test particles.

3. Distance Scales

  • Singularities on the "antipodal" axis are very far from the black hole (cosmological distances)
  • This holds provided the background electric field strength is not unreasonably large
  • Therefore, solution (5)-(9) correctly describes physical properties in a substantially large spacetime region around the black hole

Historical Development of Black Hole-External Field Interaction Research

1. Black Holes in Magnetic Fields

  • Ernst (1976): Discovered that Harrison transformation can immerse black holes in Melvin magnetic universe, obtaining various "magnetized" black hole solutions
  • Ernst & Wild (1976): Kerr black hole in magnetic universe
  • Alekseev & Garcia (1996): Schwarzschild black hole in uniform magnetic field (precursor to current method)

2. C-metric Series

  • Kinnersley & Walker (1970): Solution for uniformly accelerated charged masses
  • Ashtekar & Dray (1981): Mathematical properties of C-metric
  • Ernst (1976): Generalized C-metric; through Harrison transformation, immersed Reissner-Nordström black hole in electric Melvin universe, proving node singularities vanish for appropriate parameters
  • Bicak & Kofron (2010): Similar results for rotating case

3. Bertotti-Robinson Background

  • Levi-Civita (1917), Bertotti & Robinson (1959): Discovery of electrovacuum solution containing uniform electric field
  • Alekseev & Garcia (1996): Non-accelerated Schwarzschild black hole in Bertotti-Robinson magnetic universe
  • Alekseev (2017): "Geodetic" oscillatory motion of Schwarzschild black hole along magnetic field
  1. Spatial Uniformity: Compared to Melvin universe, the electric field in Bertotti-Robinson spacetime is truly spatially uniform
  2. Complete Dynamical Description: Provides complete solution for accelerated black hole, not perturbative approximation
  3. Systematic Method: Monodromy transformation method provides systematic approach to constructing such solutions
  4. Physical Transparency: Equations of motion naturally emerge from geometric regularity with clear physical meaning

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Construction of Exact Solution: Successfully constructed an exact solution for accelerated motion of charged non-rotating black hole in spatially homogeneous electric field
  2. Parameter Degrees of Freedom: Solution contains four physical parameters (black hole mass m, charge e, background field strength E=1/b, position/acceleration parameter ℓ)
  3. Equation of Motion: Black hole acceleration is determined by symmetry axis regularity condition; in small black hole limit, consistent with test particle dynamics
  4. Method Effectiveness: Monodromy transformation method proves effective for constructing such nonlinear superposition solutions

Limitations

  1. Non-rotating Restriction: Current solution applies only to non-rotating (Reissner-Nordström) black holes
  2. Topological Limitation: Semi-closed topology of background spacetime produces singularities on antipodal axis
  3. Idealized Model: Spatially completely uniform electric field is an idealized assumption
  4. Parameter Constraints: Equilibrium exists only for |e| < m black holes

Future Directions

  1. Rotating Generalization: Author notes that generalization to rotating case (Kerr-Newman black hole) is already contained in appendix expressions of reference 10; main issue is finding more compact form
  2. Dynamical Extension: Similar to oscillatory motion of Schwarzschild black hole in reference 12, can study dynamical evolution of charged black holes
  3. Numerical Simulation Comparison: Compare exact solution with numerical relativity simulation results
  4. Physical Applications: Explore possible applications in astrophysical or cosmological contexts

Generalizability of Method

Author emphasizes advantages of monodromy transformation method:

  • Linear Superposition Principle: Nonlinear field interactions can be generated from linear superposition of monodromy data
  • Parameter Family Construction: For u(w) and v(w) chosen as arbitrary rational functions, the fundamental linear singular integral equation system admits explicit solutions, leading to hierarchies of field configurations with arbitrary numbers of parameters
  • Systematicity: Provides systematic method for constructing field configurations with two commuting isometries

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor

  • Exact Solution Construction: Provides rigorous exact solution to Einstein-Maxwell equations, not approximation or numerical solution
  • Direct Verification: Solution verified by direct substitution into field equations
  • Limiting Consistency: Three important limits correctly degenerate to known solutions

2. Methodological Innovation

  • Monodromy Transformation: Transforms complex nonlinear field superposition problem into linear integral equation problem
  • Geometric Derivation of Equations of Motion: Derives equations of motion from regularity conditions rather than dynamical equations, demonstrating deep connection between geometry and dynamics
  • Linear Superposition Principle: Discovers that nonlinear field superposition can be realized through linear superposition of monodromy data

3. Deep Physical Insights

  • Test Particle Correspondence: Proves black hole motion reduces to test particle dynamics in appropriate limit, validating solution's physical reasonableness
  • Clear Acceleration Mechanism: Clearly distinguishes acceleration from external field interaction versus acceleration from topological singularities
  • Clear Parameter Meaning: Each parameter has clear physical or geometric significance

4. Clear Presentation

  • Logical paper structure from background introduction through solution construction to physical interpretation
  • Complex mathematical expressions well-organized despite complexity
  • Figure 1 provides intuitive geometric picture

Shortcomings

1. Technical Complexity

  • Lengthy Expressions: Complete solution expressions (equations 6-9) are very complex, difficult for direct physical interpretation
  • High Method Threshold: Monodromy transformation method requires deep mathematical physics background, limiting method dissemination
  • Lack of Compact Form: Author acknowledges rotating generalization is principally feasible but lacks compact form

2. Limited Physical Applications

  • Idealized Assumptions: Completely spatially uniform electric field difficult to realize in actual astrophysical environments
  • Topological Singularities: Singularities on antipodal axis, though distant, remain inherent solution defects
  • Parameter Restrictions: Constraint |e| < m excludes extremal Reissner-Nordström black holes

3. Difficult Experimental Verification

  • As pure theoretical construction, lacks direct comparison with observations or numerical simulations
  • Does not discuss solution stability
  • Lacks analysis of observable effects such as gravitational wave radiation

4. Literature References

  • Primarily cites author's own earlier work; limited discussion of recent field developments (e.g., AdS/CFT, holographic gravity)
  • Insufficient comparison with other black hole solution construction methods (inverse scattering, solution generating techniques)

Impact Assessment

Contribution to Field

  1. Methodological Contribution: Demonstrates power of monodromy transformation method in constructing complex exact solutions
  2. Conceptual Contribution: Deepens understanding of black hole acceleration mechanisms and geometric origin of equations of motion
  3. Benchmark Solution: Provides exact solution for numerical relativity code verification

Practical Value

  • Theoretical Physics: Provides theoretical tools for studying electromagnetic interactions in strong gravitational fields
  • Numerical Verification: Serves as benchmark for numerical relativity codes
  • Educational Value: Demonstrates application of exact solution methods in general relativity

Reproducibility

  • Solution expressions completely given, principally reproducible
  • Specific implementation details of monodromy transformation method require reference to author's earlier work
  • Lacks open-source code or numerical implementation

Applicable Scenarios

Theoretical Research

  1. Strong Field Gravity: Study black hole behavior in strong electric fields
  2. Exact Solution Classification: Enrich catalog of Einstein-Maxwell exact solutions
  3. Symmetry Research: Explore spacetime structures with special symmetries

Potential Applications

  1. AdS/CFT Correspondence: AdS₂ × S² topology may have applications in holographic gravity research
  2. Black Hole Physics: Understand fundamental mechanisms of black hole-external field interaction
  3. Numerical Relativity: Serves as test problem for numerical algorithm verification

Inapplicable Scenarios

  1. Actual astrophysical environments (electric field spatial non-uniformity)
  2. Dynamic evolution processes (solution is static)
  3. Situations where quantum effects are significant

References

The paper cites 16 key references, primarily including:

Classical Textbooks

  • 1 Stephani et al. (2003): Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations
  • 2 Griffiths & Podolsky (2009): Exact Space-Times in Einstein's General Relativity

Methodological Foundations

  • 3-5 Ernst series (1976): Harrison transformation and magnetized black holes
  • 13-15 Alekseev series (1985-1993): Monodromy transformation method
  • 6-7 Kinnersley & Walker (1970), Ashtekar & Dray (1981): C-metric
  • 8 Ernst (1976): Generalized C-metric
  • 9 Bicak & Kofron (2010): Accelerated rotating charged black hole
  • 10-11 Alekseev & Garcia (1996), Ortaggio & Astorino (2018): Schwarzschild black hole in magnetic field
  • 12 Alekseev (2017): Black hole geodetic motion

Summary

This is an important theoretical contribution to the field of exact solutions in general relativity. Using deep mathematical physics expertise, the author successfully constructs an exact solution for charged black hole acceleration in spatially homogeneous electric field through the monodromy transformation method. The paper's main highlights are: (1) systematicity and elegance of the method; (2) natural emergence of equations of motion from geometric regularity; (3) perfect correspondence with test particle dynamics.

Although the solution expressions are complex and physical applications are limited by idealized assumptions, as a theoretical construction it provides important mathematical and physical insights for understanding nonlinear black hole-external field interactions. This work demonstrates the continued value of exact solution methods in modern gravitational theory research and establishes foundations for future generalizations to more complex scenarios (e.g., rotating black holes).